Results 1 - 13 of 13
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Unanswered Bible Questions Author: terryandangie Ordered by Date |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Midianites reappear? | Num 31:1 | terryandangie | 109035 | ||
The midianites were wiped out in Numbers but they show up again in the book of Judges when they battle Gideon. Any Ideas that explain this? Thanks Terry | ||||||
2 | Personal prophets in the church? | Acts 3:6 | terryandangie | 105665 | ||
Thanks for your answer on slain in the spirit. It brings me to the question on "prophets". The ones who do personal prophesy on people. Where does that come from? Is it correct? Terry | ||||||
3 | What is slain in the spirit? | Acts 3:6 | terryandangie | 105637 | ||
Where does slain in the spirit come from? | ||||||
4 | The woman ought to have ? | 1 Cor 11:10 | terryandangie | 104120 | ||
The KJV has it as (ought the woman to have power on her head) The NIV (ought to have a sign of authority on her head) What exactly was Paul trying to say? Ive heard lately (the woman ought to have a choise) is thr correct translation. Thanks Terry | ||||||
5 | To understand one verse ! | 1 Cor 11:16 | terryandangie | 103441 | ||
I've been studying 1 Cor 11:16. If you compare KJV NKJV, NRS to RSV,NLT,NIV they seem to be saying exactly opposite. Some translations seem to say that the "custom" was held by the churches, the others seem to say that the "custom" wasen't held by the churches. What did he mean by custom? One comentary said it meant women not covering there heads. Others said he was referring to women covering there heads. I've read several different comentarys and opinions on this chapter and have gotten many different views. The oppinons on this one verse follow which version of the Bible is used. I believe the older translations are not as accurate as some of the newer ones.It seems odd that the translations would vary so much in meaning. It makes it hard to understand exactly what Paul was trying to convey. My view is that the churches of that day held to the custom of the men having short hair and their heads uncovered and the women had a covering and or long hair. I don't seen any reason for this custom not to be practiced today as long as its not made a law. If it was a good practice for the churches back then it probably is still today. Most people hold to that custom anyway. Thanks Terry | ||||||
6 | To understand one verse ! | Col 1:18 | terryandangie | 103439 | ||
I've been studying 1 Cor 11:16. If you compare KJV NKJV, NRS to RSV,NLT,NIV they seem to be saying exactly opposite. Some translations seem to say that the "custom" was held by the churches, the others seem to say that the "custom" wasen't held by the churches. What did he mean by custom? One comentary said it meant women not covering there heads. Others said he was referring to women covering there heads. I've read several different comentarys and opinions on this chapter and have gotten many different views. The oppinons on this one verse follow which version of the Bible is used. I believe the older translations are not as accurate as some of the newer ones.It seems odd that the translations would vary so much in meaning. It makes it hard to understand exactly what Paul was trying to convey. My view is that the churches of that day held to the custom of the men having short hair and their heads uncovered and the women had a covering and or long hair. I don't seen any reason for this custom not to be practiced today as long as its not made a law. If it was a good practice for the churches back then it probably is still today. Most people hold to that custom anyway. Thanks Terry | ||||||
7 | What is a covering? | 1 Cor 11:3 | terryandangie | 103234 | ||
Corinthians 11, In our church they teach that the man is the the womans covering. Is anyone familar with this teaching and what exactly does it mean to be the covering? And also what verses are used to show that a man is a covering? Thanks | ||||||
8 | What is a covering? | 1 Cor 11:15 | terryandangie | 103236 | ||
Corinthians 11, In our church they teach that the man is the the womans covering. Is anyone familar with this teaching and what exactly does it mean to be the covering? And also what verses are used to show that a man is a covering? Thanks | ||||||
9 | personal prophecy | Bible general Archive 2 | terryandangie | 98788 | ||
Ive seen and heard alot about people getting personal prophecies.Is this stuff real,is there any biblical basis for it. It just seems plain old weird to me. Thanks | ||||||
10 | Who is the god of fortresses | Daniel | terryandangie | 81750 | ||
Daniel 11:38, Any ideas on who this god of fortresses is? Seems like it might be something that is going to be revealed in the future. Thanks | ||||||
11 | Comming of the antichrist? Time unknown! | Gen 1:1 | terryandangie | 79850 | ||
It seems to me that Matthew 24:14-22 and 2 Thessalonians 2:3-6 line up for a future event. Also Matthew 24:23-28 seems to line up with 2 Thessalonians 2:7-12, These events almost certainly still need to occur. Any comments? Thanks Terry | ||||||
12 | Still studying Mattew 24 | Matt 24:3 | terryandangie | 78596 | ||
OK, so if Matthew 24 has already occured why hasn't Jesus returned? Is Matthew 24 split into two different time periods? What about the sun and moon being darkend, and stars falling from the sky, when does that occure? A group of small meteors striking the earth could easly account for that. The dust would eaisly block out the sun light. Has anybody thought that someone might be able to set off a large bomb in Jeruselum, they are already doing it but on a smaller scale? Could an event like that fit into bible prophecy? Any thoughts are appreciated. Terry | ||||||
13 | Matt 24 Is it all in the future? | Matt 24:1 | terryandangie | 78178 | ||
Chapter 24 of Matthew seems to be talking about an event in the future. (24:6,7 24:9 24:14 24:22 24:30) It seems that the sacrilegious object that causes desecration will be set up in Jeruselem in the future, then great calamity will come.(24:22 24:29) After the heavenly signs the lord will return. Does anyone have any ideas on this chapter? I've been taught that it covers two different time periods but I can't see it that way. Thanks for any comments. Terry | ||||||