Results 61 - 70 of 70
|
||||||
Results from: Notes Author: YenIsaRap Ordered by Verse |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
61 | "Women being silent" | Gal 3:28 | YenIsaRap | 218367 | ||
Dear Yedida Why do you suppose Jesus did not choose any women to be in His inner core of Disciples, those chosen personally by Him, and thereby becoming the Apostles? Seeing that God, and Jesus are one in the same. In the Old Testament we see that God did not appoint any women to service in the Temple. And in the New Testament Jesus did not appoint any woman to be Apostles. Was that due to a cultural prejudice, or could it be understood that women are not to be in positions of authority over man. Now we know that when Paul said woman, there are different categories of women. 1 Virgin 2 Young women 3 Married Women 4 Older women 5 Widows What category was he speaking to? When it is all said and done, is there any (SCRIPTURE) that contradicts Paul's teaching? 1Ti 2:12 12 But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. God Bless YenIsaRap |
||||||
62 | "Women being silent" | Gal 3:28 | YenIsaRap | 218380 | ||
Dear Yedida No one has of yet answered any of the questions I have posed for the purpose of validating the position of women in ministry. ie, pastors, preachers, teachers. You do not have any scriptures to uphold your beliefs, but rather your assumption as to what something "might" be saying. Even by trying to use the position of (Prophetess). Which has not been in question for women. A woman who speaks by divine inspiration or as the interpreter through whom the will of a god is expressed. ......free dictionary online This does not gain for women the position of Preacher, this position is totally different, because Prophesy is when God speaks, not the Preaching of the written word we call the Bible. There is a big difference in the two. Num.22:27-30 27 And when the ass saw the angel of the LORD, she fell down under Balaam: and Balaam's anger was kindled, and he smote the ass with a staff. 28 And the LORD opened the mouth of the ass, and she said unto Balaam, What have I done unto thee, that thou hast smitten me these three times? 29 And Balaam said unto the ass, Because thou hast mocked me: I would there were a sword in mine hand, for now would I kill thee. 30 And the ass said unto Balaam, Am not I thine ass, upon which thou hast ridden ever since I was thine unto this day? Was I ever wont to do so unto thee? And he said, Nay. Luke 19:38-40 38 Saying, Blessed be the King that cometh in the name of the Lord: peace in heaven, and glory in the highest. 39 And some of the Pharisees from among the multitude said unto him, Master, rebuke thy disciples. 40 And he answered and said unto them, I tell you that, if these should hold their peace, the stones would immediately cry out. From the preceding verses, do they give credence for asses and stones to Preach? When you say "The Lord gave the first commission after the resurrection to "go and tell..." to a woman." There was no "Commission" to women, at that time, or any other time, to Preach. That is tantamount to what the Catholic Church did by taking the "greeting" from the angel Gabriel, and Mary's cousin Elisabeth combining them together and making a prayer out of them. Luk 1:28,42 28 And the angel came in unto her, and said, Hail, thou that art highly favoured, the Lord is with thee: blessed art thou among women. 42 And she spake out with a loud voice, and said, Blessed art thou among women, and blessed is the fruit of thy womb. Blessings YenIsaRap |
||||||
63 | Cultural Context Helps but Doesn't Rule | 2 Thess 2:15 | YenIsaRap | 218405 | ||
Using the logic of cultural teaching by Paul. Meaning those things that Paul taught, that do not pertain to us today because they were only about the culture of the time they were taught. 1) We then need to toss out (2 Tim. 3:16) because it does say "ALL SCRIPTURE" which would not be relevant anymore. 2) Or we need to go through the entire Bible, decide which verses or books were written in the manor of cultural teaching, then delete them because they do not relate to us today. Blessings YenIsaRap |
||||||
64 | no more animal sacrifice | Heb 8:13 | YenIsaRap | 218697 | ||
Dear Tim You are right of course, "The animal sacrifices did not save anyone in the first place." I on the other hand was referring to the forgiveness of sin, now we are at cross purposes sorry:-( Forgiveness of sin, and Salvation are not synonymous If I may rephrase the questions. This statement was made recently. "Since Christ paid the price for our sin on the cross. no more animal sacrifice for sin is acceptable." 1 Did God honor the sacrifices made by the Jewish people, (for the forgiveness of sin) until the destruction of the Temple? 2 Will God again honor the sacrifices of the Jewish people, (for the forgiveness of sin) when they are reinstated, after the rebuilding of the Temple? These sacrifices were instituted by God for the people, in Exodus. The Temple was not destroyed until 70 ad. this was 35 yrs. after the sacrifice of Jesus. The people still sacrificed until that time. We are told, the Temple will be rebuilt in Jerusalem in the end times, will God again honor the sacrifices of the people, made at this new Temple until the Abomination of Desolation stands in the Holy Place? We know a New Covenant was made, but the Jews "did not," we know there is now a New Covenant in force, but the Jews "do not". God Bless YenIsaRap |
||||||
65 | no more animal sacrifice | Heb 8:13 | YenIsaRap | 218700 | ||
Dear Tim You can't have it both ways Tim, in your first post you stated. "1) The animal sacrifices did not save anyone in the first place." And I concur, with your statement, but they did gain forgiveness of sin. Now in your second post you state. "You stated that forgiveness of sins and salvation are not synonymous, but according to Eph. 1:7, they are synonymous:" Again I concur with your statement, but that event only becomes a reality in the New Covenant, not the Old. That brings us to the crux of my question. My question is asked in reference to, and only to the people, the nation of Israel, those people that did not follow Jesus, but continued in the practice of Judaism after the Crucifixion of Jesus, until the final destruction of the Temple in 35 ad. I guess you are saying, the Jewish people were not granted forgiveness of their sins after 35 ad. No matter the fact they followed the laws set down. Was the forgiveness of their sins only dependant upon the fact something was sacrificed? Or was it because they believed God at His word, that if they did sacrifice in such a manner, they would gain forgiveness of sin? Gal 3:12 And the law is not of faith: but, The man that doeth them shall live in them. Therefore if the people did continue to live by the law, did God honor their sacrifice for sin, thereby granting them forgiveness of their sins according to the law? Your Brother in Christ Yen |
||||||
66 | no more animal sacrifice | Heb 8:13 | YenIsaRap | 218704 | ||
This is a correction on my post, no more animal sacrifice ( 218700 ) until the final destruction of the Temple in 35 ad. That should have been 70 ad. Yen |
||||||
67 | no more animal sacrifice | Heb 8:13 | YenIsaRap | 218712 | ||
Dear Searcher Thank you for the response, I to feel the answer is "yes" to that question. Thanks for the information about Ez.40-46 being the new Temple. Now, could you venture an answer on the question number (1) of the same post? Thanks Brother Yen |
||||||
68 | no more animal sacrifice | Heb 8:13 | YenIsaRap | 218716 | ||
Dear Edd Just speak up, don't be so shy with your viewpoint. When we differ with others, if we don't share the knowledge we possess we become likened unto the Dead sea, where fresh, life giving water flows into it, but without any out let it becomes stagnant. God Bless Yen |
||||||
69 | no more animal sacrifice | Heb 8:13 | YenIsaRap | 218719 | ||
I would like for everyone to fully understand my position on this subject. I am a born again believer in Jesus Christ. The sacrifice which he made for me, for the forgiveness of my sins, and the Grace of God whereby I have received Salvation. I have not stated that I believe the sacrifices of the Law, conducted at the Temple by the Jews, should be reinstated, I do not advocate this practice for followers of Jesus Christ as something that we as believers should do, besides the fact we can't, even if we wanted to, on the grounds the Temple, the only place where sacrifices of that sort can be made, DOES NOT EXIST! The original question was posed. Because when Jesus was Crucified, the Temple was still standing, and would be for another 35 yrs. There were Jews that kept the old traditions, and the laws, during that time. Question: Did God honor those sacrifices until 70 ad.? Then I had the thought. The Temple will be rebuilt in the end times, the sacrifices will be reinstated, for a three and one half year period of time, until the Abomination of Desolation happens. Question: Will God Honor those sacrifices at that time? The answer does not negate, nor diminish anything that Jesus accomplished for all mankind. It's just a question about "A People", that did not believe the Messiah had come, and continued in the Law, until this day, and will into the future, until Jesus returns. On the Jewish calendar the yr.is 5770 their still waiting for Messiah. Just a question, not a new doctrine. Gods Love YenIsaRap |
||||||
70 | no more animal sacrifice | Heb 8:13 | YenIsaRap | 218720 | ||
Dear asurelaw Thank you for your concern, I felt the sarcasm that was meant. These were my two choices. I chose no.2 Pro 26:4 Pro 12:16 God Bless YEN |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 1 2 3 4 ] |