Results 1 - 5 of 5
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Best commentary on Revelation? | Revelation | kalos | 1511 | ||
Best commentary on revelation? . . . This is another non-answer to a question originally posted on 03-13-2001, 8:56PM. I hope that some of the members of this forum find the following to be informative and of interest. . . . I fully concur with EdB's (see Answer on Revelation by EdB, 03-20-2001, 1:19PM) short list of authors recommended for their reliability and trustworthiness. Following is a list of authors who, in my opinion, are doctrinally sound, reliable, and trustworthy in their teachings and writings. They are rooted firmly in the Bible and in the mainstream of the historic Christian faith. They are: . . . 1) The Christian Research Institute; 2)David Jeremiah; 3) D. James Kennedy; 4) John MacArthur; 5) Josh McDowell; 6) Charles Caldwell Ryrie; 7) Adrian Rogers; 8) R.C. Sproul; 9) Charles Stanley; 10) Chuck Swindoll. . . . (Disclaimer: Infallibility is claimed neither for or by any man on this list. No man is infallible. No translation of the Bible is infallible. Only the Bible itself IN THE ORIGINAL MANUSCRIPTS is both without error and incapable of error. Also, I do not claim this to be an exhaustive list of every reliable author in the history of the church. These names are merely among today's best known and most trusted teachers and writers. If I left out your favorite, I apologize. I am only speaking for myself, and no one else.) |
||||||
2 | Best commentary on Revelation? | Revelation | Radioman | 1568 | ||
Yours is a good answer. Forget the sensational, turn to the reliable and trustworthy. Not everyone will agree with the men cited in your answer. But, surely one can do better than to go running after Van Impe or many of the preachers on TBN. Why do they call it Trinity Broadcasting Network when they allow preachers to be on who don't even believe in the Trinity? | ||||||
3 | Best commentary on Revelation? | Revelation | inHzsvc | 1632 | ||
They even have a priest on there....talk about leading to a one-world form of worship. | ||||||
4 | Best commentary on Revelation? | Revelation | Radioman | 1714 | ||
Well put, inhzsvc. The philosophy at TBN (although some of the programs are worthwhile) seems to be: let's go for the emotional experiences and the sensational prophecy experts; and forget sound Bible doctrine. As long as you shake, rattle and roll as I do, let's not be divided over doctrine. While all people will never agree on secondary points of doctrine, we had better base our fellowship around the essentials of the historic Christian faith (e.g. the Trinity, the Deity of Christ, the Atonement, Sin, Christ's Second Coming, etc.) If we don't, we seriously err and are vulnerable to confusion. | ||||||
5 | Best commentary on Revelation? | Revelation | inHzsvc | 1772 | ||
Absolutely. They need to do a little research and see how the Catholics have treated other groups throughout history. That belief of theirs still exists, though hidden at this present time. | ||||||