Results 1 - 3 of 3
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Things the untaught and unstable distort | 2 Pet 3:16 | Radioman2 | 86195 | ||
Direct quotations from the pen of dschaertel. "To the degree that we claim to be right we in a sense are simply trying to justify ourselves." "The Bible to many people has become a crutch, kind of a security blanket." "The Bible can become a destructive tool..." "So my trust is in Him (Christ), not the Bible." ("So my trust is not [in] the Bible.") "Sola Scritpura (sic) is a doctrine that is not taught in the Bible." "You say there is agreement that the Bible is true, and I agree with that as well. But I don't believe in it's sufficiency..." Adam and Eve "didn't get kicked out of the garden because the[y] disobeyed." "Sola Scriptura is not taught in the scriptures. It was an invention in response to the oppresion of the Catholic hierarchy." "This talk about a future antichrist and this elaborate end times story is great for selling books, making movies and scaring people into coming to church, but it just isn't in the Bible." "There will be death in the millenium, because that is the period of time that we are in right now. The thousand years in the bible is not a literal thousand years." "And the question still stands, where does the Bible speak of the 66 or more books that we call the bible, and where does it say that they are the exclusive and sufficient revelation of God? What prohecy was this? I haven't found it, and nobody I know has found it either. As far as I can tell you are just making that up." "The question is of course what is scripture? Where does the Bible tell us what it is? You can't just say the Bible. Men wrote it and decided which books were in it . . . Where is the prophecy that there would be a New Testament with 27 books?" In reference to Genesis chapters 1 and 2: "But if we actually examine the text of the story, I guess I have to question it as being literal history. The imagery is quite fanciful and symbolic." "...take another look at the Garden [of Eden] story. There is some intersting things. Like for instance, God is walking and can't find them. What kind of God is that? He has leggs, and can't see through the trees. . . You see, the story doesn't hang together if it is literal." "Jesus can in fact be real even if Adam is a parable. Sorry, you have proven nothing here except that you wish Adam to be a real person . . . But I find no problem with the idea that it is a parable. And I find no real evidence that it isn't. I do see that it was in the character of Jesus Christ to speak in parables and it wouldn't be a surprise to me if the Garden story is a parable. What I do find problematic is people's religous devotion to it being literally true." |
||||||
2 | What is your reason for quoting dsch... | 2 Pet 3:16 | prazn | 86214 | ||
Hi Radioman, What is your purpose in sharing these quotations from dsch...? Is it to cast doubt on the inerrancy of the Bible? Thanks! prazn |
||||||
3 | What is your reason for quoting dsch... | 2 Pet 3:16 | Radioman2 | 86241 | ||
Hi, Prazn! No, my purpose is not to cast doubt on the inerrancy of the Bible. I don't doubt its inerrancy. In all my 946 postings, I've never written a single word with the intention of casting doubt on the inerrancy of the Bible. Could it be the intent of the AUTHOR of the quotations to cast doubt upon: the inerrancy of the Bible, or the sufficiency of the Bible, or the canon (an authoritative list of books accepted as Holy Scripture) of the Bible? Grace and peace, Radioman2 |
||||||