Results 1 - 20 of 74
|
||||||
Results from: Notes Author: Timothy Paul Ordered by Verse |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Catholic and Mary, what's the deal | Bible general Archive 1 | Timothy Paul | 48104 | ||
inmyheart, I was trying to find a reasonable explanation as to why pray to Mary, I wrote my sister who graduated from a Catholic high school, and asked her, Why? do they think Mary is omnipresent? My sister, a spiritual giant compared to me, wrote that she misses her high school days and although she belongs to a non-denominational Church now, she holds tightly to a lot of what she learned in the RC Church. As far as praying to Mary, sis said she did her best to be the most perfect mother (and wife)that she could be, and while not worshiping Mary, she did meditate on Mary as the most closely perfected mother she knew and prayed to be more like her. If you knew my sister, you would know an annointed woman, God does not hold her beliefs against her and she is blessed in this world as well as the ones who are blessed to share with her beliefs. |
||||||
2 | Law or grace or both? | Bible general Archive 1 | Timothy Paul | 50046 | ||
I wish to thank you wholeheartedly for your response to my last note on this provoking field of interest. I am in agreement with you, while still adhering to my stance. My point was, "Every person is to be in subjection to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those which exist are established by God." (NASB). So, how is one able to live in obedience to our Lord without obedience to the law? Since, I have begun an exciting excursion into the bk. of Gal. through (Back to the Bible.com)and cannot express my stimulation of awe and wonder of St. Paul. Paul, in consideration of his attempts at salvation (in his former way) by following the law saw it as a shadow (works) before the subject (Christ). By considering the law itself, he saw that justification was unobtainable through it, and that there was now no further need of the sacrifices and purifications of it, since they were done away in Christ, and therefore, the more he looked into the law, the more he saw the uselessness of obeying it for the purpose of salvation. But, though he was dead to the law, he did not look upon himself as without responsibility towards the law. He had renounced all hopes of justification by the works of it, and was unwilling any longer to continue under the bondage of it. But he was far from thinking himself released from his duty towards God; on the contrary, he was dead to the law, that he might live unto God. The teaching of the gospel, therefore, instead of weakening the duty placed upon him, strengthened and further confirmed it; and therefore, though he was dead to the law, it was only so he would be able to live a new and better life towards God, and that this new life would be more agreeable and acceptable to God than his observance of the Mosaic law could ever be. Thank you for your time and contemplation. For this idea, I was looking at Gal 2:20,21 and related some commentary of Matthew Henry's. "...For if righteousness [come] by the law, then Christ is dead in vain." |
||||||
3 | Law or grace or both? | Bible general Archive 1 | Timothy Paul | 50059 | ||
Yes, Too Too Smart, Your point is well taken and the bk. of Gal. is backs you up. see Gal.3:10.(AMP) "And all who depend on the Law [who are seeking to be justified by obedience to the Law of rituals] are under a curse and doomed to disappointment and destruction, for it is written in the Scriptures, Cursed (accursed, devoted to destruction, doomed to eternal punishment) be everyone who does not continue to abide (live and remain) by all the precepts and commands written in the Book of the Law and to practice them." The scripture that Paul refers to here is: (Deut. 27:26 AMP),"Cursed is he who does not support and give assent to the words of this law to do them [as the rule of his life]. All the people shall say, Amen." Now, we must look at the context of Paul's letter. After Paul ministered to the infant Church in Galatia, false teachers came around telling new converts that they were not true Christians unless they lived under the Law of Moses. They claimed obedience to the law was as important as God's grace and a necessary condition of salvation. Paul saw the error in their teaching and wrote the epistle that warns them of the danger of trying to mix law and grace. |
||||||
4 | Law or grace or both? | Bible general Archive 1 | Timothy Paul | 50066 | ||
In addition, Christ said in Mat.5:17,Think not that I came to destroy the law or the prophets: I came not to destroy, but to fulfil.(ASV) God's laws were a gift to us to help us love and obey Him. By Jesus' time, religious leaders had complicated the law into a lot of useless rules. Now, does the OT law still apply to us today? Let us look at the three categories of OT Law: 1.) Ceremonial; This related specifically to Israel's worship practices (Lev.1:2-3). The purpose here was to point forward to Jesus Christ. Jesus was often accused of violating ceremonial law by the Phatisees. After His death and resurrection, these laws were unnecessary, but the principles behind them -To worship and love a holy God -still apply. 2.) Civil Law; This applied to daily life in Israel (see Deut.24:10-11). Because modern culture is so different from that setting, it is hard to try and follow these laws specifically. But the principles behind these laws will never become outdated and should guide our conduct. Jesus taught these laws by example. 3.)Moral Law; This is the Ten Commandments (Exod.20:13) and are direct commands from God. These laws require strict obedience and still apply today. Jesus obeyed the Moral Law without fail. Jesus showed the Pharisees that obeying the Moral Law was more important than explaining it, yet man's way is usually the other way around. Thank you for welcoming these comments, I hope to here from you again soon (o: Praise Him!! Faithfully, Tim |
||||||
5 | Law and Christ vs Law or Christ? | Bible general Archive 1 | Timothy Paul | 50067 | ||
Yes, I agree w/you, Searcher. I would like to add a coment from Matthew Henry on Gal.5:2-4 "That their submitting to circumcision, and depending on the works of the law for righteousness, were an implicit contradiction of their faith as Christians and a forfeiture of all their advantages by Jesus Christ" However there are still requirements of law that still are demanded of us by God today, please see my third posting below Faithfully, Tim |
||||||
6 | what is the oldest form of religion? | Bible general Archive 1 | Timothy Paul | 60414 | ||
dear benard 21269, Hinduism is the worlds oldest religion, according to http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Forum/9410/hindu1.html to quote from this page; "Hinduism is also known as "Sanatana Dharma" to Hindus. In Sanskrit, the original language of India, 'Sanatana' means Everlasting and 'Dharma', by a crude translation, means Religion. The Everlasting Religion, Hinduism was founded, exists and flourishes in India. Sanatana Dharma does not have a starting point in history, does not have a founder, and has no Church. The sages who shaped the Hindu religion merely reiterated the teachings of the Vedas, the Hindu scriptures (most of which is unwritten)." Peace, Tim |
||||||
7 | what is the ploest form of religion? | Bible general Archive 1 | Timothy Paul | 60422 | ||
Hi Radioman2,funny thing about faults and foibles isn't it? (o: I just happened to look, and the first three letters of the word ploest are like a mirror image of the word old. Peace, Tim |
||||||
8 | Should the Bible be taken literlly? | Bible general Archive 1 | Timothy Paul | 61130 | ||
kalos, I earnestly thank you for your benevolent criticism concerning my post to hillbilly. I assure you that it was taken in the vein in which it was intended, being neither derogatory nor hypocritical. Being quite tired after laboring for a 17 hr. day, I was trying to answer the question in the quickest way that my 2 fingers could type it. I realize now this was self-serving, as I sometimes use this forum as a way to unwind and set my mind right before slumber. You obviously spend much time overseeing posts and censuring those that fail to toe the line and I thank you for that. I wish to thank you and all at Lockman Foundation for all of us that enjoy learning the Bible through this forum Peace and Blessings to you and yours, Tim |
||||||
9 | Do you own a TNIV? | Bible general Archive 1 | Timothy Paul | 68781 | ||
Brad K, I'm wondering if you could please give me one verse from this translation. It is one verse that I turn to first whenever I see a Bible that I am unfamiliar with. The verse is, Hebrews 1:3 Here it is in the KJV, Who being the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person, and upholding all things by the word of his power, when he had by himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high: And now, the NIV, The Son is the radiance of God's glory and the exact representation of his being, sustaining all things by his powerful word. After he had provided purification for sins, he sat down at the right hand of the Majesty in heaven. Now, the NLT, The Son reflects God's own glory, and everything about him represents God exactly. He sustains the universe by the mighty power of his command. After he died to cleanse us from the stain of sin, he sat down in the place of honor at the right hand of the majestic God of heaven. Amen. Praise God for His Living Word. The point I am trying to illustrate, never hearing before of a TNIV, is, how does this Bible translate the relation between Jesus and His Father, God? Can you see the discrepancy between two translations above, and the third one? I shall await your reply, thank you, and God Bless. tim |
||||||
10 | Do you own a TNIV? | Bible general Archive 1 | Timothy Paul | 68897 | ||
Thank-you for your reply, Makarios, nice to hear from you again. I like the versions that you sent along w/the requested info. As you see, what concerns me with any translation is how they react to Jesus. If you noticed, I included a paraphrased version that tells us Jesus is a reflection of God's Glory. This is I feel, inaccurate. It is telling me that Jesus is to the moon as God is to the sun, (the moon does not give off any light of it's own, but reflects from another source). Other translations I like use the words Refulgence, or Effulgence (of God's Glory), which means a brilliant radiance from within. This is something I use to test different versions, but I enjoyed paraphrased versions when I first started studying God's Word and did not care what others thought. I am a firm believer in the very best Bible in print is the one that you will read. This plants the seed and the Holy Spirit will nurture the seed for growth as God sees fit. again, Thank you kindly, Peace and Blessings to you, too, brother. Tim |
||||||
11 | Do you own a TNIV? | Bible general Archive 1 | Timothy Paul | 68901 | ||
Brad, yes, He did, but what's 2-1/2 hours among friends and family, Amen? Feel free to check my note to Makarios on why I was wondering about that certain verse. Also, I just stumbled on a page about different translations that I almost pasted here but decided to let you see it personally, as I obey the rules of copyright and plagerism (o; See it at, http://www.christiansinteractive.com Then in the search box, type in, which bible is for me? It is actually linked to this very site, so praise God again for his Living Word, where would we be without it? Thanx for your reply, bro. Peace and Blessings to you and yours. Tim |
||||||
12 | Do you own a TNIV? | Bible general Archive 1 | Timothy Paul | 68910 | ||
Thanks again Makarios, (o: I like these too, some new ones I have not seen, so I will copy them to my folder. I am glad you enjoy the scrutinization that I apply to this verse, may you be blessed with continued enjoyments in your studies. May our Lord bless you, too Tim |
||||||
13 | Do you own a TNIV? | Bible general Archive 1 | Timothy Paul | 69028 | ||
Justme, thank you for replying to my post, I enjoyed your slogans and statistics. I only wish that I could count myself among the top 10 percent in Bible reading, but sadly, due to the ceremonies of today's society, the prince of this world has kept me from being as diligent in my studies as I once was. This winter should be different, as it was quite the busy summer. I pray for more time with my friends on the forum, in addition to more study time and reading time. Peace and Blessings, Tim |
||||||
14 | just making shur that I have the answer | Bible general Archive 1 | Timothy Paul | 73684 | ||
I thank you from the heart, Ray. (o: bless you for filling in where I was weak. Tim |
||||||
15 | Why are movies like Harry Potter bad? | Bible general Archive 1 | Timothy Paul | 76876 | ||
Why, you ask? well, okay here are 12 reasons that I retrieved off the Christian interactive site: I edited this greatly, you are encouraged to view it in its entirety by clicking on the link above and use the search feature. 1. God shows us that witchcraft is evil. He hates those practices because they blind us to His loving ways, then turn our hearts to a deceptive quest for self-empowerment and deadly thrills. 2. The movie's foundation in fantasy, not reality, doesn't diminish its power to change beliefs and values. 3. Each occult image and enticing suggestion prompts the audience to feel more at home in the dark, paranormal setting. 4. God tells us to "abhor what is evil" and "cling to what is good." (Romans 12:9) But when Christian children and teens love the Harry Potter myths, delight in the movie and read the books again and again, they are desensitizing their hearts and minds to its evil. 5. Immersed in the values taught at Hogwarts School for Witchcraft and Wizardry, children become spiritually blind. They lose their natural aversion for the devious spirits represented by the creatures and symbols in this eerie world. 6. This inner change is usually unconscious, for the occult lessons and impressions tend to bypass rational scrutiny. 7. The main product marketed through this movie is a belief system that clashes with everything God offers us for our peace and security. This pagan ideology comes complete with trading cards, computer and other wizardly games. 8. The implied source of power behind Harry's magical feats tend to distort a child's understanding of God. In the movie as in the books, words traditionally used to refer to occult practices become so familiar that children begin to apply the same terms to God and His promised strength. 9. Blind to the true nature of God, children will synthesize or blend Biblical truth with the pagan beliefs and magical practices demonstrated in the Harry Potter movie. In the end, you distort and destroy any remnant of true Christian faith. For our God cannot be molded to match pagan gods. 10. God tells us to "train up a child in the way He should go." It starts with teaching them God's truths and training them all day long to see reality from His, not the world's perspective. 11. While some argue that Harry Potter and his friends demonstrate friendship, integrity and honesty, they actually model how to lie and steal and get away with it. 12. God has a better way. When His children choose to follow His ways, He gives them a heart to love Him, spiritual eyes that can understand and delight in His Word, a sense of His presence and a confidence in His constant care -- no matter what happens around us. |
||||||
16 | Why are movies like Harry Potter bad? | Bible general Archive 1 | Timothy Paul | 76878 | ||
Sorry Angel, I did it again )o: I replied to the wrong note, so I answered the correct one in the poster's duplicate question. Also, I agree with your answer whole-heartedly! God Bless! |
||||||
17 | What does it mean? | Bible general Archive 1 | Timothy Paul | 77190 | ||
What this means, according to Eddie Snipes, is that yes, baptism is essential but no, it does not have the power of salvation. If a person is not willing to obey in baptism, then they haven’t really surrendered to Jesus as Lord. You can’t surrender in disobedience. Baptism is an outward sign of the inward covenant between you and God. There are two scenarios of believers who will not be baptised. Those who lack opportunity to attend baptism because they are a prisoner in some foreign country where it is unavailable, and those who refuse to be baptised. Those that refuse to be baptised are wilfully disobedient to a command. This does not only apply to baptism, but also for living life as a child of God. Anyone who refuses to obey is in rebellion and should examine their life to see if they indeed have surrendered to Christ. Anyone who refuses baptism also refuses to be identified with Christ. The other scenario is the case of lacking the opportunity to be baptized. On the cross, Jesus granted salvation to a thief who would never have the chance to follow up with baptism. The thief was being crucified for his crimes. He acknowledged his sins and asked Jesus to remember him when He entered His kingdom. Jesus promised, this day, you will be with me in paradise. He was justified by faith alone. The same is true for many believers all over the world and throughout the last two thousand years. Those who surrender to Christ and die before getting baptized will not lose their salvation. Do these forfeit salvation because they lack the opportunity? No. The covenant is sealed in the heart and baptism is an outward profession of a covenant with God that has already taken place. To understand scripture, it must be interpreted by scripture. In other words, scripture will never contradict itself and usually the complete picture of a biblical principle is not revealed in a single passage. Biblically, baptism always follows a commitment to Jesus Christ. Baptizing and christening a young child may be fine as a symbolic ritual, but it does not count as a substitute for believer’s baptism. A decision must come first otherwise a person is only getting wet. The Bible clearly teaches that baptism is identification with Christ. It is an outward testimony to the world of an inward change that Jesus has made because we have invited Him into our hearts and surrendered our life to Him. Many passages throughout the New Testament validate that no external act is necessary for salvation. Salvation is by God’s grace through faith alone. If baptism were necessary for salvation, it would be presented with each gospel presentation. It is not. Peter’s sermon in Acts 2:38 is used as evidence that it is necessary, however in Acts 3:12-26 Peter preached salvation through repentance with no reference of baptism. There are many times the gospel is presented as faith alone (Romans 3:22, 24, 25, 26, 28, 30; 4:5; Galatians 2:16; Ephesians 2:8-9; Philippians 3:9, and the list goes on throughout the New Testament). Salvation is through faith. Baptism is my testimony and an outward profession of my covenant with Christ. This was edited, in part, for the sake of brevity from Sermon Central, authored by Eddie Snipes. SermonCentral.com Web Site Copyright Statement Copyright © by SermonCentral.com and the authors. This material is provided for personal study or for use in preparation of sermons, Sunday school classes, or other oral communication. This material may be quoted in written form but give credit where credit is due (author's name and web site address: www.sermoncentral.com). |
||||||
18 | What does it mean? | Bible general Archive 1 | Timothy Paul | 77194 | ||
Hi Disciplerami, If there were any one thing that fallen man could do to ensure his own salvation, such as being baptised, that act would not only prove Eph. 2:9 to be false, but Jesus saying "it is finished" in Jhn 19:30, would be invalidated as well. Please see my post below, for Eddie Snipes is able to explain it so much better than I Blessings, Tim |
||||||
19 | What does it mean? | Bible general Archive 1 | Timothy Paul | 77257 | ||
Thank you sniper. My response is to praise God that He has granted us the freedom to worship Him in so many different ways. Do we not all praise the same God? We should be asking each other questions as a means to sort out the complexities among ourselves, and not try to use it as an opportunity to sway any belief in any particular doctrine. Such as infant baptism, which I think is niether harmful or necessary, but it is an outlet for the love of the parents. I have difficulties w/catholicism, yet there are Catholics whom I love dearly. I believe that God feels the same way, and that He used the Great Reformation as a means to expand, not hinder the growth of the church. I look at it like this. The church choir has many different voices, each one with their own strengths and weaknesses, yet when they are all together, it is a beautiful sound to anyone. If there were only sopranos, it would not be as beautiful. I sing tenor, and most people prefer that I sing ten or 15 miles away. (o: It is the same with the world. There are many breeds of dogs. Why did God not say that one breed is enough? Why are so many species of birds necessary? I think of the joyful sound that praise would make to our Father in heaven, and joy through one denomination, and then through all denoms combined. This is my take on why there are so many religions, and factions thereof. (It is my humble opinion, not backed up by scripture,) but rather than creating dissension between particular dogmas and who holds more authority, we should build each other up and learn how to be harmonious and in this way we will be built up ourselves. In Christ's love, Tim |
||||||
20 | What does it mean? | Bible general Archive 1 | Timothy Paul | 77328 | ||
Amen brother, I shall remember you in my prayers. Faithfully, Tim |
||||||
Result pages: [ 1 2 3 4 ] Next > Last [4] >> |