Results 121 - 140 of 7732
|
||||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Author: kalos Ordered by Date |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
121 | What does touch mean in ancient Greek? | 1 Cor 7:1 | kalos | 183393 | ||
"a euphemism for sexual relations" 1 Corinthians 7:1 The NET Bible Now with regard to the issues you wrote about: “It is good for a man not to have sexual relations with a woman.”[1] '[1tn] Grk “It is good for a man not to touch a woman,” a euphemism for sexual relations. This idiom occurs ten times in Greek literature, and all of the references except one appear to refer to sexual relations (cf., e.g., Josephus, Ant. 1.8.1 [1.163]; Gen 20:6 [LXX]; Prov 6:29 [LXX]). For discussion see G. D. Fee, First Corinthians (NICNT), 275...' (http://www.bible.org/netbible/index.htm) Holy Bible, English Standard Version Now concerning the matters about which you wrote: "It is good for a man not to have sexual relations with a woman." Holman Christian Standard Bible® About the things you wrote: "It is good for a man not to have relations with a woman." |
||||||
122 | Preterism refuted using Scripture alone? | Matt 16:28 | kalos | 183388 | ||
Part 2 Did Jesus Already Return in AD 70? 'If the Rapture "has already taken place", then the resurrection has already taken place. Paul, in 1 Corinthians 15 writes of the day when the final "trumpet" for believers will be blown and mortality will put on immortality. In this passage, he links the Rapture with the resurrection of believers. In other words, when the Rapture takes place, the resurrection occurs. 'Those who insist that the events of Matthew 24 are history and say that the "generation that sees these things" was the generation concurrent with Jesus nearly 2,000 years ago, must of necessity show that the resurrection has also taken place. The only way that is possible is to spiritualize the text by saying that the resurrection was a spiritual one and not a physical one. 'Moderate (or partial) preterist, R.C. Sproul recognizes this when he says, To maintain that these events [the Olivet teaching] were indeed fulfilled in the first century, one must interpret the relevant passages in a way that makes early fulfillment possible. The most severe obstacle [to that] is the absence of any historical record that the rapture of the living and the resurrection of the dead occurred. (R.C. Sproul, The Last Days According to Jesus, Baker Books, 1998, pg 161) 'There are two serious problems with understanding the resurrection as a "spiritual" event. R.C. Sproul says, The first difficulty is that it [Paul's teaching in 1 Corinthians 15] involves propositions and assertions that can be neither verified nor falsified empirically. ... if one announces or predicts things that will take place in the arena of real history involving physical reality, then empirical verification becomes relevant and crucial...It is unfortunate that the apostle failed to alert the Corinthians-and us, by extension-that he was speaking of a secret, hidden, spiritual resurrection. His language certainly suggests something else, particularly as Paul so clearly conjoins the resurrection of our bodies with the resurrection of Christ's body. The resurrected Christ is the firstfruits of all who will be raised. (R.C. Sproul, The Last Days According to Jesus, Baker Books, 1998, pg 162) 'And what was the resurrected body of Jesus like? First, the tomb was empty. In other words, there was a physical body in it but on the day of His resurrection, it became empty. A body had departed from it. Second, he had a glorified body. It was different from His previous mortal body, but it was the same body. Third, Jesus was visible to the disciples until the time He ascended and was touched by them and ate with them. Christ's resurrected body was a physical body, not a spiritualized one. 'A theological problem with a spiritualized understanding of the resurrection is likewise addressed by R.C. Sproul - If a spiritual body cannot be seen, touched, or handled, is it a body at all? It is one thing to say that our resurrected bodies will be spiritiual bodies, but quite another to imply that our resurrected bodies will be merely spirits. The Bible speaks of spiritual bodies. (R.C. Sproul, The Last Days According to Jesus, Baker Books, 1998, pg 164) 'A common problem among interpreters of the Bible is that of "shifting gears". If a person approaches his interpretation of the Bible with, for example, a face value hermeneutic, then it is critical that he remain consistent with his approach. However, many often "flip flop" in their interpretation approach to maintain a preconceived understanding of a text. An example of this is the above. Preterists interpret "this generation" in the simple sense as meaning the generation concurrent with Christ and then suddenly "shift gears" and apply a figurative approach to arrive at a spiritualized understanding of the Rapture and the resurrection. That is an inconsistent hermeneutic and leads to error. 'When spiritualization is introduced into one's interpretation, Pandora's box is opened and various meanings can be understood. The only way the integrity of the Author/author's wording and meaning can be preserved is by taking Scripture at face value. Taking Scripture at face value means that the student of Scripture recognizes the difference between what can be called the "simple sense" of a passage and what is understood as a literal understanding. A literal understanding includes the examination of the historical/cultural and lexical/syntactical considerations. It also recognizes symbols and figures of speech and realizes there is a referent for them. For further information on hermeneutical principles, see the "links" section of this website for an explanation.' (Did Jesus Already Return in AD 70? By Rev. Bill Lee-Warner) (http://www.solagroup.org/articles/endtimes/et_0003.html) |
||||||
123 | Preterism refuted using Scripture alone? | Matt 16:28 | kalos | 183348 | ||
Part 1 Did Jesus Already Return in AD 70? 'By Rev. Bill Lee-Warner '"Truly I say to you, this generation will not pass away until all these things take place." Matthew 24:34 'The above passage is found in what is referred to as the Olivet Discourse of Jesus given a few days before Christ's crucifixion. The context for Matthew 24:34 is Jesus' response to the questions of the disciples regarding His return and the end of the age. There are those in the church of Jesus Christ who understand "this generation" to refer to the generation to whom Jesus was speaking the day He gave the discourse. 'The apostle Paul recognized this error and warned Timothy of it when he wrote, "But avoid worldly and empty chatter, for it will lead to further ungodliness, and...spread like gangrene. Among them are Hymenaeus and Philetus, men who have gone astray from the truth saying that the resurrection has already taken place, and thus they upset the faith of some." (2 Tim. 2:16-18) 'Today, there is a resurgence of this teaching known as preterism. The term preterism comes from the Latin word praeterism and means "past" or already gone by. The basic teaching of preterism is that the great tribulation has already occured in the distant past, principally at AD 70. Those who hold to this teaching are known specifically as full preterists. There is another subgroup of preterists known as partial or moderate preterists. This latter group sees parts of the Olivet Discourse, or Jesus' teaching on end times, as partially fulfilled in AD 70 but other parts as yet to be fulfilled at the second parousia of Christ. Several efforts have been made to establish preterism as historically sound and biblical but the clear warning of Paul reminds us that it is a...false teaching. The following reasons are offered to the student of Scripture and prophecy for consideration. Be a Berean (Acts 17:11) and examine the Word to "see if these things are so."' ____________________ To read the rest of this article and find out what "the following reasons" are, go to (www.solagroup.org/articles/endtimes/et_0003.html) |
||||||
124 | who are jehovahs witnesses | Bible general Archive 3 | kalos | 183341 | ||
CurtMan, When I posted the remark about being banned from a couple of chat rooms, I was quoting a writer who had that experience. I do not know any addresses, but perhaps a Google search will find some. I haven't read the book you mention, but it sounds good. Grace to you, John |
||||||
125 | WHAT WAS HERE BEFORE ADAM EVE | Gen 1:26 | kalos | 183339 | ||
See Genesis 1:1-31. | ||||||
126 | who are jehovahs witnesses | Bible general Archive 3 | kalos | 183312 | ||
Is the Jehovah's Witness religion Christian? (www.carm.org/jw/cult.htm) ____________________ "...they deny the Trinity, the deity of Christ, the personhood of the Holy Spirit, Jesus' physical resurrection, and salvation by grace through faith." ____________________ 'The answer to the question is, "No. It is not Christian." Like all non-Christian cults, the Jehovah's Witness organization distorts the essential doctrines of Christianity. It denies the deity of Christ, His physical resurrection, and salvation by grace. This alone makes it non-Christian. To support its erring doctrines, the Watchtower organization (which is the author and teacher of all official Jehovah's Witness theology), has even altered the Bible to make it agree with its changing and non-Christian teachings. Typical with cults that use the Bible to support its position is a host of interpretive errors: 'Taking verses out of their immediate context. 'Refusing to read verses in the entire biblical context. 'Inserting their theological presuppositions into the text. 'Altering the Biblical text to suit their needs. 'Latching onto one verse to interpret a host of others. 'Changing the meanings of words. 'Proclaiming some passages to be figurative when they contradict their doctrines. 'Adding to the Word of God. 'Additionally, the Jehovah's Witness organization requires of its members regular weekly attendance at their "Bible Study" meetings where they are repeatedly indoctrinated with anti-Christian teachings. This is done by reading the Watchtower magazine, following along with what it says, reading the questions it asks, and reciting the answers it gives. In other words, the Watchtower Organization carefully trains its members to let the Organization do their thinking for them. For confirmation of this, please read Does the Watchtower organization control the JW's thinking? 'The Witnesses are told they will be persecuted when they go door to door teaching their doctrines. They are further told that this is simply the enemy fighting against the God's organization because they are in "the truth." So, when someone disagrees with them, they are conditioned to reflect on what the Watchtower has told them. They then feel confirmed in being in God's true organization on earth (like all cults claim). They are strongly encouraged to have friends and acquaintances that are only JW’s, thereby keeping outside examination to a minimum. They are told to shun those who leave their group, that way, there is no way to see why someone has left and no way to find out that they are in error from those who have found the truth in Christ. They are conditioned to shy away from any real biblically knowledgeable person. An example of this is frequently found on the Internet. I was once banned from a Jehovah's Witness chat room after I not only answered their objections to the Trinity and deity of Christ, but challenged them in return. Subsequently, my name was passed around to all other Jehovah's Witness rooms where I was banned from them as well. This is a frequent occurrence on the Internet where the Jehovah's Witnesses are alive and well. It is obvious that critical examination of their doctrines is not encouraged by the Watchtower Organization. 'The Jehovah's Witnesses consider themselves to be Christians because they believe they are serving the true and living God. Like many cults, they think they are the only true church on earth. Yet, they deny the Trinity, the deity of Christ, the personhood of the Holy Spirit, Jesus' physical resurrection, and salvation by grace through faith. 'The Jehovah's Witnesses are discouraged from looking into Jehovah's Witness history or old Watchtower literature which is replete with contradictions, altered doctrines, and false prophecies. Instead, they are indoctrinated repeatedly against basic Christian doctrines (Trinity, deity of Christ, etc) and into the notion that they alone are the true servants of God and that all others are either in "Christendom" or simply unbelievers. 'Primarily, the Jehovah's Witness organization is a mind control organization that uses its people to pass out literature and send in "donations" to the headquarters in Brooklyn, New York. "Thus the Bible is an organizational book and belongs to the Christian congregation as an organization, not to individuals, regardless of how sincerely they may believe that they can interpret the Bible." The Watchtower, Oct. 1, 1967. p. 587. 'The Watchtower organization of the Jehovah's Witnesses is a non-Christian organization that uses its people to promulgate false doctrines, sell a multitudinous amount of literature, and expand its grip into the lives of its members and their families. 'It is a non-Christian cult.' ____________________ www.carm.org/jw/cult.htm |
||||||
127 | I need help on how to tithe. | 2 Cor 9:7 | kalos | 183244 | ||
Justme, I know what you're saying and I agree with you. To underpay one's pastor -- when a church has the resources to do better -- is definitely unbiblical. 'For the Scripture says, “You shall not muzzle an ox when it treads out the grain,” and, “The laborer deserves his wages.”' 1 Tim. 5:18 ESV And for someone to neglect his bills and the needs of his family so that he can make a larger contribution to a church or other ministry is poor stewardship. How does not paying one's bills honor God or give credibility to one's witness? The New Testament has much to say about stewardship, none of which can be used to justify foolish, impulsive, irresponsible giving. Nowhere in the New Testament will one find a loophole to justify underpaying his pastor or to get out of paying his own bills or providing for the needs of his family. Pay to all what is owed to them...Owe no one anything, except to love each other, for the one who loves another has fulfilled the law. Romans 13:7-8 ESV For if the readiness is there, it is acceptable according to what a person has, not according to what he does not have. 2 Cor. 8:12 ESV Let the elders who rule well be considered worthy of double honor, especially those who labor in preaching and teaching. For the Scripture says, “You shall not muzzle an ox when it treads out the grain,” and, “The laborer deserves his wages.” 1 Timothy 5:17-18 Grace to you, John |
||||||
128 | I need help on how to tithe. | 2 Cor 9:7 | kalos | 183225 | ||
What does the Bible say about tithing? 'The tithe is an Old Testament concept. The tithe was basically a requirement of the law in which all Israelites were to give 10 percent of everything they earn and grow to the tabernacle/temple (Lev 27:30; Num 18:26; Deut 14:24; 2Chr 31:5). Some understand the Old Testament tithe as a method of taxation to provide for the needs of the priests and Levites of the sacrificial system. 'The New Testament nowhere mentions the tithe system and nowhere recommends that New Covenant believers follow it. Paul states that believers should set aside a portion of their income in order to support the church (1Cor 16:1-2). The New Testament nowhere assigns a certain percentage of income to set aside, but only says it is to be “in keeping with his income” (1Cor 16:2). The Christian church took the 10 percent figure from the Old Testament tithe and applied it as a “recommended minimum” for Christians in their giving. However, New Covenant believers should not feel obligated to always give 10 percent. They should give as they are able, “in keeping with his income”. Sometimes that means giving more than 10 percent, sometime that may mean giving less than 10 percent. It all depends on the ability of the giver and the needs of the church. 'Each and every Christian should diligently pray and seek God’s wisdom for how much he or she should give (James 1:5). “Each man should give what he has decided in his heart to give, not reluctantly or under compulsion, for God loves a cheerful giver” (2Cor 9:7).' ____________________ Source: www.gotquestions.org/tithing.html |
||||||
129 | please explain Gen 15v1 | Gen 15:1 | kalos | 183219 | ||
What is the right translation of Genesis 15:1? Here is one "essentially literal" translation (NKJV) and three literal translations. The Darby Translation After these things the word of Jehovah came to Abram in a vision, saying, Fear not, Abram; I am thy shield, thy exceeding great reward. Young's Literal Translation After these things hath the word of Jehovah been unto Abram in a vision, saying, 'Fear not, Abram, I [am] a shield to thee, thy reward [is] exceeding great.' Note that in Young's Literal Translation the word "[is]" ("thy reward [is] exceeding great") is in brackets, indicating that it is not in the original but has been added for clarity. Take out "[is]" and what you have left is the Lord saying to Abram, 'I [am] a shield to thee, thy reward exceeding great.' J.P. Green's Literal Translation After these things the Word of Jehovah came to Abram in a vision, saying, Do not fear, Abram; I am your shield, your reward will increase greatly. New King James Version After these things the word of the LORD came to Abram in a vision, saying, "Do not be afraid, Abram. I am your shield, your exceedingly great reward." Darby: "I am thy shield, thy exceeding great reward." Young's (without "[is]"): "I [am] a shield to thee, thy reward exceeding great." NKJV: "I am your shield, your exceedingly great reward." |
||||||
130 | Need Godly advice having a male friend? | Rom 7:2 | kalos | 183217 | ||
Or do you not know, brothers—for I am speaking to those who know the law—that the law is binding on a person only as long as he lives? Thus a married woman is bound by law to her husband while he lives, but if her husband dies she is released from the law of marriage. Accordingly, she will be called an adulteress if she lives with another man while her husband is alive. But if her husband dies, she is free from that law, and if she marries another man she is not an adulteress. Romans 7:1-3 Since God permits a widow to remarry, it is safe to assume that a widow may have a male friend. Grace to you, John |
||||||
131 | The yoke Jeremiah ware was it real | Jeremiah | kalos | 183212 | ||
AMPLIFIED Jeremiah 27:2 Thus says the Lord to me: Make for yourself thongs and yoke bars and put them on your neck, In Jeremiah 27:2 and 28:10 the bonds and yokes that Jeremiah put on his neck were literal bonds and yokes. |
||||||
132 | Lot -- A Righteous Man | 2 Pet 2:8 | kalos | 183193 | ||
How is it that Lot, the character who in Genesis 19 comes off so poorly, can possibly correspond to the picture that 2 Peter 2:7-8 paints of Lot as a "righteous man" who was tormented in his righteous soul by the lawless deeds prevalent in his society? | ||||||
133 | what does God think about spanking a chi | Prov 13:24 | kalos | 183164 | ||
How should Christians discipline... 'Question: "How should Christians discipline their children? What does the Bible say?" 'Answer: Many Scriptures do in fact promote physical discipline. "Don't fail to correct your children. They won't die if you spank them. Physical discipline may well save them from death." There are also other verses that support physical correction (Proverbs 13:24, 22:15, 20:30)... 'Discipline is used to correct and train people to go in the right way. "No discipline is enjoyable while it is happening - it is painful! But afterward there will be a quiet harvest of right living for those who are trained in this way" (Hebrews 12:11). God's discipline is loving, as should it be between parent and child. Spanking should never be used to cause lasting physical harm or pain, but a quick swat (on the bottom where there is the most padding) to teach the child that what he did was wrong is acceptable. Never should it be used to vent our anger and frustrations, or be uncontrolled. '"And now a word to you fathers. Don't make your children angry by the way you treat them. Rather, bring them up with the discipline and instruction approved by the Lord" (Ephesians 6:4). Raising a child in the “discipline and instruction approved by the Lord” includes restrained, corrective, and yes loving, physical discipline.' To read much more go to: www.gotquestions.org/disciplining-children.html |
||||||
134 | Hebrews 9:15-17 mean Gospels in OT? | Heb 9:15 | kalos | 183138 | ||
No, the passage in Hebrews does not mean that. Here in Hebrews 9:15 "testament" is better translated as "covenant". NASB Hebrews 9:15 For this reason He is the mediator of a new covenant, so that, since a death has taken place for the redemption of the transgressions that were committed under the first covenant, those who have been called may receive the promise of the eternal inheritance. AMPLIFIED Hebrews 9:15 [Christ, the Messiah] is therefore the Negotiator and Mediator of an [entirely] new agreement (testament, covenant), so that those who are called and offered it may receive the fulfillment of the promised everlasting inheritance--since a death has taken place which rescues and delivers and redeems them from the transgressions committed under the [old] first agreement. |
||||||
135 | scripture that say all will taste death | Heb 9:27 | kalos | 183117 | ||
Question: Does your MacArthur Study Bible give any additional info on why John MacArthur teaches that those raised at Jesus' death were not raised in eternal bodies? Answer (short): No. Grace to you, John |
||||||
136 | scripture that say all will taste death | Heb 9:27 | kalos | 183104 | ||
A general rule for all mankind ____________________ '*to die once*. This is a general rule for all mankind. There have been very rare exceptions...' ____________________ And inasmuch as it is appointed for men to die once and after this comes judgment, (NASB Hebrews 9:27) In his Study Bible, John MacArthur comments on Heb. 9:27: '*to die once*. This is a general rule for all mankind. There have been very rare exceptions (e.g., Lazarus and the multitude who were resuscitated at Christ's resurrection died twice; compare John 11:43, 44; Matt. 27:51-53). Those, like Lazarus, who were raised from the dead by a miraculous act of our Lord were not resurrected to a glorified body and unending life. They only experienced resuscitation. 'Another exception will be those who don't die even once, but who will be "caught up...to meet the Lord in the air" (1 Thess. 4:17; compare Enoch, Gen. 5:24; Elijah, 2 Kin. 2:11).' (Emphasis added.) |
||||||
137 | Was Paul checking his correctness? | Gal 2:2 | kalos | 183074 | ||
AMPLIFIED Galatians 2:2 I went because it was specially and divinely revealed to me that I should go, and I put before them the Gospel [declaring to them that] which I preach among the Gentiles. However, [I presented the matter] privately before those of repute, [for I wanted to make certain, by thus at first confining my communication to this private conference] that I was not running or had not run in vain [guarding against being discredited either in what I was planning to do or had already done]. New Living Translation Galatians 2:2 I went there because God revealed to me that I should go. While I was there I talked privately with the leaders of the church. I wanted them to understand what I had been preaching to the Gentiles. I wanted to make sure they did not disagree, or my ministry would have been useless. |
||||||
138 | What is your favorite Bible edition? | Ps 119:105 | kalos | 183072 | ||
Recommended Editions of the Bible For the past 10 years, since it first came out, the Bible I have used the most (virtually every day since I've been on the Forum) is the MacArthur Study Bible (MacA). The new NASB MacArthur has even more features than the original NKJV edition, including a concordance (121 pages), something important that the first MacArthur lacked. Now that the MacA is available in the NASB and with a concordance, it has everything I need, except larger print. I highly recommend the MacA, either the NASB or the NKJV. For me the notes are its best feature, i.e., the great number and quality of the NKJV marginal notes, which are some of the best I've seen in any Bible. While not agreeing with every last thing MacArthur says, I find that I trust him and his scholarship more than any other living author, although I am still very much a Berean (Acts 17:11). Not that his writings are infallible -- I know that only the Scriptures in the original manuscripts are infallible and inerrant. I give the MacA Study Bible the highest recommendation. I've never been disappointed in it. It's worth every cent it cost and more. Other study Bibles I use include the Old Scofield (1917), the New Scofield Reference Bible (1967), the Scofield NIV (1984), the NASB Study Bible, the Life Application Study Bible (NIV), the Harper Study Bible (NRSV), the King James Study Bible (Nelson), the Ryrie Study Bible, NASB (both the original and the expanded), and the NET Bible with its more than 60,000 notes. If you don't have a Ryrie Study Bible, you may want to look into it. It was my most used Bible for about 20 years, before the MacA came along. Also, I wouldn't hesitate to recommend the Life Application Study Bible (LAB) to anyone from novice to experienced Bible reader. The LAB has an incredible amount of useful Bible information contained not only in the notes but also in charts, maps, diagrams, personality profiles, etc. |
||||||
139 | bible questions | 2 Tim 2:15 | kalos | 183068 | ||
"Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." --Chinese Proverb [While we could give you the answers, it will be more profitable for you if we teach you to find the answers. --John] Finding a word in the Bible: How to use a concordance At StudyBibleForum.com people often ask, "I have some questions and I know that the answer is somewhere in the Bible. How do I find them? How do I find a word or phrase in the Bible? How do I use a concordance?" 'A concordance is an alphabetical list of the principal words used in a book or body of work, with their immediate contexts...When the text of a work is on a computer, a search function can carry out the basic task of a concordance.' [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concordance_(publishing)] Beginning with the word you are searching for, find that word in a concordance (whether online or in a book) . To find a specific phrase or verse in the Bible (e.g.'The labourer is worthy of his reward'), look up a keyword such as 'labourer' (KJV) or 'reward'. Then read the context lines until you find the verse you are looking for. In our example a context line may look like this: "The l (labourer) is worthy of his reward"; or like this: "The labourer is worthy of his r (reward)". I recommend the concordances or 'Search the Bible' feature at these websites: http://bible.crosswalk.com/ http://studylight.org/ If you have any further questions about how to find a Bible verse or using a concordance, many of us on the Forum would be glad to help. Grace to you, John |
||||||
140 | Shortly come to pass ? | Rev 1:1 | kalos | 183067 | ||
"things which must shortly take place" The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave Him to show to His bond-servants, the things which must (1) shortly take place; and He sent and communicated [it] by His angel to His bond-servant John, Revelation 1:1(The NET Bible) '(1) Things which must shortly take place is a Greek clause, literally, what (it) is necessary to happen in short (soon). 'This Greek clause is often used by pretribulationists to support their argument of imminency, but is this really the case? "En tachei" is the debated phrase. The phrase can have two possible meanings: (1) that the events depicted will happen in rapid-fire fashion. That is, once the events begin to happen, they will occur very quickly; or (2) that the events depicted can happen soon. That is, the time of fulfillment will not extend beyond the normal, natural, customary sense of soon. 'The basic question is this: Is John describing how the events will happen or when the events will happen? 'Those arguing that John intends when the events will happen must overcome a logical and theological problem. Given that 1900 years have passed since John penned these words, soon would lose any historical impact or meaning. There is only one biblical sense in which soon could be used to represent 1900 years, and that’s viewing "time" from God’s so-called vantage point. However, nothing in the text indicates that this is the case. Logically then, this conclusion is weak at best. 'Theologically, for John to state that the events depicted in the Revelation will happen soon, with reference to time, contradicts Matthew 24:36. Matthew 24:36 states, "But of that day and hour no one knows, not even the angels of heaven, nor the Son, but the Father alone." Therefore, John could not say how soon the Lord might return or how soon the events connected with His return might transpire unless God gave him direct revelation. 'The only logical and theologically correct conclusion is to understand "en tachei" as indicating how the events will occur. The events connected with the Lord’s return will happen quickly. Matthew 24 indicates that they will happen in less than a three and a half-year period.' ____________________ www.revelationcommentary.org/01_chapter.html |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ] Next > Last [387] >> |