Results 1 - 2 of 2
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Mat 5:27-28. Adultery. | Prov 5:1 | mark d seyler | 178749 | ||
Hi Edwin. Thank you for your answer. The only thing that I still have a question concerning is this: Do you consider the Greek New Testament, or portions of it, to be among the translatations? Or when you say “autographs”, do you include, for example, the first Greek manuscript of Matthew’s Gospel? Concerning Mark 16:9-20, were you aware that one of these “early manuscripts”, the Vaticanus, while it does not contain this passage, does leave a blank space where that text would fit? But this really isn’t a problem either way I look at it. Its addition doesn’t conflict with any other teachings, and it omission doesn’t remove anything that’s not taught elsewhere. And nowhere, including in Mark 16, are we told that we should test the Lord, with the one exception that the Jews under the Old Covenant were to prove God concerning His promised blessing in their tithes - at least to the best of my knowledge! :-) This gets into a whole different subject of textual criticism. But I have to say that I am uncomfortable with the idea that we would reject a portion of Scripture as being authentic because we don’t happen to like or approve or understand or agree with what it says. I have to conform to Scripture, not conform Scripture to me. The only sound basis I would accept for disallowing a passage from the text of Scripture would have to be based on textual evidence alone. May the Lord bless you! Love in Christ, Mark |
||||||
2 | Mat 5:27-28. Adultery. | Prov 5:1 | ebrain | 178776 | ||
Hi Mark. You said. "Concerning Mark 16:9-20, were you aware that one of these “early manuscripts”, the Vaticanus, while it does not contain this passage, does leave a blank space where that text would fit? But this really isn’t a problem either way I look at it. Its addition doesn’t conflict with any other teachings, and it omission doesn’t remove anything that’s not taught elsewhere. And nowhere, including in Mark 16, are we told that we should test the Lord, with the one exception that the Jews under the Old Covenant were to prove God concerning His promised blessing in their tithes - at least to the best of my knowledge! :-)". My answer to this is to be found in my reply to Hank posted at 7.25 am to-day 10/24/06. The other matters to which you refer will be delt with later on. Every blessing. Edwin. |
||||||