Results 1 - 20 of 24
|
||||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Author: asken Ordered by Date |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | God speaking or the psalmist | Not Specified | asken | 242114 | ||
With ref to ps 82 (and some others). How can I distinguish when God is speaking to man and when man is speaking to God? For example: read vs 1of ps 82. Then in vs 2 is it God who goes on to judge man or is it the psalmist asking God to defend the poor and fatherless? How can I know when reading other psalms? | ||||||
2 | God speaking or the psalmist | Psalm | asken | 242117 | ||
With ref to ps 82 (and some others). How can I distinguish when God is speaking to man and when man is speaking to God? For example: read vs 1of ps 82. Then in vs 2 is it God who goes on to judge man or is it the psalmist asking God to defend the poor and fatherless? How can I know when reading other psalms? | ||||||
3 | Holy Spirit today? | Not Specified | asken | 184952 | ||
In what ways do the evangelicals understanding of the Holy Spirit differ from the pentecostals? | ||||||
4 | Holy Spirit today? | Bible general Archive 3 | asken | 184991 | ||
In what ways do the evangelicals understanding of the Holy Spirit differ from the pentecostals? | ||||||
5 | Alternative incarnation? | Not Specified | asken | 151552 | ||
Is there a possible alternative incarnation theory of Jesus Christ if the virgin birth is disbelieved? | ||||||
6 | Alternative incarnation? | Bible general Archive 2 | asken | 151553 | ||
Is there a possible alternative incarnation theory of Jesus Christ if the virgin birth is disbelieved? | ||||||
7 | Masons - Baal? | Not Specified | asken | 140067 | ||
Can the masons be traced back through the Old Testament to Baal worship? | ||||||
8 | Masons - Baal? | Bible general Archive 2 | asken | 140074 | ||
Can the masons be traced back through the Old Testament to Baal worship? | ||||||
9 | stigmata? | Heb 11:26 | asken | 118002 | ||
Then i apologise Emmaus. It was read out in church on Good Friday by a vicar i believed to be using the NJB? In that case i wonder which version he did use? I apologise for any confusion and thank you for pointing that out to me. | ||||||
10 | stigmata? | Not Specified | asken | 117964 | ||
Heb 13:13 in the NASB reads - 'bearing his reproach'. I believe the New Jerusalem Bible interperets this - 'bearing his stigmata'. Is this an acceptable translation? | ||||||
11 | stigmata? | Heb 11:26 | asken | 117966 | ||
Heb 13:13 in the NASB reads - 'bearing his reproach'. I believe the New Jerusalem Bible interperets this - 'bearing his stigmata'. Is this an acceptable translation? | ||||||
12 | clarified question to virgin birth | NT general Archive 1 | asken | 117458 | ||
Sorry, what i am after is - If as some claim that Jesus was not born of a virgin does this mean that the only alternative is Jesus had a human father and so was not God? Thanks Emmaus. I await your reply. Asken |
||||||
13 | Virgin birth and Jesus' identity | Not Specified | asken | 117450 | ||
What are the alternative identities of Jesus if the virgin birth is denied? According to such a stance would it mean that God himself in Christ did not atone for man's sin? |
||||||
14 | Virgin birth and Jesus' identity | NT general Archive 1 | asken | 117453 | ||
What are the alternative identities of Jesus if the virgin birth is denied? According to such a stance would it mean that God himself in Christ did not atone for man's sin? |
||||||
15 | sinful flesh or flesh? | Not Specified | asken | 116675 | ||
In the (NIV)Romans 8:3 and 4 the 'flesh' is called the 'sinful nature.' What implications does this have theologically? |
||||||
16 | sinful flesh or flesh? | Rom 8:3 | asken | 116677 | ||
In the (NIV)Romans 8:3 and 4 the 'flesh' is called the 'sinful nature.' What implications does this have theologically? |
||||||
17 | Unclean food for the Christian? | Lev 1:1 | asken | 105986 | ||
To Kalos. Thank you Kalos for your reply to my question. I also note that you desire not to be drawn into a debate about what you believe and I honour that. You have come closest to answering my question. May i therefore seek further clarification? I too am not seeking to be justified in any way by law or legalism. I suppose the core of my question is - 'Why did God give rules to the Jews about not to eat e.g. pork or shellfish both of which are known to be unclean and contain parasites - but yet to the Christian it seems okay for them to eat? I (forgive the pun) don't want to make a meal of this but I ask 'Are we obeying God or disobeying God about such foods. Apart from been told not to call anything unclean that God has made clean I have not read anywhere where God has clearly and specifically rescinded his law about not eating unclean foods as in Leviticus. I seek only clarification and respect each believers understanding on this subject, I thank you for your patience and insight. |
||||||
18 | Unclean food for the Christian? | Lev 1:1 | asken | 105577 | ||
Does such passages as Mk 7:15 and Acts 9:10-16 really justify a Christian eating the forbiden foods given in Leviticus 11:1-47? If they were unclean for the Jews then surely they are for us too? | ||||||
19 | future glory - different readings? | Not Specified | asken | 105265 | ||
Isaiah 9:1 (NASB) Reads that God will make the land of zebulun and Naptali 'glorious'.The (NIV)reads that God will give 'Honour'. Why does the (NKJV) and I guess the KJV too not say this but only speaks of the oppression in earlier days (nothing about future glory or honour?)Why is the NASB different? | ||||||
20 | future glory - different readings? | Matt 4:18 | asken | 105290 | ||
Isaiah 9:1 (NASB) Reads that God will make the land of zebulun and Naptali 'glorious'.The (NIV)reads that God will give 'Honour'. Why does the (NKJV) and I guess the KJV too not say this but only speaks of the oppression in earlier days (nothing about future glory or honour?)Why is the NASB different? | ||||||
Result pages: [ 1 2 ] Next > Last [2] >> |