Results 1 - 3 of 3
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | World English Bible | Bible general Archive 1 | retxar | 6940 | ||
I personally think it is better than the NASB because it is based on the MT instead of the CT, which I FEEL is more accurate. The WEB Bible is also public domain as the KJV is. The WEB Bible is complete Gen-Rev in electronic form and is available as a free download for the excellent free Bible program called e-Sword @ e-sword.net. Jesus is Lord! |
||||||
2 | World English Bible | Bible general Archive 1 | roverjbh99 | 7106 | ||
So far, I think the WEB/ASV97 is really good (in the NT, that is). As with the old ASV, some of the language is pretty old sounding. Until it's done, I won't make a comparsion to the NAS. | ||||||
3 | World English Bible | Bible general Archive 1 | kalos | 7118 | ||
roverjbh99:Thank you for a very sensible, reasonable answer. Wisdom and prudence ought to teach anyone how inappropriate it would be to compare an unpublished book with one that is published. But the illogic of it doesn't keep some people from doing just that. How can I appraise that which I have never laid eyes on, and particularly when the book remains incomplete and unpublished? You should have seen all the negative remarks here regarding the Holman Christian Standard Bible. Largely uninformed critics did everything but call the HCSB the New Satanic Bible. The reaction was downright emotional. Anyway, thank you once again for your answer. |
||||||