Results 1 - 3 of 3
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Order of Matt.29-30 | Matt 21:29 | barrybev | 126859 | ||
Why does the NASB reverse the order of verses 29-30 and change the reading of verse 31 from what all other translations have? | ||||||
2 | Order of Matt.29-30 | Matt 21:29 | Ray | 126883 | ||
Hi berrybev, For a previous discussion on your question click on Ask Questions and type in Matthew 21:29. Or, for one of my posts on that thread type in 106942 for a "Quick Search". 1) In my 1977 copyright NASB Study Bible the marginal note for verse 29 reads [Some mss. read "I will not"; yet he afterward regretted and went]. For verse 30 it has the marginal note [Some mess. read "I will"; and he did not go]. For verse 31 in this 1977 copyright there is no marginal note to inform us of what these manuscripts contain, that is, whether they say "first" or "latter". The important thing is to realize that the readings of all the manuscripts will connect the correct answer with the correct action of the son. And the resultant condemnation of the chief priests and elders of the people for not changing of their minds, repenting, regretting is there for all the manuscripts and translations in verse 32. From the heart, Ray |
||||||
3 | Order of Matt.29-30 | Matt 21:29 | barrybev | 126886 | ||
No problem with the content. We all understood that. Just the question why? It didn't concern me a lot until I realized that my Greek NT also had it the other way. I have used the NASB so long that I did not realize it was any other way. Just curious as to why Lockman chose to print it that way. Thanks. | ||||||