Results 1 - 20 of 22
|
||||||
Results from: Answers On or After: Thu 12/31/70 Author: JohnK Ordered by Date |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | More examples of God's "copys?" | Matt 6:10 | JohnK | 46291 | ||
There was a temple that God instructed the Israelites to construct. In the book of Revelation, we read about the Temple of God which is in Heaven. |
||||||
2 | Earthly copies from Heaven? | Matt 6:10 | JohnK | 46209 | ||
On that subject, what about this? Luke 17:20-21 20 And when he was demanded of the Pharisees, when the kingdom of God should come, he answered them and said, The kingdom of God cometh not with observation: 21 Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you. I hope I will one day fully understand. Great point you brought up! |
||||||
3 | define speaking in tongues. | 1 Corinthians | JohnK | 46106 | ||
Speaking in tongues is exactly what the apostles were doing. They spoke so that everybody would undestand. Also, to speak in tongues today, is one of the "signs and wonders" of satan. We know this because the Bible specifically says that speaking in tongues would cease. If Christians would take seriously, within context, all of the teaching about tongues in I Corinthians, they could not fail to see that tongues-speaking would cease. 1 Corinthians 13:8-11 8 Charity never faileth: but whether there be prophecies, they shall fail; whether there be tongues, they shall cease; whether there be knowledge, it shall vanish away. 9 For we know in part, and we prophesy in part. 10 But when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away. Paul writes, “Charity (love) never faileth: but whether there be prophecies, THEY SHALL FAIL; whether there be TONGUES, THEY SHALL CEASE; whether there be knowledge, it shall vanish away” (13:8). There will always be the need for love, therefore love will never drop off. But when the canon of Scripture is made “perfect” (or complete), there will be no further revelation from God, neither in predictive prophecy nor in divinely revealed knowledge other than prophecy. The gifts of “prophecy” and “knowledge” will be entirely unnecessary with the completion of the Scriptures. And “if any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book” (Revelation 22:18). |
||||||
4 | is it time for satan | Revelation | JohnK | 46104 | ||
Middle East has nothing to do with the second coming of Christ. Not even during Hitler's time did that warrant as a sign of the second coming. Don't be decieved, if you look for physical signs, then you are doing exactly that which Christ rebuked the Pharisees for doing. They asked for a sign, and Jesus answered, "Only a wicked and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign." I will never listen to those who try and interpret scripture by watching CNN, or reading the newspaper. The only place we should be looking, is within the Bible. The signs of Christ's coming is within the many false gospels and false signs and wonders that we see happening. Remember, the antichrist is said to "make himself as God", and that he "would even be able to fool the elect, if that were possible". So, how would the elect be fooled? The elect are in danger of being fooled by beleiving false doctrine. So if the elect are those that are in Christ, by what means would they be decieved? Of course, the only answer would be that they could be decieved by actually beleiving satan, "who makes himself as God". Satan, is not stupid, remember that. His goal is to turn people away from the truth of God's Word. He could care less if there were wars on earth, as long as the truth is hidden, then in satan's eyes, God's plan would fail. Satan wants to keep your attention elsewhere, other than the Word of God. So don't look for signs in the flesh. God is spirit, and concerns Himself with things of the spirit. "Render unto Caesar the things of Caesar, and to God, the things of God." |
||||||
5 | Clarity - Jesus being sin and in Heaven | 2 Corinthians | JohnK | 46087 | ||
What it means to "be made sin": "God made him who had no sin to be sin for us, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God." (2 Corinthians 5:21) Even though it might be difficult for us to understand, Jesus did NOT become a sinner on the cross, Jesus became sin for us. They are not the same thing. Here is what some Bible commentaries say about 2 Corinthians 5:21 (above): "sin--not a sin offering, which would destroy the antithesis to "righteousness," and would make "sin" be used in different senses in the same sentence: not a sinful person, which would be untrue, and would require in the antithesis "righteous men," not "righteousness"; but "sin," that is, the representative Sin-bearer (vicariously) of the aggregate sin of all men past, present, and future. The sin of the world is one, therefore the singular, not the plural, is used; though its manifestations are manifold (John 1:29). "Behold the Lamb of God, that taketh away the SIN of the world." Compare "made a curse for us," Galatians 3:13." (Jamieson, Fausset, and Brown Commentary) "He made to be sin (amartian epoihsen). The words "to be" are not in the Greek. "Sin" here is the substantive, not the verb. God "treated as sin" the one "who knew no sin."" Nowhere in the Bible does it say that Jesus sinned. What it does say is that "He became sin". God, in His Judgement, punished sin on the cross. So, when Jesus "became sin", He became that which God was able to punish. Jesus entered into Heaven because God knew He committed no sin, but instead, became sin that He would be able to receive it's punishment. |
||||||
6 | what is speaking in tongues? | 1 Corinthians | JohnK | 45998 | ||
I agree with Searcher, in saying that speaking in tongues is a phenomenon that was used to reach other people who spoke different laguages. Afterall, look at the enormous task that the apostles had. They were out to preach to the world. They often had hundreds, or even thousands of people who sat down to listen to them speak. But since the apostles were given direct power to cast out demons and perform miracles, they also had the ability to speak in language that was understandable to all people, regardless of the language they spoke. It was as if God was allowing the Word to reach all, without the barrier of language. When those listening to the apostles heard them "speak in tongues", they had a suprised reaction: “And they were all amazed and marveled, saying one to another, Behold, are not all these which speak Galileans? And how hear we every man in our own tongue, wherein we were born?” (Acts 2:7,8). Every man heard them speak in his own language (Acts 2:6) So, "speaking in tongues" was used not to utter jibberish, but instead, was used to speak other languages simultaneously. Also, when someone says that speaking in tongues is speaking in an "unknown" language is also incorrect because the word "unknown" does not occur in any Greek manuscript describing this phenomena but was inserted by translators. There is no reason for anyone to speak except to converse intelligibly. The Greek word laleo means “I speak.” The word is never used for mere sound or noise. Nor is it used for a mere mumbling or muttering of unintelligible gibberish. The tongues-speaking in the New Testament was in the native languages of hearing people. The supernatural phenomenon which took place at Pentecost was the exercise of a gift whereby many people from many countries, gathered at Jerusalem, heard God’s message in their own language. This was indeed a miracle of God. It would be an arbitrary and strange interpretation of Scripture that would make tongues-speaking in the New Testament anything other than known languages. There is no trace of Scriptural evidence that tongues were ever heard by anyone as incoherent, incomprehensible babbling. It is unscriptural teaching which says that all who are baptized by the Holy Spirit will speak in tongues. The Scriptures state emphatically that all saved persons have received the baptism of the Holy Spirit. “For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body . . . ” (I Corinthians 12:13). All the believers at Corinth received the baptism of the Holy Spirit, however all did not speak in tongues. The question asked in verse 30, “Do all speak with tongues?” is so phrased so as to convey the expected answer, “No.” If Christians would take seriously, within context, all of the teaching about tongues in I Corinthians, they could not fail to see that tongues-speaking would cease. Paul writes, “Charity (love) never faileth: but whether there be prophecies, they shall fail; whether there be tongues, they shall cease; whether there be knowledge, it shall vanish away” (13:8). There will always be the need for love, therefore love will never drop off. But when the canon of Scripture is made “perfect” (or complete), there will be no further revelation from God, neither in predictive prophecy nor in divinely revealed knowledge other than prophecy. The gifts of “prophecy” and “knowledge” will be entirely unnecessary with the completion of the Scriptures. And “if any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book” (Revelation 22:18). Some of the above info can be found at www.bible.org John- |
||||||
7 | Why do today's Jews reject Jesus? | Is 9:6 | JohnK | 45994 | ||
I would just like to add a little something here myself. I recently had a conversation with a Jewish Rabbi. My question was exactly yours. "Why do Jews reject Jesus?" Some of the answer was, to say it frankly, repugnant, but I would like to share some things I learned from my conversation. I am sure you would find it interesting. I brought up the passage in Isaiah 53, in it, it describes someone who will suffer so terribly for the sins of his people, and not because of himself. I asked, "who is Isaiah 53 talking about?" the answer was that the person suffering here, is not "one" person, but instead, represents the entire Jewish race. I really had a problem with that. That doesn't make sense! How could the Jewish people suffer for the sins of "my people", if they are the "my people"? How would it be that they suffered, but not because of themselves? A contradiction! That belief also is in error because it takes glory away from God, and instead, makes it look like the Jewish people will save themselves. I also brought up Psalm 22, you know, the part that said, "...they pierced my hands and feet". The response from the Rabbi was that we Christians changed the wording of the Bible and that the original Hebrew text reads, "...like a lion, they are at my hands and feet". Well, lets look at this, in the original Hebrew, the word that was used for "like a lion" could be translated as either "like a lion", "they pierced", or "they gouged". The two words are strikingly similar in appearance in the original Hebrew text. The only difference between the word translated “like a lion,” and the one rendered “they pierced” is in the length of the upright vowel stroke on the latter word. The two might easily be confused. Incidentally, when a lion, the animal is talked about elsewhere in Psalms, and in the Old Testament, a different word is used, so if he was describing a lion in Psalm 22, he would have used that same word that he used in other passages. So, why would the author suddenly use a different word when he reached Psalm 22? He did so, because he was in fact describing a "piercing", rather than an animal. Also, in the Hebrew text, "they are at" is mysteriously missing, that is because they added those words to make sense of their translation. So, if you mistook the word, and you were honest, you would read, "...like a lion my hands and my feet", does that make sense? Or, if you took notice that the word lion was spelled differently than other instances of the word "lion", and you really knew your Hebrew, the translation would be "...they pierced my hands and my feet." These are only the two things I brought up to the Rabbi. But another thing to consider is that one of the main reasons Jews so ardently rejectd Jesus when he came is due to the fact that the majority of them misinterpreted scripture. Specifically, that of the book of Daniel. Daniel talks about one who will put an end to animal sacrifices, and create a new covenant. They interpret this to be an individual who is evil. They failed to recognize that Daniel was prophecying about the coming Messiah, who in fact, did put an end to Animal sacrifices. They also mostly believe that the Messiah will come with a sword, and destroy their enemies. So, when Jesus came, meek, and humble, they laughed at him. But as we Christians know it, Jesus did in fact come with a sword, just as he said he would. Anyway, there are numerous other reasons, but I hope this info helps. John- |
||||||
8 | Did you know (Hos 4:6)... | Matt 22:29 | JohnK | 45979 | ||
That's a very powerful message. If you look at what the book of Revelations has to say about Babylon, you will find that Babylon is a representation of false beliefs, and false prophecies. That is why He said, "Come out of her my people..." So indeed, just as ancient Babylon was destroyed because the guards were drunk, and allowed the gate to remain open, so to, if we let our guard down, and drink of the wine of false prophecy, God will pour out His wrath on us. | ||||||
9 | Can you lose your salvation? | Revelation | JohnK | 45574 | ||
I won't ever say, "You can lose your salvation", because frankly, I think that sentence is misused. Instead, I think we should all get used to saying, "Yes, you can fall from Grace". Not to forget that even the promises made to ancient Israel were also conditional: Exodus 19:5 Now therefore, IF ye will obey my voice indeed, and keep my covenant, then ye shall be a peculiar treasure unto me above all people: for all the earth is mine: But the main thing is that we must rely upon God to keep us from stumbling, because we cannot do it by ourselves. Only God can keep us from falling, so there is no glory for ourselves. If we start to put our faith elsewhere, other than the Lord, then we could fall. As God has clearly said that we are all wicked, even from the womb. Through all these arguments, we have to remember the "ifs" that are so many times mentioned in the Bible. God promises that we will not fail, IF only we keep our trust in Him, since he is the ONLY one that can keep us. The moment we trust ourselves, such as with good works and the such, then we don't have the necessary faith on the one rock that can keep us. |
||||||
10 | other accounts? | Bible general Archive 1 | JohnK | 45373 | ||
It may be incorrect to say that it was those that had already physically died, were preached to. After all God did say that it is appointed unto man once to die, and then the judgement. Here is something else in the Bible that mentions captivity and prison. Luke 4:18 The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he hath anointed me to preach the gospel to the poor; he hath sent me to heal the brokenhearted, to preach deliverance to the captives, and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty them that are bruised, Luke 4:19 To preach the acceptable year of the Lord. Jesus in Luke was quoting this passage in Isaiah: Isa 61:1 The spirit of the Lord GOD is upon me; because the LORD hath anointed me to preach good tidings unto the meek; he hath sent me to bind up the brokenhearted, to proclaim liberty to the captives, and the OPENING OF THE PRISON to them that are bound; It may be that the "prison" was merely talking about the captivity of sin, and not that there was a purgatory of some sort. It does not necessrily mean that Christ preached during those three days. I may learn something from this myself. I guess this is a good example of first understanding the Word of God before trying to explain. Just be sure that wherever you get an answer from, check it's validity by using the Bible itself. There is a long-standing debate on this issue, and many books were written on that passage. Bottomline is, don't forget that Christ did say he would be in paradise "today". So, he definitely was not in hell, or anyplace of suffering. |
||||||
11 | the three days and 1Peter 3:19-22 | Bible general Archive 1 | JohnK | 45363 | ||
My appologies. Yes indeed, Christ did preach to those in prison. Where that prison is, I can't answer. But why there was a prison, I can. There were those before Christ's time that beleived in God, but yet have never heard about Christ. Those people that beleived God's Word and followed his commandments died without a meaningful sacrifice being offered for them. Remember, Jesus said, "Abraham saw my day and rejoiced". So Abraham knew the importance of the sacrifice of Christ. He had faith in the fact that the sacrifice would mean salvation. But there were those that died without hope, without knowledge of Christ's sacrifice, yet they trusted God, and lived according to the word they were given. These people were waiting for the day of the Messiah, yet they died without seeing it. God was just by fullfilling the promise that Messiah would come. The promise applied to ALL who beleived. So, the ones who died without seeing the Messiah, would be visited by the Messiah as a fullfillment of the promise. Today, we have His Word as a testimony, but they didn't have that, they only had a promise that the Messiah would come. |
||||||
12 | crucifixion - resurrection | Bible general Archive 1 | JohnK | 45347 | ||
The three days that passed were very important. Not because of "where" Jesus was, but the length of time that passed from the ressurection and the crucifixion. First, on the cross, Jesus told the thief next to him, "TODAY, you will be WITH ME in paradise." Clearly, Jesus was in His Kingdom during those three days. But the most important part, is the time that passed. Those three days were given as a sign. Remember when the Pharicees asked for a sing, but Jesus said, Matt 16:4 "...and there shall no sign be given unto it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas." As you may recall, Jonas was in the belly of a whale for three days. Jesus also said that as Jonas, so tha son of man will be in the belly of the earth for three days". But it is important to note that Jesus said "TODAY, you will be with me in paradise", a contradiction? Hardly. Christ was showing them that for three days he would be "burried", just as Jonas was. The three days also have more significant meaning, of which I will only briefly expand on: The book of Daniel mentions (Daniel 9:27) -"And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease." Christ's sacrifice happened during the middle of the week, and as you know, the result of the crucifixion was that animal sacrifices have ceased to be of meaning to God, the ultimate sacrifice had been offered. So, in order for the "week" to be completed, Jesus' body was inthe tomb for 3 days and 3 nights. The next day after the third night would have been day 7. As a sign of completeness and as a sign of fullfillment of prophecy, the timing was essential. |
||||||
13 | Help. Someone's testamony has me upset | Bible general Archive 1 | JohnK | 45339 | ||
Hi Chynna, there are some good responses to your question. I would like to remind you of one thing. It is understood that Christ came to fulfill the law and the prophets. And that he did. The days of new testimonies or revelations, such as what the individual has mentioned, have ceased. The bible is clear that what we have is sufficient. Just like to parable of the rich man and Lazarus, the rich man asked Abraham to send someone from heaven to his brothers to warn them about hell. What did Abraham answer? He said it was IMPOSSIBLE, and that they have the law and the prophets to save them. That is clear to me. The law and the prohpets is the Holy Word of God. That is the testimony to us. To say that additional testimony can come from God is in disagreemant with what Jesus mentioned in his parable. We have the book, and that is sufficient. What happened to that man is not from God. I beleive that because it is clear that the testimony of Jesus Christ is complete, and we are now living in a period of grace. I don't care what visions or miracles I or anyone else sees. I am thankful that I have God's Word, the Bible, and that is all I need. You must also remember that God said that the devil is able to show great signs and wonders, even that he will be able to call down fire from Heaven. Anything that pulls us away from the Word of God, or that forces us to think of the Holy Spirit in a physical sense, is not from God. Even if something makes you beleive God is calling you, if that something causes you to look on earth for signs of God, that is very dangerous. God is very much spiritual, look for God's spirit, not visions or signs. |
||||||
14 | How do I study Revelations? | Bible general Archive 1 | JohnK | 45333 | ||
Their are a lot of different interpretations of the book of Revelations. Please be careful in your studies in that you don't settle for what one person says, but be sure to investigate any interpretation you come to or hear about. I would recommend a great book for you to read. I highly encourage you to get a copy, it is called "Exploding the Israel Deception", by Steve Wohlberg. The book does a wonderful job in explaining the importance of interpreting scripture "in the spirit". You can get a copy at http://www.amazingfacts.org The book does a wonderful job in helping you understand the importance of using scripture to interpret scripture. The book isn't full of opinions, but instead, shows you exactly how prophecy makes perfect sense when you use the bible to interpret itself. The book also sheds much light on subjects such as "Israel in the Spirit" and "Israel in the flesh", "7 year tribulation"... Don't listen to those who want you to think that we have to look for signs within certain countries, that is nonsense, and unscriptural. |
||||||
15 | Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth? | Bible general Archive 1 | JohnK | 44079 | ||
He often sayed, "I am", and "I and my father are one and the same." That is because Jesus was God, come in the flesh. Only God could be without sin. There are numerous passages in the bible that attest to the fact that Jesus was in fact, God. | ||||||
16 | Do I need to be well versed! | Bible general Archive 1 | JohnK | 43818 | ||
Hello, welcome to the forum! It is not important to memorize chapter and paragraph numbers. After all, the numbers and chapters were all added well after the Bible was completed. If I am not mistaken, the chapter and paragraph numbers were introduced sometime after the printing press found it's way to Europe in the middle ages. But as far as the forum is concerned, it is a good idea to be able to show where your quotes are coming from, because it occasionally happens where someone makes something up or misquotes something, therefore giving it a different meaning. A good idea is to have two web-pages open when you are in the forum, the first one would be an online bible that you can copy and paste from, a great one can be found at: http://bible.gospelcom.net and of course, the other web-page would be this forum. John- |
||||||
17 | can u b forgivn if you once turned away? | Luke 15:32 | JohnK | 43751 | ||
Remember, Christ himself said, "All sins will be forgiven, but blaspheming the Holy Spirit will never be forgiven." Drifting away from God is not unforgivable. The only unforgivable sin is to believe that Christ is evil, that is what Jesus was responding to by saying "...blapheming the Holy Spirit will never be forgiven." This was because the pharisees actully believed that Jesus was possessed with the devil. You see, it isn't possible to attain salvation if you believe that Christ is evil, because there then is nobody to pay for your sins, you must do it instead. As far as the book of Hebrews, this is something that I have previously posted in this forum: This addresses the fact that many wrongly interpet the Book of Hebrews to mean that you cannot come back to God, but instead, it has a different meaning which is very clear if you read the entire book in context with itself: the entire book of Hebrews was written to a certain group of people who were considering abandoning Christ and going back to Judaism. If that wasn't the reason that the book was written, then the author would not have written countless reasons as to why Christ is superior to Moses, and to every high priest. Nor would he have written how animal sacrifices could not take away our sins, but Christ can: Hebrews 10:4 For it is not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins. Hebrews 10:12 But this man, after he had offered one sacrifice for sins for ever, sat down on the right hand of God; The entire book of Hebrews was written as a warning that one should not reject Christ and go back to Judaism. Because having been a partaker of the Holy Ghost, meaning: (once believed in Christ, and therefore Christ dwelt in him), if they were to reject Christ, then they would be living under the law again. By living under the law, they are as the Jews, and it was the Jews that had Christ crucified, so by becoming a Jew again, you are once again takin heart to the Jewish faith which openly crucifies Christ by denying him. So yes, by rejecting Christ, and going back to Judaism, one would be crucifying Christ for themselves a second time. This is not to say that they can't come back to Christ, but what it does say is that, without Christ, it is not possibe for repentance, since their no longer remains a sacrifice for sin. There no longer remains a sacrifice because the that sacrifice, Jesus, is rejected for animal sacrifices, of which God no longer accepts. |
||||||
18 | Do you still refuse to bless Israel? | Gen 12:3 | JohnK | 43673 | ||
Why would you bless national Israel? Don't you understand what God is showing us? What did Jesus mean when he said, "You shall not see me here again, not until you say, blessed is he that comes in the name of the Lord!" Also, explain this passage to me: Galatians 3:29 And if you be Christ's, then are you Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise. And what about the book of Revelations: In the very first chapter of Revelation, the "seven golden candlesticks" of the ancient Jewish Temple are used as symbols of "the seven churches" (1:13, 20). This lays down a key principle - the ancient things of literal Israel are applied to the Israel of God (God's true Church). In Chapter 2, Jesus Christ referred to "that woman Jezebel" (2:20) who brought apostasy into ancient Israel. Yet He uses this wicked woman as a symbol of people who were trying to bring false prophecies into His Church. Again the principle is revealed - the things of ancient Israel are applied to His true Church, the Israel of God. Jesus came to fullfil the prophecies of the Old Testament, and THAT HE DID! Why would you still hold on to a prophecy that was fulfilled? What about this: Revelation 21:10 "And he carried me away in the spirit to a great and high mountain, and showed me that great city, the holy Jerusalem, descending out of heaven from God" Where did this Jerusalem come from? Earth? No, clearly, it says it descended from heaven. |
||||||
19 | Could there be two Israels flesh /spirit | Rom 9:6 | JohnK | 43669 | ||
The Israel of God is God's true spiritual Israel (God's true Church) that has existed throughout history, spaning both the Old and New Testaments. The Israel of God has always been made up of faithful Jews and faithful Gentiles who truly walk with God, either waiting for, or believing in, His true Messiah, Jesus Christ. Abraham (a Gentile), Moses, Daniel, Peter, Paul, and Luke (another Gentile) were all part of the Israel of God. In the days of Elijah, there was an "Israel after the flesh" which followed Ahab and Jezebel, and yet there was also a faithful "Israel of God" which refused to "bow the knee to the image of Baal" (Rom. 11:4, 5). From the days of Adam, Abel, and Noah, to the time of Moses and "the church in the wilderness" (Acts 7:38), to the last holy saint at the end of the world, God's true Church, the Israel of God, has always been composed of both faithful Jews and Gentiles who have maintained their loyalty to the Lord in the midst of a world filled with false doctrine, apostasy, and sin. | ||||||
20 | Hebrews 6:6 explained | Hebrews | JohnK | 42697 | ||
Hello everybody. This is a difficult passage, as many have stumbled because of it. I remember when I went through a cooling off period where I turned away from God, and on my way back, the book of Hebrews threw me on my face. I can't even begin to tell you the anguish I went through. I beleived that it actually said my chance had passed and I failed. But I thank God that the message is one of hope rather than condemnation. I should have realized that the terrible conviction I felt was a good sign that God wasn't through with me, but it didn't hit me right away. Now through more careful study of the bible and by asking questions, lots of questions, I realized that the entire book of Hebrews was written to a certain group of people who were considering abandoning Christ and going back to Judaism. If that wasn't the reason that the book was written, then the author would not have written countless reasons as to why Christ is superior to Moses, and to every high priest. Nor would he have written how animal sacrifices could not take away our sins, but Christ can: Hebrews 10:4 For it is not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins. Hebrews 10:12 But this man, after he had offered one sacrifice for sins for ever, sat down on the right hand of God; The entire book of Hebrews was written as a warning that one should not reject Christ and go back to Judaism. Because having been a partaker of the Holy Ghost, meaning: (once believed in Christ, and therefore Christ dwelt in him), if they were to reject Christ, then they would be living under the law again. By living under the law, they are as the Jews, and it was the Jews that had Christ crucified, so by becoming a Jew again, you are once again takin heart to the Jewish faith which openly crucifies Christ by denying him. So yes, by rejecting Christ, and going back to Judaism, one would be crucifying Christ for themselves a second time. This is not to say that they can't come back to Christ, but what it does say is that, without Christ, it is not possibe for repentance, since their no longer remains a sacrifice for sin. |
||||||
Result pages: [ 1 2 ] Next > Last [2] >> |