Results 261 - 280 of 575
|
||||||
Results from: Notes Author: jlpangilinan Ordered by Verse |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
261 | JESUS CHRIST | Matt 13:55 | jlpangilinan | 79949 | ||
Mt 13:55 Is not this the carpenter's son? is not his mother called Mary? and his brethren, James, and Joses, and Simon, and Judas? They are brother of Jesus Christ, so it is clear that they are sons of mary. For the virgin argument, the Bible say that Joseph "knew" mary after her firstborn Jesus. Mt 1:25 And knew her not till she had brought forth her firstborn son: and he called his name JESUS. It is clear that they "had sex" and have other children. When adam "knew" eve, they got son. Ge 4:1 ¶ And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD. I know it is hard for you to believed that because the catholic always taught doctrine which is not in the Bible. You keep your traditions over the Bible. The Bible has that warning anyway: Mt 15:3 But he answered and said unto them, Why do ye also transgress the commandment of God by your tradition? If you can taught that mary goes straight to heaven without seeing death even without in the bible., what else you cannot teach anyway? God bless, |
||||||
262 | JESUS CHRIST | Matt 13:55 | jlpangilinan | 79967 | ||
I am not expected you to believed the Bible anyway, it is clear stated there that joseph "knew" mary after her firstborn Jesus. I know that you are not going to believe that, you believed your tradition over the Bible so anything that you seen in the Bible that will contradict your tradition is not true and wrong. The catholic here in the Philippines believe that mary go to heaven directly without seeing death, or maybe your traditions is not accurate anymore. I know that you continue taught doctrine that not in the Bible, as always there is will do that until the end of time. Ga 1:8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. Maybe that passages are wrong, it contradict your traditions anyway. God bless, |
||||||
263 | Bible lied? | Matt 13:55 | jlpangilinan | 79986 | ||
How do I misinterpret the Bible? Mt 1:25 And knew her not till she had brought forth her firstborn son: and he called his name JESUS. Ge 4:1 ¶ And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD. Those verse are both king james version. Aside from that our doctrine is different from luther and other person that you mentioned. God bless, |
||||||
264 | JESUS CHRIST | Matt 13:55 | jlpangilinan | 79987 | ||
If luther and other believe is like that, so what. How about the Bible? is luther is the authorize of the Bible so I have to adopt what he believed. Kindly explain the verse that stated that jospeh "knew" mary until his firstborn Jesus. God bless, |
||||||
265 | JESUS CHRIST | Matt 13:55 | jlpangilinan | 79991 | ||
If your logic is write about the term of the Bible then Cain and Abel maybe cousins. Ge 4:8 ¶ And Cain talked with Abel his brother: and it came to pass, when they were in the field, that Cain rose up against Abel his brother, and slew him. If they are the cousin of Christ, I am sure they will recognize them as cousin: Lu 1:36 And, behold, thy cousin Elisabeth, she hath also conceived a son in her old age: and this is the sixth month with her, who was called barren. But the verse is clearly stated: Mr 6:3 Is not this the carpenter, the son of Mary, the brother of James, and Joses, and of Juda, and Simon? and are not his sisters here with us? And they were offended at him. After mentioning the "son of mary" the word "brother" mentioned next. Son of mary and brother of james... and so on. well, it is your own believed, no fact can change that. God bless, |
||||||
266 | Bible lied? | Matt 13:55 | jlpangilinan | 79997 | ||
Samantha, Good afternoon from the Philippines. I expected that there are people tried to accused the Bible is wrong(indirectly just by not believing it containts) There are people that tried to exclude the teaching of Bible enable to preserved traditions. Mt 15:3 But he answered and said unto them, Why do ye also transgress the commandment of God by your tradition? Those people is not just today, even in the very start of Christianity. The Bible clearly stated that Jesus has brothers and sisters, but some people always twisted it enable to preserve thier traditions. The Bible warn as to be vigilant and to accursed teaching that not in the Bible. Ga 1:8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. Ther are people that always said that the Bible is not enough enable one persons to know more about Christ, there are people that traditions is more important than the Word of God. But did Bible is not enough? NO. Isa 34:16 Seek ye out of the book of the LORD, and read: no one of these shall fail, none shall want her mate: for my mouth it hath commanded, and his spirit it hath gathered them. Here in the Philippines there a lot of people saying that the Bible is not enough, but cannot memorize and find a single verse in the Bible. I am thanking you of being an Bible Oriented Person. You are right Hear the Gospel Believe it. The Bible is written not to subject for anyone conclusions but to believe it. God bless, |
||||||
267 | Bible lied? | Matt 13:55 | jlpangilinan | 80083 | ||
Emmaus, Why the Bible said that "And knew her" in Mt 1:25 "Knew" Jewish idiom for sexual intercourse between a man and a woman Ginosko (Ghin-oce'-ko) Knew -- The KJV New Testament Greek Lexicon 1. to learn to know, come to know, get a knowledge of perceive, feel to become known 2. to know, understand, perceive, have knowledge of to understand to know 3. Jewish idiom for sexual intercourse between a man and a woman 4. to become acquainted with, to know It is very precise with the word "knew" in Gen 4:1 Ge 4:1 ¶ And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD. When adam "knew" eve she concieve and bare cain. The explaination that you quoted about "brother and sisters" that according to you means "cousins" why still have word mentions cousins in the Bible it must be all brothers and sisters. Lu 1:36 And, behold, thy cousin Elisabeth, she hath also conceived a son in her old age: and this is the sixth month with her, who was called barren. Lu 1:58 And her neighbours and her cousins heard how the Lord had shewed great mercy upon her; and they rejoiced with her. The sisters mentioned in Mr 6:3 means a full own sister. The KJV New Testament Greek Lexicon (adelphe) original word "ajdelfhv" phonic spelling "ad-el-fay'" 1. a full, own sister 2. one connected by the tie of the Christian religion God bless, |
||||||
268 | Bible lied? | Matt 13:55 | jlpangilinan | 80091 | ||
Graceful, Why the Bible said that "And knew her" in Mt 1:25 "Knew" Jewish idiom for sexual intercourse between a man and a woman Ginosko (Ghin-oce'-ko) Knew -- The KJV New Testament Greek Lexicon 1. to learn to know, come to know, get a knowledge of perceive, feel to become known 2. to know, understand, perceive, have knowledge of to understand to know 3. Jewish idiom for sexual intercourse between a man and a woman 4. to become acquainted with, to know It is very precise with the word "knew" in Gen 4:1 Ge 4:1 ¶ And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD. When adam "knew" eve she concieve and bare cain. The explaination that Emmaus quoted about "brother and sisters" that according to him means "cousins" but in the Bible there still word cousins if Emmaus was right that the "brother and sister mentioned in Mt is means cousins, it must be no specifically word cousins in the Bible, it should be all "brother and sisters" Lu 1:36 And, behold, thy cousin Elisabeth, she hath also conceived a son in her old age: and this is the sixth month with her, who was called barren. Lu 1:58 And her neighbours and her cousins heard how the Lord had shewed great mercy upon her; and they rejoiced with her. The sisters mentioned in Mr 6:3 means a full own sister. The KJV New Testament Greek Lexicon (adelphe) original word "ajdelfhv" phonic spelling "ad-el-fay'" 1. a full, own sister 2. one connected by the tie of the Christian religion. Emmaus also mentioned why it is John He entrusted the care of His mother, who else be with Him at the time in the cross. Joh 19:25 Now there stood by the cross of Jesus his mother, and his mother's sister, Mary the wife of Cleophas, and Mary Magdalene. Joh 19:26 When Jesus therefore saw his mother, and the disciple standing by, whom he loved, he saith unto his mother, Woman, behold thy son! They are three there including John, if you are Christ that about to die there in cross, are going to send John and said "call my brother and sisters to come here" they afraid at the time, Peter denied Jesus, They all afraid to die, and John one of a few to stand in the side of Jeus even in the death of the cross. And if you are John, are you going to refuse when your Lord God asked you to take care His mother??(as human) Are going to tell Him "Lord NO! I dont! how about your own brother? they should take care of mary" are we going to say that to Jesus? To the Lord that asking a favor, are we imprudent to answer that to our Lord? what do you think? of course if you are John, as a desciple you will greatly appreciate it that Lord Jesus asked you for some favor. Bible is written to Believed not to under anyone conclusions, it is not right that because Jesus ask John to take care of His mother (as human)we had make a conclusions that she had no other children to take of here. As the Bible mentione it John, Mary and her sister was present there. God bless, |
||||||
269 | Is Catholic considered false religion? | Matt 15:6 | jlpangilinan | 71693 | ||
David, Very nice point, but I dont think they will understand that. I know they also read that verses you quote, but they just ignore it. It was written anyway: Isa 44:17 And the residue thereof he maketh a god, even his graven image: he falleth down unto it, and worshippeth it, and prayeth unto it, and saith, Deliver me; for thou art my god. Isa 44:18 They have not known nor understood: for he hath shut their eyes, that they cannot see; and their hearts, that they cannot understand. For he hat shut thier eyes; and thier minds, so how can you convince these people to look at the word of God if they did not consider they Bible as the sole authority regarding doctrine. As also paul said: 2Co 4:4 In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them. So it is very hard to convince the idolaters to change, if thier god has eyes but cannot see and ears but cannot heard, what do you expect from thier people? God bless, Johnny |
||||||
270 | Is Catholic considered false religion? | Matt 15:6 | jlpangilinan | 71802 | ||
Agree God bless, Johnny |
||||||
271 | Do all little ones believe? | Matt 18:6 | jlpangilinan | 66711 | ||
I dont think that little babies is sinned already. You quoted Proverbs 20:11 Even a child is known by his doings, whether his work be pure, and whether it be right. You have seen to him, whether his work be pure, and wehther it be right, but it is not mean he is already accountable for his sin. For sin is the transgression of the law: 1Jo 3:4 ¶ Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law. How come that a one month old babies is capable of transgression of the law, what law do you think he disobey being a little baby? take a look at this verse. Heb 5:13 For every one that useth milk is unskilful in the word of righteousness: for he is a babe. A babe is unskilful in the word of righteousness, how come that he sinned if he dont know yet what is wrong and what is right? God bless, Johnny |
||||||
272 | Do all little ones believe? | Matt 18:6 | jlpangilinan | 66714 | ||
For sin is the transgression of the law: 1Jo 3:4 ¶ Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law. It is impossible to a one month old babies are capable of transgression of the law, what law do you think the child can disobey being a little babies. take a look at this verse. Heb 5:13 For every one that useth milk is unskilful in the word of righteousness: for he is a babe. A babe is unskilful in the word of righteousness, it is impossible also that he sinned if he dont know yet what is wrong and what is right? God bless, Johnny |
||||||
273 | Do all little ones believe? | Matt 18:6 | jlpangilinan | 66715 | ||
good morning from the Philippines! What time do you have there? Im sure you still in your computer. I will read the thread of this topic, I am sorry if I did not yet read your post to Cyclist. God bless, Johnny |
||||||
274 | Do all little ones believe? | Matt 18:6 | jlpangilinan | 66737 | ||
Charis, Some of your note, I dont understand really. I was responding to the note that infants have sinned, and my answer is they are not capable of transgressing the law. 1Jo 3:4 ¶ Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law. 1Jo 3:4 ¶ Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law. I dont know also how the six months old are ready and willing to sin , as you mentioned. Are they really capable of transgressing the law. In my personal expereinces my daughter is now 5 years, and if I am asking her if she remember what we did to her when she was a baby, but she cannot have one. Is that instances in the bible that a six month old babies disobey the law, whether law of Christ, or the law of moses? God bless, Johnny |
||||||
275 | Do all little ones believe? | Matt 18:6 | jlpangilinan | 66741 | ||
I do believed to the salvation of all young Children, because I know God is just. Mt 16:27 For the Son of man shall come in the glory of his Father with his angels; and then he shall reward every man according to his works. Re 20:12 And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works. Re 20:13 And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works. If young infants died what bad works they did commit anyway to be judge and go to hell. Even they are son or daughter of non believer we cannot blame them they have not given the opportunity to know Jesus. We cannot judge them because of the wickedness of thier father as the scriptures said: Eze 18:20 The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him. God bless, Johnny |
||||||
276 | Do all little ones believe? | Matt 18:6 | jlpangilinan | 66743 | ||
Charis, No problem, I know that we born by flesh and we are not righteous as scriptures said. But my friend my argument here really is the sin that will bring young babies to hell. If they are not capable of deciding what to do, how could you judge them. You said that a six month babies is already demanding of what they want, are responsible for that. They just do that but they dont know that yet, they cannot remember that yet. I hope I am clear now. You said is there scriptures declares clearly that children are sinless and innocent, what I can show to you is this. 1Jo 3:4 ¶ Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law. I know six month babies are not capable of trnasgressing the law, wheter the law of moses or the law of Christ. I cannot even teach them thoul shall love the lord with all your might, soul, how can they understand this things yet. Re 20:13 And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works. and every man were judge according to thier works' what works did we judge to a six month old babies that not capable of changing even his own diapers? God bless, Johnny |
||||||
277 | Men had multiple wives in the old test. | Matt 19:5 | jlpangilinan | 182192 | ||
Correct me if I am wrong... God gave this commandments even in the time of Adam and Eve. Ge 2:24 Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh. I think in that verse above, God mentioned the man and wife "shall be one flesh" therefore, I dont think that one man with 4 or 7 wives are also "one flesh". I dont think also that it is okay for God, let us consult what was Jesus Christ told us about them... Mt 19:4 And he answered and said unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female, in the verses above, it is clear that even in the beggining God is against having many wives... Mt 19:5 And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh? Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder. if the man and wife will become one flesh it is really for two person man and wife not man and wives... the scribes so and so reasoning Jesus with this... Mt 19:7 They say unto him, Why did Moses then command to give a writing of divorcement, and to put her away? Jesus answered them with this... Mt 19:8 He saith unto them, Moses because of the hardness of your hearts suffered you to put away your wives: but from the beginning it was not so. "in the beggining it was not so" Jesus said. in the beggining there was no divorce, nor having many wives, it is because of the hardness of the heart of israelites, moses had to make laws about it. Hope I understand you well, thanks |
||||||
278 | Biblically correct divorce | Matt 19:9 | jlpangilinan | 163144 | ||
its vice versa my friend, if God given commandments not just for husband it also for his wife. even before at the time of adam, God declare man and woman as one flesh. Ge 2:24 Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh. If law of fornication is appicable for man, it must be applicable in vice versa considering that they are one flesh. |
||||||
279 | Why weren't Jesus' answers the same? | Matt 19:16 | jlpangilinan | 73351 | ||
Taleb, You are welcome my friend, I know you will do your best the same to others query if you could. We learn from each other. God bless, |
||||||
280 | "ONCE SAVED ALWAYS SAVED"!!! | Matt 22:37 | jlpangilinan | 30110 | ||
Roviear, Your Statement"Perhaps because we, as humans, really cannot grasp the concept of eternity and feel that we must continue to earn salvation. In the OT, especially Exodus, God laid the law down to Moses as to how Jews (believers) could get into heaven." Did moses has this teaching that if the Jews believed thier soul will go to heaven? I dont think so even "PERHAPS" as you mentioned. Are you sure my friend? I dont believe that moses has teaching about heaven or hell. If you do, show me that. I will be very thanfull. God bless, Johnny |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ] Next > Last [29] >> |