Results 1 - 3 of 3
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | The offspring of Adam's | Gen 5:1 | azurelaw | 215638 | ||
The chapter starts this verse specifically mentioning the offspring of Adam's. While reading, Cain and his line is not mentioned but Seth's only. However, end of chapter 4 records Cain and his line. Does the author (Moses, accurately should be God) intentionally leave out Cain and his line, and disregarding them being the offspring of Adam's or the sons of God as the story goes on to talk about the evil deeds of men and the marriage between sons of God and the daughers of men (Ch 6:2)? Shalom Azure |
||||||
2 | The offspring of Adam's | Gen 5:1 | Makarios | 215665 | ||
Greetings Azure! Steve and Doc gave good answers! Here is some more information to consider: When reading genealogies in scripture, many times they tend to be more 'representative' than 'complete.' Case in point: Ruth 4:18-22. Another thing to consider is that Genesis 5:1-32 connects Adam (in verse 1) to Noah (in verse 32). Therefore, I believe that the author was intentional in trying to link Adam to Noah, whose family was the only one to survive the flood. Blessings to you, Makarios |
||||||
3 | The offspring of Adam's | Gen 5:1 | azurelaw | 215667 | ||
Thank you, brother :-) Azure |
||||||