Results 1 - 16 of 16
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Unanswered Bible Questions Author: dasev Ordered by Date |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | dear m., what say ye? aye or nay? dasev | OT general | dasev | 58422 | ||
dear m., what say ye? aye or nay? dasev | ||||||
2 | how many baptisms | Luke 3:16 | dasev | 58408 | ||
dear forum, Jesus confounded His tempters by asking them of John's baptism, Was it of heaven or of men? my question is the same in regards to the baptism with the Holy Ghost, and the baptism with fire. additionaly Jesus spoke of a baptism in Luke 12:50. comments? also Matthew 20:23. comments? dasev |
||||||
3 | for today | OT general | dasev | 58412 | ||
dear forum, are tounges for today? dasev | ||||||
4 | for you | John 6:66 | dasev | 58396 | ||
dear robert, thank you, your a breath of fresh air. now for you i ask are tounges for today? dasev | ||||||
5 | what about | James 2:14 | dasev | 58390 | ||
dear A, what do you think about tounges? are they of God? are they valid to the edifying of the believer today? dasev | ||||||
6 | two questions please | James 2:14 | dasev | 58388 | ||
dear one, is simple faith, trust and belief alone a sufficient work to save one, and can dead faith be ressurected? dasev | ||||||
7 | but what means | Gen 1:1 | dasev | 58367 | ||
dear emmaus, can a non catholic be received into heaven? if so, how? dasev | ||||||
8 | may i rebuke the roman heresy , heretics | John 6:66 | dasev | 58364 | ||
dear emmaus, perhaps one might ask this, at the last supper why did Jesus not carve off the real flesh of his body and fill their cups from his very veins. surley this would have established this roman catholic doctrine more effectively. and this question, would the so called flesh of the roman eucharist not taste like flesh, and the blood like blood? and this, if the Lord is so ammenable to this daily miracle working by roman priests, why is he not doing other miracles thru them, such as raising the dead, opening blind eyes and deaf ears, or perhaps actually creating new hands and legs where there is now no flesh? the real intent of roman doctrine is in this and many other instances to erect a wall of tradition by which it can indoctrinate and control the masses. it is a way of by fantasy separating itself and deceitfully promoting itself as a source of truth which cannot be supported by scripture or daily life. lets remember that the roman so called church did not allow its flock to read the Bible for centuries. it also made an extrordinarily successful effort to eliminate the truth and the true church by progromatic murder. it also forbids its so called pastors from marriage contadicting very clear scripture, allows and in some cases promotes statues or idols to be prayed to and worshipped, elevates Mary, Christ's mother in the flesh to the status of God, has long and to this day promoted purgatory and by falsehood and extortion deprived the poor of their money, having them to buy their dead loved ones release from purgatory, and sells to this day indulgences, that is to be forgiven in advance for sins not committed but planned. the present day prevalence of the roman so called church is a testimony of the human condition of absolute depravity of man apart from the redemption of the LORD Jesus Christ, and the gullible, lazy nature of men who are willing to let others search the scriptures for them. it is interesting to note that before 325 a.d. when constantine, who was the first real pope, opened the church to the unbelieving masses, the seven churches of Revelation's early chapters had already been destroyed by earthquakes. emmaus and you other roman heritcs need to come out from among the unclean and get washed in the blood and filled by the Spirit. hurry for the day draws near whes you will see Him, either to be like Him or to see Him no more. for Christ, dasev | ||||||
9 | help me understand | John 6:66 | dasev | 57952 | ||
dear ones, roman catholic doctrine teaches that in their mass, the wafer and wine that they call the eucharist turn into the literal body and blood when the priest blesses and offers them. further they teach that this constitutes the renewal of Christ's sacrafice daily. in light of the following list of scriptures would anyone be able to straighten them or myself out? John 2:1 to 11; Luke 22: 19 and 20; Hebrews 10; 11 to 18. |
||||||
10 | do you have anything | Bible general Archive 1 | dasev | 57947 | ||
dear kalos, what an interesting web site this is. do you have any thing you would like to adress to me personally? dasev | ||||||
11 | what is the source | Mark 15:21 | dasev | 41577 | ||
dear prayon, what is your source for this info | ||||||
12 | does your last | Genesis | dasev | 38526 | ||
dear hank does your last name begin with H and are you on the radio? | ||||||
13 | does your last | Genesis | dasev | 38527 | ||
dear hank does your last name begin with H and are you on the radio? | ||||||
14 | could it be later than we think? | Matt 24:42 | dasev | 38489 | ||
from the book of daniel many believe a great, two part 7 yr. time of tribulation will occur very near the time Jesus the Christ will return. in light of the violence in Isreal for the past nearly year and a half, is it possible that we might see the middle of the 7 years in the spring of 2004, 3 and 1 half years from the beginning of the latest "intafada"? |
||||||
15 | could it be later than we think? | Matt 24:42 | dasev | 38491 | ||
from the book of daniel many believe a great, two part 7 yr. time of tribulation will occur very near the time Jesus the Christ will return. in light of the violence in Isreal for the past nearly year and a half, is it possible that we might see the middle of the 7 years in the spring of 2004, 3 and 1 half years from the beginning of the latest "intafada"? |
||||||
16 | what is the mark of the beast | Rev 16:2 | dasev | 34965 | ||
most christians i talk with think that the mark of the beast, rev.13: 16,17, is some literal physical mark. a few others think it may be a practiced complicity or alignment with anti christ , a sort of faustian deal with the devil. if you agre with the latter view and not the literal physical mark please tell me how you support this view. | ||||||