Results 1 - 20 of 53
|
||||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Author: Hiskid84 Ordered by Verse |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Fruit vs. Works: the same or different? | Not Specified | Hiskid84 | 129744 | ||
Fruit vs Works: are they the same thing? Jesus said, in regards to bearing fruit, we can do nothing outside of Him (John 15:5). He says we must abide in Him. In verse 9, He says if we abide in His love we will keep His commandments. While doing a study today of John 15:5 and surrounding text, I realized I was trying to equate fruit with works. Is this an incorrect assumption? Are they two separate things? I'd greatly appreciate any Scripture showing that they are either equal or two separate things. In Christ, Karen |
||||||
2 | Is it ever o.k. to say no to a brother | Bible general Archive 2 | Hiskid84 | 125745 | ||
kalos: great answer! I have to admit, your example concerning grown children hit a little too close to home for me. I think as a mother it's especially difficult to stifle that desire to shelter our kids, even from their bad choices. (And even harder when the fate of our grandchildren is involved) And though I struggle with this issue, you gave some excellent advice on this and helping people in general. I think both of your principles regarding (1) creating dependency and (2) interfering in God's instruction, go hand in hand. These are definitely areas where we need to exercise great caution. I would like to add a couple of thoughts: 1) Pray for those in need. Ask God what He would have you do to help them (if anything). For some people, it's easier to give money as a quick fix than it is to come along side a person and help them look for long term solutions to financial problems. In other words, it's easier to give of our money than it is to give of our time. (Example: could you provide reliable transportation to someone who is unable to work due to lack of transportation? Could you provide emergency babysitting services? Help them find affordable transportation or childcare if you are unable to offer those things?) 2) Don't be disheartened if you give to someone and discover you have been taken advantage of. God may use your gift to change their heart or He may use it to bless yours (and teach you wisdom in discernment in the process). Anything is possible with God! However, we don't have to see what He's doing to know that He is working. I'd rather err on the side of giving than withholding. hisown_07: you asked about taking money that was meant to pay an obligation and using it to help another person. It seems like the obvious answer would be "no" when in reality it may depend upon many variables. Here are a couple: a) Are others depending upon you (ie., spouse, children) to meet these obligations? I believe God would have us make those dependent upon us for their care our first priority. (Insert Scripture here. Anyone?) However, b) Is the other person's need a true emergency? (Unexpected illness, loss of job, car repairs causing them to face dire circumstances? Or has laziness or foolish spending brought them to this point?) If it is a true emergency and helping them would put you in somewhat dire circumstances, you might need to help them seek other sources of aid. If it is a true emergency and helping them would be an inconvenience in some way (having to pay late fees on the earmarked bill) or would cause you to put in a few extra hours at work, then I would say the decision would be based on how much you believe that you should help this person. I guess what I'm trying to say is this: Carefully weigh all the factors. Just as carefully, pray for godly wisdom and direction. Sorry this was so long! It was my first post and I got carried away! Karen (Mrs. Doc) |
||||||
3 | What is God's major attribute? | Bible general Archive 2 | Hiskid84 | 129556 | ||
tgbishop, Thank you for sharing about yourself. It really does help to know something about the person when you address their question. (Not that I can talk... it took me over a month to fill out my profile) When I responded to another question you asked I might have phrased it somewhat differently if I had know more about you. For instance, having been a single mother and knowing what a struggle that can be, I probably wouldn't have asked if your desire was to "keep up with the Jones" (Jones'? Joneses? Jones's? Jones'es? Ack...why couldn't the person that coined that phrase have said "keep up with the Smiths?" Please don't tell anyone I homeschooled my children!). Anyway, your questions are interesting to me as I like to challenge myself to support what I believe with Scripture and not just because it's my opinion or my experience. So thanks for asking them! May God richly bless you in your pursuit to know Him better. :) Your "sista" in Christ, Karen |
||||||
4 | What is God's major attribute? | Bible general Archive 2 | Hiskid84 | 129559 | ||
Hi, Steve. Thank you for posting about God's attribute. Having considered it for a while I couldn't see a way to make one stand out above the others. I imagine from God's perspective they are all equal. It sure is hard to wrap our finite minds around the things of God! Anyway, it is interesting that, of all the attributes of God, holy is the only one that is repeated (to my knowledge) 3 times (Isa 6:3 and Rev 4:8). I hope others will respond as well. It certainly makes for an interesting discussion. In Him, Karen |
||||||
5 | SHOULD WOMAN BE PRECHING | Bible general Archive 2 | Hiskid84 | 130133 | ||
Hi, Searcher. Thank you for your contribution to this thread. I often wonder if the people that have been on the forum for a long time ever get tired of answering the same questions over and over. (Perhaps it is evidence of the fruit of the Spirit; love, patience, kindess, etc) The person that posted this question (jehova4130) seemed to be having difficulty getting the question just right. First was posted this question, "what does it mean in chpt2 11,12?". I responded by asking, "What book??". (Though I had a feeling the question was refering to 1 Tim, I opted to use 2 Tim for the verse I had to post in order to even respond to this person) Then the person posted a second question (which was the same as the first) and which started this thread. After starting this thread, the person then went back to the original question they posted (what does it mean...) and responded to my question of "which book??" with the reply, "1 Tim. 2:11-12". So the person has clarified which book, which verse and what the question is. Unfortunately, all of this is done in bits and pieces as part of two different threads. And if I have you totally confused, my work here is done. :-) In Him, Karen |
||||||
6 | cremation or burial of the body | Bible general Archive 2 | Hiskid84 | 130711 | ||
Reminds me of how the Moslems had heard about the story of Messiah, so when they were in control of Jerusalem, they studied the prophecy carefully. Knowing that Jews avoid cemetaries, they carefully built one right in front of the gate that Messiah would have to enter on the foal of a donkey. They went to great pains, and that cemetary is still there. However, they built it around the 1300's. :-) Doc (on my far-better-half's computer) |
||||||
7 | The New Birth - A Survey | NT general Archive 1 | Hiskid84 | 129130 | ||
In response to your instruction, "All you have to do is answer...active or passive", here's my reply: passive Thanks! Karen |
||||||
8 | How can incest be forbidden? | Gen 3:3 | Hiskid84 | 129813 | ||
Ed: please don't shoot my husband! Doc: please stop speculating in your posts directed to Ed! Both: truce? It seems your dialogue has ceased to be beneficial to either of you. Perhaps your time and energy could be put to better use by moving on. May we glorify God together, Karen |
||||||
9 | Pragmatism is of the World | Job 21:15 | Hiskid84 | 129570 | ||
Hi, mommapbs. I should probably think about this more before posting this but since I'm impulsive I'm going to throw it out here anyway. :) (Actually I've been thinking of it off and on since you posted it but now it's almost time to leave for church) The other day as I was thinking of some ways that I have grown (mostly in trusting God and understanding that one can experience His peace even in the midst of intense heartache but also in learning to keep my mouth shut when it wouldn't be beneficial to say what is on my mind), I realized that every single good thing that comes out of me is not of me. It's all HIS work in me. So even if some good "works" come out of me or I am able to minister to someone or do anything of eternal benefit, I can't claim it. Certainly not here and I doubt it in the hereafter. How can I, when it's all His work and none of mine? So I had this vision of giving back my crown(s) when I stand (or kneel or lay prostrate) before Him and understanding that they rightly belong to Him not me. The surprise came when I went to look up the verse that says we will throw our crowns at His feet and discovered that (according to Rev. 4:10) it is the four and twenty elders that are casting their crowns at His feet! So I'm not sure if I will be given the opportunity to give my crown back to Him but I do know that this knowledge I've been given, that it is His work and not mine, causes praise to well up in my heart each time I see Him at work and instead of patting myself on the back I am able to truly give Him all the glory. Hope this makes sense! My one other (quick!) thought is this: Our "service" to Christ can't have only eternal benefits when we are so blessed by His work in us here as we seek to do His will. In Him, Karen |
||||||
10 | Pragmatism is of the World | Job 21:15 | Hiskid84 | 129626 | ||
Hi, Ray. Thank you for sharing your thoughts. :) Though it was my impression that Hank's post was strictly tongue-in-cheek, you posted some interesting things to think about. I was curious about this statement you made: "How about us? Are we going to make Him King of our lives? This is an important pronoun of Deity. It is a thing (pronoun) to consider carefully, pragmatically." Now I have to admit, not being as knowledgeable as some on the forum I am still trying to understand the term "pragmatism" and get a general idea of what it encompasses. For that reason I can't really address that entire statement. However, I am curious as to your thought that somehow we have the ability to make Christ the King of our lives. It seems to equal Country Girl's statement that Hank was replying to. Please don't think I am nit-picking here. (That's a weird phrase...has anyone ever really picked a nit? What IS a nit? Is that like those tiny things monkeys like to eat?) I honestly do believe that I understand what it is you (and Country Girl) are wanting to convey (and please correct me if I'm wrong). I'm just wondering if this might be a better way to express it: Jesus Christ is the eternal King. He is Ruler over all things. He is King of my life. As such, I acknowledge His kingship through my obedience to His commands. (1 Tim 1:15) This is a faithful saying, and worthy of all acceptance, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners; of whom I am chief. (1Tim 1:16) However, for this reason I obtained mercy, that in me first Jesus Christ might show all longsuffering, as a pattern to those who are going to believe on Him to everlasting life. (1Tim 1:17) Now to the KING eternal, immortal, invisible, to God who alone is wise, be honor and glory forever and ever. Amen (1 Tim 6:13) I urge you in the sight of God who gives life to all things, and before Christ Jesus who witnessed the good confession before Pontius Pilate, (1 Tim 6:14) that you keep this commandment without spot, blameless until the appearing, (1 Tim 6:15) which He will manifest in His own time, He who is the blessed and only Potentate (Sovereign), the KING of kings and Lord of lords, (1 Tim 6:16) who alone has immortality, dwelling in unapproachable light, whom no man has seen or can see, to whom be honor and everlasting power. Amen. NKJ He IS the King. To say that I must make Him king of my life is to say that failure to do so makes Him NOT king of my life. I do not possess the power to either place Him on any throne (whether my heart or elsewhere) or to dethrone Him (since He already is King). So the real issue is not whether I make Him king of my life (something already existing) but to what degree I submit my life to His kingship. Or so go my thoughts on the subject. I hope they make sense. If not, please see Hank. :) In Christ, Karen |
||||||
11 | Pragmatism is of the World | Job 21:15 | Hiskid84 | 129732 | ||
Hello, Ray. Thank you very much for taking time to respond to my post and for giving me some new things to think about. :) After I posted to you yesterday, I went back and reread your post a couple of times. I realized that I was missing (what I believe was) the key point that you were trying to make and knew that it had to do with the upper and lower case use of the letter "k" in the word king. So first of all, I will confess to you (and everyone else) that I realize I am hypersensitive towards anything that hints at a "works" gospel. I won't apologize for that but I will apologize if it causes me to misinterpret the main idea someone is wanting to express (as in the case yesterday). The only way I can see to deal with this "problem" I'm having is to acknowledge the main idea, derive any benefit from it (the opportunity to learn), and ask about the statements that I believe are in opposition to what the Bible teaches. With those things in mind, I address the latest post by you (directed to me: 129690). I want to preface anything I write henceforth by saying that even if a statement is within the context of the main idea (which, of course, it would be), if, on its own, it is something I believe to be false I will question it. Okay, now to the heart of this post: I am very sincere in giving thanks to you for giving me some things to "chew on". After looking at the verses in John 18 (37-38) and seeing Jesus acknowledging He is "a king" I am now very curious as to His statement. Though it may be painfully obvious to some, I am trying to understand how He was/is a king in the lower case sense of the word. To say He is THE King (King over all, uppercase K) is easy. His Word makes that plain. And yet, I am struggling with the concept of Him being a king in the earthly sense of the word (a male sovereign over a group of people). I would be very interested in anything you (or others) would like to share on the subject. Though I have a little bit of difficulty getting it totally straight in my mind, I can understand the concept of Him being the Light (though I'm not sure if I would equate "enlighten all men" with "gives light to every man"...I'll have to get back to you on that). And I can easily see that Jesus was indeed a man as well as the second Adam. However, would you please explain (if time permits) how He was a savior, lower case, if the definition of that word is, "A person who rescues another from harm, danger, or loss." Again, it is simple to see Him as Savior, upper case form. I'm also having the same difficulty with the word, "rock". In what way was He a "fortress, stronghold" in the earthly sense of the word? To help you understand my perspective, I am looking at all these things from the point of them equating to His earthly ministry. How else can we apply any lower case word to Him except to apply it to His humanity (as opposed to His diety)? Help, please! My brain is hurting! With all of that addressed I will now move on to my "nit-picking" for today. Your statement was: "So I do not want you or anyone to make Him king of your life. I want us to make Him King of kings, and Lord of lords. That is accomplished by accepting the things, the truths, of God's word; even knowing the Truth." Please help me to understand how we can possibly make Christ anything. If I fail to accept the truths of God's Word, even "knowing the Truth", is He no longer King of kings? Or are you meaning that we are to acknowledge Him for who He is? Part of my confusion is in the phrase, "I want us to MAKE Him King of kings..." Your definition above of "make" is, " "to do" something, to accomplish a thing." Ray, please believe me when I say it is not my intention to cause dissension. I truly want to understand your position. I hope you can help me. In Him, Karen |
||||||
12 | Pragmatism is of the World | Job 21:15 | Hiskid84 | 129751 | ||
Aaron, Thank you so much for sharing your thoughts. :) They did help bring some things into perspective for me. I was wondering if you could answer a question for me (since it appears that I cannot post without asking at least one). Knowing that God cannot lie, Jesus must have been (or still is?) truly the king of the Jews (according to your statements above). You wrote that He did not claim to be "THE King" but "a king" the "king of the Jews (an earthly king)". Could you define His (earthly) kingship over the Jews if you have time? Thank you so much for your help! In Him, Karen |
||||||
13 | Pragmatism is of the World | Job 21:15 | Hiskid84 | 129804 | ||
Greetings, Ray. I pray that your daughter and new son-in-law will draw close(r) to Christ in their union and that God will use the gift of marriage to give them, on a more personal level, insight into His relationship with the Church (especially the depth of His love for us as revealed in Eph 5:22-33). I pray that your daughter's husband will nourish and cherish her, following Christ's example, and that your daughter will submit to Christ with respect and honor towards her husband. May He be greatly glorified today and may it be a truly joyous occasion! I know this can be a highly emotional event, even for a dad, so I pray that both you and your wife will find God's grace to be more than sufficient as you give the care of your daughter over to her new husband. I look forward to a continuation of our discussion, as time permits, and hope you are able to address my questions. In Christ, Karen |
||||||
14 | follow-up question. | Is 9:6 | Hiskid84 | 129433 | ||
Hi, Country Girl. I have a question about your statement: "Absolutely none of us could hold a candle to what Christ did or even the Apostles did; mainly because they had the Spirit of God to assist them." We cannot "hold a candle to what Christ did" because He is the Son of God and sinless perfection. However, though I would not dare to compare myself to an Apostle, do we not have that same Holy Spirit to assist us? Thank you for your explanation to flordeliz. As is usually the case, they (and we) had their eyes on earthly things rather than heavenly. The Jews were looking for relief from their bondage to the Romans (physical) rather than relief from their bondage to sin (spiritual). Just as when Jesus said in John 2:19, "Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up," the Jews thought He meant the actual building and He was speaking of the temple of His body (John 2:21). Though the Holy Spirit guides us into all truth, many times we still don't see the "heavenly perspective" because our eyes are on the earthly. For example, in Romans 8:28 we read that "all things work together for good to those who love God, to those who are the called according to His purpose." From our earthly perspective we expect God to take difficult circumstances and make something good out of them in such a tangible way that we can point to the "good" and say, "See what God has done for us?" This helps to "explain" away the "bad" things that come our way. However, if we view it from a "heavenly perspective" (God's view) we can rest in knowing that in all circumstances God is conforming us to the image of His Son. We may not be able to see it and yet, we can KNOW it because He has told us so. "Lord, help me to get my eyes off of the temporary, physical realm that focuses on me and help me to put them on You and things eternal." In Him, Karen |
||||||
15 | Does God judge nations directly? | Obad 1:2 | Hiskid84 | 130709 | ||
This is easy to answer: we take the literal stuff as listeral and the symbolic stuff as symbolic. The only trick is when the text does not lend itself to clear identification. I've never been a big fan of eschatology. Probably because I see so many people all wrapped up in it instead of pursuing holiness. I have a solid confidence in seeing my Lord. How He chooses to manifest Himself will, no doubt, be different than I am able to conceieve. That said, I find that Revelation is a powerfully symbolic book. There are dragons and beasts etc. etc. Some is or must necessarily be symbolic. The millinial reign possibly falls into the catagory. One reason is that there is mention of sacrifices being made. Since Christ is our sacrifice, fully fulfilling our every need for sacrifice, what can this mean? If you really pin me down, I tend to fall on the more literal view of the millenial reign. I'd be considered pre-mill post-trib. But there are a lot of dead theologians out there, who are a whole lot smarter than I am, who don't see a millenial reign at all. in the face of such opposition, I just can't seem to get onto the Hal Lindsey band wagon. If that makes me foolish, then its your fault for dragging it out of me! :-) If you'd left it well enough alone, maybe my foolishness would have been in question! :-) Doc (On my far-better-half's computer) |
||||||
16 | Friend of God and friend of the world? | Matt 6:24 | Hiskid84 | 129555 | ||
Hi, tgbishop. You've kept your questions fairly simple so far but I'm curious as to your wording of this one, "No one can be a friend of God and a friend of the world at the same time?" The verse you've cited speaks of being devoted to either God or the world, since we cannot serve both. Scripture plainly tells us that we cannot be devoted to God if our desire is seeking to obtain worldly things. Take the verse Hank posted to you and add the verse that follows it: "For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world." 1 John 2:16 Here it is in the ESV: "For all that is in the world--the desires of the flesh and the desires of the eyes and pride in possessions--is not from the Father but is from the world." I wish I had more time to expound but my time at this moment is limited. To sum up so far: We live in the world. We have needs as do all humans. God tells us that He will supply our (His children's) needs. What is your heart's desire? Is it "keeping up with the Jones?" If it "feels good" will you "do it?" Are you willing to compromise your beliefs in order to "fit in" and be liked and accepted by the world around you? Or is your desire to seek God and are you motivated in your day to day living by that desire? The bottom line is a matter of the heart. Consider the following verses, especially vs. 21: Mat 6:19 "Do not lay up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moth and rust destroy and where thieves break in and steal, Mat 6:20 but lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust destroys and where thieves do not break in and steal. Mat 6:21 For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also. Mat 6:22 "The eye is the lamp of the body. So, if your eye is healthy, your whole body will be full of light, Mat 6:23 but if your eye is bad, your whole body will be full of darkness. If then the light in you is darkness, how great is the darkness! Mat 6:24 "No one can serve two masters, for either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and money. Mat 6:25 "Therefore I tell you, do not be anxious about your life, what you will eat or what you will drink, nor about your body, what you will put on. Is not life more than food, and the body more than clothing? Mat 6:26 Look at the birds of the air: they neither sow nor reap nor gather into barns, and yet your heavenly Father feeds them. Are you not of more value than they? Mat 6:27 And which of you by being anxious can add a single hour to his span of life? Mat 6:28 And why are you anxious about clothing? Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow: they neither toil nor spin, Mat 6:29 yet I tell you, even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these. Mat 6:30 But if God so clothes the grass of the field, which today is alive and tomorrow is thrown into the oven, will he not much more clothe you, O you of little faith? Mat 6:31 Therefore do not be anxious, saying, 'What shall we eat?' or 'What shall we drink?' or 'What shall we wear?' Mat 6:32 For the Gentiles seek after all these things, and your heavenly Father knows that you need them all. Mat 6:33 But seek first the kingdom of God and his righteousness, and all these things will be added to you. Mat 6:34 "Therefore do not be anxious about tomorrow, for tomorrow will be anxious for itself. Sufficient for the day is its own trouble. Would you please explain your wording of being a "friend of God and a friend of the world"? What do you mean by "friend?" Thank you! Karen |
||||||
17 | isan't moses and elijah dead | Luke 9:30 | Hiskid84 | 130710 | ||
Two answers: In the case of Moses, because the resurection of the dead has not yet occured. In the case of Elijah, because he never died. | ||||||
18 | Do we receive *holy *spirit as a gift? | Luke 11:13 | Hiskid84 | 130094 | ||
Ray, I don't know how welcome my comments will be but, since you asked, I'm going to share them. Frankly, I'm puzzled by your use of the lower case letters when refering to the 3rd member of the Trinity. Romans 8:9-10 But you are not in the flesh but in the Spirit, if indeed the Spirit of God dwells in you. Now if anyone does not have the Spirit of Christ, he is not His. And if Christ is in you, the body is dead because of sin, but the Spirit is life because of righteousness. (NKJ) These verses plainly state that if the Holy Spirit is in you, Christ is in you. Do you use lower case letters to refer to Christ? Was Christ not a gift as well? I guess what I really want to know is, why do you feel it necessary to change the spelling? What is it you are accomplishing through it? Why does this awesome Gift from God need to be reduced to our level? Hoping for more insight from you. In Him, Karen |
||||||
19 | Do we receive *holy *spirit as a gift? | Luke 11:13 | Hiskid84 | 130188 | ||
Hi, Ray. Thank you very much for explaining your thoughts to me in such a way that I think I understand what it is you are wanting to convey. I must admit though, it didn't come easy! I only have a few moments to write this reply but hopefully I will be able to cover everything I want to point out. You say that you are "...merely suggesting that there is a holy spirit in Scripture as well." We know there is a spirit. Romans 8:16 speaks of "the Spirit" and "our spirit" in the same sentence. I guess my response to your statement would have to be; do you believe our spirit (obviously after conversion) is holy? If we are to walk "according to the spirit" it would seem, by necessity, it would have to be holy. The same is true of verse 9. If we are "in the spirit" because the Spirit of God dwells in us" and being "in the spirit" means we are not walking in the flesh, our spirit would have to be holy. So this is why you are wondering if the "gift of the Holy Spirit" is really the "gift of the holy spirit" or God giving us the gift of making our spirit holy. Yes? No? You wrote: "2) Verse 6, NKJ, "For to be carnally minded is death, but to be spiritually minded is life and peace." Verse 6, NASB, "For the mind set on the flesh is death, but the mind set on the Spirit is life and peace." We have to decide whether the Scripture is talking about being spiritually minded or be thinking of the Spirit. Is it speaking of spirit or Spirit?" I believe that verse is saying (in both forms) that we are to have our minds set on the things of the Spirit. Wouldn't being carnally minded mean our minds are focused on the things of the flesh? Why we would want our minds focused on the things of the spirit? To use spirit in this way we would have to say our minds are focused on the things of OUR spirit, wouldn't it? Even if our spirit was holy, why would we be told to focus on the things of our spirit rather than God's? Because our spirit now looks like His? What would it mean for our spirit to be holy? What would it "look like"? Isn't holiness the absence of sin? If you could define "holy" that would help. Because to say our spirit is without sin is to say that part of our being has already attained a form of perfection. (I can't wait to hear the "Be ye holy as I am holy" quotes!) Unfortunately, my brain functions at an even slower pace at this time of night so I have to quit for now. The more I try to reason this out the more I get tangled in my circles. I just want to add one last thing. In verse 6 of the NKJ it speaks of being "spiritually minded". I don't think it's in error to equate this with setting our minds on the things of the Spirit. To be godly (lower case) minded still means to have our mind toward the things of God. In the same way, to be spiritually minded would mean to have our mind toward the things of the Spirit. Your turn. :-) In Him, Karen |
||||||
20 | why was the thief saved without baptism? | Luke 23:43 | Hiskid84 | 129923 | ||
Hi, Hank. You asked, "Do we seek in Scripture ways to justify our preconceptions and misconceptions, or do we found our faith and practice solely on Scripture?" As is the way of the forum I would like to ask a question (or 4 1/2) in response to your question. How can we tell the difference? How can we know if what we believe to be biblical truth is, in fact, erroneous? Would anyone admit to using Scripture to justify their incorrect beliefs? Wouldn't (most) everyone claim that THEIR faith and practice is founded solely on Scripture (regardless of reality)? Solely on Scripture. Isn't that known as...never mind. :) Inquiring minds would like to know. Karen |
||||||
Result pages: [ 1 2 3 ] Next > Last [3] >> |