Results 401 - 420 of 515
|
||||||
Results from: Notes Author: humbledbyhisgrace Ordered by Date |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
401 | Paul, the Answers Are? | Luke 5:8 | humbledbyhisgrace | 179551 | ||
Paul, You said: "Jesus told Judas 'that thou doest, do quickly.' (John 13:27) When confronting Jesus before the throne of judgement could Judas reply, 'I did what you told me to do'?" Are we now going to blame God for our sins? Matthew 26:24 (NASB95) "The Son of Man is to go, just as it is written of Him; but woe to that man by whom the Son of Man is betrayed! It would have been good for that man if he had not been born." I wonder Paul, how many of us will actually be able to say those words to our Lord, "I did what you told me to"??? To His Glory, Steve |
||||||
402 | Is there any scripture regarding whether | Gen 3:15 | humbledbyhisgrace | 179136 | ||
Greetings Edwin! I have no problem comprehending what you say. I just disagree with it! “Let me try once more to make my position clear. At Matthew 26:53, Jesus said "Do you think that I cannot appeal to my Father" (ESV), please tell me Steve would I be right in interpreting this as "I can appeal to my Father", I am able to do it, it is not impossible for me to do this , however, although I can, I will not, as if I did, how would Scripture be fullfiled?, (verse 54). Please, Please tell me Steve, have I completely misunderstood what Jesus was saying, and if so how then should I have understood it?” No, I would not agree with your interpretation. Where you and I differ is where you insert “however, although I can, I will not”. This to me is a stretch and misses the point of why He said what He said. “If Jesus were to have done what He clearly said He could do, and thereby have prevented Scripture from being fullfiled, would He have sinned?, Yes, or No.” If Jesus had done as you say, what He said, do you think the following verse would say what it says? It’s obvious we see this differently. But trust me, it’s not because I don’t understand what you are saying. As I said, I just disagree with it. Right or wrong in interpretation, I will always try and submit to His Holiness and with His grace do my best not to make God into our image just because I cannot grasp His word or His ways. To me, it is foolishness of us to apply the wisdom of man which seems to, if not always make God into our own image. You find strength in that you say the Lord Jesus could have sinned but didn't. So be it! I on the other hand find strength that The Lord God (Father, Son, and Holy Spirit) is Holy and sin never has been, is not, and never will be a threat to corrupting His Holiness. God bless you Edwin! Steve |
||||||
403 | Is there any scripture regarding whether | Gen 3:15 | humbledbyhisgrace | 179049 | ||
Greetings Edwin! You said “Your problem as I see it is one that is all too common with a lot of christians, that is an inability to reconcile the Diety of our Lord Jesus, with His true humanity.” Interesting comment. This is basically what I was thinking about you ;-) I don’t mean to sound arrogant here but looking at your statement and then the scripture references and follow on questions it appears to me you fail to understand what you accuse me of not understanding. Regardless, I want to be sure and take the right approach to this discussion. It appears the discussion has been restricted from public view which I guess is a good indication we are on thin ice ??? Moving on cautiously, looking back at your scriptures and questions, can you think of any scripture where God calls Jesus God? Just had to through that one in :-) Back to the subject, two natures, fully God and fully man, united in one person! God cannot sin, Mankind can sin, Jesus has both divine and human nature united in one person, if Jesus is God and we both agree with that as the scriptures clearly teach it, then in my opinion the human nature of Jesus could not have sinned because it would have involved the person of Jesus which as we have both agreed with scripture clearly teaches both divine and human nature in the one person of Jesus. God bless, Steve |
||||||
404 | Is there any scripture regarding whether | Gen 3:15 | humbledbyhisgrace | 178993 | ||
Greetings Brother! You said "If He said He could do this, which He did in fact say, but it was impossible for Him to do so, then you are calling Him a lier, and as I have said in my post to "NewPilgrim" on this topic, (which post I suggest you read), "my Jesus is not a lier"." Let's please be careful with our accusations. Accusing me of calling our Lord a liar is unacceptable. I'll leave it at that and let you address your own motivation for such an accusation against a brother. If my original post instigated such anger in you I apologize and ask you to forgive me. That was not my intent! You ask "What is the point of His saying this, if as you maintain He was incapable of doing it?, it just does not make sense." I humbly admit I probably don't make good sense most of the time. Let me try and explain. Matthew 26:51-54 (NASB95) 51 And behold, one of those who were with Jesus reached and drew out his sword, and struck the slave of the high priest and cut off his ear. 52 Then Jesus said* to him, "Put your sword back into its place; for all those who take up the sword shall perish by the sword. 53 "Or do you think that I cannot appeal to My Father, and He will at once put at My disposal more than twelve legions of angels? 54 "How then will the Scriptures be fulfilled, which say that it must happen this way?" I don't for a second think I can speak for Jesus but in MY OPINION and with confidence I might add, the point of him saying this was not to prove he could sin which you teach! Based on the scriptures, I would say his point is clear in the above passage paying close attention to verse 54. Is he not teaching that what was taking place and would take place was the will of God. Notice in verse 54 it says, "it must happen this way". Is it possible to find conflict in the triune God? Let's look back at exactly what I said. My version not yours :-) I said "I think we can agree that He had the ability to call on the Father, but how does this prove He could have been disobedient to the Father?" You pointed to the scripture as evidence that Jesus could sin. In my opinion this is a worldly view placing Christ on the same level as man, completely over looking the fact He is God and well teaching that God himself could sin. You attribute the nature of mankind (sinful) to Jesus. To this again I ask, How can it be? As the son of God I believe he could do anything but sin! It goes against the nature of God to sin so how is it possible that He could have sinned? If the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are one God, how is it possible that any of the three persons in the triune God could sin? You ask "Please tell me what Coll 2:9 has to do with this? "in Him dwells all the fullness of the Godhead bodily", so what, how does this relate to what Jesus said at Matthew 26:53?." It was a reminder to you who this Jesus was who you attributed the ability to sin. God bless, Steve |
||||||
405 | Is there any scripture regarding whether | Gen 3:15 | humbledbyhisgrace | 178949 | ||
Greetings Brother! If he would have done so? Surly we cannot pass this off as proof of such a teaching! I think we can agree that He had the ability to call on the Father, but how does this prove He could have been disobedient to the Father? Is the "If" not assumption on your part? How can it be? Colossians 2:9 (NASB95) For in Him all the fullness of Deity dwells in bodily form |
||||||
406 | Is there any scripture regarding whether | Gen 3:15 | humbledbyhisgrace | 178948 | ||
Greetings NewPilgrim! The question was, "Is there any scripture regarding whether Jesus could sin?" You have offered much opinion but no scripture. This is dangerous when our opinion contradicts scripture. Keep in mind we don't want to mislead anyone. You said "It was entirely possible for Jesus to have sinned, elsewise the overcoming of temptation would be nonsense and his sacrifice would be an eternal joke, being little more than a token gesture." This is a bold statement. Is it wise to teach others so boldly with our own opinions with out being able to back it up with scripture? Are you talking about Jesus overcoming temptation or us? Either way, can you provide scripture proof of your teaching? You said "For Jesus to be fit to judge, the scripture teaches us, he lived as a man, with the temptations of man." Actually, scripture teaches us that Jesus is fit to judge us because God the Father has given Him this right! John 5:22-23 22 For not even the Father judges anyone, but He has given all judgment to the Son, 23 so that all will honor the Son even as they honor the Father. He who does not honor the Son does not honor the Father who sent Him. You said "If Jesus didnt have the potential to sin then temptation would not be temptation at all." Please, give us one scripture that teaches such a thing! James 1:13-15 (NASB95) 13 Let no one say when he is tempted, "I am being tempted by God"; for God cannot be tempted by evil, and He Himself does not tempt anyone. 14 But each one is tempted when he is carried away and enticed by his own lust. 15 Then when lust has conceived, it gives birth to sin; and when sin is accomplished, it brings forth death. Can you show me in the scriptures above where it says anything about Jesus must have the potential to sin before we are tempted. Does it not teach we are tempted when we give into our "OWN" lust. Can you show any scripture that teaches such a teaching. In Christ, Steve |
||||||
407 | Apologetics Help Please! | Is 7:14 | humbledbyhisgrace | 178893 | ||
I hear ya! But keep in mind, there is nothing wrong with telling them you don't know. It still doesn't mean they are right and it certinaly doesn't mean our faith is not based on the truth. Don't forget to smile at them ;-) Knowing in all their selfrighteousness they are actually the ones that are wrong :-) and if it pleases the Lord God to open their eyes He will! Oh yea, and don't forget to pray for them! God bless, Steve |
||||||
408 | Apologetics Help Please! | Is 7:14 | humbledbyhisgrace | 178889 | ||
Greetings Murrai! Actually, It was Tim and Mark who responded with some great answers. All of it good but the point Tim makes regarding the inspired New Testament is something Christians need to keep in mind. In every attempt by a none believer to discredit the Word of God that I have seen, always falls short in light of the scriptures. This case is a good example of how one would have to disregard other scriptures in order for their argument to stand. Of course I'm convinced no argument will ever stand if it contradicts the Word of God :-) Let me take this time to invite you to continue to spend some time in this forum. I don't count myself in the mix but there are many others here that you can learn a lot from. You will find it is a good place to study and discuss the Word of God. God bless you in your study! Steve |
||||||
409 | Apologetics Help Please! | Is 7:14 | humbledbyhisgrace | 178885 | ||
Greetings Brother Tim! " However, we know from the New Testament that there was an even greater fulfillment where a virgin would conceive without knowing a mn. Which, brings us to the final issue. The doctrine of the Virgin Birth does not stand or fall upon how one translates the term in Is. 7:14. Why? Because, the inspired New Testament specifically tells us that Mary was a virgin." Amen and Amen! Excellent point! God Bless, Steve |
||||||
410 | Is it wrong to consult fortune tellers? | Deut 18:10 | humbledbyhisgrace | 178680 | ||
Greetings once again Sister! Okay, we are moving on. I just hope you did not or do not misunderstand me. I would like to address something found in your post if I may. You say in your post "But I would appreciate if you read my other responses and you will get a better understanding. In all your getting get an understanding. In James 1:5 it says those that lack wisdom let them ask of God he will give it freely. I haven't had anyone else misunderstand me and if there is something that I wrote that wasn't understandable I am available to give a more inept discussion until there is an understanding." I noticed in some of your other post you use this same teaching regarding this scripture. Let me ask you this, is James 1:5 teaching one to ask God for wisdom that we may understand others or does this teach us to ask God for wisdom that we may understand Him and His ways? Is it not that we are to ask for wisdom that we may understand and know what it is He is teaching us through the trials we face? Consider the context of the verse. James 1:1-5 (KJV) 1 James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad, greeting. 2 My brethren, count it all joy when ye fall into divers temptations; 3 Knowing this, that the trying of your faith worketh patience. 4 But let patience have her perfect work, that ye may be perfect and entire, wanting nothing. 5 If any of you lack wisdom, let him ask of God, that giveth to all men liberally, and upbraideth not; and it shall be given him. As you have taught it, is it accurate? If you believe so, will you explain please? Thank you and God Bless, Steve |
||||||
411 | Is it wrong to consult fortune tellers? | Deut 18:10 | humbledbyhisgrace | 178638 | ||
Greetings Sister! I did read your post. That's what prompted the request! Keep in mind, they are still there for all to see and they will remain for a long time. If you watch this forum long enough you will see someone respond to a post that was actually posted years ago. Just goes to show you never know who or when someone may actually read a post and if His word is taught accurately then the opportunity to teach and share with others goes far beyond the person you are talking with at that time. I do understand the zeal to share the word of our Lord God with others. I thank Him I too have this hunger for His word and to share it with others. My prayer is that we all handle it properly so that it may bring glory to the Lord God and that we all may grow in knowledge of His truth! Amen? God Bless, Steve |
||||||
412 | Is it wrong to consult fortune tellers? | Deut 18:10 | humbledbyhisgrace | 178613 | ||
Greetings Sister! Please, please, please think about this. You almost never point to scripture in your post. Some may be familiar enough with scripture to know what you refer to. Many who read along may not. It will also help cut down on confusion. As is, it comes across as your opinion with no scripture reference to back it up. If your intent is to teach the word of God, present it as such so the unlearned can be edified through God’s word. I pray you see my point and take this as it is intended! Your Brother in Christ, Steve |
||||||
413 | Free will and predestination co-exist? | Rom 8:29 | humbledbyhisgrace | 178582 | ||
Greetings Z! You said " I am NOT supprised that you do not wish to "debate" with this kind of theology." in reference to "God brings to us the message of faith, that if we believe in our heart, and confess with our mouth, we will be saved. Just curious if you have ever read this scripture Romans 10:9? On this matter I would say Marks theology is dead on based on scripture. What say you? Your Brother in Christ, Steve |
||||||
414 | Faith apart from works! | James | humbledbyhisgrace | 178490 | ||
Ya, I've been there myself! Don't you wish some times they had an edit option? God bless, Steve |
||||||
415 | Faith apart from works! | James | humbledbyhisgrace | 178486 | ||
Greetings souljourners! Dear sister, is this a miss quote? "YOU CAN SAY WITH YOUR MOUTH THAT YOU HAVE FAITH IN GOD, BUT IF YOU'RE DOING THE WORKS OF THE LORD FAITH IS OBSOLETE." Your Brother in Christ, Steve |
||||||
416 | Women Preachers? Yes or No? | 1 Cor 1:1 | humbledbyhisgrace | 178333 | ||
Greetings Jeff! Well said Brother, well done! God Bless, Steve |
||||||
417 | Where did our conscience come from? | Rom 2:15 | humbledbyhisgrace | 178056 | ||
Greetings rebar and welcome to the forum! The responses given were not ment to be all inclusive of every scripture related to the subject. As Brother Doc pointed out in his post, there is much that can be discussed on the subject, i.e. "This topic is a fascinating one, but ferreting out the details can get pretty involved." (taken from Doc's post). Take a look at Romans 2:14-15. Good stuff yes? It speaks right to the heart of the matter. And as the scriptures you refered to point out as well, mankind is without excuse. Thanks for your input on the subject and again, welcome to the forum! If you would, please take the time and enter a little information about yourself in your profile. This is a great place to learn and study the Word of God and to share with others as well. I think you will find there are many here that can be very helpful in learning more about the Word of God and there is always lots of opportunities to share what you know as we all continue to grow in Christ. God Bless, Steve |
||||||
418 | Where did our conscience come from? | Rom 2:15 | humbledbyhisgrace | 177997 | ||
Greetings Brother! Thanks for the kind words! I hear what your saying. I was searching the scriptures on this one too and then I realized I had put together a short sermon ;-) that really was not what she was asking for. Oh well, I had much fun in the effort. The Lord God truly is Good! He showed me once again as I searched His Word. In service to the King Brother! Steve |
||||||
419 | The time of your visitation? | Luke 19:44 | humbledbyhisgrace | 177946 | ||
Greetings Doc! Great stuff Brother! One point in particular, "beg Him to work the power of the Word in your own life" Amen! It reminds me of a few of the older brothers and sisters in my local church. You can see it in them! They teach by example! This also applied to our Pastor who recently went Home! I learned much from his example. God bless, Steve |
||||||
420 | The time of your visitation? | Luke 19:44 | humbledbyhisgrace | 177943 | ||
Greetings Mark! "I hope I am making sense!" Yes my brother you are. I see the point(s) your making. As far as my belief / understanding of "because you did not recognize the time of your visitation." Yes I think our Lord is speaking of a particular time and that they did not recognize it. "I did not mean for you to defend Piper's statements. I apologize if that was how I came across. I will try to be more careful! :-)" Not at all. Just made the statement to help point out my only desire was to understand you on the points you raised as I didn't agree that his intent was to deflect. You have offered much to consider and I do appreciate that. I'm still digging! God Bless, Steve |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ] Next > Last [26] >> |