Results 1 - 20 of 30
|
||||||
Results from: Notes Author: pcdarcan1 Ordered by Verse |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | The laws of the bible in todays world | Bible general Archive 2 | pcdarcan1 | 137307 | ||
My apoligies to the forum, but there is some very serious corruption going on right now with the self-appointed people running this forum - I'm in the process of working with the Lockman Foundation to blow this wide open. Sorry that you have to suffer for their blatant abuse of power. Hank very recently restricted a post for no other reason other than it came from me - it broke no rules. Hank, that's not nice... I'm still reporting you to Lockman and I have all the proof in these posts to show that you have been dishonest in upholding the rules of this forum. Look at this post... what's wrong with it? What rule did it break Hank? You are involved in some serious corruption here and it needs to be straigthened out. I'm calling for you to step down from your post as you are abusing it and you know it. Shame on you for not carrying out your responsibilities in a fair and equitable manner. I told you that I'm serious about reporting you and I won't give up until pcdaran gets re-instated and the whole group of corrupt people controlling this forum relinquish their control of it. This is worse then Enron because its reflecting poorly on the Bible. |
||||||
2 | Why Is Joesphs Called The Dreamcatcher | Bible general Archive 2 | pcdarcan1 | 137339 | ||
Gen 37:19 says of Joseph's half-brothers about him: "They said to one another, "Here comes that dreamer." Is this the account that you are referring to? Joseph of course, does go on to interpret dreams, as set out in the account of Genesis Chapter 40. If not, perhaps you could clarify your question? Thank you. |
||||||
3 | CLARIFICATION of Gen. 1:26 | Gen 1:26 | pcdarcan1 | 137296 | ||
Hank, thanks for restricting the thread that contained this awful comment from BradK "If these are indeed your "only true and honest observations", you need to be a bit more observant!" - BradK I know you have a lot on your plate... may I remind you (in case you may have overlooked it) that BradK needs to be removed from this forum in harmony with the rules of this Lockman Foundation forum. Thank you Hank for carrying out your duties in a fair manner. |
||||||
4 | Eve always blamed for the fall of Man. | Gen 3:12 | pcdarcan1 | 137186 | ||
Good post... in a way, Adam was more responsible because he wasn't deceived (as Eve was). Like you said, the result is that we "all" inherited sin. Ro 5:12 | ||||||
5 | Noah's wife name and text reference | Gen 7:13 | pcdarcan1 | 137678 | ||
That’s interesting Doc… apparently not an unusual Biblical name either (Naamah, that is). But I concur - the Bible simply doesn't mention her name. Naamah’s in the Bible: 1. Descendant of Cain; sister of Tubal-cain and the daughter of Lamech by Zillah.—Ge 4:17-19, 22. 2. Ammonite wife of Solomon and mother of Rehoboam.—1Ki 14:21; 2Ch 12:13. 3. A Judean city in the Shephelah. (Jos 15:20, 33, 41) |
||||||
6 | Noah's wife name and text reference | Gen 7:13 | pcdarcan1 | 137680 | ||
No, you didn't mis-speak Doc... I took your statement "Scripture does not mention her name" within the context of your entire reply. That is, I properly understood you to mean: "Scripture does not mention her [Noah's wife's] name." I was simply supplementing your interesting post. :-) |
||||||
7 | Which prohet ate a book? | Ezek 3:1 | pcdarcan1 | 137166 | ||
Hi BradK, btw: How did you know this? Also, did you not see that Hank and Steve broke the rules? This is a double-standard and I'm trying to report them to the Lockman Foundation. Do you know how I can do this? I'm not getting any response when I try to report it according to this site's quidelines. btw: I'm not going away until both Hank and Steve are held accountable for there dishonesty, or apologize for their improper actions and then I get re-instated. Did you see that nice post I had about "angry", this could have saved people's lives... what a shame! Now, please let me know, who to contact about Hank and Steve... thank you for your help. |
||||||
8 | Which prohet ate a book? | Ezek 3:1 | pcdarcan1 | 137168 | ||
Tim, any help would be appreciated... what's up with these guys? I think we had some excellent exchanges... don't you? |
||||||
9 | Which prohet ate a book? | Ezek 3:1 | pcdarcan1 | 137169 | ||
I just found out that Lockman Foundation is backlogged and will be getting to my complaint. I'm assuming this, because I just got the message that "pcdarcan" was kicked off. So, I'm hoping that they will now entertain the abuse case (its all documented in this forum) against Hank and restate pcdarcan once they see how Hank has bullied people brutally on this forum. Thank you Lockman Foundation. |
||||||
10 | Which prohet ate a book? | Ezek 3:1 | pcdarcan1 | 137171 | ||
One point BradK, did you notice that I came in under the same name - with a 1 added? No attempt to hide here because I did nothing wrong. There is a double standard here and Hank, Steve and all need to be held accountable to the same rules. This is for the benefit of all... if your review my posts, I have some good respectful contributions and have received positive feedback. Of course, the forum doesn't mandate that we all have to agree on everything, but we should be respectful and not try to "lure" or "string people along with insincere questions" like Steve did. And Steve attacked one of my posts and called it "illogical and cogent" and I had to beg him to tell me how. Of course, I should have reported him right away because that breaks the Lockman Foundation rules, doesn't it - to attack someone like that, esp. when it was unprovoked. You can check it out, it's all documented under the restricted post for 2 Cor 4:4. Time to stand up for what is right, don't you agree? Do you see my points? |
||||||
11 | Which prohet ate a book? | Ezek 3:1 | pcdarcan1 | 137172 | ||
Hank, you better stop this - because I'm not stopping until I get justice. Do you see what you created here - you - not me? It's a shame that a Christian would act this way. You can't prove I'm wrong, but your responses prove you to be out of line, but you don't want to be held accountable. I will continue to report you until I hear from Mr. Lockman himself. You should not be allowed to abuse whatever powers they have endowed to you - I'm sure it was done with trust. And, you have forsaken that trust and acted like a dictator. Do you really think our merciful God acts that way? |
||||||
12 | Which prohet ate a book? | Ezek 3:1 | pcdarcan1 | 137175 | ||
Hank, you should know that legally you cannot hold anyone accountable to the stated rules of this forum IF the moderators don't enforce them for "everyone". And, because there are no real moderators, but an elite class of uses that seem to control the posts in this forum, if those elite don't hold everyone, including themselves to the same high standards laid out in the forum, there is absolutely no legal recourse. So, you are really up a creek without a paddle. And, you brought it all on yourself. Your behavior is childish. |
||||||
13 | I need verses that say God is the ONLY 1 | John 17:3 | pcdarcan1 | 137306 | ||
Hank, that's not nice... I'm still reporting you to Lockman and I have all the proof in these posts to show that you have been dishonest in upholding the rules of this forum. Look at this post... what's wrong with it? What rule did it break Hank? You are involved in some serious corruption here and it needs to be straigthened out. I'm calling for you to step down from your post as you are abusing it and you know it. Shame on you for not carrying out your responsibilities in a fair and equitable manner. I told you that I'm serious about reporting you and I won't give up until pcdaran gets re-instated and the whole group of corrupt people controlling this forum relinquish their control of it. This is worse then Enron because its reflecting poorly on the Bible. |
||||||
14 | I need verses that say God is the ONLY 1 | John 17:3 | pcdarcan1 | 137317 | ||
Hank, but you lead to this by reporting me to the Lockman Foundation simply because you didn't like my respectful posts. And, now you restrict posts from pcdaran1 with no reason - they don't break any rules. I want to know who in the Lockman Foundation you reported me to? Please provide names and e-mails, phone numbers, whatever. I told you I am not giving up because you need to be brought to justice for your corrupt and devious ways - conspiracy and prejudice are very serious offenses and are not Christian Hank. You are setting a very bad example. And when you appear in this forum to ask questions as a lure under Tamer and then answer it with your personal username Hank - that's "playing games", something you said you don't do. Your actions show that you are employing double standards - that's not acceptable to someone who has been entrusted by the Lockman Foundation to handle the abuse reports. btw: I feel very much like Luke 18:1-5 I suspect "you" Hank are filtering these complaints and side-tracking them so they don't get to the Lockman Foundation "judge". Are you? Be honest now - you keep digging yourself deeper and deeper. Have you learned nothing about what happens in the corporate world when they practice corruption and try to hide it? This is not your forum - it belongs the the partipants of the Lockman Foundation and as long as they don't break the rules, they can use it. |
||||||
15 | I need verses that say God is the ONLY 1 | John 17:3 | pcdarcan1 | 137322 | ||
By the way, why don't you see all these posts dealing with the Catholic church as "disrespectful of the people who try to use this forum to learn more about the word of God"? Think, before you respond to this. This is a BibleStudyForum, ask Bible questions, get Bible answers. Why-ever are these posts specifically about the Catholic church (nuns included) allowed in this forum? Do you ever reprimand these posters for not sticking to the forum rules - even if they are your friends? |
||||||
16 | I need verses that say God is the ONLY 1 | John 17:3 | pcdarcan1 | 137323 | ||
Oh, by the way Hank. If its not you that boot me off and it was only a result of what you reporting to the Lockman Foundation, I want to know what specifically you reported about me? What did you tell them? Or, do they just take your word? Please answer Hank - it's common courtesy to answer my sincere questions. |
||||||
17 | I need verses that say God is the ONLY 1 | John 17:3 | pcdarcan1 | 137340 | ||
Hank, in case you are interested in knowing what is in my heart about my participation on this forum, let me reveal it. "I did not and do not intent on violating any of these rules." That is my promise. pcdarcan I do honestly feel that there has been a huge mis-understanding and now it has advanced to an issue of principle alone - mine, for justice and yours for the reason you felt I violated the rules. Here's my Christian attempt at a compromise. I will drop the issue with the Lockman Foundation and as always, obey the rules of this forum. I will not allow myself to be provoked by anyone in the future. (I've used this restricted thread so that this is between you and I, only.) Will you meet me half-way? Ro 14:19 |
||||||
18 | Who's at the circumcision debate in Acts | Acts 15:2 | pcdarcan1 | 137266 | ||
By the way Hank, what was wrong with this post?, because its another example of mine for the Lockman Foundation and I need to know what in particular was in violation or is this you again showing favoritism and partiality towards your personal believes? How many times do I need to prove to you that this is a site for interdominational beliefs? You are violating this Hank and you need to stop it. | ||||||
19 | 2 corn. 4:4 the god of this world hath b | 2 Cor 4:1 | pcdarcan1 | 137191 | ||
But that is another subject... let's be clear Steve, you acknowledged in your posts here that Satan IS "the god of this world"... and that's the real issue that was raised when one of the posters said it was God (the Creator) who "blinds the minds of the unbelievers" and created quite a stir as you know, “but” it took some time before you came out with that admission yourself because you were hoping to discourage me and you wanted to support one of your “own” because that poster was be proved wrong. So, by your actions, you were more interested in making me look bad, as opposed to supporting the truth of the Bible – do you see this? As people read through the threads between you and I, they will see that you were less than honest with an ulterior motive all along because you are (I'm guessing) intimidated by my Biblical response. The truth must be made known. I'm gathering all the usernames that have abused their self-appointed positions on this otherwise great site, because you’re spoiling it for everyone! We will have no Enron's on this forum, it was not the intention of the Lockman Foundation to have an elite class of users abuse their power. Remember the saying, "Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely." Hank is the poster child for this and I have his number. I am politely proceeding to round up all of Hank's Lackeys (you would be one and I suspect BradK) and I'm investigating the others. I'm going to blow this wide open get this straightened out for the Lockman Foundation. |
||||||
20 | 2 corn. 4:4 the god of this world hath b | 2 Cor 4:1 | pcdarcan1 | 137240 | ||
From the Lockman Foundation web-page: "The Lockman Foundation is a nonprofit, interdenominational ministry dedicated to the translation, publication, and distribution of the New American Standard Bible, La Biblia de las Américas, the Amplified Bible, and other Biblical resources." Key phrase: "interdenominational ministry" Hank, I really don't mean to cause you pain (what are you doing up so early in the morning... for heavens sake, get some sleep... and I mean that sincerely.) My personal belief is that you over-acted, causing you to not act in fairness. When rules are given in a forum, they just have to apply to everyone - I'm sure you agree with that statement. Respectfully, pcdarcan |
||||||
Result pages: [ 1 2 ] Next > Last [2] >> |