Results 1 - 20 of 31
|
||||||
Results from: Notes Author: RCSCROLL Ordered by Date |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Who is the Bride of Christ? | Revelation | RCSCROLL | 79895 | ||
The doctrine of a 7 yr trib,is only one of assumption,and at best presumptueous that really dosent add up. And did you know that it wasnt even taught until 1830 AD, beware in the last days they shall not endure sound teaching,There is only one ressurection.The pretrib view says that Christ cant come rite now, because 2Thess2 says this so called futuristic anti Christ will have to have a Temple to sit in.That Temple was destroyed in 70 AD, just some food for thought love in Christ RC | ||||||
2 | WHOS THE NEW BRIDE | Rev 1:1 | RCSCROLL | 79342 | ||
I forgot the betrothel, Hosea2:16-23. And please read Rev 19:7-8. Whos the lambs wife, that made herself ready,She is dressed in the white righteousness of the Saints.Love in Christ Jesus, RCSCROLL |
||||||
3 | WHOS THE NEW BRIDE | Rev 1:1 | RCSCROLL | 79326 | ||
Answer: RC, thank you for your reply. 1, Yes, (Jer 3:14) 2,referring to the covenant (Lev 26:42) 3, Yes. (Jer 3:8) 4, (?) 5, Yes, (Eph. 5) 6, No 7, The Holy City 8, (?) In love with faith Tim 2.and 4. IF If the old covenant was considered to be His wife Israel (Jerusalem).In whom He divorced. Then would you agree that the New covenant would indeed have to be His New Bride, but not yet His wife, until His throne is in the New Heavens and Earth. Jer3:16-19, 6. Are we the new covenant people?, which duplicates,and continues Abrahams covenant which was completely fullfilled to Israel, before She was cut off. I beleive that the New Jerusalem is in fact all the people of God old and New covenants combined. Remember the writer of Hebrews said that you have come to the Heavenly Jerusalem, Hebrews 12:22-23. And Jesus says in Rev 3:12, to whom overcomes He will write the Name of his Father and the name of His city the New Jerusaem, and His name aswell. The New Jerusalems foundation is made of the Apostles and Prophets Eph 2:20, Rev 21:14, and we the Church are built upon this foundation. Eph 2:21, 4:16, We are the 1Peter 2:5- Spiritual house, vs 6, we are the stones. We are the New Spiritual Jerusalem. When Christ comes with the souls of His Bride 1Thess 4:14, The New Jeusalem, Rev 6:9, Rev 20:4, I believe most assuredly that we are the sons and daughters of the Bride chamber, we are the Sons and daughters of God the Father, But we are going to be Christs New wife, hence we are His bride being formed now. Remember the wedding garment that we have recieved, cloaked in His perfection, we dont have a spot , blemish or wrinkle, we are His virgin. When He arrives and after the rapture, He will eat and drink again during the marriage supper of the Lamb, the supper happens in Jewish litrature after the Marriage has taken place, this would be when all the people of God, old and new covenants at the rapture takes place, this is when we become His wife.remember He said He will not eat or Drink again until He dose it in the Kingdom of God. When He arrives and makes a New Heaven and Earth then shall we be with Him, and become His wife. I beleive that when the New Jerusalem comes down from Heaven Rev 21: 2 this is exactly Who we are. A spiritual house.Answers Question 7. and 8. I am certainly not close minded, but beleive that this prooves the point. I thank You aswell for you correspondence.Love in Christ Jesus RCSCROLL |
||||||
4 | Help Nolan K. | Bible general Archive 1 | RCSCROLL | 78584 | ||
Thank You very much Hank, I took a turn for the worst in Dec 2001, but the Lord has shown me much mercy and grace, for by Him, yet I still live.Ray | ||||||
5 | will the world end soon | Matt 25:13 | RCSCROLL | 17118 | ||
yOU OBVIOUSLY DECLARE TOO KNOW MORE THAN gOD HIMSELF MANIFEST IN THE FLESH, FOR NO MAN WILL KNOW THE HOUR OR DAY, FOR ONE TOO SAY WE WILL KNOW THE SEASON IS INCLUDED WITH WHAT OUR lORD SAID, IN ORDER TOO KNOW TRUTH WE MUST LOVE IT H.H. IF YOU KNOW IT SO WELL WHY REPEAT REGURGETATED PROHESY TEACHERS OWN WORD'S THE ONLY PEOPLE THAT SAY THIS ARE PRETRIBERS,WHICH MAY I REMIND YOU IS A DOCTRINE WHICH IS ONLY 180 YRS OLD,FROM THE PLYMOUTH BRETHEREN FROM IRELAND,BEFORE THIS TIME IT WAS NEVER TAUGHT,REMEMBER THAT IN THE LAT DAYS THEY SHALL NOT LISTEN TO SOUND DOCTRINE. 1 QUES HOW WOULD A MAN BECOME A CHRISTIAN DURING GODS WRATH SINCE WE ARE NOT APPOINTED TOO IT.REV 6:17 HIS WRATH HAS COME ,IN GREEK THIS IS ALSO PAST TENSE PHRASE,NOT GOING TOO COME BUT HAS COME.THE CHURCH HAS STOOD FOR TWO THOUSAND YRS DURING SATANS WRATH.LOVE YOUR BROTHER IN CHRIST R.C.SCROLL | ||||||
6 | What does "I N R I" mean? | John 19:19 | RCSCROLL | 15057 | ||
IN HEBREW AND WITH AN ACROSTIC MIND ,THE VERY JEWS THEM SELVES WOULD OF NATURALLY READ BACKWARDS Y.H.W.H. OF THE JEWS, GOOD REASON FOR THEM TO SAY,NO SAY THAT HE SAID HE WAS KING OF THE JEWS, THIS WOULD HAVE ALTIMATLY LET THEM SEE WHO WAS ON THE CROSS. LOVE YOUR BROTHER IN CHRIST R.C.SCROLL | ||||||
7 | Was the lord's forgiveness conditional? | Matt 18:27 | RCSCROLL | 14500 | ||
GOD IS NOT A RESPECTOR OF PERSONS. THE MAN WAS THE CONDITIONAL ONE NOT GOD, WHEN WE COME TO CHRIST AND FIND GRACE HOW MUCH MORE SHOULD WE BEING PARTAKERS OF GRACE BE WILLING TO GIVE THAT TOO SOMEONE ELSE AS WELL, FOR WE ARE INDEBTED TO HIM FOR MILLIONS OF SINS.LOVE IN CHRIST RCSCROLL | ||||||
8 | Mark 16:9-20 | Mark 16:9 | RCSCROLL | 13278 | ||
There is a very interesting thing about Mark's gospel. In its original form it stops at Mk 16:8. We know that for two reasons. First, the verses which follow (Mk 16:9-20) are not in any of the great early manuscripts; only later and inferior manuscripts contain them. Second, the style of the Greek is so different that they cannot have been written by the same person as wrote the rest of the gospel. But the gospel cannot have been meant to stop at Mk 16:8. What then happened? It may be that Mark died, perhaps even suffered martyrdom, before he could complete his gospel. More likely, it may be that at one time only one copy of the gospel remained, and that a copy in which the last part of the roll on which it was written had got torn off. There was a time when the church did not much use Mark, preferring Matthew and Luke. It may well be that Mark's gospel was so neglected that all copies except for a mutilated one were lost. If that is so we were within an ace of losing the gospel which in many ways is the most important of all. We can surmise many a thing, the one thing we can't forget is the very fact that each and every scripture here in effect has either allready been said, or was shortly there after fulfilled by the Apostles them selves. So in conclusion let it be said that these events are biblical,and stand in light of scripture, of whats already been said in one place or another, If we didn't have Mark 16:9-20 we would still arrive at the same conclusion.Love in CHRIST.RC.Scroll P.S.Irenaeus in 180 A.D. I don't quite remember him naming the verse or book I could be wrong, |
||||||
9 | Prerequisite-infallibility? | 1 Cor 12:27 | RCSCROLL | 12572 | ||
2nd post CHARIS Why did not the New Testament apostles appoint successors for themselves? And how is it that God's purpose in establishing the church could be so completely frustrated (Matthew 16:18; Jude 3)? (3) The point of Ephesians 4:11-13 is that "the building up of the body of Christ" (vs. 12) will continue "until" the church is matured (vs. 13). The first-century apostles and prophets have fully "equipped" (vs. 12a) the church with the revelations given in the New Testament, combined with the Old Testament, so that all of the information the church needs to do its tasks is contained in Scripture (II Timothy 3:16-17). The Epistle of Jude also bears witness to the first-century Christian conviction that the days of the apostles and of gospel revelations were foundational and not ongoing. Jude speaks of "the faith which was once for all delivered to the saints" (Jude 3). The expression "once for all" clearly indicates that the "delivery" of the faith is complete, so that we should not look for a new revelation. Indeed, the new teachings of certain persons (Jude 4) are condemned for this very reason. The way to avoid the trap of heresy, says Jude, is to "remember the words that were spoken beforehand by the apostles of our Lord Jesus Christ" (Jude 17). When Jude was writing, the apostles were either a phenomenon of the past, or were fast becoming so. The apostle Peter also made it clear that he thought the apostolic period was ending in his day. II Peter appears to have been written by Peter as he awaited martyrdom. In this epistle, he does not urge his readers to look to the next apostle or apostles for leadership, but rather to remember the apostolic message after he is gone (II Peter 1:12-15). Like Jude, Peter warns of false teachers who will take advantage of the lack of apostolic presence, and "secretly introduce destructive heresies" (2:1). The solution, says Peter, is to "remember the words spoken beforehand by the holy prophets and the commandment of the Lord and Savior spoken by your apostles" (3:2). They are to seek diligently to follow the teachings of the apostles, particularly Paul, despite the fact that he is often misinterpreted by "the untaught and unstable" (3:14-16). Therefore, Peter did not look for the continuation of apostolic authority, but rather for the church to follow what the departing apostles had taught. Like Jude, he does not say, "Listen to the apostles living today" (as the Mormons and other groups with apostles say), but instead urges us, "Remember what the apostles said." That the apostleship was confined to the first-century church does not necessarily mean that only the Twelve and Paul were apostles. Barnabas (Acts 14:14) was certainly an apostle, as was Silas (I Thessalonians 2:6; cf. 1:1); Andronicus and Junia may also have been apostles (Romans 16:7). That Timothy is not included as an apostle in I Thessalonians 2:6 is implied by 3:1-2, where "we" means Paul and Silas distinct from Timothy. We know that Timothy was not an apostolic eyewitness of the risen Jesus, because he was led to Christ by Paul (I Timothy 1:12; 18; II Timothy 1:2; 2:1-2). There is no reason to doubt that Barnabas, Silas, Andronicus, and Junia may not all have been among the over 500 witnesses to the resurrection of Christ (I Corinthians 15:6), and thus "apostles" in the strict sense. Finally, the word "apostle" appears to be used in the sense of a church's missionary in Philippians 2:25 (of Epaphroditus, whom Paul calls "your apostle") and II Corinthians 8:23 ("apostles of the churches"). If so, these men have neither ecclesiastical authority nor revelational gifts; they are simply missionaries. This is not the sense in which "apostle" is used by those claiming to have restored the apostleship to the church. We conclude, then, that the apostleship ended with the death of the apostles appointed by Christ Himself in the first century. With them died the authority to speak definitively for God. We should therefore reject the claims of any religious organization or teacher who claims that the office of apostle has been restored to the church. Love in CHRIST JESUS your brother RC.Scroll |
||||||
10 | Prerequisite-infallibility? | 1 Cor 12:27 | RCSCROLL | 12570 | ||
Hi Charis well here goe's It is sometimes claimed (for example, by the Mormon church, and by the Christian organization known as Gospel Outreach) that God intends for the church to have the office of apostle operative today. The Scriptures, however, indicate that the apostleship was strictly a first-century office. Jesus trained the Twelve to be preachers, teachers, and evangelists for Him after His death and resurrection (John 14:17; Matthew 16:18-19; 18:17-18; etc.). The apostles would speak with authority, not only because they had the Holy Spirit teaching them, but also because they were eyewitnesses of the saving events of Christ's death and resurrection (John 14:26; 15:26-27). The apostles, therefore, were trained by Jesus to play a vital and unrepeatable role in the history of the church. While the Holy Spirit still dwells in the church, there are no more apostles, since an apostle was required to have been an eyewitness of the resurrected Christ (Acts 1:21-26; 5:32; Luke 1:1-4; Ephesians 3:4-5; I Corinthians 9:1). Given the fact that no one living during the past eighteen centuries has seen the risen Jesus (despite the claims of persons such as Joseph Smith), it is impossible that during this period we should have "apostles." The New Testament indicates rather clearly that the apostleship did end in the first century. In Paul's recounting of the resurrection appearances, he ends with his own, saying, "and last of all, as to one untimely born, He appeared also to me" (I Corinthians 15:8). Elsewhere, Paul speaks of the church as "having been built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Christ Jesus Himself being the cornerstone" (Ephesians 2:20). Just as we do not lay new cornerstones from time to time to replace the old one, so too, we do not lay a new foundation of apostles and prophets over and over. The foundation of the apostolic witness to Christ and the prophetic revelations which pointed to and interpreted the saving acts of Christ has been laid; it does not need to be laid again. Whenever teachers come along with "new revelations from God," they are attempting to lay a foundation which has already been laid (see I Corinthians 3:11). It is sometimes argued that Paul clearly implies the perpetuity of apostles and prophets in Ephesians 4:11-13. On a superficial reading of the passage, it might seem to be saying that Christ gave apostles and prophets to the church "until we all attain to the unity of the faith," thus implying that these offices continue until the church is perfected. This interpretation is incorrect, though, for the following reasons: (1) Paul has already set apostles and prophets in a class by themselves in Ephesians 2:20. (2) If apostles and prophets were intended by Christ to continue until the church was perfected, how is it that a second generation of apostles was never chosen? |
||||||
11 | Who Killed Goliath? | 2 Sam 21:19 | RCSCROLL | 12566 | ||
Remember that David took five stone's with him,well I had allway's been taught that five represented grace but upon study we see that Goliath had four brothers, Amen, that is why he had five to ensure he could defend himself against the brother's. Wonderful faith to only take what you need .Love in CHRIST JESUS .RC.Scroll | ||||||
12 | Is the KJV "Supreme"? | Ps 12:6 | RCSCROLL | 11848 | ||
the King James is good but far from the only,in 1993 a video came out which is what the web site you named is im sure aware of. It is highly controversial and very biased for king james only and against all others. authored by gail riplinger. When I read I like either NASB or NIV when I study there are many morehelps for king james , so I prefer it But considering that the King James was made from five other Bibles I would have to ask which version of the king james do we study, you see the very thing they stand on fails in light of evidence,love in Christ your brother N.K. RC.Scroll | ||||||
13 | Bodypiercing scriptural?ok? | Ps 139:14 | RCSCROLL | 11822 | ||
Lets remember that the people are cutting and marking their bodys in worship of other gods. I think that if you can bring glory to God, not other gods, perhapps in a cross earing, or tatoo it could be pleasing to God also, remember this to is a form of worship. as long as history has been. I think that the real que lays in who will our children obey the parents or peers. While in my house they listen to me and my wife. Love in CHRIST. RCScroll |
||||||
14 | How do we lift up Christ for healing? | Ex 20:4 | RCSCROLL | 11497 | ||
ISA 53:5 LOVE IN CHRIST RC.Scroll MATT 13:15 IF THEY WILL SEE WITH THERE EYES AND HEAR WITH THEIR EARS AND SHOULD UNDERSTAND WITH THEIR HEART, AND SHOULD BE CONVERTED, AND I SHALL HEAL THEM, ANYTIME A BELEIVER COMES TO CHRIST THEY ARE HEALED FROM THE DEATH OF THE LAW, TO LIFE EVERLASTING. |
||||||
15 | How do we lift up Christ for healing? | Ex 20:4 | RCSCROLL | 11493 | ||
Let's all remember that healing was guarenteed while Christ was here phisically with his people, ISA 53:4-5, Healing was provided for at the cross but not guarenteed, as in Matt8:17 it was fulfilled, That is the scripture and his phisical life , when we go to be with him and he makes another heavens and earth then and only then shall we be fully healed. Until then we will all die of our last illness. your brother in CHRIST.RC.Scroll Faith doesn't heal you, only God can when he choose's.It's not his will to do this allways, however we as Christians have allready been healed,the spirit of God is in us and will raise us as he did himself at the cross. Don't try changing God he's perfect, we need to "change" | ||||||
16 | Foolish controversies worthless? | Titus 3:9 | RCSCROLL | 10346 | ||
mode of baptism to me is not the issue, the heart of the one being baptized is, and if there sincere then even the mode will not matter, for I have baptized in many different places so that they could be baptized,a river where the water could only wash over ones person , to in a hospital where one could only be sprinkled. As I said the mode differenciates and I beleive if the person is sincere then let it be , after all the thief on the cross didn't get to. love in Christ RCScroll | ||||||
17 | Foolish controversies worthless? | Titus 3:9 | RCSCROLL | 10019 | ||
Baptism is not law it is obedience,love in CHRIST RCScroll | ||||||
18 | What are our options? | NT general Archive 1 | RCSCROLL | 9834 | ||
Hi Jim dunny, or should we not write , for I don't know you,I don't see you and I surely cant hear you, oh Im sorry maybe your just a legend.All scripture is inspired by GOD. Im not sorry for the sarcasim. love in Christ RCScroll, P.S. I hope you grow AMEN | ||||||
19 | Replenish the earth | Gen 1:28 | RCSCROLL | 8034 | ||
Male, hebrew to fill,accomplish #4390 both gen1:28 and 9:1 both are the same verb. love in CHRIST JESUS, RCSCROLL | ||||||
20 | kindle no fire,or start cars same thing | Col 2:16 | RCSCROLL | 7868 | ||
Make sure no one uses a pencil or pen either,for no jot or tittle, is allowed. Keep one part of the law, keep it all.you can only walk 3000 ft.Love in Christ. RCSCROLL The law was fulfilled in Christ ,accept what he did,and know that it is done perfectly by him, now rest from your works | ||||||
Result pages: [ 1 2 ] Next > Last [2] >> |