Results 1 - 8 of 8
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Amazement functioned in Mark? | Mark 1:22 | Tamara Brewington | 204520 | ||
How did amazement function in Mark? God Bless hat lady |
||||||
2 | Amazement functioned in Mark? | Mark 1:22 | RC Scrolls | 204531 | ||
Tamars do you look to see if your questions are already answered before asking them. or are you possiby taking the easy way out of having to study for yourself at Collage. Just seems that you have alot of the same questions that are asked while in Collage. Forgive me if I am wrong. in Christ RC | ||||||
3 | Amazement functioned in Mark? | Mark 1:22 | Tamara Brewington | 204553 | ||
My dear RC, I always forgive you. I say what follows in respect and love. I am not in college at all, just a Bible school. and yes I went checking although I didn't say that for each question and didn't find an answer so I posted the questions. These are not class questions per say, some of them did not stem from hearing things I did not agree or disagree with in class, but came from looking at some passages. But some of them did come from taking class and being left wondering more about the subject, or just plain frustrated with what I have been taught. But I never, ask something because I need an answer for class and look for the answer here. I often ask forum members what they think about a take on a subject that I already have researched and don't agree with what a professor taught, but not to be able to take that to go pass a class. These are professors who decided to devote their time to a Bible School for lay people. Does it really matter what my motive is in asking a question other than a real desire to study everything about the Bible? As long as I am not tryint to get a grade by doing it what is the harm to anyone? God bless Tamara |
||||||
4 | Amazement functioned in Mark? | Mark 1:22 | RC Scrolls | 204586 | ||
Well apparently your motive is not about what I thought. But motive to Study shouuld do just that make you study, maybe when you have exhausted all effort you would then call upon others for an answer. I suggest that if you want to study something that it is very Dangerous to do so, unless you are already grounded in Biblical Theology. When you are grounded well you just have learned to Depend on God and your self for study. When approaching my goal of Higher Education my disertation and Thesis studies I failed, because I have a totoally ligitamate Eschatology that the Church has writings of for two thousand yrs and completely disagreed with the Dispensational Futurisim Idea and invention of futurists Doctrine. Never the less I had failed my last yr because they listen to a false doctrine. it cost me my PhD and about 5 yrs not to mention the financial loss of over 50,000 Dollars. When they only had 181 yrs of witnesses. They told me I was screwd up. My Disertation Was over 200 pges long, My Thesis was about the Dating of Johns Revelation. Now after This view taking on and winning 35 and 40 yrs of Pastoring Teaching is going to awake the Christian Chuurch and their view will be laughted at as it gets written in the History books of the Church of the time so many were so fooled for so long 2 centuries that it will be called the great Fake doctrineof the 19th and 20th centuries. I did finally Get my Degree after taking it to court 10 yrs ago. But I only won because I had paid the money and past every class with an 4.3 Average except my Theology on Eschatology. They were federally accedited. The ruling was that I had suffered long enough because I disagreed with what they called an intolerant position. Funny that the world view actually worked for me. Now I say I am highly intolerant. I made money on that but it effected me maybe all the way until this Day because I worked so Hard, and I knew people that cheated all the way through even a guy who was drunk every night passed atleast with papers from His Friends. That just maybe where ny emotions came out from. Sorry and God bless you have a nice Day from an old Saint, I wish I were here for their doctrinal fall which is coming.But its going to take probably 10 to 20 yrs. It is started now. The perseverance of the Saints. love in Christ Jesus who constrained me night and Day forever . RC | ||||||
5 | Amazement functioned in Mark? | Mark 1:22 | Tamara Brewington | 204588 | ||
My Dearest RC, There is absolutely no offense taken at all. I am very sorry to hear what happened to you and can see how it might color how you view some things, hard to remain unjaded I know.:) Wondering if you would care to enlighten me about the erroneous teachings of Dispensationalism? Not looking for a debate I promise you, I will be open to a new view than mine. Please email me at whatdoyoubelieve@hotmail.com. I am a Dispensationalist who believes in an Historical Futuristic view of Revelation based on Revelation 1:3,9, I am also a Pre-Millenialist. However, there are elements of what people call Dispensationalist, Historical Futurist that I don't agree with as they are currently being taught. As I said, I am not looking to debate, maybe just ask you questions since you have been around for a while and try to understand your views. Just a thought, hat lady |
||||||
6 | Amazement functioned in Mark? | Mark 1:22 | RC Scrolls | 204606 | ||
The Historical Futurist view, is only 181 yrs old. Not much History at all. I was a dispensationalist as well for many yrs. When I went on a study frenzie for 8 yrs, Dug into eveything that existed. I was shocked. I thought dispensationalism was always taught but to my surprise I found out its only 181 yrs old. There were a few that looked like they couldve been, but upon further study I found out differently. Any way I will email you tommorow. Love in Christ Jesus RC. Apreciate your heart. But your about to get some very overwhelming documents from History. But the truth is more sensational than what you know now. its great. please after I send yooou the documents send me back an emial with your interpretation of three scriptures. Matt 10:23, 16:28, 26:64. Thank you and God bless |
||||||
7 | Amazement functioned in Mark? | Mark 1:22 | Tamara Brewington | 204609 | ||
Dear RC, No problem I will be wanting to write you back of course don't worry I always write back, character flaw I think. You got me wondering already what it realy matters how old the theology is, that smacks of holding to the traditions of the church fathers and the chruch above the higher authority of the Bible. I could care very little how old it is, only if is correct, but we will be getting into that after you finish teaching me what you know if that is ok with you. email me HAT LADY GOD BLESS |
||||||
8 | Amazement functioned in Mark? | Mark 1:22 | RC Scrolls | 204624 | ||
You got it. Its not How old it is that makes it correct. But it sure is suspisous when doctrine is very youg. Because we dont accept any new revelation. The Church always has had its great studying Saints. We have many more innovations and inventions but as a whole we are not really anysmarter than they were back then. We just have greater innovations. Computors are a way to study something out so much faster than before. After 5 yrs Christians should be well balanced except that their not willing to take the time as we used to. Email yah in a bit today. | ||||||