Results 1 - 16 of 16
|
|
|||||
Results from: Notes Author: bible believer Ordered by Date |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Difference between feeding 4,000 5,000 | Matthew | bible believer | 201803 | ||
no problem. thanks for the quick response! i agree with you about all the "bickering" that does happen on these boards----this one is no exception. i've just resolved to not be drawn into it! i've found almost all who post on this site to be honest, thoughtful, helpful and willing to both teach and, more importantly, learn. unfortunately, the exceptions are very difficult to deal with due to arrogance and their own personal darkness. i continue to hold them in prayer and ask God's guidance should i have to respond to them. looking forward to seeing more from you! |
||||||
2 | Difference between feeding 4,000 5,000 | Matthew | bible believer | 201787 | ||
good evening some other name: is there a chance that your note was intended for another topic or question? although i appreciate reading all of the Scripture you included, i don't see exactly how they relate to the original question. what am i missing? | ||||||
3 | Will we know each other in Heaven? | 1 Cor 15:52 | bible believer | 201697 | ||
hi doc: i'm not going to take the bait you've tossed but assuming that you've got something additional you wish to say, perhaps this is a communication which would be better continued "off line"? if not, once again, i don't believe the back and forths (yes, even yours!)have added value to this thread. i'd be happy to discuss the Bible and theology with you but i think you left that realm behind a couple of "notes" ago. should you wish to revisit it, just let me know. |
||||||
4 | Will we know each other in Heaven? | 1 Cor 15:52 | bible believer | 201690 | ||
hi doc: while not "new" (different) bodies they are not the "same" (functioning)bodies- i agree with you that they are our old bodies resurrected but, as i said, they are definitely "glorified" bodies- free of all the earthly limitations (disease, physical corruption etc.)---functioning on a VERY different level! i think basically you and i agree on what God's word has to say to us in this matter although perhaps we express it a little differently, limited by our method of communication (typing vs. face to face conversation!) i don't believe that further nitpicking would add value to this thread, so i close with thanks for your contribution. |
||||||
5 | Genesis 1:1 | Gen 1:1 | bible believer | 201278 | ||
thank you for the note. you're absolutely right. | ||||||
6 | What does "God Fearing" really mean? | Prov 9:10 | bible believer | 201101 | ||
sister azure and brother john: you are both too kind. i am confident that my next reply on the forum (whenever it may be!) will convince you that you have spoken too soon. with you in His service, bb |
||||||
7 | how many verses in the whole bible | Bible general Archive 4 | bible believer | 201091 | ||
thanks, john. now...if you just take the 31,301 verse total and divide that number by the 137 unnumbered verses and then multiply it by the number of persons in the Trinity, then find the square root of............oh, sorry, my mistake, i'm responding to a different forum question:-) (still appreciate my contribution??) God bless you, brother! |
||||||
8 | how many verses in the whole bible | Bible general Archive 4 | bible believer | 201080 | ||
or ......you could just "google" number of verses in the kjv bible......:-)) | ||||||
9 | which miracle is mentioned in all da 4 g | Bible general Archive 4 | bible believer | 200995 | ||
good morning azure: i just noticed your note that asked for rephrasing of this forum user's question. when i considered the question i assumed, maybe incorrectly, that it was from someone who speaks hawaiian pidgin and was using "Da Jesus Book", which is Wycliffe's translation of the New Testament into pidgin. if so, the question stands on its own and does not require rephrasing. although the forum's Q and As are best addressed in english, i thought that Pidgin, although technically another language, was close enough to be understood. perhaps i am mistaken. God bless you! |
||||||
10 | What does "Edens Dawn Light Mean?" | Heb 2:9 | bible believer | 200931 | ||
Could you clarify what you're trying to say here? You've referenced the NASB Hebrews 2:9 which, of course, makes no reference to "Eden's dawn light". i am aware of the message's use of this phrase, as well as other new age, gnostic writings however no credible translation of Scripture uses this terminology. | ||||||
11 | Ephesians 4:5 | Eph 4:5 | bible believer | 200869 | ||
good evening brothers and sisters: upon return from work today imagine my surprise to see the response that my response to this question generated!! i do stand corrected on my use of the word "force" in my initial response. of course, i am very aware the the Holy Spirit of God is not a "force". i can only say that i did not communicate clearly in that phrasing. perhaps better stated would have been that it is only through and thanks to the work of the Holy Spirit in us that the body of Christ experiences unity. to those who noticed my poor choice of words....kudos for your keen eyes! regarding whether or not the particular verse in question (eph 4:5) is speaking of the baptism of the HS or water baptism, i respectfully submit that the remark(s) tendered regarding my consideration of orthodox thought (implying a lack of regard) were uncalled for. nonetheless, if you would genuinely like to know some of the commentators, educators and scholars that i have consulted on occasion (outside of the Biblical text itself) i am happy to share that information: walvoord and zuck; matthew henry; john macarthur, to name just a few. i have found the commentary/insight provided by these men to be consistently true to Scripture and, as such, i do consult them periodically. all of them incidentally, do assert that MOST LIKELY eph 4:5 is speaking of water baptism but i do understand that there are other opinions regarding this. (the commentators appear to understand that as well). to my knowledge, these men would not be considered beyond the pale of orthodoxy! in this context only, whether or not paul was speaking of water baptism or that of baptism of the HS, i would consider this to be a disputable matter, as in romans 14, and i pass no judgment on those whose opinions differ. |
||||||
12 | Ephesians 4:5 | Eph 4:5 | bible believer | 200843 | ||
good evening brothers and sisters: upon return from work today imagine my surprise to see the response that my response to this question generated!! i do stand corrected on my use of the word "force" in my initial response. of course, i am very aware the the Holy Spirit of God is not a "force". i can only say that i did not communicate clearly in that phrasing. perhaps better stated would have been that it is only through and thanks to the work of the Holy Spirit in us that the body of Christ experiences unity. to those who noticed my poor choice of words....kudos for your keen eyes! regarding whether or not the particular verse in question (eph 4:5) is speaking of the baptism of the HS or water baptism, i respectfully submit that the remark(s) tendered regarding my consideration of orthodox thought (implying a lack of regard) were uncalled for. nonetheless, if you would genuinely like to know some of the commentators, educators and scholars that i have consulted on occasion (outside of the Biblical text itself) i am happy to share that information: walvoord and zuck; matthew henry; john macarthur. i have found the commentary/insight provided by these men to be consistently true to Scripture and, as such, i do consult them periodically. all of them incidentally, do assert that MOST LIKELY eph 4:5 is speaking of water baptism but i do understand that there are other opinions regarding this. (the commentators appear to understand that as well). to my knowledge, these men would not be considered beyond the pale of orthodoxy! in this context only, whether or not paul was speaking of water baptism or that of baptism of the HS, i would consider this to be a disputable matter, as in romans 14, and i pass no judgment on those whose opinions differ. |
||||||
13 | Ephesians 4:5 | Eph 4:5 | bible believer | 200842 | ||
good evening brothers and sisters: upon return from work today imagine my surprise to see the response that my response to this question generated!! i do stand corrected on my use of the word "force" in my initial response. of course, i am very aware the the Holy Spirit of God is not a "force". i can only say that i did not communicate clearly in that phrasing. perhaps better stated would have been that it is only through and thanks to the work of the Holy Spirit in us that the body of Christ experiences unity. to those who noticed my poor choice of words....kudos for your keen eyes! regarding whether or not the particular verse in question (eph 4:5) is speaking of the baptism of the HS or water baptism, i respectfully submit that the remark(s) tendered regarding my consideration of orthodox thought (implying a lack of regard) were uncalled for. nonetheless, if you would genuinely like to know some of the commentators, educators and scholars that i have consulted on occasion (outside of the Biblical text itself) i am happy to share that information: walvoord and zuck; matthew henry; john macarthur. i have found the commentary/insight provided by these men to be consistently true to Scripture and, as such, i do consult them periodically. all of them incidentally, do assert that MOST LIKELY eph 4:5 is speaking of water baptism but i do understand that there are other opinions regarding this. (the commentators appear to understand that as well). to my knowledge, these men would not be considered beyond the pale of orthodoxy! in this context only, whether or not paul was speaking of water baptism or that of baptism of the HS, i would consider this to be a disputable matter, as in romans 14, and i pass no judgment on those whose opinions differ. |
||||||
14 | scriptures for lyrics | Bible general Archive 4 | bible believer | 200717 | ||
good morning: psalm 24:7-10 is a perfect Scripture reference for the lyrics cited. nice work, cheri! | ||||||
15 | daniel 11:37 translation differences | Dan 11:37 | bible believer | 197960 | ||
again, i apologize for the lack of clarity in my question. i am not asking whether one would determine the antichrist to be jewish vs. gentile. i think that is a very debatable topic. what i am questioning is the substantive difference between the niv and the kjv translations. essentially, the kjv says he is a jew and the niv (as well as the nasb, esv, etc) says he's a gentile. how could two reputable translations say the opposite thing? thanks for your "two cents". :-) celebrating His birth, biblebeliever |
||||||
16 | daniel 11:37 translation differences | Dan 11:37 | bible believer | 197959 | ||
thanks so much for taking the time to comment but i must apologize for not making my question more clear. i have used the revelation verses to support my belief regarding the antichrist being a gentile. that isn't the issue (by the way, in this case the niv and the nasb are in perfect agreement.....its the kjv that is "different" and indicates jewish heritage of the antichrist). my question was regarding the magnitude of the discrepancy between the two bible translations. i understand difference between translations (word for word- thought for thought, etc) but i was very surprised to see what i perceived to be as a contradiction between the two translations and wondered if there was any reasonable explanation of this that i had not yet uncovered. that question remains unanswered!! | ||||||