Results 1 - 3 of 3
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Author: michaelintoronto Ordered by Date |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | then why people think 2 woman | Gen 1:27 | michaelintoronto | 202668 | ||
Hi Doc, I looked into the discussion about the "Gap Theory" and I will take some time out to comrehend what people have to say who seem to be so much more educated than me. The Lilith legend seemed to have origin in german medieval contexts and was possibly one reason of alienation among german christians and jews and maybe also one of the reasons why the european antisemitism developed its most ugly face in the murderous 3. Reich. And yes, I currently decided on an answer, where considering arguments from the Gap Theory discussion, I would be requested to analyze my understanding of good and evil as it might be appropriate for God. One opinion I found about that was that God is God in heaven and in hell. That God is above everything, but I wouldn't know whether to be able to jump into such a direction for me for now. Sincerely. Michael |
||||||
2 | then why people think 2 woman | Gen 1:27 | michaelintoronto | 202665 | ||
I suggest to dismiss the statements of Brother Tim as unfounded. One problem is according to Kings James Gen 1:31 "And God saw every thing that he had made, and behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day." God would not salutate a demonic being to be wife of the first man. The second problem is to postulate "Lilith" to be a Jewish myth. A jewish myth in this context would refer to an "authentic Rabbinic tradition" or a "midrash". Please compare the following from, www.ucalgary.com, where Elizier Segal states: --- Start of quote --- The story of Lilith is not actually found in any authentic Rabbinic tradition. Although it is repeatedly cited as a "Rabbinic legend" or a "midrash," it is not recorded in any ancient Jewish text! The tale of Lilith originates in a medieval work called "the Alphabet of Ben-Sira," a work whose relationship to the conventional streams of Judaism is, to say the least, problematic. --- End of quote --- Currently I would support the opinion that Gen 1:27 and Gen 2:20fff are version differences of the same account. The reason is that the word female used in both chapters depicts the wife to be from the male. Please email me, in order to obtain the accurate URL for the above quote. Within the characterset allowed in this forum a full representation of the URL cannot be provided. Sincerely Michael |
||||||
3 | difference Gen1:27 and gen 2:21-23 | Gen 1:27 | michaelintoronto | 202664 | ||
This is different from Gen 2:21-23. Why is that? | ||||||