Results 1 - 2 of 2
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Unanswered Bible Questions Author: Robert Hommel Ordered by Date |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | What's the form of ADON in Ps 110:1? | Ps 110:1 | Robert Hommel | 33214 | ||
Hi, thanks for the response. It doesn't quite get at what I'm asking, though. The Masoretic Text does not have the vowel points for ADONAI, but rather for ADONI in Ps 110:1. Some Unitarian apologists are claiming that while ADONAI is the sole form of ADON used of YHWH, ADONI is used only of human lords (or angels). I don't think this is correct - ADON does appear to be used of YHWH also; however, my question really is with regard to the Concordance. Strong's lists the second occurance of Lord as ADON (#113) while the NASB Concordance lists it as ADONAI (#136). Either they are basing this on different textual evidence (i.e., Strong's is relying on the MT, while the NASB on something else) or one is incorrect. If the NASB Concordance is correct, the Unitarian argument is proven wrong at its very root. However, if the NASB Concordance is in error, then Trintitarians (such as myself) will need to demonstrate that the Unitarian argument is deficient in other ways (which I believe it is). Hope this helps clarify! |
||||||
2 | Adonay or Adoni in Ps 110:1 | Ps 110:1 | Robert Hommel | 33201 | ||
The NASB Exhaustive Concordance lists the second occurance of "Lord" in Psalm 110:1 as "adonay" (#136). Strongs and the NIV concordance list it as "Adon" (#113). The MT reads "adoni," a form of #113. Is the NASB Concordance in error, or is the NASB relying on other MS evidence? Thanks! |
||||||