Results 1 - 3 of 3
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Anyone take notes during Yashua's life? | NT general | Maus | 239844 | ||
Hello Doc: The 70 that I referred to was the disciples that Yeshua sent out by twos. A third possibility; that many contemporary notes were kept, by many different people, in several different languages, and that the "Q-document" which is presumed to be the source for the gospels, is actually a compilation of these notes. If so, then the Gospels sources had originated from many languages. This would infer that the New Testament is the authorized word of Elohim, in every language which our current texts may have been preserved by. If this is so, then Greek re-translations back into Hebrew, and Latin, Aramaic, and Greek texts are all equally reliable ... even more so if they are each referenced with the others ... none having supremacy over the others. | ||||||
2 | Anyone take notes during Yashua's life? | NT general | DocTrinsograce | 239849 | ||
Dear Mause, The theory of the Q document has never been substantiated by anything but circumstantial evidence. It was popularized by liberal scholars for quite a few decades. However, I do not find any serious biblical scholar or textual critique holding to this speculation. Often speculation is of passing intellectual curiosity. But Christianity is based on historic fact. Thereon we may solidly build our thinking. In Him, Doc |
||||||
3 | Anyone take notes during Yashua's life? | NT general | Maus | 239857 | ||
Hello Doc: There is also "M", which again is speculative. However, more to the point is "Matthew collected the oracles in the Hebrew language" (Ecclesiastical History, III, 39, 16). Which oracles, from where? We are not told. But certainly a reference to writings much closer to contemporaneous events. | ||||||