Results 1 - 3 of 3
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Son of Abraham, David, Joseph? | John 7:46 | Ray | 34941 | ||
Does the offspring from the descendants of David, this Son of David, need to be thought of as a man? Which translation/interpretation do you like best? NASB John 7:46, "The officers answered, "Never has a man spoken the way this man speaks." Amplified John 7:46, "The attendants replied, Never has a man talked as this Man talks! [No mere man has ever spoken as He speaks!] NKJ John 7:46, "The officers answered, "No man ever spoke like this Man!" Again, the question is, is it necessary to think of Jesus as a man or should we only think of Him as the God/Man. |
||||||
2 | Son of Abraham, David, Joseph? | John 7:46 | Wigglesworth | 34953 | ||
Jesus was as much man as though He were not God, but, at the very same time He was as much God as though He were not a man. One hundred percent man and one hundred percent God at the same time. | ||||||
3 | Son of Abraham, David, Joseph? | John 7:46 | Ray | 34989 | ||
Hi Wigglesworth, In the framework of capitalization then, you would make Jesus into the God/man. I would like to make Him the God/Man because He came as the second Adam. Adam was called Man when he was created. I know that Jesus was sinless and I see no reason to think of Him as a man [sic]. He came in the likeness of men, yes, but in order to show the contrast between Himself and mere men I see the need of showing His sinlessness and His deity by capitalizing Man. Do you see a necessity of keeping Him as a man? From the heart, Ray |
||||||