Results 221 - 240 of 801
|
||||||
Results from: Notes Author: jlhetrick Ordered by Verse |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
221 | Can one who commits suicide be saved? | Ex 20:13 | jlhetrick | 186804 | ||
I agree that arguing about the issue may not at all edify anyone and arguing is rarely productive. I do have to stand by my calling you to account for your teaching with Scripture; but I certainly appreciate that I can not force you too. We can agree to disagree but I can't agree to sit passively by while you or anyone else presents opinion as biblical teaching. You see friend, the matters of life and death and the condition of ones soul are not matters that two differing "opinions" can both be right on. Hardly points to agree to disagree on. Rather, we should do our best to present to others what Scripture says on such matters and remain silent where Scripture is silent. I'm not so interested in "moving you from where you are" as you put it. I'm more concerned about addressing teachings that don't agree with the bible. "All of us are saved right?" No, wrong my friend. I suspect that there might be hundreds if not more who visit this site, some regularly, that are still unsaved. More the reason to insure what we teach is sound. God bless, Jeff |
||||||
222 | Can one who commits suicide be saved? | Ex 20:13 | jlhetrick | 186894 | ||
Amen! | ||||||
223 | Problem sharing our faith? | Ex 20:13 | jlhetrick | 211892 | ||
I'll add to the fine response John has already given. I'll say it straight, without assuming anything about you personally, and you can take from it what's helpful... if anything. Context, context, context and then context. What can be known about the sovereign and holy God without Scripture? What can be known about His ways by ripping one verse from one place and another from somewhere else and drawing the ridiculous conclusion that He, God, has contradicted Himself? As if it were possible that He might contradict Himself. A fool might think so… the enemy will want you to believe it. Taken grossly out of context and held side by side, the two verses may very well appear to be a contradiction. For example, the owner’s manual for my motorcycle reads that if the oil is below a certain line ADD OIL. If it is between the two lines DO NOT ADD OIL. If I were a fool I might rip out the ADD OIL from one sentence and then the DO NOT ADD OIL from the other sentence, hold them up side by side, and say the writer of the manual has contradicted himself. See how important context is? If you try to answer the coworker with your own reason and logic you may get it wrong. As brother John has pointed out, if you point the person to Scripture the answer is there. Of course, you will have to do some work, spend some effort, and discover just what the Bible does teach on the issue. Simply put, murder is the unlawful taking of life. This is different from the lawful taking of life. God, being the only true just One, sovereign over all things sets the standard for what is lawful and what is not; thus, the CONTEXT of Scripture that clearly illustrates the difference. Hope this is helpful, Jeff |
||||||
224 | having sex with other men husband disabl | Ex 20:14 | jlhetrick | 200047 | ||
Brother's Hank and Dave (workman)- Your exchange here is exemplary so thank you both. Brother Dave- welcome to the Forum. After reading several (but not all) of your 21 posts to date, I'm looking forward to seeing more from you. I'm guessing, and hoping, that you are going to be a much appreciated contributor to the Forum. God bless, Jeff |
||||||
225 | Does the Mosaic Law apply to gentiles? | Leviticus | jlhetrick | 156684 | ||
Hi Doc, What Mark said. Thanks, Jeff |
||||||
226 | do you think tarot cards are a sin? | Lev 19:31 | jlhetrick | 189170 | ||
excellent response sister. | ||||||
227 | Do homosexual tendencys constitute sin? | Lev 20:13 | jlhetrick | 185124 | ||
Hi Steve, I believe your understanding of the manifestation of sin is right on the mark. If we are to believe that we have not sinned until we have touched the unholy thing then we are in fact, at that time, guilty of tempting ourselves. As you point out, it is that unholy nature, the sinfulness of our inheritance, through which we do tease ourselves to believe that we can dance around that forbidden thing without having sinned unless we touch it. It is certainly sin when we do touch it; but as you have pointed out, our sin is already counted against us when our hand only begins to reach out for it, nay, even at that point our mind has agreed with the hand to reach out. Ps 44:21 (ESV) 21 would not God discover this? For he knows the secrets of the heart. Deut 29:16-19 (ESV) 16 "You know how we lived in the land of Egypt, and how we came through the midst of the nations through which you passed. 17 And you have seen their detestable things, their idols of wood and stone, of silver and gold, which were among them. 18 Beware lest there be among you a man or woman or clan or tribe whose heart is turning away today from the Lord our God to go and serve the gods of those nations. Beware lest there be among you a root bearing poisonous and bitter fruit, 19 one who, when he hears the words of this sworn covenant, blesses himself in his heart, saying, 'I shall be safe, though I walk in the stubbornness of my heart.' (emphasis added) Scripture is clear that there is a progression toward and a progression of sin. (Isaiah 30:1-2, Jer 9:3, Jer 16: 11-12, Hos 13:1-2, etc.) As it is said in 2 Tim 3:13 …evil people and impostors will go on from bad to worse, deceiving and being deceived. (ESV) Praise God for His mercy, praise Him for His grace: Heb 9:11-12 (ESV) 11 But when Christ appeared as a high priest of the good things that have come, then through the greater and more perfect tent ( not made with hands, that is, not of this creation) 12 he entered once for all into the holy places, not by means of the blood of goats and calves but by means of his own blood, thus securing an eternal redemption. Thank you for your posts that are always thoughtful and well grounded in Scripture, Jeff |
||||||
228 | At the Beginning of His Story | Deut 4:10 | jlhetrick | 238049 | ||
I remember when I had a couple years of real study under my belt I had the feeling (if not the attitude?) that I had much of it figured out. The more I learn to the point of knowing the bigger it all becomes. The bigger it gets the more I realize my years of study are like a razor blade slightly scraping away a layer of dust. Someday I may get far enough along to do the sanding and, who knows, may even get a chance to do some painting. | ||||||
229 | the lives of the riches and the poor. | Deut 7:9 | jlhetrick | 189314 | ||
John, well said brother. Jeff |
||||||
230 | Can you please explain tithing? | Deut 14:1 | jlhetrick | 163313 | ||
Hello jl, No, I wasn't saying that, but I do believe it so I'll say it now. My response was to lisandra's question specifically asking about the tithe. But yes, I believe the tithe is still required. I haven't seen where God has changed this from a command to a "if it's in your heart do it". The verse you quote has often been used to argue out of context that God's people no longer have a responsibility to give back to God and to provide for the needs of the church at the stipulated 10 persent commanded in the Old Testament. In fact, I was once guilty of being mislead by that very verse. If you study in context though, I believe that you will discern the meaning of what the verse is saying. By the way, the verse you quoted is not Jesus speaking but Paul. So let's see what paul is really saying. Remember context. Back up a verse. 2Co 9:6 But this I say, He which soweth sparingly shall reap also sparingly; and he which soweth bountifully shall reap also bountifully. So, with this in mind; 2Co 9:7 Every man according as he purposeth in his heart, so let him give; not grudgingly, or of necessity: for God loveth a cheerful giver. Notice that the issue of tithe is not even hinted at. I believe, and have no reason not to believe, that Paul and his audience in Corinth did not question the responsibility to follow the command of God by tithing. Why would we assume that paul is presenting argument that the tithe is no longer commanded???? The passage goes on to encourage by showing how God "is able" to bless the "sowing". As we continue in the passage it would appear that Paul is not referring to the tithe, but rather, "liberal giving". This would insinuate giving above the tithe (see verse 13). But you did ask, "did Jesus require us to give ten percent..." Luk 11:42 But woe unto you, Pharisees! for ye tithe mint and rue and all manner of herbs, and pass over judgment and the love of God: these ought ye to have done, AND NOT TO LEAVE THE OTHER UNDONE. (emphasis added, not intended as YELLING). hope this helps explain my position. By the way, Do you believe christians are required to tithe. If not, can you support your position with scripture? with love, Jeff |
||||||
231 | Can you please explain tithing? | Deut 14:1 | jlhetrick | 163316 | ||
Hi again jl, in my response to you I asked if you believe the command to tithe is still relevant. That was before I saw this post, sorry. Well, you do not believe the tithe is still commanded, so the last part of my question in the previous post still stands. Can you give scriptural support for your beleif? I don't mean a single verse taken out of context, but actual biblical teaching that supports your belief here. P.S., always remember context. It is dangerous to take a single verse and attempt to make meaning of it out of the context in which it is provided and the wider teaching of the word of God. I in no way intend to accuse you of doing this on purpose so don't be offended by my next comment. Refer to the book of Matthew chapter four. You will see Satan himself attempting to use the very words of scripture out of context in order to decieve the Lord. Interestingly, the Lord does not attempt to debate with Satan; He simply provides more scripture in order to put the devils qote into context and therefore provide truth and meaning. With this in mind, please never attempt to answer another's question with a single verse. With love, Jeff |
||||||
232 | Can you please explain tithing? | Deut 14:1 | jlhetrick | 163365 | ||
Hello jl, Thanks for responding. Unfortunately you presented nothing more than your belief and offered nothing that even suggests that the tithe is no longer commanded by God. Let me attempt to address your post in the order that you laid it down. First you write: that “what I mean is no one required someone to give ten percent.” My response: The answer to your statement that no one required is, God required (please refer to my previous post for scriptural support). You write that the tithe was a part of the law and does not justify us. I agree, your on track here. At no point have I argued that we are justified by following any commands of God. We are justified by faith in Christ alone. Please study the book of Romans for understanding. You ask me to explain that the tithe is not part of the law. This confuses me as I have already argued that the tithe is a command from God. Anything that God commands is part of His law. Regarding your reference to my quoting Luke 11:42 I am still not sure of your point. Are you trying to insinuate that I was teaching that paying your tithe relieves you from the responsibility of obeying God in all areas?????? This is not my position at all and I’m not sure why you might have drawn that conclusion. Regarding Jesus and the disciples not requiring believers to tithe “to them”. I think you have missed the point completely. We do not tithe to any person, but to God. Again, referring back to my previous post I pointed out that the tithe was a well established part of God’s law at that time and practiced without question (though I am sure there were those then, as now, who did not obey it fully as they did not obey other commandments). The tithe is made to God. It is “received”, or “taken” by those that God has entrusted leadership over His people. Again, as I mentioned previously, in the OT this was the tribe of Levite, after the finished work of Christ, it is the church. Regarding the passages in Hebrews, I continue to believe you are missing the point. Lets look at it. Heb 7:11 If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron? Heb 7:12 For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law. What is being said here? This is the basic teaching of Christianity. The law here is referring to the whole economy of the time if you will. That is, where tithing was concerned it was commanded, it recognized that all they had came from God in the first place, it served to provide for the needs of the Levites who did not have the option of doing other works to provide for their sustenance. Secondly, the passage is making reference to the sacrificial system by which the people of God made atonement. This served two purpose generally speaking. It demonstrated the requirement of death as the penalty for sin and it pointed to the need for a sacrifice and to the Savior to come. Heb. 7:11 is rhetorical. Many believe that Paul wrote this book and this verse is a good representation of Paul’s way of presenting his point by anticipating the question his reader might ask. “If perfection were by the Levitical priesthood...” We know it wasn’t, “what further need was there that another priest should rise...” We know there was the need. So what change in the law is Paul referring too? Is it the Ten Commandments, the tithe, etc.? I don’t believe so. Is it the law as it pertains to the system of sacrifice which was established by God and required of the people before the coming of the Savior? I say yes. And this answer is supported by the wider teachings of scripture in context. There is no other teaching I have found that suggest that any other law of God has been abolished. You argue that the tithe was part of the law and I agreed. Jesus said: Mat 5:18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. Paul said: Rom 3:30 Seeing it is one God, which shall justify the circumcision by faith, and uncircumcision through faith. Rom 3:31 Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law. Hope this was helpful, in love, Jeff |
||||||
233 | Can you please explain tithing? | Deut 14:1 | jlhetrick | 163367 | ||
Hello ngkh, Thanks for the response. These verses say it very clearly. I didn't use them earlier because it's my experience that those who argue that the tithe is not a command for today always point out that this was God speaking to a different people at a different time. Your right that no one can judge another if they don't pay their tithe or if they don't follow any other command. This is not about judging and I don't believe there has been any judgmental statements on either side of this debate here. This is about teaching the truth found in the word of God. I disagree with your statement "in the end it's one's belief if he wants to pay or not". This is a dangerous position to take. As christians, our responsibilities do not come from what we believe about a particular subject. They come from the truth and what God expects from us. Again, this is not an issue of salvation, but one of obedience. It is each of our responsibility to look to God's word for the truth and then to be obedient to it through the power of His Spirit. Am I ever disobedient? Very often I'm afraid. Do I judge others for their disobedience? I have no right to and I try my best not to. I am most successful at not having a judgmental attitude when I turn the focus on myself and my own failure to allow Christ to work in my life at times. with love, Jeff |
||||||
234 | Can you please explain tithing? | Deut 14:1 | jlhetrick | 163377 | ||
Hello Lionheart, well said. |
||||||
235 | Can you please explain tithing? | Deut 14:1 | jlhetrick | 163434 | ||
hello kisha, Good points. Remember too that it is all that we are blessed with that we are to give back to God from. Not just our money, but our time and other resources. Regarding the return blessing, I have always thought of it like this. I do give "expecting" to get back because God promises this and He also says "test me" on this issue. I agree with you on the motivation issue. If my motivation for giving is because I am expecting something back, then I am giving with the wrong motivation. We should give because we are commanded, we are thankful, we recognize that we only have what God has provided in the first place, we want to see God's plan furthered, etc. But when God promises something, we should expect it, this includes blessings. Jeff |
||||||
236 | Can you please explain tithing? | Deut 14:1 | jlhetrick | 163439 | ||
hello inmyheart, Your welcome. Your right. Someone being right and someone being wrong is not the point here. The truth is what is important. I know that the day will come when I see Him face to face and I believe that at that time I will find that I was wrong on many points. I have been corrected on this very forum which has helped to add to my understanding and knowledge. I am thankful for that. If there is anything I enjoy about debating these issues it is that 1). I learn more through my own searching 2). I learn from others, and 3). I hope to pass something on that's beneficial. I do have a rule for myself regarding discussing the teachings of God. I believe what I believe because I have come to believe it through my personal study and sitting under the teaching of others. I have enough experience to be able to look back and see that some beliefs I have had needed correcting as I learned more. I'm sure this will always be the case. But I am careful to reconsider my beliefs based only on the basis of scripture. Thanks for your kind comments, Jeff |
||||||
237 | Can you please explain tithing? | Deut 14:1 | jlhetrick | 163455 | ||
hello njkh, Thanks for responding. I did use the word "disagree" regarding a point you made in your post, but not intending to say "I'm right and your wrong". That's not the issue. the issue is what is the truth. I stake no claim on the truth. I turn to the bible for it. You write: "That's why we have this topic in the first place- two completely difference in opinions." I have been trying to point out that this way of thinking is folly from the start. Our opinions matter not at all. In the search for the truth we only have God's word and therefore, when we present our "belief" it needs to be supported by scripture. You ask a good question, why are there so many denominations. I don't know but I do have an "opinion" for what that's worth. I start with a question. Why did God use so many different men to inspire and have write down His word to us? In part I believe it is because He used their differing personalities and styles to present the word the way He wanted it presented. With that thought, I believe it may also pertain to different denominations. God did not take away our personalities when He saved us. Different denominations do add opportunity for the wide ranging personalities within the family. As to "who are we to say" certain "denominations are cults? My answer is that we have a responsibility to call them cults. Any "denomination" that teaches what is contrary to the truth found in the word of God needs to be identified and exposed. With rights come responsibility, and by virtue of our responsibility we have the right. Yes, Mr. Pilate asked, "what is truth". But I think that what is missing from your point is the answer. Truth is the word of God. So no, it is not acceptable to defer to "differences of opinion" nor are we to be satisfied with the argument of "differences of interpretation". There is only one interpretation of the truth. It is not an issue of relevance. So, our work is to come into a knowledge of the truth through the study of God's word and the guidance of the Holy Spirit. You write: I myself see some of my fellow church brothers going overboard in the name of truth. So where do you draw the line? My answer: I don't. Who am I to draw the line on truth. I have no authority over it. Considering where you state that you draw the line let me offer this as thought. You write:"How do I know if I am doing the right thing? Simple acid test. Do I feel at peace or burdened. If I feel burdened, then I believe it's not spiritually led. With love I offer. Never rely on your feelings. They will fail you. They are not the "acid test". Once again, the bible, the word of God and that alone is the only test for truth. I am being long-winded but I really want to address all that you have asked or point to here. But let me finish as briefly as possible. Arguing a point with scripture should be considered teaching and not imposing or judgmental. And no, I do not attempt to get "the poor chap" to follow what I think is true. I respond to the questions and statements with what I believe supported by scripture. If I am right it is only because I am in agreement with the word of God. If I am not right, then I look forward to others better educated in the word to redirect my understanding which will result in my adjusting my belief. Not to fit my opinion, but to be in line with the truth. Finally, you write: "why not let God lead the poor chap in His own time and ways". What does that mean. The chap is here on the forum participating in bible study and he has access to the truth in the word of God. He also can pray and listen if He knows the Lord. Sincerely, Jeff |
||||||
238 | Can you please explain tithing? | Deut 14:1 | jlhetrick | 163605 | ||
Hello again jl, I didn't want you to think I was ignoring you, I've been really busy with work and the Holiday prep. and all. I too often give impulsive responses and I would rather not do that here. Especially with a subject that I began my first post by advising that I am not an authority on the subject of tithes. When I have time I will respond to this post and if you are still interested we can take up the dialogue. P.S. I just wanted to remind you of the forum rule and the legal issue of quoting the works of others. Don't forget to make reference to your source when you directly quote another's work (i.e., Easton's Bible Dictionary) Sincerely, Jeff |
||||||
239 | Is Deu 25:5, applicable to day? | Deut 25:5 | jlhetrick | 200927 | ||
Cheri- thanks for the info. Yes, of course...it was the seed spilling that was the point. His deceit was pretty much complete at that point. As for the first born issue, it seems clear that the point of the law was to ensure the carrying on of the name of the deceased brother and not his own (but I wasn't focused on that and so haven't really dug into it). Thanks again, Jeff |
||||||
240 | Questions I'm trying to answer | Joshua | jlhetrick | 168838 | ||
Hello ebrain, I would like to ask for clarification on your post. 1. Are you saying there are "subliminal" messages in the bible? 2. Are you saying that there are secret messages in the bible that can be deciphered by code? Jeff |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ] Next > Last [41] >> |