Results 81 - 100 of 105
|
||||||
Results from: Notes Author: G. Preston Ordered by Verse |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
81 | Enoch did not die and went into heaven? | Ezekiel | G. Preston | 231691 | ||
Elijah ...also. | ||||||
82 | during the 3 days? | Matthew | G. Preston | 195384 | ||
Michael, I have no issue with your scriptural reference of Matt 12:40. Do you have references for balance of conclusions? Example; I am reminded that Rev.9:1 is prophecy which carries the school of thought that it is yet in the future. |
||||||
83 | during the 3 days? | Matthew | G. Preston | 195386 | ||
Jesusman, Amen, on the butchering of scripture. It seems prevelant today, consistant with end times teaching of..."tickling the ears"... I refer to it as "Spiritualizing the Bible". |
||||||
84 | during the 3 days? | Matthew | G. Preston | 195387 | ||
BradK, Your patience is requested. Why did you react in such manner to, admittedly, a "speculative" answer? Aren't you convinced that G-d had the Bible written thru man, in its' fashion to foster and promote individual interpretation and intent? I am....and I believe He did it for a purpose. That is to urge us to study,analysis,discuss,debate and do it all over again. Thanks. I am new on the board and wish to gain insight. |
||||||
85 | during the 3 days? | Matthew | G. Preston | 195406 | ||
With respect. You extracted my writings from proper context. I am presently familiar with Pet. 1:20, and am not surprised of its' reference by any good Bible student, in due time. I was not aware that the discussion had reached an "Interpretative" state. Wasn't the proponent in the process of discerning a proper conclusion? Was he not asking questions? Further, please note:..."one's own interpretation". Meaning two are more are obliged to review, analysis, discuss, debate in the process of concluding...with help from the Holy Spirit...per scripture;..."where two or more are gathered, there I will be also". During that process, where scripture is not sufficiently clear to a proponent, is he not permitted to engage as an interlocutor? If not, please give scripture reference. Also, if not, please explain the process by which proper interpretation becomes established? Bible students recognize some scriptures are not sufficiently clear for immediate conclusion...less this and 75 percent...estimate...of exchanges would not be necessary. Positions which contribute to stifling discussion or intermediate opinion in the process of finding proper conclusions of The Words' meaning is not G-d's way, I submit. Less much productive discussion of scripture would be lost. Isn't the concern... how an interpretation is accomplished?: without arguing, criticism of position and malice towards opponent and without other proper decorum? It is not my desire or intent to violate forum rules which I have familiarized myself. Please be specific and direct me to the words of such rules I am in violation of , as you have charged. |
||||||
86 | Baptized | Matthew | G. Preston | 232309 | ||
G-d can and will impute as He wishes...so He did on the cross. John 3;16 speaks of salvation. We must be reminded that when Christ presented himself to John for baptism...John said..."why must(not should; not may; not can!!) it be"?...Christ said ..."for completion"...of what...the cleansing process. The Bible is full of examples of what we are to do and how we are to prepare ourselves to receive eternal salvation. | ||||||
87 | Baptized | Matthew | G. Preston | 232325 | ||
BradK, You are not challenging me.... perhaps G-ds Word. I am surprised you need references. I am aware there are different conclusions on baptism and I don't understand why; The KJV Bible speaks volumes on Baptism. I invite consideration of the following; Mark 16 Acts 2 and 22 1 Peter 3 Galations 3 Romans 6 There are many others. This is so basic I will not addres it further. |
||||||
88 | Baptized | Matthew | G. Preston | 232326 | ||
PS Matt. 28 ( Did not post for some reason) | ||||||
89 | Baptized | Matthew | G. Preston | 232328 | ||
BradK, The Bible says it. Not me. The church is not always right and are often out of step with G-d's word. Please be consistent with the rule and give me references that baptism is not necessary and we can have a good dialogue here, which will be helpful. To this time you have shared no bible references which support your contention that baptism is not necessary. Please do so. I am afraid some mix the process of getting prepared...the heart...with receiving eternal salvation. |
||||||
90 | Baptized | Matthew | G. Preston | 232336 | ||
Beja, I have not said that baptism saves us...one thing at a time for us to be constructive...where did you get this? |
||||||
91 | scripture for salvation | John 3:16 | G. Preston | 234356 | ||
Stop being sinful. Prepare your heart and live a life for Christ....rejecting sinful ways of this world/life. | ||||||
92 | Saturday vs Sunday? which is the sabeth | Acts | G. Preston | 196080 | ||
EdB, Are you suggesting the difference came about after The Risen Christ? |
||||||
93 | Cain's wife is from who? | Acts 17:26 | G. Preston | 223597 | ||
I am not aware of the Bible/Genesis,et al, saying that God only created Adam and Eve. Just that they were the first creation. The reference to them is an example of creation and may not reflect the totel content of the act of Creation of man. It makes sense that God created more in numbers. To dispatch this reasoning infers God allowed the conditions for incest...which the Anti-Christ folks love. Reactions/Opinions are invited. |
||||||
94 | Cain's wife is from who? | Acts 17:26 | G. Preston | 223603 | ||
Beja, I submit you may be applying that parable a little narrow. With logic,a wide interpretation of...'made from one man"....is that Adam was the base creation from which additional creation numbers were drawn. e.g Eve. The Bible reflects other examples. For instant ...Christ was baptised ...not because he had sinned...but, because He desired an example for us to follow. |
||||||
95 | Cain's wife is from who? | Acts 17:26 | G. Preston | 223605 | ||
Grandpa, Perhaps I understand the thought process behind your point. However, we are reminded that The Bible Is the ...'inspired word of God'... and is presented for us as a ...'road map'...(if you will) for us to get from this fiscal life to eternal spiritual life. It is complete. Some parables which apply here; 1)....'some things are reserved for Gods' knowledge only....' 2) ...'it shall be revealed in due time'. Points for consideration. |
||||||
96 | Cain's wife is from who? | Acts 17:26 | G. Preston | 223609 | ||
Use of the word ...'parable'(by inattention)...please substitute...'language'. | ||||||
97 | Is there a bible verse that means this? | Rom 8:28 | G. Preston | 232178 | ||
NOTHING...just happens. The word...."Luck"... is a misnomer and should be removed from the dictionary IMHO. We are blessed even in challenges. It is G-ds' plan and nothing just happens. Otherwise one would have to conclude that G-d is not in charge...of all. Does He allow bad things to happen to good people? Yes...as part of his overall plan of which our limited brains/intel. cannot understand. G-d causes nothing bad to happen to a human. He may allow tribulations.... for his purposes. Study...don't just read it...study the book of Job. It will help greatly to understand this point. Make note G-d said Job was a "perfect" servant. To my knowledge/memory He said that about no other in the Bible. |
||||||
98 | IF HE AINT REAL, THEN IM CRAZY | Rom 8:28 | G. Preston | 232182 | ||
Justme, No better mature guidance could be offered. You captured it in short order. |
||||||
99 | Is there a bible verse that means this? | Rom 8:28 | G. Preston | 232259 | ||
I would urge you to give more thought to your statement. To suggest that..."most of what happens has nothing to do with G-d"...can't stand for many reasons. Nothing,Nothing happens without G-d allowing it to happen. This point is clearly depicted in the guidance set forth in the book of Job. S t u d y the book of Job and see if you have the same conclusion...after. |
||||||
100 | Is the Jews are the elect people of God | Rom 10:12 | G. Preston | 196778 | ||
The Jew of today does not believe that Christ as depicted in the New Testament/New covenant was the Messiah. They did believe in G-d under the old testament/covenant/mosaic law, as they believe in G-d today. Thus the difference. |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 ] Next > Last [6] >> |