Results 1 - 7 of 7
|
|
|||||
Results from: Notes Author: punk monkey Ordered by Date |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | What is required for Salvation? | John 17:3 | punk monkey | 140192 | ||
your quoting outdated sources. i care less what they had to say about repentance in 1859 - i live in 2004 (going to 2005) and i find that the new understandings of the words have more meaning - evangelical and modern sources have no value to me - i see them as skewd and outdated. | ||||||
2 | What is required for Salvation? | John 17:3 | punk monkey | 140191 | ||
i agree - for me the "turn back" has ment "turn to" - i see the more "mystical" view of the word - which can get weird, i will admit - but the idea is to "trun back and seek the face of God" - not words were required, it's an action that leads - not one leading to :) pax |
||||||
3 | What is required for Salvation? | John 17:3 | punk monkey | 140167 | ||
some very poor assumptions are being made in that post - the response is both insulting and not at all based on what the intent was - responses like that give reason to why postmoderns/emerging people want nothing to do with moderns - the response is not to what i said, but what was thought said. here is the confusion, in one breath it is said that this form is to be "respectful" - and then attacks and judgemental statements are made, respectful? - not very. if not mistaken, the idea is to accept peoples theology and not attack it on certian "lines." if that is incorrect, please explain it better. the understanding is that disagreememnts are ok. differing in thought and structure does not make one person wrong and another right - it just means there is a differance and if that is hard to understand, sorry. knowing gender, status or anything has nothing to do with an invite to speak, and for anything "wrong" to be into it except an honest offer for dialog is beyond insulting - there was no, and is no, attemept to "advertize" any site - mentioning a way to email a person is not plugging a site. if an honest extention of friendship is seen as "wrong" or other motives are read into that honest extention then that shows the placement of the heart or the person questioning the offer of freindship. upon looking over the past posts there is no "plug" for any site - now, in a profile there is a mention of a site, but that is because when asked to share, some share - so to bring that up as a point is not only insulting it is so out of place - by looking at other profiles can assumtions be made concering others? to see the expression of friendship as wrong, is heart breaking and i can only say - blessings pax |
||||||
4 | What is required for Salvation? | John 17:3 | punk monkey | 140166 | ||
dude, you may not like this but i do not care what easton has to share regarding the meaning - i am not evagelcial and i do not see it with evagelical eyes - sorry. | ||||||
5 | What is required for Salvation? | John 17:3 | punk monkey | 140153 | ||
what the modern evangelical church holds as "repenting" is not what the 1st church had in mind - we have based our understanding of it on anglo-saxon legal system and not the jewish legal system. to "repent" simply means to seek God's face and to desire the expression of that face. this may sound silly, but i was under the impression that this was a "answer question" place and not a place open to form debate - if you like you can email me directly and we can chat - jxpxus@yahoo.com - my name is john :) pax |
||||||
6 | What is required for Salvation? | John 17:3 | punk monkey | 140062 | ||
interesting - i can never pay for salvation, and neither can you - jesus did that already - but if you honestly think you can - ok :) your premis is wrong - if one seeks salvation, that presuposes a desire for a relationship - so, if hitler asked - yup, saved - if the those who flew the planes saught that relationship, yup saved - you may not like it - but hey, it's God's game :) and thanks - looks like a kinda fun place :) |
||||||
7 | 18 yr old son seeing 27 yr old - HELP!! | Prov 7:6 | punk monkey | 140034 | ||
i noticed the date on this and pray you are still checking to find answers - there is nothing you can do, and truly no bibical guide to help - in my reading of this i have to say that it sound like you are desiring to find scripture to support your human view - i think that is not a good thing to do - because you will simply push your son away - from you and from God. this may not be the advise you seek - but here goes: accept her and her child. welcome them into your home and show her the love of christ in your life. let the child sit on your lap, and hold you and call you grammy - love her as a daughter-in-law and know that she will love you as a mother-in-law. help them plan for the future (their future, and not the one you desire for them) and trust that they are walking with God - to judge her faith is not your place, or my place - to accept her and let God work in there lives is the only truth we can live by. in christ we love, when we are christ-like we seek to find ways that unite us, not seperate us. pax |
||||||