Results 1 - 3 of 3
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Acts 16:33 and infant baptism. | Acts 16:33 | Huron | 110046 | ||
I'm trying to settle in my own mind whether or not the NT gives any credence to infant baptism. If the word "household" includes babies in this verse, it is a small amount of evidence for infant baptism. I realize that there are no direct stories in the NT where the Apostles clearly and directly baptized infants, but I want to make sure I research the topic completely. I had thought that Philip's statement to the Ethopian Enuch (Acts 8:37) was airtight against infant baptism, but I see in Metzgers'Commentary on the New Testament Greek that the verse was likely added to the original text. No arguing please, but I'm hoping that those of you out there who have considered both sides of this issue will lend your thoughts! Regards and Thanks! Huron |
||||||
2 | Acts 16:33 and infant baptism. | Acts 16:33 | Emmaus | 110048 | ||
Huron, You may find the links below to two article of interest in relation to your question. http://www.catholic.com/library/Infant_Baptism.asp http://www.catholic.com/library/Early_Teachings_of_Infant_Baptism.asp Emmaus |
||||||
3 | Acts 16:33 and infant baptism. | Acts 16:33 | Huron | 110053 | ||
Emmaus, Thank you for the links. I see that this issue is not as clear cut as I previously believed. There were some good points in the articles. Huron |
||||||