Results 61 - 73 of 73
|
||||||
Results from: Notes Author: RC Scrolls Ordered by Verse |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
61 | What Jesus meant Matt 10:23.16:28 26:64 | Rev 17:10 | RC Scrolls | 204378 | ||
Test all things in light of scripture. You cant do thaat with a future revelation, Peace out RC Scroll. | ||||||
62 | What Jesus meant Matt 10:23.16:28 26:64 | Rev 17:10 | RC Scrolls | 204381 | ||
Well most people Believe this to be the rapture but its not its the parousia in greek or presence. The Disciples were familuar with Old Testament analogies. Such as Gods Judgement being seen by clouds in the air. When 70 AD rolled aorund they perieved that The Coming of Christ had happened. They did not see Jesus, they knew He was there because of the Old Testament analogies. Now we are waiting until the end of time for the Rapture of all people to be Judged. Matt 24 was fulfilled in 70 AD. Remember that the disciples asked Jesus about temple which was standing in 30 AD as they talked to Him. Not a futureistic Temple. And the Temple they talked about was indeed destroyed along with the Jewish Religion in 70 AD. Remember Daniels prophecy that the sacrifice shall Cease in chp 9. Its over for Israel. Christ even told the fig tree that it wont produce fruit forever. He meant forever. The Fig tree is a Biblical Representative for Israel. Deut 8:7-8 For the LORD thy God bringeth thee into a good land, a land of brooks of water, of fountains and depths that spring out of valleys and hills; A land of wheat, and barley, and vines, and fig trees, and pomegranates; a land of oil olive, and honey; He GOD used the fig tree as a way to let Israel know if they were being Blessed or cursed by whether or not there figs were growing or not. Jer 5:17 And they shall eat up thine harvest, and thy bread, which thy sons and thy daughters should eat: they shall eat up thy flocks and thine herds: they shall eat up thy vines and thy fig trees: they shall impoverish thy fenced cities, wherein thou trustedst, with the sword. Thanks RC love in Christ Jesus. History records all these facts and this point of view for 2 thousand yrs. Pre Trib has only been taught since its invention in 1830 AD. |
||||||
63 | What Jesus meant Matt 10:23.16:28 26:64 | Rev 17:10 | RC Scrolls | 204383 | ||
Yep it does, look at other spellings RC Scroll, Rc Scrolls rcscroll rcscrolls Been here since the first week we started it. Thanks RC I had to change email because of some bad mailings I was recieving. | ||||||
64 | What Jesus meant Matt 10:23.16:28 26:64 | Rev 17:10 | RC Scrolls | 204384 | ||
Its rcscroll you wanna look up | ||||||
65 | What Jesus meant Matt 10:23.16:28 26:64 | Rev 17:10 | RC Scrolls | 204386 | ||
No problem. In Christ RC :-) | ||||||
66 | What Jesus meant Matt 10:23.16:28 26:64 | Rev 17:10 | RC Scrolls | 204405 | ||
We are in the Millenial Kingdom now Look at Rev 20 vs 4 The souls are still remaining in the heavenly Jerusalem no, until the Judgement when Satan is loosed a little season. We are in the middle of chp 20 right now between vs 10 and 11. Christ is our King now Satan has been bound back in 70AD. This view has been around since 66 AD there are hundreds of writings of this. Compared to Dispensationalism which there are only and thats maybe 2 people throut Hiistory until 1830 AD when they made this new doctrine of it still being future. Its funny when you realize that the Church was always past tense on this until Pre millenilism came out in 1830. They really believe that they are correct but they are severly wrong. God Bless. Remember that Christ saw Satan falling from Heaven in 30 AD as lightning. And there is also the Saints being ressurected after Christ ressurection. Its in the Bible. Remeber that the Bible is its own best interpreter. If you are looking to the Future you become Subject to what ever someone says. Also if you look at the Dating of Revelation , they say in Domitians Time 90 to 100 AD. Its been proven that it was written before 65AD probably 63 AD. I can show you plenty of mistakes for the 90 AD theory.And why it was written in 63 AD. This dating creates a servere problem in mosts Eschatology. In Christ Jesus. |
||||||
67 | What Jesus meant Matt 10:23.16:28 26:64 | Rev 17:10 | RC Scrolls | 204429 | ||
No it is a general time frame. if you look at all the other times Gods word uses thousand you will see it is an indefinate amount. like God owns cattle on a thousand Hills. What about the 1001 hill. You see its always used as a Figure of speech. The milenial Reign starts in The Kingdom of God. That is what we preach the Kingdom of God. Remember Christ Says that the Kingdom is not Here it is in you, Hence a spiritual New Jerusalem. At the end of Revelation it Talks about Two New Jerusalems One here and one in the Sky. We are a part of the New Jerusalem Here while we live physically. When we die we go To the New Jerusalem in the Heavens. ? Why would we read a Spiritual Teaching and come up with a literal 1000 yrs. Peace RC in Christ. 1 Cor 15:25-32 (KJV) 25 For he must reign, till he hath put all enemies under his feet. 26 The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death. 27 For he hath put all things under his feet. But when he saith all things are put under him, it is manifest that he is excepted, which did put all things under him. 28 And when all things shall be subdued unto him, then shall the Son also himself be subject unto him that put all things under him, that God may be all in all. 29 Else what shall they do which are baptized for the dead, if the dead rise not at all? why are they then baptized for the dead? 30 And why stand we in jeopardy every hour? 31 I protest by your rejoicing which I have in Christ Jesus our Lord, I die daily. 32 If after the manner of men I have fought with beasts at Ephesus, what advantageth it me, if the dead rise not? let us eat and drink; for to morrow we die. |
||||||
68 | What Jesus meant Matt 10:23.16:28 26:64 | Rev 17:10 | RC Scrolls | 204453 | ||
I remember studying this document and I found alot of assumption involved, especially when more than a few copies of the syriac version of Revelation States that Revelation was written by John who was banished to the Island of Patmos by the emporer Nero. I agree that at first glance it looks like that and I wouldnt dought that possibly He did think like that, But we have to keep in mind that many have come up with Doctrines that were self imposed and generally of a bad Hermenutic. In light of hundreds of statements that differed at His time. He may have been a great Saint in many areas but that doesent constitute that He was correct or truley believed in this Eschatology. I always have Dispensationalists look at all their witnesses, which sometimes are Premillenial and not dispensational or pre trib, mid trib etc. I personelly could find five throught out all History and studied that only two statements were acurate as Pretrib. I cant even remember the other one. We run into alot of trouble in the 1800s with alot of Heresy. in deed alot created by the Millerites. I dismiss that Ephraem of Nisibis wrote it being that the one who found the writing had alot of other discrepencies. Also When I did some other research on the people of His day I couldnt find any witnesses to to state anything that He taught even remotely to that end. How ever after stating that atleast we do have one witness in that time who was Pretrib perhappaps the author of that Doc. I whish I had all my study on this matter but it was probably 22-25 yrs ago that I had done it.I also know that your not a dispie, and I appreciate your Help. But I dont think that we can say that it was a doctrine that had any creedance to it at all. For His hearers never back ed it up. So a great Saint thats assured that he was,but that He made famous this view we cant trust because of His great Teaching. Especially in light of the Syriatic Version and all the other witnesses of His time. Good to hear From you Tim its been awhile. I went through chemo again after eight yrs ago. Did it eveyday for 10 months lost fifty pounds and I am just now recovering, I look like a wet squirrel. I will try to restudy some of the facts that I have stated and send them to you, so you dont have to guess at my statements.Oh Im not even close to being a post triber either, only a post Triber if you believe that the tribulation happened in 63-70AD. I Do how about you. Dispensationalism is cracking all around them as Tim La Haye states now.We are about to go through somewhat of a revival with the Oldest Church Doctrines in History. I believe that infatically, and that Dispies will be dismissed very shortly as those who did stumble over the scriptures, when History is written in about 20 to 30 yrs from now. love in Christ Jesus RC |
||||||
69 | What Jesus meant Matt 10:23.16:28 26:64 | Rev 17:10 | RC Scrolls | 204527 | ||
You must have missed my note back to you, I said the opposite. That it is usally used as not meaning a perfedt thousand, In Christ Jesus RC PS, is it Accurate or an approximate as you said,It is overwhelmingly used as an accurate number or at least an approximation. Just a funny statement. Thats my point its used as a generalization. Why would you read chap 20 in a spiritual way which it is, and then put right in the middle of everything else being spiritual a literal Phrase, thats Bad writiiiiiiiiiing. When John wrote this He is very correct, He hes telling you a spiritual thing and He means it that way. In other words, if He had wrote spiritually until He got to 1 thousand He would have continued the shift in literalism. But its a terrible thing to say That he wrote Spiritually everything else but that one phrase. You would never write anything literally and take one vs and put a spiritual meaning in it. No body would see the shift or know what your talking about. You dont have to accept it, but it has been taught for two thousand yrs now. I wouldnt try and twist your arm at all. in Christ Jesus RC |
||||||
70 | What Jesus meant Matt 10:23.16:28 26:64 | Rev 17:10 | RC Scrolls | 204589 | ||
On Writing I have mentioned, if you write a spiritual CHP you dont put a literal statement in the middle, no one would understand it as being literal. No body would write a literal chapter either and put one vs in it as spiritual. No one would know that either. You can always see the shift Froom a literal passage into a Sppiritual one. They my shift but generally if they do they Shift after 20 vs or so and when they shift they will use the other for many verses. not just on in the middle. Nope the Nations were decieved pertains when the Gentiles couldnt know God unless they converted to Judaisim. And that was a terrible thing to do, mockery hate from them. When Jesus conquered Death on Ressrection Day, the Gentiles had their blinders taken off by God if you will. Now Everyone can be saved it dosent matter what Nation or tongue your from. Satan had a strangle hold on the Gentiles. Now we dont need Him we have enough sin generated by men. The Gentiles are now free atlast. So the nations can still be decieved through men or Nations, but its not Satan.If you send me an email Address I can send you the evidence in one 8 page study, Which includes this whole view. 1335 Days after The Sacrifice Had ended in 70 AD that Ress happened. Or what Daniel said was a false prophesy. Love in Christ Jesus. RC Ahh Satan is loosed only to be Judged by God. The Bible says that we shall laugh at this silly looking beast. That will be when all of us from this age are Judged as well. REV chapter 12 Satan is thrown from Heaven that already remember he took a third of the angels with Him. |
||||||
71 | What Jesus meant Matt 10:23.16:28 26:64 | Rev 17:10 | RC Scrolls | 204668 | ||
You got it I am very busy. it took 8 yrs on this one subject. In Christ RC a couple of hours ill send it, and if you have any question s just email me back. RC | ||||||
72 | What Jesus meant Matt 10:23.16:28 26:64 | Rev 17:10 | RC Scrolls | 204773 | ||
I thought I sent it already, But I will send it again In Christ Jesus. | ||||||
73 | What Jesus meant Matt 10:23.16:28 26:64 | Rev 17:10 | RC Scrolls | 204791 | ||
No problem have a good time. Let me know if you need anything broke down, Or if you dont understand something. Just write. I wouuld rather it this way so you can determine your self. Thanks in Christ Jesus .RC | ||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 1 2 3 4 ] |