Results 1 - 20 of 125
|
||||||
Results from: Answers On or After: Thu 12/31/70 Author: Brian.g Ordered by Verse |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | writing in the sand? | Bible general Archive 4 | Brian.g | 194765 | ||
Michael John 8:6 first states that the scribes and Pharisees were testing Jesus so they could bring charges against Him. John 8:6 They said this to test him, so that they could have some charge to bring against him. Jesus bent down and began to write on the ground with his finger. Subsequently, Jesus' response of writing in the sand is a reference to Jer 17:13 O LORD, the hope of Israel, All who forsake You will be put to shame. Those who turn away on earth will be written down, Because they have forsaken the fountain of living water, even the LORD. Brian |
||||||
2 | Why is wisdom referred to as HER? | Bible general Archive 4 | Brian.g | 194950 | ||
bhazz Referring to wisdom as 'her' has its historic roots in Greek mythology. Sophia was the Greek goddess of wisdom and it carried forward as a result of the Hellenistic influence of the Greek and Roman empires and ultimately into the Septuagint. From a philosophical standpoint, philosophy itself means 'love of wisdom'. And, like a woman giving birth to a child, wisdom, when added with a sincere desire for discovering truth - gives birth to knowledge. Brian |
||||||
3 | Is the Bible alone sufficient in authori | Bible general Archive 3 | Brian.g | 174999 | ||
CWT I ran across this a while back and I found it interesting: Christ commanded the Apostles to preach the Gospel. In keeping with the Lord's command, the Gospel was handed on in two ways: … in writing (Sacred Scripture) Under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, the message of salvation was committed to writing by the Apostles, and other men. … orally (Sacred Tradition) by the spoken word of their preaching, by the example they gave, by the institutions they established, the Apostles handed on what they themselves had received from Jesus' teaching and example and what they learned from the Holy Spirit. We must acknowledge that the books of Scripture firmly, faithfully, and without error teach that truth which God, for the sake of our salvation, wished to see confided to the Sacred Scriptures. But, it is important to remember that, the first generation of Christians did not yet have a written New Testament. And the New Testament itself demonstrates the process of living Tradition. In this living transmission of the Gospel called Tradition, the Church, in her doctrine, life and worship, perpetuates and transmits to every generation all that she herself is and all that she believes. The task of interpreting the Word of God (Scripture and Tradition) has been entrusted to the Bishops. It is the Magisterium's task to defend God's people from deviations and falseness of the Word. And also, to guarantee God’s people the verifiable possibility of professing the true faith, without error. Yet the Magisterium is not superior to the Word of God, but is its servant. The first 20 Ecumenical Councils, a gathering of all of the Catholic Bishops of the world - in communion with the Pope, were for the purpose of discussing, interpreting, confirming and regulating Catholic doctrine and discipline. The 21st Ecumenical Council: Vatican II, convened by Pope John XXIII, was with a unique purpose: not to evaluate Church doctrine, but to focus on ‘the manner in which the sacred doctrine is spread’ and ‘that the sacred deposit of Christian doctrine should be taught more effectively’ One of the first Councils of the Church is recorded in the Bible in Acts 15:2-29 in which the Bishops addressed the doctrinal issue of whether the Gentiles needed to be circumcised, as prescribed in the Old Testament Regards Brian |
||||||
4 | Confused? | Bible general Archive 3 | Brian.g | 192288 | ||
Hello Believer I hope this might be of help to you.. In Jer 31:31-35, God said that the day will come in which he will make a new covenant with the people of Isreal. A covenant written on the hearts of people. This new covenant is Jesus. In Mt 5:17-20, Jesus said he did not come to change the law, but to fulfill it. This is to be understood as the difference between the 'letter of the law' versus the 'spirit of the law'. Jesus explained this difference at the Sermon on the Mount in Matthew chapters 5,6 and 7. In Scripture, there were various times in which Jesus was accused of breaking the law, but in turn Jesus explained the spirit of the law. Subsequently, the laws of Moses which the scribes and the Pharisees insisted that people follow, was replaced by the teachings of Jesus. In one sense, the laws of Moses still remain, but our duty as Christians (and our gift from Jesus) is to understand and live within the spirit of the law rather than just living a 'checklist-style of religion'. In our new covenant, we do not have to say that 'yes, I have completed 'this' obligation' or 'no, I did not violate 'that' rule', with the exception of our obligations and responsibilities in accordance with the teachings of Jesus. But more so, to be able to say that I have lived this day in accordance to the teachings of, and in the Spirit of, our Lord. With regard to Tithing. In the old covenant, God did not give any land to the people of Levi. It was the responsibility to the priests to serve God and the responsbility of the people to support the priests. That responsibility is still the same, today. But, the greatness of the act of tithing is when it is done for the love and glory of God and with our trust in Him. As did the widow in Mk 12:42-44 Brian |
||||||
5 | what does God think about marriage | Bible general Archive 1 | Brian.g | 11393 | ||
Paul's 'objections' to marriage is focused strictly and only at the disciples and Apostles, in order to dedicate their lives and energies to spreading the word of God. Paul felt marriage (wives and children) detracted these men from their total and complete service to God. For all others, Paul was an advocate of marriage. God has always intended for men and women to join each other in marriage. |
||||||
6 | Eggs for cash: Help! | Bible general Archive 1 | Brian.g | 11506 | ||
A suggestion on handling this situation... Your niece, like many people, is having trouble recognizing that her egg is the life of her future children and her future family. Second, I'm guessing that her relationship with God is a little bit on the weak side. Any Biblical quotes given to her will fall upon deaf ears and solidify her stance against you. I would suggest taking a step backward and reach out to her on a her level of belief and gently guide her. Let her understand the magnitude of the situation by your questions and her answers. Guide the conversation to discuss, for example, parental relationships and responsibilities. For example, how does she feel about Abraham's willingness to sacrifice Isaac at God's demand. How does she feel about Abraham not protecting his son? With her faith (or lack of) she will probably be in disbelief that Abraham (or any parent) would actually be ready to murder his own son - and for who? - God? She will probably think that Abraham must be some kind of nut, not willing to protect his own son! Ask her, would Abraham have been more justified in sacrificing his son for money? I think at this point you will get a soft 'no', as she begins to relate to the discussion. Then explain to her, that the seed within her is her future child and examine her responsibilities to that child. Guide the discussion along the path of what a parents responsibility is, with regard to protecting their children - and when does that parental protection begin - does she feel that a parent should be willing and even expected to sacrifice their own lives to protect their children. Let her answer that question. Give her food for thought. After she answers, ask her point blank, what do you think will happen to your children (not eggs) if you sell them - list her fairy tale answers as well as the probable answers - she will understand the list as it is being compiled. This will help make her understand the adult decision she is about to make. Then, maybe just some general discussion of her relationship with her parents. If it is good, then wouldn't she like to have the same with her children and aren't her children entitled to what she has had. If there is a poor relationship, then wouldn't she like a better one with her children. Everything that she would have wanted out of the relationship with her parents, she can achieve with her children. Remember, by gently guiding her today, you have the opportunity to help her preserve her body, lay the foundation for a postive future relationship with her children and you are helping her understand the family relationship which we have with God, our Father. You are now planting seeds for her future. Be patient and trust that the Holy Spirit will be with you and remember, only God is allowed to judge, not us. |
||||||
7 | Peter first Pope? | Bible general Archive 1 | Brian.g | 12719 | ||
Johnny Sorry for the delay in answering your question. Yes, I do believe Peter is the first Pope of the Catholic Church. Brian |
||||||
8 | What do you base your belief on? | Bible general Archive 1 | Brian.g | 12937 | ||
John Paul II (1978 to present), our current Pope is the 265th, with Peter (years 32 to 67) being the first. The second Pope, Linus (67 to 76 or 79), is thought to be the same Linus, Timothy refered to in 2 Timothy 4:21. The Church recognizes 30 antipopes. An antipope is a false claimant of the Holy See in opposition to a pontiff canonically elected. First, why Rome for the location of the Church. Peters final years were spent in Rome, or more specifically, in an area known as Ager Vaticanus. This area did not belong to ancient Rome, nor was it built within the walls of Rome. This is were Peter died and was buried. This simply became the physical center of the Church. When Peter lead the Church, he created a Senate consistng of 24 priests and deacons - this is documented. One of the roles of this Senate was to elect the new Pope - with Linus being the first Pope elected by men. Over time, the Senate structure while having taken different shapes - has remained constant. Keep in mind, Peter gave formal organizational structure to the Church. This is important, because this is the correcting factor when the office of the Pope was occupied by a man who was more interested in this world, than in heaven. It is through this election of the Pope by the Senate (College of Cardinals), this formal organization created by Peter, which enables us to discern who the properly elected pontiffs were as opposed to the antipopes, who, at the same time, were claiming the Church. How do we know Peter was choosen by Jesus to head his Church. Three reasons: first, Matthew 16:17-19, And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church Second: In numerous references within the Bible, when Jesus spoke to the Apostles as a group, He directed His conversation to Peter Mathew 26:40 - And He came to the disciples and found them sleeping, and said to Peter, "So, you men could not keep watch with Me for one hour? Third, on various occasions Peter speaks in the name of the other Apostles (Matthew 15:15; 19:27; Luke 12:41, etc.). Then Peter said to Him, "Behold, we have left everything and followed You; what then will there be for us?" Is there anyplace in the Bible where Jesus flat out said 'Peter - your the first Pope', no. It is not the strength or depth of the discussion between Jesus and Peter, it is the fact that it was Peter acting as the representative head of the Apostles with Jesus. Did Jesus intend for Peter to be the head of the Church, or did Peter just assume this role. I believe Jesus selected Peter. |
||||||
9 | Follow up Peter first Pope | Bible general Archive 1 | Brian.g | 12950 | ||
I don't know when the title 'Pope' was first used, or if it was used by Peter. However, I believe the following passages does reinforce Jesus selection of Peter as the leader of His Church Mark 16:5 Entering the tomb, they saw a young man sitting at the right, wearing a white robe; and they were amazed. Mark 16:6 And he *said to them, "Do not be amazed; you are looking for Jesus the Nazarene, who has been crucified. He has risen; He is not here; behold, here is the place where they laid Him. Mark 16:7 "But go, tell His disciples and Peter, 'He is going ahead of you to Galilee; there you will see Him, just as He told you.'" Peter was singled out to reaffirm his position as the leader of the disciples ...... Luke 24:34 saying, "The Lord has really risen and has appeared to Simon." First, Jesus appeared to Peter, then the other disciples ...... John 21:14 This is now the third time that Jesus was manifested to the disciples, after He was raised from the dead. John 21:15 So when they had finished breakfast, Jesus *said to Simon Peter, "Simon, son of John, do you love Me more than these?" He *said to Him, "Yes, Lord; You know that I love You." He *said to him, "Tend My lambs." John 21:16 He *said to him again a second time, "Simon, son of John, do you love Me?" He *said to Him, "Yes, Lord; You know that I love You." He *said to him, "Shepherd My sheep." John 21:17 He *said to him the third time, "Simon, son of John, do you love Me?" Peter was grieved because He said to him the third time, "Do you love Me?" And he said to Him, "Lord, You know all things; You know that I love You." Jesus *said to him, "Tend My sheep. |
||||||
10 | Follow question to There and to Catholic | Bible general Archive 1 | Brian.g | 13021 | ||
From Brian I am leaving for a short trip and I will be back on Friday. I will respond then. Thank you for your patience Brian |
||||||
11 | Documented?? | Bible general Archive 1 | Brian.g | 13634 | ||
Lucius Ferraris An eighteenth-century canonist of the Franciscan Order. The exact dates of his birth and death are unknown, but he was born at Solero, near Alessandria in Northern Italy. He was also professor, provincial of his order, and consultor of the Holy Office. It would seem he died before 1763. He is the author of the "Prompta Bibliotheca canonica, juridica, moralis, theologica, necnon ascetica, polemica, rubricistica, historica", a veritable encyclopedia of religious knowledge. The first edition of this work appeared at Bologna, in 1746. A second edition, much enlarged, also a third, were published by the author himself. The fourth edition, dating from 1763 seems to have been published after his death. This, like those which followed it, contains the additions which the author had made to the second edition under the title of additiones auctoris, and also other enlargements (additiones ex aliena manu) inserted in their respective places in the body of the work (and no longer in the appendix as in the former editions) and supplements. The various editions thus differ from each of her. The most recent are: that of the Benedictines (Naples, 1844-55), reproduced by Migne (Paris, 1861-1863), and an edition published at Paris 1884. A new edition was published at Rome in 1899 at the press of the Propaganda in eight volumes, with a volume of supplements, edited by the Jesuit, Bucceroni, containing several dissertations and the recent and important documents of the Holy See. This supplement serves to keep up to date the work of Ferraris, which will ever remain a precious mine of information, although it is sometimes possible to reproach the author with laxism |
||||||
12 | Early church support for Peter as Pope? | Bible general Archive 1 | Brian.g | 13685 | ||
How much farther are you planning on taking this debate. I have been insulted My Church has been mocked And any I answer, is never adequate. So, what more do you want from me. |
||||||
13 | Advise on contradictions found in bible | Bible general Archive 1 | Brian.g | 17603 | ||
Joseph's Father According to Julius Africanus: Estha married Mathan, a descendant of David through Solomon, and became the mother of Jacob; After Mathan's death she took for her second husband Mathat, a descendent of David through Nathan, and by him became the mother of Heli. Jacob and Heli were, therefore, uterine brothers. Heli married, but died without offspring; His widow, therefore, became the levirate wife of Jacob, and gave birth to Joseph, who was the carnal son of Jacob, but the legal son of Heli, thus combining in his person two lineages of David's descendents. Brian |
||||||
14 | Advise on contradictions found in bible | Bible general Archive 1 | Brian.g | 17607 | ||
Resurrection: One woman, two women, three women, etc The holy women carrying the spices previously prepared, start out for the sepulchre before dawn, and reach it after sunrise; they are anxious about the heavy stone, but know nothing of the official guard of the sepulchre (Matt., xxviii, 1-3; Mark, xvi, 1-3; Luke, xxiv, 1; John, xx, 1). The angel frightened the guards by his brightness, put them to flight, rolled away the stone, and seated himself (not upon, ep autou), but above (epano autou) the stone (Matt. xxviii, 2-4). (Three Women-One Angel, Above the Stone) Mary Magdalen, Mary the Mother of James, and Salome approach the sepulchre, and see the stone rolled back, whereupon Mary Magdalen immediately returns to inform the Apostles (Mark, xvi, 4; Luke, xxiv, 2; John xx, 1-2). (Two Women-One Angel, Inside the Tomb) The OTHER TWO holy women enter the sepulchre, find an angel seated in the vestibule, who shows them the empty sepulchre, announces the Resurrection, and commissions them to tell the disciples and Peter that they shall see Jesus in Galilee (Matt., xxviii, 5-7; Mark, xvi, 5-7). (Three Women-Two Men) A second group of holy women, consisting of Joanna and her companions, arrive at the sepulchre, where they have probably agreed to meet the first group, enter the empty interior, and are admonished by two angels that Jesus has risen according to His prediction (Luke, xxiv, 10). Not long after, Peter and John, who were notified by Mary Magdalen, arrive at the sepulchre and find the linen cloth in such a position as to exclude the supposition that the body was stolen; for they lay simply flat on the ground, showing that the sacred body had vanished out of them without touching them. When John notices this he believes (John, xx, 3-10). (One Woman-Two Angels) Mary Magdalen returns to the sepulchre, sees first two angels within, and then Jesus Himself (John, xx, 11-l6; Mark, xvi, 9). Brian |
||||||
15 | Advise on contradictions found in bible | Bible general Archive 1 | Brian.g | 17609 | ||
Visitors at Jesus' grave - Mary, Mary, Joanne and Salome The holy women carrying the spices previously prepared, start out for the sepulchre before dawn, and reach it after sunrise; they are anxious about the heavy stone, but know nothing of the official guard of the sepulchre (Matt., xxviii, 1-3; Mark, xvi, 1-3; Luke, xxiv, 1; John, xx, 1). The angel frightened the guards by his brightness, put them to flight, rolled away the stone, and seated himself (not upon, ep autou), but above (epano autou) the stone (Matt. xxviii, 2-4). (Mary Magdelen, Mary mother of James, and Salome) Mary Magdalen, Mary the Mother of James, and Salome approach the sepulchre, and see the stone rolled back, whereupon Mary Magdalen immediately returns to inform the Apostles (Mark, xvi, 4; Luke, xxiv, 2; John xx, 1-2). (Mary, Mother of James and Salome) The OTHER TWO holy women enter the sepulchre, find an angel seated in the vestibule, who shows them the empty sepulchre, announces the Resurrection, and commissions them to tell the disciples and Peter that they shall see Jesus in Galilee (Matt., xxviii, 5-7; Mark, xvi, 5-7). (Joanna, et al) A second group of holy women, consisting of Joanna and her companions, arrive at the sepulchre, where they have probably agreed to meet the first group, enter the empty interior, and are admonished by two angels that Jesus has risen according to His prediction (Luke, xxiv, 10). Not long after, Peter and John, who were notified by Mary Magdalen, arrive at the sepulchre and find the linen cloth in such a position as to exclude the supposition that the body was stolen; for they lay simply flat on the ground, showing that the sacred body had vanished out of them without touching them. When John notices this he believes (John, xx, 3-10). (Mary Magdalen alone) Mary Magdalen returns to the sepulchre, sees first two angels within, and then Jesus Himself (John, xx, 11-l6; Mark, xvi, 9). Brian |
||||||
16 | Advise on contradictions found in bible | Bible general Archive 1 | Brian.g | 17611 | ||
Drinks offered to Jesus Both situations appear to have occured at the same point, the place Golgotha, which is translated, Place of a Skull. Here, Jesus was offered two drinks, one which He refused, completely and the second He tasted, but was unwilling to drink. (Wine mingled with myrrh) - Jesus DID NOT drink Mark 15:23 They tried to give Him wine mixed with myrrh; but He did not take it (Vinegar Mingled with Gall) Actual passage is Mathew 27:34 , not 7:34 Matt 27:34 they gave Him wine to drink mixed with gall; and after tasting it, He was unwilling to drink. This is not a contradiction, but two different occurrences Brian |
||||||
17 | Advise on contradictions found in bible | Bible general Archive 1 | Brian.g | 17613 | ||
Jesus on a Tree or a Cross This is only an interpretation of the original language word. Some use cross and others use tree. Brian |
||||||
18 | Advise on contradictions found in bible | Bible general Archive 1 | Brian.g | 17618 | ||
12 thrones of Isreal - 12 Including one devil. It was during Jesus' 4th journey at which time, Jesus told the Apostles that they would sit on the twelve thrones of Isreal, (Autumn,A.U.C. 780 to Passover, 781) It was during Jesus' 5th journey in which He identified one fo the Apostles as the devil. (Spring A.U.C. 781). Again, these are not conflicting statements, but statements which were made at different times. And, it should be noted that after the death of Judas, the remaining eleven Apostles elected a new 12th Apostle - keeping the total at 12 - which gave truth and merit to both statements made by Jesus. The true questions which needs to be addressed here is: What was Judas' real role and why did Jesus pick him. Did Jesus not know what He was doing? Did Jesus knowingly pick Judas to fulfill Scripture? Did Jesus pick Judas to show the fraility of man, even when the men are committed to Christ? Brian |
||||||
19 | Advise on contradictions found in bible | Bible general Archive 1 | Brian.g | 17622 | ||
All Other 'Contradictions' Upon closer inspection, all will realize that there is no contradiction - only loose interpretations of the Bible - God's word - based upon a single passage or phrase, instead of learning the whole word of God. When people take the time to learn the whole word of God, then the full meaning, truth and greatness of God's word, and of God Himself, will become evident to each person. Brian |
||||||
20 | Possible Lockman Forum Improvement #1? | Bible general Archive 1 | Brian.g | 17872 | ||
Sir Pent I agree with your plan Brian |
||||||
Result pages: [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ] Next > Last [7] >> |