Results 641 - 660 of 1290
|
||||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Author: jlpangilinan Ordered by Date |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
641 | tithing | Acts 13:39 | jlpangilinan | 66149 | ||
You want me to stop but you still using your deffective logic. You write"I have readily admitted things that no one could prove, because they are simply not addressed in the Bible. I then said because it isn’t mentioned we should not assume it never happened. You mocked my logic. You said if it was important Jesus would have mentioned it. Then continuing with your logic you state because Jesus never mentioned it we shouldn't do it. Is that logic? Is it the truth? Jesus never mentioned driving or riding in a car yet it so very important we do this everyday, maybe we shouldn’t be doing it or maybe your logic doesn’t hold water." You know that we are talking about tithes but again you used another excuses like cars. Did cars is important for your salvation is that a doctrine that Christ has to mentioned it. We are talking about doctrine and teaching here not cars, and specifically tithing and not with the problem of traffic police. Please dont think that Christ will do teaching about cars or traffic this will not do with the teaching of Christ! I want really this topic remains in a Christian tone, but it is start accussing me of false statement. You try to insist your logic even it is nothing to do with the topic. Johnny |
||||||
642 | tithing | Acts 13:39 | jlpangilinan | 66138 | ||
Inmyheart, As I said in all of my posting regarding tithes, it is not a requirements, people can give freely but if there someone requires them to give, and the amount is mandated i.e ten percent or something there is something wrong. If Christ, and apostle did not require us to give ten percent, why others would try to require us? We can give as free as we can. If we can give more than twenty percent of our income please do, but make sure that there is no someone require you. Thanks for the note, I know we have some disagreement with this before. Everyone learned from each other, and I hope I can make it always in Christian tone. My apology for anyone if may made offended. God bless Johnny |
||||||
643 | tithing | Acts 13:39 | jlpangilinan | 66108 | ||
My condition there is simple show me the scriptures that He received tithes, or the desciples that give or receive tithes. The mere fact that you cannot show it meaning it is not included in thier teaching. If this tithes is important it must be happened to the life of apostle, but they never do it, what always happened in terms of giving is love offering, the example of widow is a very fact that love offering is the teaching of Christ Paul teach us to give as cherful giver, if the tithes is the true teaching of Christ, why paul teach love offering instead of tithes. As paul he receive his teaching not from man but from Jesus Christ. So paul should teach tithing instead of love offering, if Christ really teach the tithe. What you showed me is your conclusions, bible was not written for your conclusions, it was written to believe in it. The woman help paul trough love offering paul did not ask them to give ten percent of thier income, it is you conclusion said that they maybe give tithes. If tithes is requirements and important the desciple should teach that and observed that but it never mentioned meaning it is not important for Christian. I asked you to show me the scriptures if they receive tithes, and give tithes. Your answer is but me I cannot show you too that they did not, if you you understand logic, how can I show the things that is not there! it is your responsibility that show that there is any people that observed tithing not me because I am believed that there no desciples in the new testamnet that observed tithing. So how can I show the things that I really believe that was not there, please repair your logic it quiet broken. I was wondering, and continue wondering, even before the law the tithe is not a requirements abraham give tithes but no one requires him to give but he gave. Under the law it was required by moses to give to the levites. it become an important part of thier religion. When Christ, he free us from the works of law, and make tithes not a requirements by teaching love offering. I was wondering that after Christ free us from the requirements of the law there people that trying to take them back and make again the tithes as a requirements. So the sequence is this. The time of patriach, the tithe is not a requirements but voluntarily as abraham did. In the time of moses it was a requirements. In the time of Christ and the desciples, it was love offering, when the time EdB comes, it was a requirements again. Go on EdB, I hope there are someone comes again that will free us in tithes as a requirements. God bless, Johnny I was wondering that there are people that trying to teach teaching that was not taught by the apostle, there people trying to be wiser than the authority of the bible. |
||||||
644 | tithing | Acts 13:39 | jlpangilinan | 66017 | ||
Again, I dont know if you are starting fight here, you always accussing me that my statement is false. Let me remind you that I post this question to you and you never ecxplain it yet. you can prove that my statement is false if you can prove that there is anyone give tithes to Jesus Christ is there any desciples that received tithes as well: This questions remains. If Jesus clearly said that we have to pay tihes why there is no single moment in the new testament that He receive tithes or there are any desciples give tithes are they not follow the commandments of Christ? Kindly answers those questions. If you cannot show any desciples that received tithes or any desciple that give tithes to Jesus Christ, it is clear that your statement was false and not mine. Johnny |
||||||
645 | tithing | Acts 13:39 | jlpangilinan | 65998 | ||
EdB please calm down, please dont tell me that I making false statement you cannot prove that. Even before the law tithes is not a requirement Even abraham pay the tithes, no one requires give but he gave. Mt 23:23 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone. Jesus never said here directly that you give tithes, if you give tithes dont forget other matters of the law. As a proof of that no one can show that Jesus received tithes or any desciples give tihes and they not required anyone to tithes. If Jesus clearly said that we have to pay tihes why there is no single moment in the new testament that He receive tithes or there are any desciples give tithes are they not follow the commandments of Christ? Kindly answers those questions. Edb, we have to settle this in Christian tone, again may I request not accusing me of making false statement because you cannot prove that. To prove that I make false statement you should show me any person in the new testament that Christ requires to give tithes, and any single moment that there are desciples that give or receive tithes. May I ask you EdB, did you require your members to give tithes? I want an answer of Yes or No! God bless, Johnny |
||||||
646 | Should I resign from the Forum? | Bible general Archive 1 | jlpangilinan | 65841 | ||
denny, It was rabbi mark accused mommapbs of error not the enemy, please be careful, it could be a big strike to rabbi mark too. Just commented fair for both side. God bless, Johnny |
||||||
647 | Should I resign from the Forum? | Bible general Archive 1 | jlpangilinan | 65838 | ||
denny, It was rabbi mark accused mommapbs of error not the enemy, please be careful, it could be a big strike to rabbi mark too. Just commented fair for both side. God bless, Johnny |
||||||
648 | tithing | Acts 13:39 | jlpangilinan | 65836 | ||
You write"Again you always go back to the Law. Forget it! You write"Tithing was before and after the Law. You do not have to be a Levite to receive a tithe that was under the Law." Are you suggesting that this verse is a lie? Heb 7:5 And verily they that are of the sons of Levi, who receive the office of the priesthood, have a commandment to take tithes of the people according to the law, that is, of their brethren, though they come out of the loins of Abraham: It is not mentioned here that other can take tithes if not under the law. Nowhere in this verse that mentioned that they allow other to take tithes if not under the law. I have to follow the word of God instead of conclusions of other. You write"You always say Paul did not get paid but he clearly said a Pastor should be paid, He told how he took money from other churches to support himself. Why can't you see that?" You always take the discussion to somewhere else, I was talking of paul did not require anyone to tithes. If you remember the discussion now is tithing not about he took money from other churches, it nothing about the tithes. He did not mention that he took the tithes of other churches. You always take the discussion in somewhere else. We talk about tithes here. You write"Call it what you will love offering, tithe, giving money to the church. The fact remains ministry requires money and the people that receive from the ministry have a moral responsibility to support that ministry." Love offering indeed is different from the tihes,love offering was taught by Christ but not the tithes. We have responsibility to our church the same as we have responsibility for our unforunate members. We support our ministry by love offering that was taught by Christ. We know that ministry and missions requires money but this is not a reason that we have to teach the teaching that Christ never taught. God bless, Johnny |
||||||
649 | The man is the head of the wife? Meaning | 1 Cor 7:39 | jlpangilinan | 65785 | ||
It is in regards of the church, it is not mention that the woman always overpower by man. It is talking about the Christian family or married if they are both follower of Christ we know that they have always good opinons. I dont think that a good husband will taught his wifes to do adultery or do bad. If the the husband will teach bad to her wife of course wife can overpower that by asking the authority but I dont think a good husband will do that. 1Co 11:3 But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God. |
||||||
650 | tithing | Acts 13:39 | jlpangilinan | 65783 | ||
I know that ministry requires money, we have ministry, we have mission, we have evangelistic work on television, all of those needs money, but it is not a reason that we have to teach the teaching that not required by Christ. Paul support his own evangelistic he needs money too, he knows that ministry has requires money, why he did require the members to tithes? because he knows it is not a teaching of Christ. Instead he taught love offering. Do you think paul did not know that minstry requires money that is why he did not require anyone to tithes? if tithes really the very right way of supporting ministry I know paul will do the same thing but he did not do it because he knows that Christ never taught about this, and paul follow the teaching of Christ. If really giving tithes is the way to honor God, are you saying that the desciples did not honor God because they did not give tithes anyway? they never taught to give tithes but love offering, are they not honoring God? Our ministry survives by not requiring tithes but love offering. We have hospitals, home for the aged and for the most unfortunate member of the church, we support that by giving love offering, not ten percent nor 20 but any purposes of the heart. We follow the example of apostles they did not require anyone to give tithes, as they said the authority of receiving it is for the levites because they came from the loins of abraham. We are not levites so we have no authority to receive tithes but love offering. I know the teaching of apostle did have no mistakes when they said that the authority of receiving tithes is for the levites, we just follow that. God bless, Johnny |
||||||
651 | tithing | Acts 13:39 | jlpangilinan | 65682 | ||
How Jesus Christ fulfill the law anyway? Did He fulfill it like what moses taught? No! did He fulfill it by giving tithes or requiring anyone to give NO! Mt 5:17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. Jesus Christ fulfill the law with deep meaning, working on Sabbath is punisheable by death under the law of moses, but Christ allow His disciples with Him to go to cornfields, He also healed sick on Sabbath, did He disobey the law? If you said yes! Then Christ is imprudent to His word in Mt 5:17 if you said NO! and you will agree that Christ observing the law different from the people of Israel observing it. Mr 2:23 And it came to pass, that he went through the corn fields on the sabbath day; and his disciples began, as they went, to pluck the ears of corn. Jesus fulfill this commandments and gave this to us at the same time: Mt 22:37 Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. Mt 22:39 And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. What it is in the law we disobey if we observe all this things None. And tithes is not a teaching of Christ Christ teach us that we have to be consistent, otherwise He will call us hypocrites! Mt 23:23 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone. If you observe the tithes, you must observed other matters of the law! You did you kill your brother and sisters if you found them gathering stick in Sabbath day? Did you stone to death anyone caught in adultery? Did you not eat all food that prohibited by the law? If you don’t observed those and observe only tithing then My Lord will call you hypocrites! If you observed all those things then, we are from different believed you still under the law. God bless, Johnny |
||||||
652 | Should I resign from the Forum? | 2 Thess 1:3 | jlpangilinan | 65678 | ||
mommpabs Good morning, I did review some of posting in that thread, and I think we dont need anyone to resign in this forum. We should always be reminded that not all of our posting is acceptable to everyone, there are some maybe same as we have in mind but there are others also that will criticize us. I learned many things in this forum, we learned from each other. I learned from Hank that if there some topics that we cannot agree on just drop the issue, it could start some irritations from both sides! God bless, Johnny |
||||||
653 | 1st 5 place the ark of covn. moved too | 1 Sam 1:1 | jlpangilinan | 65196 | ||
Welcome to the forum! I hope this will answers your querry: he sacred ark is designated by a different Hebrew word, 'aron', which is the common name for a chest or coffer used for any purpose (Ge 50:26; 2Ki 12:9-10). It is distinguished from all others by such titles as the "ark of God" (1Sa 3:3), "ark of the covenant" (Jos 3:6; Heb 9:4), "ark of the testimony" (Ex 25:22). It was made of acacia or shittim wood, a cubit and a half broad and high and two cubits long, and covered all over with the purest gold. Its upper surface or lid, the mercy-seat, was surrounded with a rim of gold; and on each of the two sides were two gold rings, in which were placed two gold-covered poles by which the ark could be carried (Nu 7:9; 10:21; 4:5,19-20; 1Ki 8:3,6). Over the ark, at the two extremities, were two cherubim, with their faces turned toward each other (Le 16:2; Nu 7:89). Their outspread wings over the top of the ark formed the throne of God, while the ark itself was his footstool (Ex 25:10-22; 37:1-9). The ark was deposited in the "holy of holies," and was so placed that one end of the poles by which it was carried touched the veil which separated the two apartments of the tabernacle (1Ki 8:8). The two tables of stone which constituted the "testimony" or evidence of God's covenant with the people (De 31:26), the "pot of manna" (Ex 16:33), and "Aaron's rod that budded" (Nu 17:10), were laid up in the ark (Heb 9:4). (See Tabernacle) The ark and the sanctuary were "the beauty of Israel" (La 2:1). During the journeys of the Israelites the ark was carried by the priests in advance of the host (Nu 4:5-6; 10:33-36; Ps 68:1; 132:8). It was borne by the priests into the bed of the Jordan, which separated, opening a pathway for the whole of the host to pass over (Jos 3:15-16; 4:7,10-11,17-18). It was borne in the procession round Jericho (Jos 6:4,6,8,11-12). When carried it was always wrapped in the veil, the badgers' skins, and blue cloth, and carefully concealed even from the eyes of the Levites who carried it. After the settlement of Israel in Palestine the ark remained in the tabernacle at Gilgal for a season, and was then removed to Shiloh till the time of Eli, between 300 and 400 years (Jer 7:12), when it was carried into the field of battle so as to secure, as they supposed, victory to the Hebrews, and was taken by the Philistines (1Sa 4:3-11), who sent it back after retaining it seven months (1Sa 5:7-8). It remained then at Kirjath-jearim (1Sa 7:1-2) till the time of David (twenty years), who wished to remove it to Jerusalem; but the proper mode of removing it having been neglected, Uzzah was smitten with death for putting "forth his hand to the ark of God," and in consequence of this it was left in the house of Obed-edom in Gath-rimmon for three months (2Sa 6:1-11), at the end of which time David removed it in a grand procession to Jerusalem, where it was kept till a place was prepared for it (2Sa 6:12-19). It was afterwards deposited by Solomon in the temple (1Ki 8:6-9). When the Babylonians destroyed Jerusalem and plundered the temple, the ark was probably taken away by Nebuchadnezzar and destroyed, as no trace of it is afterwards to be found. The absence of the ark from the second temple was one of the points in which it was inferior to the first temple. EASTON BIBLE DICTIONARY God bless, Johnny |
||||||
654 | tithing | Acts 13:39 | jlpangilinan | 65189 | ||
Some clarifications, is tithing for you is ten percent of your income or love offering. If you are talking about ten percent, tithing is not a requirements for Christian today, there is no single teaching of Christ that will require anyone to give tithes but love offering. You cannot find any singel scene in the bible that Christ commanded anyone to give tithes to HIM. Tithes is included in the law of moses, and according to paul it cannot justify us: Ac 13:39 And by him all that believe are justified from all things, from which ye could not be justified by the law of Moses. Authority and commandments of receiving tithes was given to the levites not for me not for you not for any pastors of today: Heb 7:5 And verily they that are of the sons of Levi, who receive the office of the priesthood, have a commandment to take tithes of the people according to the law, that is, of their brethren, though they come out of the loins of Abraham: If you are talking about love offering, you can give your offering by helping others. If you can find your home church then give to them what purposes of your heart, not ten percent, nor 20 percent but in what purposes of the heart. God love cheerful giver. 2Co 9:7 Every man according as he purposeth in his heart, so let him give; not grudgingly, or of necessity: for God loveth a cheerful giver. God bless, Johnny |
||||||
655 | OT "firstborn" significance | Deut 21:17 | jlpangilinan | 65059 | ||
I hope this entry will help you First-born sons enjoyed certain special privileges (De 21:17; Ge 25:23,31,34; 49:3; 1Ch 5:1; Heb 12:16; Ps 89:27). (See Birthright.) The "first-born of the poor" signifies the most miserable of the poor (Isa 14:30). The "church of the first-born" signifies the church of the redeemed. The destruction of the first-born was the last of the ten plagues inflicted on the Egyptians (Ex 11:1-8; 12:29-30). Menephtah is probably the Pharaoh whose first-born was slain. His son did not succeed or survive his father, but died early. The son's tomb has been found at Thebes unfinished, showing it was needed earlier than was expected. Some of the records on the tomb are as follows: "The son whom Menephtah loves; who draws towards him his father's heart, the singer, the prince of archers, who governed Egypt on behalf of his father. Dead." Birthright (1.) This word denotes the special privileges and advantages belonging to the first-born son among the Jews. He became the priest of the family. Thus Reuben was the first-born of the patriarchs, and so the priesthood of the tribes belonged to him. That honour was, however, transferred by God from Reuben to Levi (Nu 3:12-13; 8:18). (2.) The first-born son had allotted to him also a double portion of the paternal inheritance (De 21:15-17). Reuben was, because of his undutiful conduct, deprived of his birth-right (Ge 49:4; 1Ch 5:1). Esau transferred his birth-right to Jacob (Ge 25:33). (3.) The first-born inherited the judicial authority of his father, whatever it might be (2Ch 21:3). By divine appointment, however, David excluded Adonijah in favour of Solomon. (4.) The Jews attached a sacred importance to the rank of "first-born" and "first-begotten" as applied to the Messiah (Ro 8:29; Col 1:18; Heb 1:4-6). As first-born he has an inheritance superior to his brethren, and is the alone true priest. EASTON BIBLE DICTIONARY |
||||||
656 | does the bible support any thoery about" | Matt 24:40 | jlpangilinan | 64966 | ||
I believed that rapture will take place: Mt 24:39 And knew not until the flood came, and took them all away; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be. Mt 24:40 Then shall two be in the field; the one shall be taken, and the other left. |
||||||
657 | organ donation and The Bible | Rom 16:4 | jlpangilinan | 64963 | ||
Organ donation is not bad if you do it to save life, The doctrine of Jehovas Witnesses stated that they are not allowed to donate blood, but it is not written that to donate blood is prohibited in the bible. The blood is prohibited to eat. In the bible there are passages that even the church members ready to sacrifice thier lives for others: 1Jo 3:16 Hereby perceive we the love of God, because he laid down his life for us: and we ought to lay down our lives for the brethren. We can sacrifice our lives to the benefit of others, organ donation indeed sometimes put the lives of the donors in danger, but if the motive is good (to save lives) I dont think God will prohibit that. Priscilla and Aquila helped Paul, take a look what paul said to them. Ro 16:3 Greet Priscilla and Aquila my helpers in Christ Jesus: Ro 16:4 Who have for my life laid down their own necks: unto whom not only I give thanks, but also all the churches of the Gentiles. They ready to give thier own lives for the sake of paul. God bless, Johnny |
||||||
658 | God can't sin? | Ps 93:5 | jlpangilinan | 64673 | ||
Job 34:12 Yea, surely God will not do wickedly, neither will the Almighty pervert judgment. Ex 15:11 Who is like unto thee, O LORD, among the gods? who is like thee, glorious in holiness, fearful in praises, doing wonders? Ps 93:5 Thy testimonies are very sure: holiness becometh thine house, O LORD, for ever. |
||||||
659 | Do you pay tithes on whole check or part | Acts 15:1 | jlpangilinan | 64660 | ||
I hope you read my other post. We better drop the issue. God bless, Johnny |
||||||
660 | Do you pay tithes on whole check or part | Acts 15:1 | jlpangilinan | 64659 | ||
Good morning from the Philippines. we better drop the issue, it could make us some "irritation" i am not participate in this forum to lose friends like you! God bless, Johnny |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 ] Next > Last [65] >> |