Results 1 - 2 of 2
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Solomon's judgment of Adonijah and Joab | 1 Kin 2:13 | CarlosDF | 203978 | ||
Good stuff, perhaps this is more specific to a certain interpretation than anything I have come across in general discussion. Take Joab specifically. No way it is simple that Solomon commands one to be executed in the tent before the altar of God. Even holding on to the horns of the altar. First, this signifies that God had utterly departed Joab, and what he represented. That being the 'blood shed without cause', the act is significant. And there was blood shed before the altar, a desecration? But the altar resided in the old, the new temple being built soon. As for the other, wishing to take away part of the wives (bride), to take part of the inheritance. More of a glimmer than a precept. Yet I am sure someone must have made these parallels, rightly or poorly, I just have never come across such. Thanks for your response, my blessing to you. |
||||||
2 | Solomon's judgment of Adonijah and Joab | 1 Kin 2:13 | Tamara Brewington | 203981 | ||
I hear you Carlos, problem, Joab wasn't sinless, which is why it did not occur to me as a parallel. Although it seems right that God did desert him as he commited wrong, not a shadow of Christ who didn't and was deserted becuase he took on sin. But I see how you are making the parallel there... The blood was definetely shed with cause because Joab had killed men without just cause as Solomon relates. Trying to understand what you meant by 'blood being shed without cause'? God Bless, Tamara | ||||||