Results 1 - 20 of 23
|
||||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Author: Theopnuestos Ordered by Verse |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Is it right to use the word "Trinity"? | Bible general Archive 1 | Theopnuestos | 38217 | ||
Why not? Is it right to use the word rapture? Just because a word does not appear in the Bible doesn't mean that it is the spawn of Hell! "Trinity" is a single descriptive word for a reality presented in the Bible, the same as with the word "rapture." "Rapture" is the sudden taking away. Trinity describes the triune nature of God, three persons, equal in value and essence, yet possessing differing roles in the economy of salvation. They are in that order if you wanted to apply an order. Think of it as three co-equals doing different jobs just like my stomach doesn't do the thinking "well, sometimes! :)", yet I don't regard my stomach of less value than my brain. They both are me! If we were to get technical about words, then we should all be speaking in ancient Greek and Hebrew as it is used in the original autographs. |
||||||
2 | Meaning of Spirit filled | Bible general Archive 1 | Theopnuestos | 38220 | ||
They have to - the Holy Spirit does not reside in the temple of Baal. He resides in temples that have been prepared for Him - us. To be born again is to be "spirit-filled." The term "spirit-filled" comes out of alot of crappy interpretation. (I originally used theology for interpretation, but had to replace it with the latter. The whole "spirit-filled" movement is the result of a lack of knowledge of God, not a Theo-ology, or knowledge of God. The ideas presented are that you can "leak" needing refilling. How absurd - can God wane in power? Is He waiting on us to get cleaned-up enough before He saves us? But, mainly, "spirit-filled" is in reference to the Apostolic confirmation of a believer. Spirit-filled, in the Bible anyway, refers to the gifts of ministry given by the Holy Spirit - everybody who is born again is equipped for whatever task God has called them to. If He sends you to hoe, you get a hoe. If He sends you to plant, He gives you a sack of seed. The ability to speak in foreign languages is the "filling" of the Spirit(Acts 2:4), then Peter's boldness before Sanhedrin to speak the truth (go read it, I doubt any man "in the natural" could speak those things. Acts 4:31-"And when they had prayed, the place where they were assembled together was shaken; and they were all filled with the Holy Spirit, and they spoke the word of God with boldness." But Colossians 1:9 sums it up nicely - "For this reason we also, since the day we heard it, do not cease to pray for you, and to ask that you may be filled with the knowledge of His will in all wisdom and spiritual understanding" This filling is for equipping - being filled with knowledge equips you to resist temptation, do good works, proclaim the truth in hostile scenarios, remain steadfast and sure, et. al. |
||||||
3 | What is the best version of the Bible? | Bible general Archive 1 | Theopnuestos | 38224 | ||
I would guess that there are few linguistics experts here so I will give it my novice attempt. I have read several critiques of differing versions. Personally, I use the NKJV - specifically, the New Geneva Study Bible. The ASV is good to, at least to my knowledge. I started out with the KJV but I would not recommend that for anybody. I believe the strange grammer and language usage of the "King's English" veils the Scriptures from the baby Christian. I don't consider it profitable to have them learn a new language to get to the word of God. The NIV I "feel" plays loose with some texts. I say I feel, but we will call that an "educated feeling." What I have read says to me that I don't want to have to be on guard all the time over my Bible version. The recent "gender-neutral" version by IBS/Zondervan is a blasphemous load of tripe and I would avoid it. They are not careful with grammatical interpretaion. They substitute popular opinion for textual fidelity. This is the stuff I think that verse about changing the Bible is about. Read - http://www.cbmw.com/ for more on gender issues. Specifically, see- http://www.cbmw.org/resources/tniv/index.html "More than thirty-five evangelical scholars issued a joint statement declaring that the recently released Today’s New International Version, which news reports on Monday identified as "gender-neutral," should not be commended to the church. The scholars expressed concern about "troubling translation inaccuracies ... that introduce distortions of ... meanings." The NKJV and ASV both use our common vernacular, so it is readable by the average "Joe" or "Jane" for our gender-neutral constituents. Of course this does not clear up every verse, but it does help in the reading - with the KJV you have to do a mental translation of strange usages into our modern day usage, and that is if you properly understood the strange usage in the first place. I am not familiar with the RSV, NASB or others. I hope this helps. In Him, Matt. |
||||||
4 | Lowest Common Denominator | Bible general Archive 1 | Theopnuestos | 25227 | ||
Would you agree that truth takes precedence over a "false" unity. | ||||||
5 | where do blacks come from? | Bible general Archive 1 | Theopnuestos | 38228 | ||
Melanin - the amount of this substance that determines skin pigmentation is one of the true differences between caucasians and negros. Some have more so they have dark skin, some have less - hence, pale faces like me! Thats it, and a couple of proteins. Genetic discoveries are fun to watch. It is wonderful that the world is learning what we already know to be true. That all the peoples on the earth descended from about 6 to 10 gene "parents." Hmmm. I choose eight! If I remember correctly, I believe that Ham was the parent of the black folk. (Gen ch. 10) |
||||||
6 | Predestination vs free will--a thought.. | Bible general Archive 1 | Theopnuestos | 38230 | ||
A problem with your example - Jesus was not a slave to sin. Jesus could make a choice with a truly free will - one that is not in bondage to sin. The language and EXPLICIT references to this condition makes it clear that God initiates the activity of salvation, not man. We are - SLAVES(or were, now we can choose either - our "wills" have been liberated from bondage - the captive has been set free, we didn't execute a jailbreak!) As unregenerate sinners we are held in bondage to sin - no weekend furlows to go and pursue God. You are comparing apples and oranges. |
||||||
7 | Non-denominational theology? | Bible general Archive 1 | Theopnuestos | 38234 | ||
Non-denominational - A misnomer - they divided over theology! Reminds me of a joke - never mind, too long! That is why they started a "non-denominational" church - differences, division, denominators. A non-denominational church is a denomination unto istelf. Therefore, it is a denomintional non-denominational church(?). Most non-denoms I have encountered are the result of rebellion. I would imagine that some are legitimate defections from bad churches - I can't say which, if you know of any, point me to their theology! Baptist theolgy has undergone several revisions. The latest SBC Baptist Faith and Message is starting to look like biblical theology, but then ground gained in one area was lost in another. Take Baptist as they are and ignore the "Charismatic" influences, such as the prevalence of teaching and preaching being replaced by shows, musical presentations, et.al. Baptist churches vary as much as any other. The Cooperative Baptist Fellowship based in Atlanta, GA is a spit from the SBC. Don't go to a CBF church unless you want to sit next to homosexual lovers in the pew. Most non-denoms that I have experienced are heavily influenced by Charaismatic thought. That the worship service should be entertaining(though they wouldn't use this language, they would use "edifying", "uplifting", "coming into His presence.") I love music and musical worship. It should not replace expository teaching. Making people feel good is not the point, actually, I would be so bold as to suggest that the opposite is true - no building up of self-esteems and personal perceptions, but revealing the sinfulness we all posess and our desparate need for salvation. Preach a little "hellfire and brimstone" I say, heck, preach alot! "Oh, but we don't want to scare them away!" Yes, God's word, when PREACHED FAITHFULLY, is scary! Let's face it - we are all toast, literally, if we don't repent! The Baptist denomination has its roots in "Calvinism." In our time it has strayed from that path. It is mostly semi-arminian - with some members confessing agreement with two or three of the "Five Points" of Calvinism. Hope this helps. Matt. |
||||||
8 | What unmarried sexual acts are sinful? | Bible general Archive 1 | Theopnuestos | 38242 | ||
Well, the last sentence I think you will disagree with that "one should know EVERYTHING about their partner before marriage." Before marriage it is fornication, if I understand the "EVERYTHING" mentioned here. If I respond to your question verbatim, then all SEXUAL acts are forbidden outside the means God has ordained, marriage. Sex and sexual "pleasuring" are only to be conducted between a male and female who are married. The sexual pleasing part is my opinion. I draw this conclusion from understanding that the PURPOSE of sexual pleasing is to arouse sexually. This question could be a lengthy work of study that I am not prepared to engage in at this time. I am sure there are great resources on the net for this topic. To me it is a common sense question. No intimate contact outside of marriage. Does this mean kissing too in my view? Yes. A kiss is a powerful bio-physical force. Heck, I kissed my wife and got three kids! I think its in the water! :) Matt |
||||||
9 | Scripture reference on the prohibition? | Bible general Archive 1 | Theopnuestos | 38243 | ||
Where does it say that "the Bible prohibits any activity that creates sexual arousal in either of the unmarried partners?" I would like to know so that I can quote it in the future. Thanks for your help. Matt |
||||||
10 | Is any type of contraception allowed? | Bible general Archive 1 | Theopnuestos | 38253 | ||
There is no objective, explicit prohibition against contraception. Though you will get an argument from the Catholics. Catholic belief is based upon the narrative of the man who cast his seed onto the ground. They conclude that the seed should not be wasted. That he was supposed to impregnate the wife of his dead brother so that she could have children. His purpose was not to violate a prohibition aginst sex for other-than-procreation purposes - He didn't want to do it. He didn't want the obligation of caring for the child and its mother. God was angry at him for not giving an offspring to the wife of his dead brother, not for casting his seed on the ground. The text explicitly says why God was angry. (I can't for the life of me remember where in the Bible this is, I can't remember the guys name or any of the details - just the thrust of the text. The odd thing is I was just studying this issue about a two months ago and we covered this event.) The RCC interpretation is not found in the text of Sacred Scripture. It must be another of those Ex Cathedra things! The pleasure and nurturing found in healthy sex is of great benefit to the union of marriage. 1 Cor 7:5 says "Do not deprive each other except by mutual consent and for a time, so that you may devote yourselves to prayer. Then come together again so that Satan will not tempt you because of your lack of self-control." This follows the command to fulfill marital duties and the bodies belonging to the partner as well. This text is about sex for satisfaction "Then come together again so that Satan will not tempt you because of your lack of self-control." If my reasoning is accurate - I can't think of anybody who is burning with desire to procreate. My thoughts. Matt. |
||||||
11 | Grossly mistranslated | Bible general Archive 1 | Theopnuestos | 38954 | ||
Amen to EdB - What evidences do you use to support these claims? How is it that you came to these comclusions? Are we to beleive your post without evidence? Are we to be mindless simps who believe everything somebody says? NO! I believe, "not feel good about" the Sacred Scriptures. I CAN supply a MOUNTAIN of OBJECTIVE, COGENT and RATIONAL evidence that is contrary to your statement. So, leave the rhetoric at the door and let's see your PROOF! Ambassador of the Lord God Omnipotent, Matt. |
||||||
12 | Wife learning to control tongue......... | Bible general Archive 1 | Theopnuestos | 38967 | ||
The tongue! Oooo - it causes us so much trouble - It is something that you have to really work on - to get that thing under control - BUT, doing so preserves peace. A couple of helpful rules that are helping me, is to consider the other as having unique insights that I don't have, to not interupt and/or finish thier sentence(that relly irritates - think about how you feel when someone finishes your sentences). I just try to remember how I feel when these things happen to me and it has been helping - the ministry of the Holy Spirit is wonderful! |
||||||
13 | Suggest OT Heb and NT Greek study aids? | Bible general Archive 1 | Theopnuestos | 38969 | ||
A good start, though not a primer or tutorial on the languages themselves, is to understand the science of textual interpretaion. Third Millenium Minstries has a Real Audio teaching with study guide on hermenuetics - see www.thirdmill.org, click on "Visuals and Videos" then click on "Videos" then scroll to the bottom. Its called "He Gave Us Prophets." Hope this helps. Soli Deo Gloria, Matt. |
||||||
14 | invitation to salvation/accepting Christ | Bible general Archive 1 | Theopnuestos | 38971 | ||
I don't find anything in the Bible about an "offer to accept salvation." I do find the command to repent. You find it everywhere. The preaching of the Gospel is complete in the Bible as opposed to what is common today. Today - the "bad parts" are left out. What are you saved from? The wrath of God, which you are exposed to if you are not saved. You read these Gospel tracts, they have John 3:16 and ignore :17,18,19 and 20, 21,......! Its less "marketable." I am opposed to the long-drawn out pleas to come foreward, accompanied with music or what-have-you. To me, that is emotional manipulation. I think it is good to mention that someone would be available to answer questions. The unregenrate are not interested in repentance, the regenerate, though unconfessed, do. They have legitimate questions that they would rather discuss privately, as a rule. The churches I have attended that use this method(emotional pleas) often have a Sunday service that consists of John 3:16 amd that's it - meanwhile, those that are saved are starving for instruction - being fed milk and nothing else! I think it is a dis-service to the people of God to tailor the Sunday worship to address the un-saved. To teach the Law convicts - and that is what the un-regenerate need to face - their guilt! People who don't think they are guilty repent. My conclusion is that I think it is right not to "offer salvation" in the sense which you talk about. Offer a time for testimony, a time for confession, an opportunity to have questions answered - If they are in church, they may be ready to confess faith! But to engage in these drawn-out invitations, I find no scriptural support for and I think it is harmful to the faithful that are there. Matt. |
||||||
15 | invitation to salvation/accepting Christ | Bible general Archive 1 | Theopnuestos | 39293 | ||
While my post focused on the attention to doctrine, I too am somewhat in agreement with you. God also created our emotions and that definitely falls into the category of loving the Lord with our all. During a sermon, when convicted of sin in my life, I cry, when I am reminded of the assurances He has given us of my eternal place with Him, I am filled with joy. I love the sound of clapping during music that is upbeat and exhalting of Him. And I am struck with awe every time a sinner repents. Our emotions have every place in the worship service, as do our minds. The thrust is to restore that balance from it tipping to far into "feel good" worship. I also believe in the singing of songs such as Isaac Watts "Alas! And Did My Savior Bleed?", particularly the version before is was PC'd up, that is the original that uses "worm" instead of today's politically correct version which uses sinner." "Alas! and did my Savior bleed And did my Sovereign die? Would He devote that sacred head For such a worm as I?" See Job 25:4-6 for worm reference. I want to hear all that God has said of us and to us - "I would see Jesus". If He called Peter Satan, and rebuked His disciples as well as the Pharisees, then what benefit is it to us to only be exposed to the "positives." Our knowledge of our sin moves us to seek to hide under His wing and consequently, sanctification. When we see how great our wickedness, then the brightness of His forgiveness illuminates our hearts with great hope! Regarding the side thread of accepting salvation, I missed a reference - The references you cited don't provide any information regarding the role of this type of invitation in a worship service. The first speaks of the hearts attitude; the second speaks of the adoption of the saved, there change of relationship status that is; the third is in regards to the surety of our salvation, the fourth has me perplexed why you quote that one. Paul's forgiveness he received as an example for the depth of forgiveness we should exhibit? Is that the reference? All of everything that God declared good at our creation should be given to Him in our sacrifice of praise, our minds as well as our emotions. Our emotions should be tempered by a clear, rational cogent understanding of God. We should not supplant the rational understanding with emotionalism. But, rather both should be present with the emotions filtered by a proper perspective of the Father. To regard God other than who He is is to engage in idolatry. That is one of the chief errors of emotionalism. There is also the element of that which is edifying. Jubilant celebration of which the type most commonly associated with these types of worship services(ongoing altar call) has its proper context. The sabbath service should be devoted to the proclamation of the word of God for that is when you are most likely to have the unregenerate in the congregation. If they wanted John 3:16, then would turn on ESPN and look in the stands - what they need to hear is God's righteous standard by which He will judge all the world AND God's answer to that. Not just God's answer. The unregenrate or new Christian is "unchurched" and does not understand - the care of nurture should be the ministry of the congregation. Gathered together with the visible church, it is better to sacrifice than to seek after one's own. I referred to conviction of sin, there must be the preaching of what God has declared as sin. We must be constantly(Ps 1:1-3, Mt. 4:4) be exposed to the standard of righteousness to shed the light of that righteousness on our darkness. We must be exposed to light then given an outlet to rejoice when we have turned - that outlet is our emotions which when given with a contrite heart is a sweet smelling aroma to Him. Ps 51:17 "The sacrifices of God are a broken spirit; a broken and contrite heart, O God, you will not despise." That, to me, is balance. Your servant, Matt. References(all [NIV]): Job 25:4-6 How then can a man be righteous before God? How can one born of woman be pure? If even the moon is not bright and the stars are not pure in his eyes, how much less man, who is but a maggot- a son of man, who is only a worm!" Ps. 1:1-3 Blessed is the man who does not walk in the counsel of the wicked or stand in the way of sinners or sit in the seat of mockers. But his delight is in the law of the Lord , and on his law he meditates DAY and NIGHT.[emphasis mine] He is like a tree planted by streams of water, which yields its fruit in season and whose leaf does not wither. Whatever he does prospers. Mt. 4:3-4 The tempter came to him and said, If you are the Son of God, tell these stones to become bread. Jesus answered, It is written: Man does not live on bread alone, but on every word that comes from the mouth of God. Ps 51:17 The sacrifices of God are a broken spirit; a broken and contrite heart, O God, you will not despise. |
||||||
16 | Meaning of Spirit filled | Bible general Archive 1 | Theopnuestos | 39942 | ||
I have an article which I believe is recommended reading for everybody titled "Guidelines for Godly Dispute." I also recommend B.B. Warfield's "The Dogmatic Spirit." After several character assaults you proceed with your premise which you claim supports your conclusion that there are varying levels of the "Spirit" which one can have. Just a little argumentum ad hominem to start your post, eh? You seem to know the contents of Eph. 4:30 - Did you read 4:29, 4:31-33 also? Just in case you missed them, here they are: "29 Let no unwholesome word proceed from your mouth, but only such a word as is good for edification according to the need of the moment, so that it will give grace to those who hear. 30 Do not grieve the Holy Spirit of God, by whom you were sealed for the day of redemption. 31 Let all bitterness and wrath and anger and clamor and slander be put away from you, along with all malice. 32 Be kind to one another, tender-hearted, forgiving each other, just as God in Christ also has forgiven you." Reading Eph. 4:30 "Do not grieve the Holy Spirit of God, by whom you were sealed for the day of redemption." what I hear is stop doing those things Paul just mentioned. There is no information at all in this text that tells me anything about "spirit-filled"-ness or any degrees of "spirituality." 1 Thes. 5:19 simply tells me not to quench the Spirit. In what way am I not to quench the Spirit, what is quenching the Spirit? I find Matthew Henry's comments on Eph. 4:30 to be helpful with understanding this text - "In the midst of these exhortations and cautions the apostle interposes that general one, And grieve not the Holy Spirit of God, v. 30. By looking to what precedes, and to what follows, we may see what it is that grieves the Spirit of God. In the previous verses it is intimated that all lewdness and filthiness, lying, and corrupt communications that stir up filthy appetites and lusts, grieve the Spirit of God. In what follows it is intimated that those corrupt passions of bitterness, and wrath, and anger, and clamour, and evil speaking, and malice, grieve this good Spirit. By this we are not to understand that this blessed Being could properly be grieved or vexed as we are; but the design of the exhortation is that we act not towards him in such a manner as is wont to be grievous and disquieting to our fellow-creatures: we must not do that which is contrary to his holy nature and his will; we must not refuse to hearken to his counsels, nor rebel against his government, which things would provoke him to act towards us as men are wont to do towards those with whom they are displeased and grieved, withdrawing themselves and their wonted kindness from such, and abandoning them to their enemies." The quenching of the Spirit refers to suppressing the conviction, instruction and correction of the Spirit. Do not sear your conscience - do not disregard or ignore the feelings of guilt you have over your sins. The inference of the "Spirit-filled" philosophy is that the "power" available to us waxes or wanes in proportion to our "spirituality." This thought cannot be obtained from the TEXT of Sacred Scripture. If you want that RTF document, "Guidelines for Godly Dispute," let me know by sending an email to theopnuestos@hotmail.com. I apologize for the use of the word "crappy." It is just one of those words which don't "ping on my radar", but I can see how others may be offended by it. Let's replace "crappy" with "unsupported conclusions." I read all 4 and can honestly say YES! Regards, Matt. |
||||||
17 | Meaning of Spirit filled | Bible general Archive 1 | Theopnuestos | 40182 | ||
How you were able to make a comprehensive psychological profile and motive evaluation from my post is amazing. From my post you discerned that "I think myself better than others." How did you come to that conclusion? What evidences did you observe that left you with no other rational choice but to label me as one "Who thinks himself better than others?" To say it is not a good answer is one thing. Why is it not a good answer? Was not the textual interpretation correct? I do not see why you do not accept it other than you thinking it is not a good answer. "Your answer to my other question seems to be you find it hard to change or that you believe Spirit fullness is a black or white deal." I am still waiting for evidence which results in that conclusion. The texts you originally listed do not support your conclusions. "Your answer to my other question seems to be you find it hard to change..." Yes, I do find it hard to change from a rational understanding to an unfounded one. This thread is going no where. "you have mountain moving faith because the Spirit is totally free in you" I choose the latter - because, regardless of what you or I think the Spirit is totally free to do what He designs. God is primarily concerned about His own happiness, so He will remain free - because He totally is! What you or I think about it is irrelevant - the Spirit is free! The Spirit also possesses mountain moving faith - I possess that which He has ordained for me to possess at any one time. Whether that be mountain moving faith or whatever - it all comes from Him. The truth is, I possessed no faith - and now I do. That's that. "hope you can see why its not a good answer" Don't see it, sorry. Can't - no evidences provided to support your claims. To expect me to accept your position without any rational explaination is unfair - how am I able to make any decision with such a lack of proof? Regards, Matt. |
||||||
18 | Meaning of Spirit filled | Bible general Archive 1 | Theopnuestos | 40462 | ||
Hadn't forgot about your post - in the middle of moving and have less time to research my answers. Will get back to you on this soon! Thanks for your patience! | ||||||
19 | Meaning of Spirit filled | Bible general Archive 1 | Theopnuestos | 40461 | ||
"want His truth more then the thrill of beating someone into submission of letting you believe what is wrong by being willing to say whatever is needed to do so, without caring whither or not what you say is true." There are some very serious accusations here which you make without any knowledge as to the truth of them. "Beating someone into submission" is not my purpose here, and I do care about what I am saying as to its truthfulness. Does "thou shalt not bear false witness" mean anything to you? This commandment sets forth the vital importance of truth. Yet accusations are made without any demonstratable knowledge as to whether they are truthful or not. Secondly, since this is a personal attack, I guess you didn't read the four questions at the bottom this time! Have a nice day - I will not be replying to this thread anymore. You seem convinced that any action is warranted in defense of your views. You seem satisfied that you are justified to levy false accustaions, accusing someone of lying by design, et. al. The point I made I supported with careful textual fidelity. Needless to say, I will not be falsely accused in public without accountability. You have levied a charge of deceitfulness by design in order to support my point. I charge you to present your evidence. If you cannot present objective, valid evidence, I expect an apology. Have a nice life and repent. Matt. |
||||||
20 | Hands of an angry God | Rom 13:1 | Theopnuestos | 38939 | ||
I have read through much of it and I heard it described as a beautiful picture of the grace of God. Most see it as "hellfile and brimstone" stuff, and it may be, but when you consider the sinfullness of man, the grace of God in this sermon is so evident. I recommend it to everybody as well as anything this great man of God has written - also see "God Makes Men Sensible of Their Misery Before He Reveals His Mercy and Love." See http://www.jonathanedwards.com/. | ||||||
Result pages: [ 1 2 ] Next > Last [2] >> |