Results 1 - 20 of 46
|
||||||
Results from: Notes Author: believer 2004 Ordered by Verse |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Is it biblical? | Bible general Archive 2 | believer 2004 | 134115 | ||
The statements I made were not my opinion. They are a fact. I was answering to the fact that it seems everytime someone asks a question, the "long time" users of this forum oust them out with their holier than thou attitudes, much as the pharisees did to Jesus. I was under the impression that this forum was for further study of the Bible. And it is, as long as the "long time users " don't object. The question the man asked WAS Biblically based and I was trying to give him an answer to the question he asked which the"long time" users of this forum didn't. Furthermore, My statements were not political in content, but Biblical. If you will read your Bible, it is full of "political stuff." You should spend more time answering the questions on a Biblical basis, and not your"opinion." I will not be a party to such prejudice and will find a site where there are real christians who will give real biblical answers to real Biblical questions that the "long time users" of this forum who are too busy passing judgement to answer. In closing, I will pray for the people I have talked with on this site and hope that they open their eyes to the people they are turning off of God with their rude answers and snide opinions. God Bless You All! Believer |
||||||
2 | Is it biblical? | Bible general Archive 2 | believer 2004 | 134128 | ||
mark, Thank you very much. I want you to know that it is not animosity that I feel, but hurt that things ARE as bad as they seem, even when we wish they weren't. But I do thank you that I finally have a welcome. I tried to base what I was saying on scripture, but it seems like I must be reading from a different Bible. Love in Christ, Misty P.s. Your rebuke is well heeded and correct. |
||||||
3 | Is it biblical? | Bible general Archive 2 | believer 2004 | 134134 | ||
BradK, As you requested, I did the profile.You can read it. Most normally, reverse psychology doesn't work on me, but in this instance, I'll take your challenge. I am not a quitter and never have been. I did start this forum for the right reasons. I wanted fellowship and learning, as well. Psalm 46:10 popped in my head as I was sitting here thinking about how I would reply. No matter what anyone says, I am not going to let a little disagreement run me off. We are all here for a bigger purpose than we realize. Obviously, I am led to stay here and stick it out. I will give you scripture when I can. What some call my opinion is really the way I interpret things,because there are no two people a like. We can read the same book and not get the same thing out of it, that's what makes us human. There is unending love in the Bible which I intend to learn, explore and enjoy with the people on this forum. I expect for my take on things to be heard as well as yours. With Love in Jesus Christ, Misty |
||||||
4 | Is it biblical? | Bible general Archive 2 | believer 2004 | 134135 | ||
Mark, Since I was feeling a rebuke was in order, I gave the pleasure to you because I felt you were polite and had no real animosity under what you were saying. Believer |
||||||
5 | Is it biblical? | Bible general Archive 2 | believer 2004 | 134136 | ||
Norrie, With all due respect, I think I (and many others I hope, will stay right here). There is no doubt that politics strikes a note of discord for you. I myself had no intention of upsetting you or anyone else. I agree that politics shouldn't be discussed alone, but when there is an honest question asked that is Biblical, I don't feel that it is going against the rules of this forum. If you have felt insulted by anything I said, please let me apologize. I was coming to the defense of someone who was misunderstood. Love in Christ Jesus, Misty |
||||||
6 | Is it biblical? | Bible general Archive 2 | believer 2004 | 134190 | ||
That's good, I always got fifty irons in the fire. I was just making the statement that what I was discussing was not political, but Biblical. GOD BLESS! Misty |
||||||
7 | (What is one to think???) | Bible general Archive 2 | believer 2004 | 134376 | ||
mommapbs, I think that you are judging. Did it ever occir to you that this person might need a little reassurance and christianly love? So many christians today lose out on the oppurtunity to witness because they have become callous and unfeeling to the needs of those under conviction. Even if this person came to this forum for the wrong reasons, what better way to make it turn into the right reasons... And may I add that it is not too late until someone is dead. With all due respect, believer |
||||||
8 | (What is one to think???) | Bible general Archive 2 | believer 2004 | 134377 | ||
As an afterthought, I just want to add that my first reading of the BIble had me asking a lot of the same questions. It is different when you have the light of love(HOLY SPIRIT)in your heart, your mind and your soul. Please don't extinguish a possible flicker that may result in lasting life. Love in Christ Jesus, Believer |
||||||
9 | if you don't believe...? | Bible general Archive 2 | believer 2004 | 134378 | ||
sorry, long day | ||||||
10 | (What is one to think???) | Bible general Archive 2 | believer 2004 | 134407 | ||
mommapbs, as far as I could tell, he was basing his questions on biblical passages. I just think it better to give him an answer that cannot be proven wrong. There are many people out there who just need a little interaction with the right people. If he came to be derogatory,we should be respectful and answer his questions. You haven't disappointed me at all. No one has to answer to me. I am sure he is well aware why he is here, we aren't.If he asks these questions, he obviously does not deny God exists or he wouldn't bother. The Holy Spirit calls on people and we don't know His mind. I will go and read his posts as you suggest. Love in Christ Jesus, Misty |
||||||
11 | (What is one to think???) | Bible general Archive 2 | believer 2004 | 134408 | ||
well put. misty |
||||||
12 | is the seed non-human? | Dan 2:43 | believer 2004 | 133397 | ||
when speaking of seed in the Bible,It is always talking about a specific thing. When talking about fruit or animals or humans, It was explicit that they were not to mix the seed. As were the Israelites not to mix with other people. In Dan. 2:43, It says they Mingle WITH the seed of men,which leads me to believe that it is mingled with a seed other than human seed. I very much agree tha scripture you gave is referring to JESUS CHRIST. Misty |
||||||
13 | why say mingled with the seed of men? | Dan 2:43 | believer 2004 | 133456 | ||
I use the king james version and have also checked with the original text. The correct translation is with. As your translation stands, what exactly do you think it would mean that the seeds wouldn't cleave together? Misty |
||||||
14 | is the seed non-human? | Dan 2:43 | believer 2004 | 133458 | ||
I'm not really suggesting that, as no one knows the mind of God, but it is a possibility that I can't rule out.There are many scriptures that lead to my thinking.Matt. 24:37-39. When the race of giants was being killed out, there is no scripture to say that Og the King of Bashan was killed out, it just says that they ran them out of the land. This would also explain a lot of things that happen in the end times. If the people are corrupted by this seed, they would be this evil an unrepentant. I am not saying this is a truth, just a conjecture. Could you tell me, if the fallen angels were all killed out, how did they repopulate the earth after the flood? Another thing to think about is the fact that angels, whether fallen or not, are spirits. Do you think they can be killed? The scripture says the ones who left their first estate are in chains awaiting judgement, they aren't dead. also, note 2 peter chapter 2 and tell me what you think. God bless, misty |
||||||
15 | how can gov. minglewith the seed of men? | Dan 2:43 | believer 2004 | 133472 | ||
I agree with that completely. However, that still doesn't explain why it says mingle with the seed of men. If it were only talking about a gov., it would have said mingle with men, not the seed of men. To me, it is saying that something is going to mingle with the seed of men,something that will not work, as in the case of the fallen angels, where the mixed seed caused giants and unprecendented evil, causing God to bring down judgement. Judgement is what is also going to be brought down in the endtimes, as well. I am not saying it has to be fallen angels. It could be cloning, or some other type of scientific experimentation. There was a scripture, (I will look it up,) That says that what God has not made, he will not except... Misty |
||||||
16 | how can gov. minglewith the seed of men? | Dan 2:43 | believer 2004 | 133484 | ||
A government is a thing, and can not mingle with the seed of men.There were several different systems of government, and I don't recall any of them being referred to as mingling with the seed of men. When seed is used in the Bible, it is referring to reproduction,or people or beasts, as well as fallen angels, not systems. | ||||||
17 | is the seed non-human? | Dan 2:43 | believer 2004 | 133485 | ||
There will also be mass genocide in the endtimes, though they will not be destroyed by a world-wide flood. The endtimes is mainly a spiritual fight between good and evil. The whole earth will be manipulated by satan and his minions to do their bidding,(except those who follow Christ)what better way to make an army than to actually MAKE them.There are many intelligent people in the world, and it's hard to get one group of people to agree on anything, let alone the whole world. I am not stating that as a fact, I also said cloning is a possibility,(they could clone humans and indwell them, but it says in Dan.2:43 that they mingled with the seed of men...) It's just a thought that should be explored. I have often followed the mainstream and found that it was the wrong doctrine I was following. Be true to God and you can't go wrong! God bless, Misty |
||||||
18 | is the seed non-human? | Dan 2:43 | believer 2004 | 133487 | ||
I believe that someone on the ark, (obviously not Noah) had this seed.) Many people think that they were all perfect in their generations, but the Bible only says this about Noah, not the others. I totally deep six the idea that anyone lived besides Noah and his family. God doesn't lie, neither does the word. Secondly, some people say there was a second wave of fallen angels, but I haven't been able to find this proof in scripture. As for the spirit thing, I may have not stated clearly what I meant: When we die, our spirit will either live eternally or burn eternally, so it just seems logical this would be the case with the fallen angels. Now, here is another question; do you think the nephilim had souls? they were not of GOD... |
||||||
19 | how can gov. minglewith the seed of men? | Dan 2:43 | believer 2004 | 133488 | ||
The only reason that I have to disagree with your interpretation is that it is being explained what the image is, not symbolizing it. Misty |
||||||
20 | is the seed non-human? | Dan 2:43 | believer 2004 | 133539 | ||
I do not believe that clones will have souls. God does not create them, only the living tissue used to grow them. I also do not believe in murder of any kind.Rev. 13:10, Matt.26:52, and many more.also,as for those who do not belong to Him:Matt.15:13. misty |
||||||
Result pages: [ 1 2 3 ] Next > Last [3] >> |