Results 141 - 160 of 172
|
||||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Author: serenetime Ordered by Date |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
141 | Does my Pastor have to live in my state? | Heb 13:17 | serenetime | 22160 | ||
Mincc, I also have in the past have listened and excepted a pastor from another state. First of all, if you feel that the pastors in your area are not teaching the true word of God, and have doubt to this and are happy with your relationship via radio or television, then who am I to object. But I hope that you are supporting this ministry. Also are staying in the Word of God and am communicating with your questions. Yes, we need to be held accountable, but shall we be to a pastor or pastors in your area who you feel are not biblically correct. 2 Tim. 2:15, Seek the Father daily. Your Friend, Serenetime | ||||||
142 | Explain Chapter 5 | 1 Corinthians | serenetime | 22155 | ||
Racersedge, I agree with all that I have heard. If this is found among the church and the church is allowing this to happen and continue on, what does that say. That they have become complacent to the activity and calous. So not only does the individuals involved need to repent, but the church members as well for allowing it to be among them. If not,this will lead into more and more allowances. This is a pretty strong sin in the church, and yes I agree, only when the church feels that true repentance has been made, but not only to them, but to Jesus most of all. They have to realize what they have done, and realize that IT IS WRONG. Everyone gave excellent scriptures to back up it all. The church is to be the bride of Christ. Your Friend in Christ, Serenetime | ||||||
143 | meaning of numbers in the bible | NT general Archive 1 | serenetime | 22150 | ||
Hi Ray, Me and my husband are very interested in the book on theomatic 11. I don't know what it entails but sounds very interesting. Do I have to go to a Christian bookstore to find it, or any bookstore?? Thank you Much. Serenetime | ||||||
144 | meaning of numbers in the bible | NT general Archive 1 | serenetime | 22141 | ||
To Kalos,and Nolan, I'm sorry, but somehow you both continue to confuse all of us. I've even asked Nolan to go back to where the question was where it was asked " the seal and the horse in the same verse" by Casiv. I gave an explanation to SirPent, but somehow this continues to be a confusion. I am completely separate from Casiv, and Praisemaster whom I've already explained is my husband. Why is it so necessary for this to continue on with the jokes. I may not always agree with someone's way of interacting on the forum, but I'm sorry if you feel that if we are not on the forum at the same time, then it's because that you think we are all one person. But I can guarantee that it we will be on at the same time sooner or later, it's bound to happen. Please quench that somehow this is the reason for this. But myself and Praisemaster will never be on at the same time unless we are on together, cause of having only one computer. Your suspicions are unjustified. If you would only choose to read what I wrote to SirPent as I have asked Nolan previously. Would Jesus want this to continue on this way? Are we not to strive to be more like him. Yes, we have all studied together in the past, But I tell you truly that we are all individuals, separate from one another. I'm asking you as a fellow Christian and a friend to address us separately, And PLEASE take the time to read my explanation to SirPent on that question, and put a rest to this so we all can continue on in harmony. As for using numerics in the bible, Using chapter and verse is not the correct way as Casiv has stated. My Husband Praisemaster when he has the time is writing a thesis on how Biblical numbers are to be used in the right way. And he is quite convinced that if you would all put your agitation aside for a moment that you would all be pleasantly surprised how the biblical numerics really works. For it proves itself. My Husband almost left this sight completely, but feels that the way some things have been handled by both sides have denied us all of reaching a deeper truth of the Bible. But my Husband wants all to know that he doesn't agree with Casiv's approach and use of Biblical numerics by chapter and verse. But regarding what I believe was Ray's suggestion on theomatics, we would both like to read this. My husband told me he is expecting that as soon as his name is put upon anything i this forum, that he will be insulted and and ridiculed because everytime he has gotten on this, it has been done. And he has been on this site the least amount compared to to me and Casiv. THANK YOU, In Love, Serenetime | ||||||
145 | Women teaching or in authority | 1 Timothy | serenetime | 21697 | ||
Hank, I agree with you on this, and I'm glad that some of the tradional views taught in some churches today are being exposed if they are unscriptual. I have always had the highest respect for her, she had such a devotion and love for Jesus, that I think everyone could learn from. The fact that before we were saved by grace, we all had a little something going on in our lives that we needed cleansing from. I thank him for cleansing me. Opening my eyes to the truth, and giving me an unfailing desire to know him, and to continue seeking him and searching the scriptures for a better understanding. Thanks to all for your help in this area. Serenetime | ||||||
146 | Women teaching or in authority | 1 Timothy | serenetime | 21627 | ||
Nolan, I agree regarding naming her as Mary Magdalene, I have not been able to show you this. I guess I remember this belief that it was her from when I was going to a church years ago, and I remember that they said it was her, but whether It's true and I can show it, is another thing, but Nolan I never ever said that she was a prostitute. I said adulteress not prostitute. For the woman in that scripture is being accused of being an adulteress. serenetime | ||||||
147 | Women teaching or in authority | 1 Timothy | serenetime | 21573 | ||
Hi Norrie, It's in St. John 8:2-11. Take Care, Serenetime | ||||||
148 | Women teaching or in authority | 1 Timothy | serenetime | 21567 | ||
Tim, I worded that wrong. I know it's the inspired word, but like you said many differences of opinion. I feel like sometimes paul also gets where he is more speaking of the statutes and ordinances more than the law. Women sometime get suppressed because of the differences of that interpretation. And because it is the inspired word of God, then it's there to see. It's difficult especially when I am always being told that women have their roles in the church, but it's not of any of high importance of teaching the word of God, but when I was going to a church years ago. Two evangelists came to visit our church. The woman evangelist had to sit in the pew while the male evangelist got sit up in the pulpit. I feel women could be a real strength and power for God and Iesous in strengthening the people of God, and spreading the Word. Jesus had the highest respect for them. I believ it's wife, because it does say that elsewhere where it's translated wife. Thanks for you help. serenetime | ||||||
149 | Women teaching or in authority | 1 Timothy | serenetime | 21561 | ||
Hi Brad, I disagree on what it says in Verse 14, the reason is first Eve was formed to be a help for Adam. Adam was to be the dresser of the garden. When Eve partook of the deception, where was Adam. Adam was responsible for the garden and for her, and he didn't try to stop her, but took of it and ate also. Eve wasn't the only one punished. It's like you and I go out and vandalise a home, just an example, but at first you didn't want to be involved, but changed your mind and decided to do the same. Is it right that only I get punished. No, we both did it and should both be punished. In verse 1 Timothy 2:12 "I do not allow a woman to teach, this is not saying that Jesus said it. this is Timothy talking about what he wants. Take off these flesh bodies and what do you have. No difference. It has nothing to do with our fleshly sexual origin, this what I believe. God will use whatever and whomever he chooses to teach and speak for him, a rock, a ass, a woman or man. In Acts 10:34, God is no respecter of person's. and in Number 22:21-34, The angel of the Lord used a ass to speak to Balaam. just my belief and interpretation considering there are other scriptures about Jesus, when the men brought Mary magdeline to him because they said whe was a adulteress and caught in the very act. To stone her, and Jesus says, he who is without sin cast the first stone. If Jesus felt she was worth something then so should we. Serenetime for real. | ||||||
150 | Where are you getting your information? | Hebrews | serenetime | 21558 | ||
EdB, I didn't answer this post. I would of took the time to read what was asked. There is a whole mix up on who I am really. Someone put this in here and logged in as me. I'm gonna find out. If I find this again, I will report it to the forum. Thanks, Serenetime | ||||||
151 | "Herodians" who were they? | Matt 22:16 | serenetime | 21555 | ||
Nolan, If you look at my note to Sir Pent on the question black horse and seal in same verse by Casiv in Rev.6, I believe. I explain that I am not Casiv or praiseMaster.Please take a moment to read, Ok? Thanks Serenetime | ||||||
152 | Only seal and horse in same verse Rev6:5 | Bible general Archive 1 | serenetime | 21535 | ||
Sir Pent, This is Serenetime. I have to let everyone know how it all started. You see Casiv found this forum and told us about it. Casiv was interacting on the forum at home, and there were times when we would all be together. Sometimes not even thinking, we didn't even think of who was logged on at the time. So we would go on to look up questions, answers, etc. Sometimes me and my husband would log onto the forum as Casiv because it was easier to find his questions, and the answers. But without thinking we would start interacting, not realizing. We would get involved and forget we were logged on as Casiv, and or Praisemaster, causing confusion. It's all a mess. This is how I feel that my husband Praisemaster and Casiv got mixed up by name, and some thought they were one and the same. We don't have any control of what someone individually does on their own, and I don't really know how the tension all began. But we are all to be held accountable for what we do, and what we say and if we offend, then we must amend. You are so right Sir Pent that we are solely responsible for how we talk to people, and no one is to elevate themselves above other's. This is a bad spirit to be in, and if I could take it all of this away, I would. We can be studying with each other, if I see something that I know is the wrong kind of spirit, I can try to help the person to see, but does not always see, and may keep on. We are separate individuals, and should be held accountable as separate. As for me, I've only asked one question on the forum, and have interacted briefly here and there. It was mostly Casiv, and sometimes Praisemaster. I can't speak for no one else, but for me. I never meant to ever offend anyone on this forum. I try very hard in my personal life to come to people in a serene spirit. This is where I got my name. Because the time is now. Also I think that there were times when an answer by someone written in away that some would take offensive, or maybe is that they needed more of an explanation. It is never wise to ask a question, and when you don't get what you're looking for in a answer, get abrupt. This starts a chain reaction, and then other's to there friend's defense, and here we go. Then no one wants to answer but just defend. This is not in the spirit of love and patience. There were times when my husband would ask a question, and because people weren't sure if it was praisemaster or Casiv, they would think that he was trying to set a trap or bait someone. this is how bad it got. My husband has to answer for himself. But because of this arrogant answer, then my husband would get upset. Please except my deepest apology for if I was a partaker in this mess. Charis, I'm sorry, I know you had seen and heard so much that you were through with it all. I understand why your note was the way it was. By the way Charis, in your profile, it says your name came from charismatic. Please, my heart is so heavy, and I need for you to lift this burden off of me. I am coming to you ALL in the sincerest of hearts. Will you give me an opportunity to show you that I have only good intentions when interacting on the forum. Yes, Iosous (Jesus) is our Saviour and I excepted him in 1986. Charis felt that maybe we hadn't or didn't choose to except Jesus. I understand why. Please contact me, it's very important to me that I hear from you and you have forgiven me if I have done anything to hurt anyone. Thank you, In the Father's and Son's Love, Serenetime | ||||||
153 | "Herodians" who were they? | Matt 22:16 | serenetime | 21508 | ||
One more note, Because the Herodians were partisan, meaning they strongly supported one side, it's interesting in the verse that they say to Jesus, that you defer no one, and are not partial to any. That is so cool. Serenetime | ||||||
154 | "Herodians" who were they? | Matt 22:16 | serenetime | 21506 | ||
Hi to All, the word Herodians translating it back to the Greek,They were partisans of Herod, they were heroic fighters, but most of all they had eyes to not only see, but know who Jesus really was, they discerned clearly. Serenetime | ||||||
155 | Only seal and horse in same verse Rev6:5 | Bible general Archive 1 | serenetime | 21499 | ||
Charis, That's short for charismatic, right. Let me undo the confusion, I'm serenetime, my husband is Praisemaster, a friend of ours is Casiv. Now since that is made clear. I'm sure glad I would never attend your church, I'd be chased down the street. I've never talk to you, and you know nothing about me, so I don't understand your problem. I for one have never tried to offend anyone. I've hardly conversed on this forum. As for my husband Praisemaster. Just because you claim that no one can understand him, doesn't give anyone the right to insult him, if you're not interested in what we have to say, then don't respond. But I am an individual, and my husband is an individual, so is Casiv. It wouldn't totally be fair to make us all one person, would it But the problem is that so many respond just to argue and not to further a greater understanding of the Word, that if someone could relate to our understanding and wanted to interact with one of us, but by seeing what was happening would not even attempt it. It wouldn't be worth it to them. All I've seen is chaos and confusion, and the word is not so complex. And God is not the author of confusion, but of Love, and peace. We're being attacked by some in the same arrogant, belittling manner you spoke of. But that's ok. The door swings both ways. It is mindblowing only because we only believe what the bible teaches, but go back to the original language that it was originally written, some words translated later may not always be the closest to right meaning, but the translators do their best. So what is so wrong with that. I know that everyone would not continue in the defense mode if we felt we were being given a fair chance. Please don't respond to us if it's not going to edify and strengthen us all in our desire for deeper truth. That's all I ask. If you're not interested, then don't respond back. And that would keep the unnecessary tension down. I'm sorry if we seem to be a threat to you, only on the fact that we're a little bit harder to understand. It's interesting that everyone seems to categorise us as wacko's, cocky, arrogant. I don't think God want's us being this way to one another. But focusing on working together for a better understanding of the Bible. Not treating people in a way where they want to avoid interacting on this forum. Where is your right to tell us to leave. And how can you say "God Bless" in the same sentence as 'somewhere else". They contradict one another. I'm sure their are many faithful saints in this forum, it's not all one sided here, and I think you know it. Your tone and note are quite offensive to me, but that's ok. I come on this forum to interact with people that want to interact with me, I don't deserve to be lashed out at because I seem foreign to you. No one ever said on our end that we were better than anyone, Let's face it, there's been some competition going on here. Let's see who'll win. I'm ruting for Fred, and so on. When someone is being cornered, by several people, it's normal human nature to defend themselves. I will not speak for Casiv, or Praisemaster, but treat me as a individual. Serenetime | ||||||
156 | Only seal and horse in same verse Rev6:5 | Bible general Archive 1 | serenetime | 21497 | ||
Kalos So you are familiar with the beatitudes Do you know that in Matthew 5 verses 3 THROUGH 12 are the eight beatitudes for the good and are to be contrasted with and understood by the eights woes of Matt 23 verses 13 THROUGH 33. What this means that if you abide by the one's in Matt. 5 than everything will be alright, but if you disobey them, in Matt.23 , you will reap your reward. Very good find Kalos, You understood exactly what I was talking about. Chapter 5 is the cause, and chapter 23 is the judgement. As for the verses you quoted in Matt. 5 verses 33,34,37. verse 34 says to Swear not all, neither by heaven, for it is God's throne. The word Swear here means in the Greek translation 3660, to take or declare an oath. An oath is a promise made to my Father. When I swore on my Father's word that I didn't go into the forum to answer EdB in anger, By me declaring an oath, if I lie then I will be breaking one of the commandements, bearing false witness.Don't perjure yourself, I am putting myself on the scale of balances and if someone comes on the scale and bears false witness against me. My Father will judge them of what they're are accusing me of. I do like the laws of the old times. If two make an oath and their are no other witnesses, and one perjures himself, The Father would strike you dead right where you stand. M AN R HEL DE. PRAISEMASTER and a second witness SERENETIME | ||||||
157 | Who are the Gog and Magog? | Rev 20:8 | serenetime | 21338 | ||
Hi Joy, Just another scripture regarding your question. In Ezekiel 39:11 it says, And it shall come to pass in that day, that I will give unto Gog a place there of graves IN Israel, the valley of the passengers on the east of the sea: and it shall stop the noses of the passengers: and there shall they bury Gog, and all his multitude: and they call it The valley of Hamon-gog. This is what is referred to as the battle of Armageddon. Hope this helps you in your desire for a better understanding of The Father's Word Serenetime | ||||||
158 | Who are the Gog and Magog? | Rev 20:8 | serenetime | 21336 | ||
EdB,Doesn't this sound kind of fitting as to whats going on right now after Sept.11?? In the Father's Love, Serenetime | ||||||
159 | please explain someone | Luke 2:52 | serenetime | 21322 | ||
Hi, It is beyond me where Mr.Hagee got this idea. The only scriptures I can find regarding Jesus as a child is in Luke 2:43-52. Nowhere can anyone get this information out of the scriptures. They do call Jesus rabbi in the gospels, meaning teacher. But I'm sorry it is not scriptural what Pastor Hagee says. In the Father's Love, Serenetime | ||||||
160 | is naked picture of your spouse wrong | Phil 4:8 | serenetime | 21321 | ||
Hi Raychel, I really don't think that it's wrong. The fact that it's a picture of the spouse, what's the problem? The fact is ,is that if the spouse was there, then they would see each other naked everyday! In Gen. 2:23 it says, therefore shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one. The fact they are only looking a naked picture of the spouse, and not another person, then it's ok! In the Father's Love, Serenetime | ||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ] Next > Last [9] >> |