☰ Menu
bible.lockman.org  Home | Search
 
  • Lockman.org
  • About Us

    • About
    • Who we are
    • History
    • Who is Jesus?
    •  
  • Shop / Catalog

    • Digital
    • NASB 2020
    • NASB 1995
    • NASB 1977
    • Amplified
    • NBLA (Spanish)
    • LBLA (Spanish)
    •  
  • NASB

    • NASB
    • Amplified
    • LBLA
    • NBLA
    • Permissions
    •  
Click Here
Bibles by the Case, with free shipping
All New NASB 2020 - 44% off
Save 40% or more on Bibles now! Limited quantities

Questions, answers, or notes on a Bible verse:
(i.e. Gen 1:1)
Read the Bible:
Book Chap:verse
New Window
Translation: Search Range: Search word(s):


Search for your Bible question and answer here:


Results 1 - 2 of 2
 
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse
Results Verse Author ID#
1 how can Barnabas sell or possess land Acts 4:36 MJH 215367
  Hey John,

Mind if I bring up old items? I just got back from a Bible teaching and I'm about to go nuts. I struggle with even saying anything in a class or even to a teacher; because I certainly don't desire to cause a problem...so I shut up. But here maybe I can speak....

Why do people want to say that obeying a law is the same as trying to earn merit by obeying a law? Paul obviously teaches against earning anything, particularly a right place with God in His Kingdom, by doing works or obeying any law. That's as obvious as anything in the New Testament. Then why do some further say that anyone obeying the law is in error? For example: the thousands of believing Jews in Jerusalem who were zealous for the Law. They are apparently in "error" because they were trying to "earn a place with God." But Acts never says they were trying to "earn" anything and Acts never says they were in "error." It simply says they were believers and zealous for the Law. What can possibly be wrong with this picture? Why can't people see the distinction? Is it blindness? Is it a fear of ever appearing to say anything positive about God's Law? UUUGGGHHHH.

Okay... I vomited my thoughts all over. Sorry for the mess.

MJH
- p.s. I intentionally left the note under your name so as to not make too big of a scene.
- Also, in regards to what this post is linked to; Barnabas could have owned and sold land as a Levite even before Jesus was born or died. That’s my point. The ceremonial law didn’t need to be abolished to absolve the man for selling property, so why mention it even if it’s true? I suppose he mentions it to make his point even stronger.

2 how can Barnabas sell or possess land Acts 4:36 stjohn 215370
  Hi MJH,

No problem about the mess. I've cleaned up some pretty bad stuff in my day. I've been an attendant for an alcoholic quadriplegic, worked as a janitor in a government run day-care center, (with over a hundred kids) raised kids, lots of puppies, and barn-yard animals, so I'm no stranger to messes!:-)
Well, I'll try to address your p.s. first. Though I thought already had? Liv.25:34 clearly says: "But pasture fields of their cities shall not be sold, for that is their perpetual possession." so though there is nothing wrong with Barnabas owning land under the OT ceremonial law, Gill points out that under the new covenant, Jesus having fulfilled the law, Barnabas was then free to sell that land, (Liv 25:34 says he cannot sell it) and now not being under that OT dispensation of not being allowed to sell the land, he is now free to do so.

Now I think where the problem may lie with people saying you are in error for trying to keep the ceremonial law is, because some that do (and there is nothing wrong in doing that, if that's what you want to do) but some say they do it because it is obeying God's command to do so. That a real problem, because it brings into question the issue of not judging your brother in regard to feast days and holy days and sabbath days and eating clean or unclean foods. We are not to judge in regard to those things. But if it is said that it is commanded then, by implication, it judges those who do not chose to follow the ceremonial law, because again, by implication, they would be sining by not obeying. Anyway I think that is maybe where the problem is. So, if you want to, to honer God, then by all means, go for it, but just don't say it is commanded. And if they still say you are in error, then I believe they are the ones who are judging you, and, they then would be in error. It's very important to keep in mind too, that we are not talking about God's moral law, which we all should strive to keep, and God certainly does command us to do that. Though, of course we will fail, and we should bring our sins to the cross on a daily bases to get cleaned up. But hey, that's a joy, knowing He will always be there to wash us up and brush us off, just like any loving father would. :-)

I hope that helps.

Shalom and
God bless
John


  Up   |    Down    
 Questions and/or Subjects for Acts 4:36   Author 
 Is this the same Barnabas? (?)
  thestraws
 who was barnabus the encourager (?)
  seekie
  how can Barnabas sell or possess land (?)
  jbjona
 Barnabas was "a Levite of Cyprian birth...
  PaulusSecundus
 Hi jbjona, Having no 'inheritance' ...
  stjohn
 John, I like Gills answer.  It's inform...
  MJH
 MJH, It seems simple enough that Gill...
  stjohn
 Hey John, Mind if I bring up old item...
  MJH
 Hi MJH, No problem about the mess. I...
  stjohn
 HI jbjona Barnabas was a Levite, he d...
  Vintage68




bible.lockman.org
Answered Bible Questions
Primary Bible Questions (?)
Bible verses
About StudyBibleForum.com

The Lockman Foundation did not screen Postings. Postings are the opinions of others and may or may not represent a commonly held view.

StudyBibleForum.com Copyright © The Lockman Foundation 2001-2016
Permission to quote guidelines.