Results 1 - 2 of 2
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Solomon's judgment of Adonijah and Joab | 1 Kin 2:13 | DocTrinsograce | 204041 | ||
Oh my, Tamara, you're only encouraging him! We'd derive as much instruction by speculating on Micah 8 or Romans 17! Here's a comment you may have read by Norman Geisler (on the Chicago Statement of Biblical Hermeneutics, Article VII) "The Affirmation here is directed at those who claim a 'double' or 'deeper' meaning to Scripture than that expressed by the authors. It stresses the unity and fixity of meaning as opposed to those who find multiple and pliable meanings. What a passage means is fixed by the author and is not subject to change by readers. This does not imply that further revelation on the subject cannot help one come to a fuller understanding, but simply that the meaning given in a text is not changed because additional truth is revealed subsequently." In your Bible School studies you will learn about logical fallacies. This question is a prime example of plurium interrogationum, commonly known as the "loaded question." We learn from example of Christ (Mark 11:28-33) to focus on the tacit presuppositions, rather than getting entangled in valueless speculation (Titus 3:9). In Him, Doc |
||||||
2 | Solomon's judgment of Adonijah and Joab | 1 Kin 2:13 | Tamara Brewington | 204044 | ||
Doc you are pure gold! Thanks for the advice... I hear you loud and clear, where text says there is a type, there is a type, where the text says there is a shadow, there is a shadow, where the text draws a parallel, there is a parallel(like in Hebrews about Melchizedek and Jesus). Where there are silimarities those are legitimate similarities but if the various authors did not intend to draw that into a parallel don't make one... Got it Doc. God Bless, Tamara | ||||||