Results 1 - 18 of 18
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Author: Natoochton Ordered by Date |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Should my daughter get baptized again? | Luke 15:18 | Natoochton | 156841 | ||
I would have to agree with Hank here. It's truly a trajedy that we create lines in which we determine which baptism is legitimate. I think when we do this we are confusing ritual with belief (not to offend anyone here with the ritual aspect) we are a granted grace freely, it a gift, that if we accept it and believe with also surrendering our lives to Christ. You can't really say that because you were "baptized" in this church it's not legite here. Who are we to draw lines in God's grace. Baptism is accepting Christ as your lord and Savior, surrendering him your life so that he mold you in his likeness, dying of our old "natural" body, and being raised in the Spirit in a new body. I guess I didn't really answer your question here, sorry, it's more so thoughts than a direct and clear answer. In Christ, Natoochton |
||||||
2 | Bright morning star | Not Specified | Natoochton | 156672 | ||
what does Christ's title of "Bright Morning Star" in Revelation 22:16 mean? | ||||||
3 | Bright morning star | Rev 22:16 | Natoochton | 156673 | ||
what does Christ's title of "Bright Morning Star" in Revelation 22:16 mean? | ||||||
4 | Is Pat Robertson a Christian? | Heb 10:24 | Natoochton | 156483 | ||
I just saw this, and well before I toss my answer in, consider this, Pat's in the limelight, whatever he says is going to be seen, now true he has greater responsibility to act in a way pleasing to God. Pat also has been known to say some things in the past that were, well, contraversial (sorry about any spelling mistakes) such as Feminism and and other governmental issues. Now because he "messed up" does that not make him a Christian. Of course not, we all make mistakes and stumble before others. I think the challenge is just, how are you going to serve God afterwards, if you identify the mistake, seek and serve God so that you may be made clean through his son's blood. I also think this is very common among Christians, as soon as the media see's something with religion and controversy in the title they jump at it. We are set apart by God and we are to act according to his good will. We also must remain united as a Church through times of struggle. this interdenominational warfare? It's ridiculous, what makes us think we are any better than anyone else. I don't know, Hebrews 10:24 was wise to cite, and I thank you for that, we must all be aware of our resposibilities as a Christians, not only to our God, but to others. God be with you |
||||||
5 | Christian Polygamy? | Bible general Archive 2 | Natoochton | 156439 | ||
Thank you for your answer, just one thing about your paraphrase of a 1 corinthians 7:4, would it really be "power over" or as it says, belonging as in I belong to God and yes he of course has power over us (okay I just answered my own question) Thanks |
||||||
6 | Faith Knowledge and Baptism | Rom 10:17 | Natoochton | 156438 | ||
Thank you for your answer, It really does help to have this forum, I find that even in "Christian" environments I cannot share with others the same enthusiasm I have about my many many questions. Anyway, I guess what I would to add would be that if we are to say that infancy cannot bear faith, and go moreso into the whole age of accountability question, then are we putting a limit or restriction on who can be called into God's kingdom. Perhaps I'm questioning the wrong principles, perhaps not, I honestly, have no idea whatsoever as to what I'm questioning. Now would it make a logical arguement, to say that a baby of course does possess knowledge. For if his parent is to make a sound in a quiet or noise filled room, will the baby not respond to the parent's voice? Also, about the age of accountability thing, was that formed as maybe a pattern or observation of a child's ability to ask questions, concernig his or her faith. A child's mind is of course capable of processing such abstract or conceptual thoughts. I guess what I was trying to clear up all along, was the frequent questions of if my baby dies and was not baptized, what is to happen of him. Obviously the grace of God is absolutely amazing. And I honestly think that once we enter the gates of heaven our minds will be without suprise. Now I don't know if I made any progress in this post here, but I would like to thank you again for your willingness to share your knowledge with me. thanks |
||||||
7 | Faith Knowledge and Baptism | Not Specified | Natoochton | 156427 | ||
I hope I'm not out of line with this question, so if you could cut me some slack, I'd appreciate it (hey I'm a college kid what can I say). Anyway, with that aside, I must inquire of you all about faith and knowledge, and of course the infant baptism that rests in between these two. Would any of you say that there is a distinct difference between that of knowledge and faith. Can we have one and yet not have the other, or not have a lot of the other for that part. As you can see I've been having some trouble with this, I've consulted Eph 2:8-10, and other books, but so far I have yielded an inconclusive answer. It all comes to this (well sort of). If you kind of understand what I'm saying here please reply. Thanks I really appreciate it, |
||||||
8 | Faith Knowledge and Baptism | Rom 10:17 | Natoochton | 156429 | ||
I hope I'm not out of line with this question, so if you could cut me some slack, I'd appreciate it (hey I'm a college kid what can I say). Anyway, with that aside, I must inquire of you all about faith and knowledge, and of course the infant baptism that rests in between these two. Would any of you say that there is a distinct difference between that of knowledge and faith. Can we have one and yet not have the other, or not have a lot of the other for that part. As you can see I've been having some trouble with this, I've consulted Eph 2:8-10, and other books, but so far I have yielded an inconclusive answer. It all comes to this (well sort of). If you kind of understand what I'm saying here please reply. Thanks I really appreciate it, |
||||||
9 | Faith Knowledge and Baptism | Rom 10:17 | Natoochton | 156433 | ||
I hope I'm not out of line with this question, so if you could cut me some slack, I'd appreciate it (hey I'm a college kid what can I say). Anyway, with that aside, I must inquire of you all about faith and knowledge, and of course the infant baptism that rests in between these two. Would any of you say that there is a distinct difference between that of knowledge and faith. Can we have one and yet not have the other, or not have a lot of the other for that part. As you can see I've been having some trouble with this, I've consulted Eph 2:8-10, and other books, but so far I have yielded an inconclusive answer. It all comes to this (well sort of). If you kind of understand what I'm saying here please reply. Thanks I really appreciate it, |
||||||
10 | Morning Star | Not Specified | Natoochton | 156333 | ||
Good evening, I've been having some trouble with Isaiah 14:12, though it has no relevance on my growing faith, I still pick at it with an uncontrolable diligence as i like to say, though you can call it an obsession. As you might already know it contains the story of the Morning Star, or Lucifer. But I have a couple questions and I'm sorry they seem to be obvious in answering. First of all, Lucifer is Latin for Morning Star (and I've only seen Lucifer in one translation, though I apoligeze that I do not remember of which it was), so what I don't understand ( keep in mind I know nothing of the translation of the Bible)is what is a latin word doing in the Old Testament, i.e. I understand that it was later translated from Hebrew to Latin (or was it?), but why is morning star a general term translated into Lucifer a name and not aexactly a general term. Also, who is this section referring to, it seems as if it is implicating the story of Satan in verses 12 through 14, but then it all changes and for the rest of the passage the Morning Star character takes on the traits of a mere man (if you read it maybe you'll agree with me, maybe not). Now I know this is irrelevant, but why do we refer to Satan as Lucifer if quite possibly this passage is speaking of an ancient Babylonian King (in my study bible). Also, as far as the Babylonian King goes, could this also be a symbol. I mean, in the book of Revelation it talks about Babylon the great in chapters 14, 16, 17 and 18. Now Babylon is often seen as the image of sin and evil in the world, indulging in her may bring about instant gratification but it will lead to death and destruction. Could this also be what Isaiah is speaking about. I don't know if I'm making any sense at all, so just answer if it's worth it. I know that it is very important not to try to disect every bit of these books, more specifically Revelation, and getting caught up in the symbolism. So I'd appreciate your thoughts. Thank you |
||||||
11 | Morning Star | Is 14:1 | Natoochton | 156337 | ||
Good evening, I've been having some trouble with Isaiah 14:12, though it has no relevance on my growing faith, I still pick at it with an uncontrolable diligence as i like to say, though you can call it an obsession. As you might already know it contains the story of the Morning Star, or Lucifer. But I have a couple questions and I'm sorry they seem to be obvious in answering. First of all, Lucifer is Latin for Morning Star (and I've only seen Lucifer in one translation, though I apoligeze that I do not remember of which it was), so what I don't understand ( keep in mind I know nothing of the translation of the Bible)is what is a latin word doing in the Old Testament, i.e. I understand that it was later translated from Hebrew to Latin (or was it?), but why is morning star a general term translated into Lucifer a name and not aexactly a general term. Also, who is this section referring to, it seems as if it is implicating the story of Satan in verses 12 through 14, but then it all changes and for the rest of the passage the Morning Star character takes on the traits of a mere man (if you read it maybe you'll agree with me, maybe not). Now I know this is irrelevant, but why do we refer to Satan as Lucifer if quite possibly this passage is speaking of an ancient Babylonian King (in my study bible). Also, as far as the Babylonian King goes, could this also be a symbol. I mean, in the book of Revelation it talks about Babylon the great in chapters 14, 16, 17 and 18. Now Babylon is often seen as the image of sin and evil in the world, indulging in her may bring about instant gratification but it will lead to death and destruction. Could this also be what Isaiah is speaking about. I don't know if I'm making any sense at all, so just answer if it's worth it. I know that it is very important not to try to disect every bit of these books, more specifically Revelation, and getting caught up in the symbolism. So I'd appreciate your thoughts. Thank you |
||||||
12 | Temple building | 1 Chr 28:6 | Natoochton | 156310 | ||
I understand, but what I see in this passage is not God telling the Israelites to build him a temple. God did not tell them to build a temple, it was only after David told Him "I will build you a temple" that God allowed for this to happen. In my mind I see this passage to have a great deal of similarity with that of electing a King. God did not tell the Israelites to have a King, He was their King, and it was only after they persisted that he allowed for a King to be chosen. Also, it seems as if in both these circumstances they are rejecting God and taking on the customs of pagans, who ahd a King? the pagans/everyone else, the same as true as far as the temple is concerned. Now I'm not sure about the tabernacle, as far as I understand though, the tabernacle like the one at Shiloh was one of its kind, in that it was God ordered. | ||||||
13 | help find a bible? | 1 Thessalonians | Natoochton | 156305 | ||
You can obtain a copy of God's word in many places; a local church is your best choice, also at a Christ Bookstore (Family Christian Stores), I notice that a lot of Christian coffee houses have numerous translations. Now as far as translations are concerned, there's a ton. You'll probably find the NIV (new international version) in most churches as far as what you pick out of the pews. I prefer the NIV only because i do not have the intellectual capabilities required in understanding the King James version, the NIV is translated into modern english. Oh, sorry this probably makes the preceding worthless, but oh well. I am new to this forum so I would not have noticed it off hand, but in your right margin of course, you have access to an online New American Standard Bible. I hope this can provide you with some beneficial information. |
||||||
14 | Christian Polygamy? | Not Specified | Natoochton | 156302 | ||
I was watching the 700 club (please stay with me here) the other week, and they were talking about the Homosexual marriage movement, they then ended this discussion by acknowledging the next big wave in the attack on marriage. The founders refer to themselves as Christian polygamists, they claim their movement is legitimate because and I quote, "Polygamy is in the Bible. Polygamy is found throughout history. These facts prove that marriage's definition includes plural marriage. Polygyny is a far older traditional marriage than anti-polygamy." Well first of all there's a spelling mistake, so right-a-way I wouldn't be giving them too much credibility. But also did our Father not create Adam and Eve first, I mean it is not as if God created Adam and then created Mary Susan Eve and Beth. My question is what other evidence does the Bible have against this movement usefull for that of rebuking, i.e. God never condones polygamy, neither does he ever say "every man should be with that of only one wife". Now he does say in 1st Timothy and Titus that elders and Pastors should only have one wife, but never as a general rule of thumb, applicable to everyone. What are your thoughts on this matter also here is the url of the polygamists, if you wish to use it; http://www.truthbearer.org |
||||||
15 | Christian Polygamy? | Bible general Archive 2 | Natoochton | 156319 | ||
I was watching the 700 club (please stay with me here) the other week, and they were talking about the Homosexual marriage movement, they then ended this discussion by acknowledging the next big wave in the attack on marriage. The founders refer to themselves as Christian polygamists, they claim their movement is legitimate because and I quote, "Polygamy is in the Bible. Polygamy is found throughout history. These facts prove that marriage's definition includes plural marriage. Polygyny is a far older traditional marriage than anti-polygamy." Well first of all there's a spelling mistake, so right-a-way I wouldn't be giving them too much credibility. But also did our Father not create Adam and Eve first, I mean it is not as if God created Adam and then created Mary Susan Eve and Beth. My question is what other evidence does the Bible have against this movement usefull for that of rebuking, i.e. God never condones polygamy, neither does he ever say "every man should be with that of only one wife". Now he does say in 1st Timothy and Titus that elders and Pastors should only have one wife, but never as a general rule of thumb, applicable to everyone. What are your thoughts on this matter also here is the url of the polygamists, if you wish to use it; http://www.truthbearer.org |
||||||
16 | Temple building | Not Specified | Natoochton | 156299 | ||
Hello all, Never in the scriptures does God condone building a temple, he has them build the tabernacle, but never the temple. WHy is this? My first thought was that God wanted to set them apart, but I don't know. Is it similar to that of their desire to have a King, instead of the true King they already had? |
||||||
17 | Temple building | 1 Kin 8:18 | Natoochton | 156308 | ||
Hello all, Never in the scriptures does God condone building a temple, he has them build the tabernacle, but never the temple. WHy is this? My first thought was that God wanted to set them apart, but I don't know. Is it similar to that of their desire to have a King, instead of the true King they already had? |
||||||
18 | Temple building | 1 Chr 28:6 | Natoochton | 156306 | ||
Hello all, Never in the scriptures does God condone building a temple, he has them build the tabernacle, but never the temple. WHy is this? My first thought was that God wanted to set them apart, but I don't know. Is it similar to that of their desire to have a King, instead of the true King they already had? |
||||||