Results 1 - 3 of 3
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | gender ,yes | Gal 3:28 | kalos | 7152 | ||
Part 2 (continued from Part 1) RCSCROLL says: this chapter does by inferance refer to the fact that we all can now enter into the holy of holies by our selves with no need of a priest, JVH0212 says: With all respect, I do not agree with you that what you say is what this chapter is talking about, since the chapter in Galations makes no mention whatsoever of the priesthood or the holy of holies. (In a previous posting, I have already given my reasons for not being able to agree.) I If we start arbitrarily deciding that such and such a passage by inference refers to a particular fact or subject without making mention of that subject, then we begin to depart from what the Bible SAYS in that passage. Using that approach in every case would open up the Bible to all sorts of private interpretation. If the words do not mean what they SAY but instead refer to an entirely different, unmentioned subject, then we can never be sure of the meaning of any scripture.) RCSCROLL says: lets remember that the bible is of no private interpretation, and please never grasp anyones commentary as absolute truth , their not the word of God,try not using one for awhile and see if what you came up with lines up to them. JVH0212 says: Amen, the Bible is of no private interpretation, which, by the way, does not refer to interpreting the meaning, but in the context refers to the inspiration of the Bible. Again I did not use anyone's commentary in my previous posting. Except for quoting you and the Bible, the writing was entirely my own. I never have "grasped" at any commentary as absolute truth. I have said over and over and over again on this Forum that no man, no commentary, no study Bible notes, no TV preacher, no author, no human institution is infallible. Only the Bible is infallible and only IN THE ORIGINAL MANUSCRIPTS. I am a Berean in the sense that I check out everything for myself. The Bereans "searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so." RCSCROLL says: May our Lord Jesus richly bless you in your understanding . P.S. anytime you talk about the law the priesthood is allways incorporated and so implied that women slaves or greek are not. JVH0212 says: And may He richly bless you as well. I'm not sure what the following phrase means: "and so implied that women slaves or greek are not." Who? And they are not WHAT? RCSCROLL says: Go all the way back to vs 19.About faith vs 23 faith allways has been only now we see it completely in Christ as in times past it was hid.Heb 11:27-31 love in Christ RCSCROLL JVH0212 says: Sorry, but I don't really don't know what you mean by the above or how it pertains to the subject at hand. Again, no offense to you personally, but I don't intend to debate this endlessly. I wouldn't have anything new to add to what I've already said. Sincerely, JVH0212 |
||||||
2 | gender ,yes | Gal 3:28 | RCSCROLL | 7165 | ||
I was saying that in verse 19 starts with the law,and by inclusion the law demands a priest,which in a majority of ocassion demends a #1 jew, #2 man #3 freeman , not a gentile, woman,or slave. there in lays my interpretation of galations 3:28 which we agree is a spiritual here and now. Love in Christ RCSCROLL | ||||||
3 | gender ,yes | Gal 3:28 | kalos | 7170 | ||
RC: OK! Now I finally get your point. A little slow here. You are right: *in the law* a priest is required to be male. Nevertheless, *in Christ Jesus* there is neither male nor female. Under Grace, not Law, men and women are exactly equal. They differ in their respective roles, but neither is inferior to the other. It is an immutable fact that in the eyes of God in this age THERE IS NO DISTINCTION; "there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus." Neither other verses of Scripture nor any amount of "reasoning" will ever change the truth of this verse. RC, no hostility or personal criticism is intended here. We are merely discussing the issue. Your point about the Law is well taken. But, let us never confuse or mix Law with Grace. The original question was in regard to the Kingdom of God. It wasn't about Judaism or the Priesthood. Again, thank you for having the patience to keep explaining your point to me until I finally got it. :-) Take care. --JVH0212 |
||||||