Results 1 - 6 of 6
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | blessing on marriage | Matthew | tocurious | 93267 | ||
I have remarried a second time all I want is to know that god has blessed my marriage.... | ||||||
2 | blessing on marriage | Matthew | DAIRYLEADER5 | 93268 | ||
Tocurious;There is a lot of misunderstanding on marrage and divorce, and can I say a lot of hard feelings.Most people who dont know what it means to be hungry always turn their head the other way and have no understanding of the cause or reprocusions. For give the spelling, Im just and old country boy. Math.5:31-32, romans 7;1-6, this is law not grace., Rom 8;7, The carnal mind is not subject to the law of God and neither can be.The subject of divorce is clear in scripture, surcomstances which are between you and God are 1. were you an unbeliever and 2. was there adultry?I judge not for as the scripture says, seek out your own salvation with fear and trembling.People are too quick to judge by what they think they know, I didnt know what a sinner was untill I became one and was convicted in my heart, crude example but there it is.If you and God are settled with each other its fine with me.A man told me once, a long time ago,A man must be the Husband of one wife to be a decon, I said ok, so a nother man of the same church was not allowed to be a decon because his wife was married before.So what happened to the 1wife law.?This man had never been married before and was punished by wrong interpretation.So be careful of of wrong interpretation and be honest to God.Hey George, I read and some of this is in responce. | ||||||
3 | blessing on marriage | Matthew | GeorJoy | 93661 | ||
Well hey to you too Hank. Glad to hear your thoughts. I will not argue anything you have stated, only that you may not have understood why that Deacon was discharged. Then again, you may have. He may have been right and the Church leaders wrong. As you may have noticed, I don't always agree with interpritations of others, (churchs included) where the word is concerned, but I do know what the Word says concerning such subjects. If that Deacons wife had been married b4 and was not free according to the Word, would not the Deacon have been in an adultrous marriage, whether knowingly or unknowingly? If you desire to answer, please be sure to quote scriprture cuz I can remember quiet a few concerning my stand on this matter, and there is no matter of interpritation where they are concerned. "Dogmatic? I think not. Stuborn? Standing firm? I hope so!" It is neither mine nor anyone elses place to judge any other. It is ours to know the sin when we see it, AND, it IS YOURS, MINE AND EVERY CHRISTIANS responsibility to quote the Word without judgement of person, but with all truth and honesty!!!!! If in reading the QUOTED Word, one feels condemned, who would you say has condemned them? Most assuredly not the quoter! How about the one who originated the Word? Is the individual condemned? Most certainly not! Not unless they die in their sin. Will there be any liars in heaven? How about adulturers, whoremongers, thieves and homosexuals? Is there one of these sins that is worse than the others? God Bless George |
||||||
4 | blessing on marriage | Matthew | GeorJoy | 93662 | ||
Sorry DAIRYLEADER5. I guess that is a sign of senility. Or is it just that I'm getting drifty. George |
||||||
5 | blessing on marriage | Matthew | DAIRYLEADER5 | 93667 | ||
Hi George, howdido, Hank this is aka Dairyleader5, I have a little imput to you subject, Rom 8;7, 1Cor 7;2,7;12,7:15,7:39 We sometimes think of an unbeliever as being under the law, they are not, because the law was written for the jews, Look at Rom 6:19-20, Rom, 5:13.The Bible states that the carnal mind is not subject to the law of God and neather can be.For when ye were the servants of sin, ye were free from righteousness. Just a thought. | ||||||
6 | blessing on marriage | Matthew | GeorJoy | 93808 | ||
Thanks Hank. It sure is nice to know that I'm not as goofy as I was begining to think. Anyway, I agree wholeheartedly with your statement that unbelievers are not under the law. Did I imply otherwise somewhere? God Bless George |
||||||