Results 1 - 7 of 7
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Unanswered Bible Questions Author: jonnyr1 Ordered by Date |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Can a true christian lose salvation? | Bible general Archive 2 | jonnyr1 | 110970 | ||
I'll shift bases a little. I will ask the question of whether or not someone can lose their salvation. I have never heard a sermon on this, and I go to church three time a week. Please support your summaries and views with scripture. Thanks. Jon |
||||||
2 | Can a true christian lose salvation? | Bible general Archive 2 | jonnyr1 | 110971 | ||
I'll shift bases a little. I will ask the question of whether or not someone can lose their salvation. I have never heard a sermon on this, and I go to church three time a week. Please support your summaries and views with scripture. Thanks. Jon |
||||||
3 | Was Mary in David's Line | Gen 3:15 | jonnyr1 | 110955 | ||
Good to hear from you again Emmaus, I have read Galatians but don't see how it pertains to David's seed. How does this verse show that Mary is adequate, and that Joseph is not required. Where in the Holy Bible can it be proved that Mary was in the line of David? Galatians 4:4 (KJV) But when the fulness of the time was come, God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law, Jon |
||||||
4 | How was Jesus of David's seed/line? | Gen 3:15 | jonnyr1 | 110950 | ||
From the below verses it is very clear that Jesus had to be from the seed of David according to the flesh. But how?? Joh 7:42 Hath not the scripture said, That Christ cometh of the seed of David, and out of the town of Bethlehem, where David was? Ro 1:3 Concerning his Son Jesus Christ our Lord, which was made of the seed of David according to the flesh; 2Ti 2:8 Remember that Jesus Christ of the seed of David was raised from the dead according to my gospel: In Mt 1:18 Now the birth of Jesus Christ was on this wise: When as his mother Mary was espoused to Joseph, before they came together, she was found with child of the Holy Ghost. We see that see was with child of the Holy Ghost. How could Jesus be the seed of David in anyway, let alone to the flesh as stated in Romans 1:3? My Questions Continue Jon |
||||||
5 | Do you have any other explanations? | Mark 14:62 | jonnyr1 | 110902 | ||
Hello Ray, I will respond to your post very similiar to that of Emmaus's. Your words are in quotes. "Hi jonnyr1, A comparison of the gospel may give you an answer to your question as well as the excellent answers you have already received." Nice greeting, but I wish I could agree with you on the excellent answers portion of the opening. "In Mark, as you have said, the chief priest is the person of which it says "and you shall see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of Power,..." It simply says "you shall see" with some time in the future being indicated." I address this in my critique of Emmaus's response. It clearly says that he would see Jesus coming back in the clouds. It would have to happen in the priest lifetime, because after he is dead, there would be no clouds for him to see Jesus come back in. Please read Emmaus's message for more. "In Matthew 26:64 it says, "nevertheless, I tell you, hereafter you shall see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of Power,..." My Study Bible has a marginal alternate reading for "hereafter" as [Or, from now on]. I believe the Greek supports that idea that "from now on" we all will see that He is who He said He was, and He will be coming in power and glory. See last section." Looks like Mark left out an important detail. But how is the problem fixed in Matt 26? This is what my online bible greek lexicon returns. 737 arti arti artee from a derivative of 142 (cf 740) through the idea of suspension; TDNT-4:1106,658; adv AV-now 24, henceforth 575 2, hereafter 575 2, this present 2, hitherto 2193 2, misc 4; 36 1) just now, this moment 2) now at this time, at this very time, this moment For Synonyms see entry 5815 It has to be within the priest lifetime! "In Mark 13:26, it doesn't talk of the high priest but it has the same idea of His coming. "And then they will see the Son of Man coming in clouds with great power and glory." So you see that not only the high priest but all of us will see this." The best point I have read yet, but still the disciples have tasted of death and not seen Jesus come in his kingdom with his angels and reward. And if the priest is not alive and on earth, he won't be able to see Jesus coming in the clouds, the priest would have to be in some eternal bleachers enjoying the show. "Psalm 110:1, "The Lord says to my Lord: "Sit at **My right hand, Until I make Thine enemies a footstool for Thy feet." Ok, what's the point. If I wanted I could search the phrase right hand and I would get back 174 result using SwordSearcher. So what? This has nothing to do with the main promise to the priest and disciples. "Mark 14:62, "...and you shall see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of **Power..." Same as above. Jon |
||||||
6 | Can you answer this? | Mark 14:62 | jonnyr1 | 110899 | ||
Hello Emmaus and thank you for responding so quickly. I'll try to go over your response while keeping it somewhat short. Your words will be in quotes. -"Jesus did not say when the High priest would see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven." Irrelevant. He says that the priest will see him returning. If he wasn't to see him coming back in his lifetime while he was on earth, then when? Jesus is clearly referring to his second coming to earth to judge and reward (matthew), and it would be impossible for him to see Jesus returning in the clouds if he wasn't alive and on earth. In Matthew 16:27-28 (KJV) Jesus says this to his disciples: 27 For the Son of man shall come in the glory of his Father with his angels; and then he shall reward every man according to his works. 28 Verily I say unto you, There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom. Please don't try to say that this was fulfilled during the transfiguration. Problems with this defense: 1) Matt. 16:27 says the Son of man "shall come"; whereas, Jesus didn't come from somewhere to Peter, James, and John. He was with them all along and, in fact, took them up the mountain. 2) Jesus was supposed to come with angels and they aren't even mentioned in the Transfiguration account. 3) When did Jesus "reward every man according to his works" at the time of the Transfiguration? Nothing is said about rewarding anyone. 4) Jesus was to come "in his kingdom." Yet, his kingdom isn't mentioned in the Transfiguration account either. 5) According to the same narrative in Mark 9:1 the kingdom was to "come with power." Yet, the events surrounding the Transfiguration elicit no exceptional display of power. Read also: mark 9:1, luke 9:27 Use any translation or version you like, the message remains clear. -"He will certainly see Him at the last judgement and may have seen Him at the moment of death before his individual judgement." Yes, we will all see him at the last judgement. But the verses in Matthew and Mark don't refer to the last judgement. Your answer is evasive and unscriptural. His individual judgement right after death? Please bring out your Bible and enlighten me on this. Not to mention that it is still invalid, as is the last judgement. Neither have anything to do with him coming back to earth in the clouds. -"This statment of Jesus was mor a declaration by Jesus of His own identity as the divine "I am" and the Messiah." He says 'I AM'. The passage has more meaning than simply a declaration. Read the rest of the verse. Also read Matthew 16:27-28 again. The verse consists of more than two words! Let's be honest and keep the whole verse intact please. If it was just a declaration, Jesus wouldn't have made a promise that the priest would see him coming, and Jesus wouldn't have promised to his disciples (in Matthew 16) that they would see him coming in his kingdom. -"See Psalm 110:1,2, 5-7 and Daniel 7:9,13, 23-27. for the reference verse and how they also show thet the Son of Man will be vindicated over His enemies by God. Jesus was vindicated in the face of His enemies by His Resurrection and Acension into heaven." I have already read and studied these cross reference many times. Being vindicated is not the point I am getting at. You know very well that I am concerned with his prediction and promise to the priest and disciples. -"Also interesting is the response of the High Priest who tears his garment in violation of Leviticus 10:6 and 21:21:10. Mystically this has been interpreted as the rending and end of the priesthood of the Old Covenant. By comparison, the Linen garment of Jesus, the High Priest of the New Covenant (Hebrews 7:23-24)is not torn (John 19:23-24)." Interesting, but not the issue of discussion. Hope to hear from you again, Jon |
||||||
7 | Is Mark 16:42 a failed prophecy? Help me | Mark 14:62 | jonnyr1 | 110886 | ||
In Mark 14:62 Jesus is speaking directly to the high priest. Jesus says, "...you shall see the sone of man sitting at the right hand of power, and coming with the clouds of heaven." In other words, Jesus told the high priest that he would see Jesus (the Son of Man) returning in the clouds of heaven. But did he? The priest has died and did not see Jesus returning in the clouds. Nor did anyone else. Is there any defense for this verse? Help Please! Jon |
||||||