Results 1 - 20 of 54
|
||||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Author: RevC Ordered by Verse |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Did the Amplified come from Wescott and | Not Specified | RevC | 2574 | ||
Is The amplified bible is a takeoff of the ASB or NASB? Did the Amplified come from Wescott and Hort? Isnt Wescott and Hort full of errors? Didnt the main translator of the NASB refute the version based on the fact that the Wescott and Hort text was used? | ||||||
2 | Women's hair length and 1 Corinthians 11 | Not Specified | RevC | 3346 | ||
Can someone explain intelligently the 11th chapter of 1 corinthians in regards to womens hair length. What is Paul saying here!?! I look forward to someones response.............thanks | ||||||
3 | Holy Ghost Baptism subsequent to salvati | Not Specified | RevC | 4412 | ||
Can someone show me in a sound theological and scriptural manner that the baptism of the holy spirit is subsequent to salvation | ||||||
4 | Jesus name baptism fulflls matt 28 | Not Specified | RevC | 4481 | ||
Jesus name baptism fulfills Jesus command in Matthew 28 which is baptize in the NAME of the father son and holy ghost.... I would like to hear from those who differ and why..no arguments jsut interested in other points of view | ||||||
5 | How much should we give? | Not Specified | RevC | 4950 | ||
Is tithing still a "law" under the new covenant? | ||||||
6 | Can someone tell me about original greek | Bible general Archive 1 | RevC | 2218 | ||
Can someone tell me about original greek texts such as how the KJV was translated and from(what text) what is the problem with the Wescott and Hort text and so on. What are the most reliable manuscripts and what versions are translated from those manuscripts | ||||||
7 | Did the Amplified come from Wescott and | Bible general Archive 1 | RevC | 2598 | ||
Is The amplified bible is a takeoff of the ASB or NASB? Did the Amplified come from Wescott and Hort? Isnt Wescott and Hort full of errors? Didnt the main translator of the NASB refute the version based on the fact that the Wescott and Hort text was used? | ||||||
8 | CHRIST IS jehovah | Bible general Archive 1 | RevC | 4692 | ||
not sure that I understand this note...can you explain | ||||||
9 | JOE THROWS ONENESS INTO HERESY | Bible general Archive 1 | RevC | 4693 | ||
Joe you have done such a wonderful job of throwing oneness people into heresy lets see how you do with the following questions! 1. Is the word trinity in the Bible? No. 2. Does the Bible say that there are three persons in the Godhead? No. 3. Does the Bible speak of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost? Yes. 4. Do these titles as used in Matthew 28:19 mean that there are three separate and distinct persons in the Godhead? No, they refer to three offices, roles, or relationship to humanity. 5. Does the Bible use the word three in reference to God? Only one verse in the entire Bible does so-I John 5:7. It speaks of the Father, the Word (instead of Son), and the Holy Ghost, and it concludes by saying, "These three are one." 6. Does the Bible use the word one in reference to God? Yes, many times. For example, see Zechariah 14:9; Malachi 2:10; Matthew 23:9; Mark 12:29, 32; John 8:41; 10:30; Romans 3:30; I Corinthians 8:4; Galatians 3:20; I Timothy 2:5; James 2:19. 7. Can the mystery of the Godhead be understood? Yes. Romans 1:20; Colossians 2:9; I Timothy 3:16. 8. Has the Christian only one Heavenly Father? Yes. Matthew 23:9. 9. Then why did Jesus say to Philip, "He that hath seen me hath seen the Father" (John 14:9)? Because Jesus is the express image of God's person. Hebrews 1:3. The Greek word for personin this verse literally means "substance." 10. Does the Bible say that there are two persons in the Godhead? No. 11. Does the Bible say that all the Godhead is revealed in one person? Yes, in Jesus Christ. II Corinthians 4:4; Colossians 1:19; 2:9; Hebrews 1:3. 12. Is the mystery of the Deity hidden from some people? Yes. Luke 10:21-22. 13. Who is the Father? The Father is the one God, particularly as revealed in parental relationship to humanity. Deuteronomy 32:6; Malachi 2:10. 14. Where was God the Father while Jesus was on earth? The Father was in Christ. John 14:10; II Corinthians 5:19. He was also in heaven, for God is omnipresent. 15. Did the prophet Isaiah say that Jesus would be the Father? Yes. Isaiah 9:6; 63:16. 16. When God said, "Let us make man in our image" (Genesis 1:26), was He speaking to another person in the Godhead? No. Isaiah 44:24; Malachi 2:10. 17. How many of God's qualities were in Christ? All. Colossians 2:9. 18. How may we see the God who sent Jesus into the world? By seeing Jesus. John 12:44-45; 14:9. 19. Does the Bible say that Jesus is the Almighty? Yes. Revelation 1:8 20. Whom do some designate as the first person in the trinity? God the Father. 21. Whom do some designate as the last person in the trinity? The Holy Ghost. But Jesus said that He was the first and last. Revelation 1:17-18 22. How many persons did John see sitting on the throne in heaven? One. Revelation 4:2. 23. If Jesus is the first and the last, why did God say in Isaiah 44:6 that He was the first and the last? Because Jesus is the God of the Old Testament incarnate. 24. Did Jesus tell Satan that God alone should be worshipped? Yes. Matthew 4:10 25. Does the devil believe in more than one God? No. James 2:19. 26. Does the Bible say that God, who is the Word, was made flesh? Yes John 1:1, 14. 27. For what purpose was God manifested in the flesh? To save sinners. Hebrews 2:9, 14. 28. Was Jesus God manifested in the flesh? Yes. I Timothy 3:16. 29. Could Jesus have been on earth and in heaven at the same time? Yes. John 3:13. 30. Does the Bible say that there is but one Lord? Yes. Isaiah 45:18; Ephesians 4:5. 31. Does the Bible say that Christ is the Lord? Yes. Luke 2:11. 32. Does the Bible say that the Lord is God? Yes. I kings 18:39; Zechariah 14:5; Acts 2:39; Revelation 19:1. |
||||||
10 | JOE THROWS ONENESS INTO HERESY | Bible general Archive 1 | RevC | 4840 | ||
Perhaps the confusion comes because you have not made a single valid point regarding your current doctrinal view......when you start making points that a legitimate then I'll listen | ||||||
11 | JOE THROWS ONENESS INTO HERESY | Bible general Archive 1 | RevC | 4847 | ||
The hostility on this issus is getting heated... it seems to happen that way when doctrines start to crumble.Let me say I am new to this forum and apologize for multiple postings. If I am not welcome in the conversation lets not beat around the bush.Just ask me to shut up and move on. Contention is not something that I enjoy. Not one of you wonderful trinitarians has provided a shre of evidence for your view. I have not seen what was posted this weekend. I will do so shortly. Thank you for your responses however if you wish to criticize me personally I would request that you keep it to yourself.... I have not personally critcized yor knowledge or you as a person and would ask for the same respect. Please review my responses 5. Although I know there have been many newer versions and better translations since the KJV, many of which I own I have taken a personal stance against omitting verses based on these supposed new finding...so in the idea of "fair play" I'll retract position #5 based on translational discrepancies and we'll move on..of course I'll ask that you retract the whole "salt" thing. 7. I will assume that the lack of here in this answer is due to lack of explanation in your own doctrinal stance 8. At this point my answer would have to be "no"...do you? If so explain it to me 9. Dumb answer I am not going to waste much time on this one 15. I would look forward to this 23. Again Joe, this is poor it is obvious in Revelation that there is one God in heaven and that is Jesus Christ.... the whole time John has his revelation we never get to see the other two guys that Trinitarians say exist...... What's the deal with that? 42. No offense but I am not impressed with Gregory Boyd...most of what I have read form him has been really poor in scriptural points and has relied mostly on personal feeling and his own revelations......regardless of our trinity or oneness viewpoint ..I am sure we can agree that Boyd's work is really not that convincing.... I have gained more from your views than his I feel you have refuted nothing in a logical, concise or biblical manner...every point is tainted with verbal muck and no biblical basis at least I have lead to undeniable scriptures that our not easy for a Trinitarian to refute. This at one time was a non-issue for me until I started seeing some qoutes by hank hannagraf like " how can Jesus be the creator if he was not born until 2000 years ago".... or things like "Do we really want a non-Trinitarian to be the spiritual leader of our country?" Buckner wrote. This Hannagraf cronie is mad about the success of TD Jakes T.D. Jakes is a cult leader and his ministry is a cult," Buckner told "Charisma" magazine. This is just ridiculous. I am not hung up on roles,entities,modes or persons....there is one GOD.. HE came as Jesus Christ the son. There is no doubt that JESUS WAS GOD... this is your stance also.....so where do we differ just what is it that you see that I do not? God There is only one God (Deuteronomy 6:4). He is the creator of heaven and earth, and of all living beings. He has revealed Himself to humanity as the Father (Creator), in the son (Savior), and as the Holy Ghost (indwelling Spirit). Father God is a Spirit (John 4:24). He is the Eternal One, the Creator of all things, and the Father of all humanity by creation. He is the First and the Last, and beside Him there is no God (Isaiah 44:6). There was no God formed before Him; neither shall be there any after Him (Isaiah 43:10). Son Jesus is the Son of God according to the flesh (Romans 1:3) and the very God Himself according to the Spirit (Matthew 1:23). Jesus is the Christ (Matthew 16:16); the creator of all things (Colossians 1:16-17); God with us (Matthew 1:23); God made flesh (John 1:1-14); God manifested in the flesh (I Timothy 3:16);He which was, which is, and which is to come, the Almighty (Revelation 1:8);the mighty God, everlasting Father, and Prince of peace (Isaiah 9:6). Jesus Himself testified of His identity as God when He said, "He that hath seen me hath seen the Father" (John 14:7-11) and "I and my Father are one" (John 10:30). It took shedding of blood for the remission of the sins of the world (Hebrews 9:22), but God the Father was a Spirit and had no blood to shed. Thus He prepared a body of flesh and blood (Hebrews 10:5)and came to earth as a man in order to save us, for in Isaiah 43:11 He said, "Beside me there is no Savior." When He came in flesh the angels sang, "For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Savior, which is Christ the Lord" (Luke 2:11). Holy Ghost The Holy Ghost is not a third person in the Godhead, but rather the Spirit of God (the Creator), the Spirit of the resurrected Christ. The Holy Ghost comes to dwell in the hearts and lives of everyone who believes and obeys the gospel, as the comforter, Sustainer, and keeper (John 14:16-26; Romans 8:9-11). |
||||||
12 | How much should we give? | Bible general Archive 1 | RevC | 4967 | ||
Is tithing still a "law" under the new covenant? | ||||||
13 | is ten percent the scriptural tithe | Bible general Archive 1 | RevC | 4998 | ||
So is this tithe----which is ten percent---how do you know its scripturally correct to give the standard ten? Thanks for your reply | ||||||
14 | Women's hair length and 1 Corinthians 11 | Amos 1:1 | RevC | 3444 | ||
Can someone explain intelligently the 11th chapter of 1 corinthians in regards to womens hair length. What is Paul saying here!?! I look forward to someones response.............thanks | ||||||
15 | who is Jesus talking about in Matthew 24 | Matt 24:1 | RevC | 6607 | ||
who is Jesus talking about in Matthew 24 | ||||||
16 | Jesus name baptism fulflls matt 28 | Matt 28:19 | RevC | 4492 | ||
Jesus name baptism fulfills Jesus command in Matthew 28 which is baptize in the NAME of the father son and holy ghost.... I would like to hear from those who differ and why..no arguments jsut interested in other points of view | ||||||
17 | Jesus name baptism fulflls matt 28 | Matt 28:19 | RevC | 4495 | ||
Not sure about that one.. Its you again huh? That is wonderful, we are both quite active today huh?... Let me tell you what I think. I think that wehn Jesus said the NAME he meant his name. Because his name is above all names, also in Him dwelleth the fullness of the Godhead bodily. I realize the Trinitarian veiwpoint of "these are Jesus'words. However once again there is a consistency that cannot be ignored. This is found in the book of Acts... every baptism is done in Jesus name and not just by Peter but also by Paul and others. I do not believe that this was an abbreviated form of the Matt 28 but the fullness of it... why abreviate over and over again throughout the entire book.... Lets remember that Johns baptism was not the same as Jesus name baptism.. this iswhy Paul insisted that the two Ephesian be re-baptized or baptized in Jesus name. I realize that this view is only found in yoru "oneness" churches and different sects of the charismatic movement. I thinkthat is however only due to the ormula being changed by catholocism and not because the evangellical or protestant church felt this was the best way...however should any one argue my speal goes this way "I baptize you in the name if the father and the son andthe holy ghost with in whom the fullness of the Godhead swelled bodily...I baptize you in the name of Jesus Christ" A bit lenghty but worth it..... I look forward to yoru response | ||||||
18 | Jesus name baptism fulflls matt 28 | Matt 28:19 | RevC | 4564 | ||
JVH0212 Yes we can always share with each other even in disagreement.. It is my desire to maintain unity and I enjoy hearing your thoughts. My question is respectfully,how do you not see, Jesus name baptism? We see this formula done throughout the entire book of Acts. The Matthew 28 dissertation was fulfilled with Acts 2:38 and continued in Samaria,the jailer,the Eunich the house of Cornelius and teh two ephesian disciples of John. With all due respect to your current belief and with humility I would ask you to check your heart on this. I think that many times we do what we have been taught....it then becomes tradition and tradition is not always right. The baptismal formula of Father.Son and Holy Ghost was fulfilled in Acts 2:38 because in Jesus dwelleth the fullness of the Godhead...thus the first church baptized in then NAME of the Father,Son and the Holy Ghost....and that name as previously discussed is Jesus..now then if any man be contenious I was raised Baptist and baptized father,son holy ghost...then when I went to the apostolic church I was baptized in Jesus name....so I guess I covered all the bases(LOL) | ||||||
19 | Jesus is the Father and the Holy Spirit? | Matt 28:19 | RevC | 4573 | ||
Interestingly enough Jesus was not scizophrenic,yet he did call himself the father and the holy spirit....first of all collosians tells us that in Jesus dwelleth the fullness of the God head bodily, Isaiah tell us He(Jesus) shall be called wonderful,counselor and the MIGHTY GOD...Jesus himself said if you have seen me you have seen the father.....Jesus also said He was the root of of Abraham and teh offspring of David. In the book of Revelation Jesus said he was the alpha and the omega..... .Thomas proclaimed to Jesus after the resurrection...My Lord, My God......John tells us in the beginning was the word the word was with God and the word was God and teh word became flesh and swelt amoung us......His name is Emmanual which means God is with us.... The list goes on and on and on... To suppose that there are actually three God is heresy and a very dangerous doctrine....... Peter,Paul and all the apostles understood this and this is how the baptismal formula is fulfilled in by the apostles. | ||||||
20 | Jesus name baptism fulflls matt 28 | Matt 28:19 | RevC | 4576 | ||
Unfortunantly after looking at your article, Although I appreciate your time in trying to give me a answer that would be thoughtful and insightful and done in sucha aspirit of love I can do nothing but reject your findings. The Bible can be a difficult and complex book, however many times we are the ones that make it that way. What I have presented have been clear and concise scriptures. For instance Isaiah told us that He would be called wonderful,counsellor and "the Mighty God" Jesus said of Himself..."I AM" "if you have seen the me you have seen the Father" Thomas proclaims He is God and Jesus seems content with the title.......Paul tells us that in Him dwelleth the Fullness of the God head.....in other words in Jesus There was the Father-the Son and the Holy Ghost...again that is God breathed scripture and not some loose interpretation. These are a few of a great many verses that Jesus and others testified of. It is simple to see that Christ was a great orator and however He chose to word His teachings, they should be revered and understood. There are instances and I will include them (my work schedule does not permit me to do so at this time) where Jesus says The Father will send the comforter...and a few verses later Jesus says "I will send the comforter"...Whats the deal with that. The fact is Jesus was as Paul said the Father-the Son and the Holy Ghost.... To negate Mr. Boyds finding there are several instances where Jesus name baptism is seen in Acts and in each case the resemblance is strong........whether it means "in the authority of" or "for the sake of" is a mute point and really a contradiction to the argument Mr Boyd is struggling to make. We are told that His name is above all names We are told there is no other way to salvation but through His name. The fact of the matter is it is quite clear what Jesus meant when He gave his dissertation, the apostles upon recieving the Holy Spirit immediatly proclaimed this type of baptism...perhaps Peter made a mistake....what a rough way for te Holy Ghost to start His ministry huh? Perhaps it was as Hank says an abreviated version...this is highly unlikely and though I do not like Hank I would still think a man of his education could come up with a better one than that... What we have here is mere tradition.......We have been taught by the early rise of the catholic church to baptize in the titles... it is scripturally evident that this was not the way of the first church....we can argue all day long but the fact is God's word says what it says.... I suggest we all let loose of some traditional teachings and look at His word...GOD BLESS | ||||||
Result pages: [ 1 2 3 ] Next > Last [3] >> |