☰ Menu
bible.lockman.org  Home | Search
 
  • Lockman.org
  • About Us

    • About
    • Who we are
    • History
    • Who is Jesus?
    •  
  • Shop / Catalog

    • Digital
    • NASB 2020
    • NASB 1995
    • NASB 1977
    • Amplified
    • NBLA (Spanish)
    • LBLA (Spanish)
    •  
  • NASB

    • NASB
    • Amplified
    • LBLA
    • NBLA
    • Permissions
    •  
Click Here
Bibles by the Case, with free shipping
All New NASB 2020 - 44% off
Save 40% or more on Bibles now! Limited quantities

Questions, answers, or notes on a Bible verse:
(i.e. Gen 1:1)
Read the Bible:
Book Chap:verse
New Window
Translation: Search Range: Search word(s):


Search for your Bible question and answer here:


Results 1 - 2 of 2
 
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse
Results Verse Author ID#
1 Evidenc of Signs in 2008 Valid? Mark 16:17 Tamara Brewington 205649
  Dear Forum members,

I already know what I think of the Pentecostal belief that speaking in tongues is evidence of the Holy Spirit having entered one and I know all the scriptures to refute that understanding of scriptures.

I wonder though how should we understand Mathew verse 17 and 18 - are these signs just to be applied to the first century - the tongues, the casting out of demons, the not being affected by poisons or deadly snakes? Or do you think it is possible that these things could still apply now?

Please don't answer with stuff about snake handlers or refutations of crackpot practices in phony bony churches - I am well aware of what types of charlatans are out there, I am well grounded and not in any danger of falling prey to false doctrine.

Please try to craft your answer around some scriptures if you can..

God's Day To You, Tamara
2 Evidenc of Signs in 2008 Valid? Mark 16:17 Morant61 205654
  Greetings Tam!

Well, here is my two cents worth! :-)

First of all, I am careful not to build doctrine around any disputed text. As I am sure you are aware, the ending of Mark is very much in dispute. No one is certain how the Gospel of Mark ends.

Therefore, I would be careful not to base my actions or beliefs upon just this passage.

However, most of the things mentioned in the latter part of Mark are mentioned in other contexts. Certainly, the sign gifts are supported elsewhere.

The picking up of a snake (accidentally) and surviving the bite was recorded of Paul. I don't know of any other support for the drinking of poison, unless one appeals to the OT.

I would say that miraculous signs should be a part of the Christian experience, simply because God is involved in our lives. I would not limit the evidences of His presence to just this one short list though. :-)

Your Brother in Christ,

Tim Moran


  Up   |    Down    
 Questions and/or Subjects for Mark 16:17   Author 
 where is the (signs) located at (?)
  jackie seeley
 Christians Demon Plagued?
  Tamara Brewington
 Christians Demon Plagued? (?)
  Tamara Brewington
 Evidenc of Signs in 2008 Valid? (?)
  Tamara Brewington
 Greetings Tam! Well, here is my two c...
  Morant61
 Hi Tamara: Mark 16:17,18 17)  And thes...
  lookinforacity
     Continuation 2 of 2 Now, as far as ...
  lookinforacity
 My dearest Jim, Did you read Pastor M...
  Tamara Brewington
  Hi Tamara: I didn't get anywhere. I w...
  lookinforacity
 Well thanks for the Help Jim! By the ...
  Tamara Brewington
 do we have authority to forgive sins ? (?)
  glenaglena

Result pages: [ 1  2  ]




bible.lockman.org
Answered Bible Questions
Primary Bible Questions (?)
Bible verses
About StudyBibleForum.com

The Lockman Foundation did not screen Postings. Postings are the opinions of others and may or may not represent a commonly held view.

StudyBibleForum.com Copyright © The Lockman Foundation 2001-2016
Permission to quote guidelines.