Results 861 - 880 of 1239
|
||||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Author: jlhetrick Ordered by Date |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
861 | Where's the Sacrifice for Sin? | Luke 16:19 | jlhetrick | 171406 | ||
Hello brother lionheart, Your right. It wasn't until I made that connection myself that the OT and the Bible as a whole really came alive for me. As a result, my faith and belief grew by leaps and bounds (Romans 10:17). Thanks for your input brother, Jeff |
||||||
862 | Where's the Sacrifice for Sin? | Luke 16:19 | jlhetrick | 171400 | ||
Hi Tommy, Great question. Short answer for now as I am on my lunch break at work. To start with, lets do away with any notion that we "do" anything to "earn" salvation. I'm not saying this was your point when you asked "what did Lazarus have to do in order to be in Abraham's bosom?" Salvation has never been earned whether we are referring to OT or NT saints. Salvation is a free gift of GRACE given to the elect by God. We do nothing at all to earn it. We do nothing at all to secure it. The "channel" (for lack of better descriptor) through which God accomplishes this is that of FAITH. And even that faith is not of our own "doing" but that which is given us by God Himself. In other words, one only has faith to believe in Christ for salvation because God has given that faith in the first place. Eph 2:8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Faith in what? You already understand this as being Jesus Christ. So what about Lazarus? Christ had not yet died and rose again. In short, in the OT, beginning in Genesis (3:15)God promises of the coming Messiah. The OT saints did not know His name, but they believed in faith that God would provide a savior as promised. So, it was not only their believing and trusting in God that demonstrated their faith, but their belief and faith in the Messiah promised by God. In essense, they believed in the same Jesus Christ that you and I do, only not knowing His earthly name. We are told very little about this man Lazarus and nothing at all regarding his past life or history of worship. We do not know that there was "no sacrifice for sin..."; but we can logically assume it because he was so poor. So, if Jesus said that Lazarus was in Abraham's bosom (the place for OT believers prior to the finished work of Christ)we don't assume, but we know; that Lazarus believed the promise of the Messiah. Nothing else saves. No, all the sins of the people before His crucifixion were not forgiven. This will probably start a new topic to discuss that the finished work of Christ did atone for all sin (prior to and all-time after His crucifixion); but only for the elect. Hope this helps, Jeff |
||||||
863 | have you really forgave that person? | Matt 18:21 | jlhetrick | 171373 | ||
Hello Sherita, Welcome to the forum! Start with Matthew 18:21-35. Read the parable by Jesus which illustrates man's responsibility to be mercyful and to forgive others. Notice that one's failure to offer forgiveness results in his/her own conflict with God (not that of the one to which forgiveness was not extended). But keep in mind that the one you speak of is not God. He/she will struggle in his imperfections. We are incapable of "forgetting" in the way God promises to do when He forgives. So patients may be in order on your part. Be careful not to put undue expectations on the one you have wronged by requiring their dealing with the issue to conform to your expectations. If you are saved you are already forgiven by God, to incude the wrong against this person you speak of (Heb. 10:12). Hope this helps, Jeff |
||||||
864 | Must Christians follow OT Law? | James 2:10 | jlhetrick | 171371 | ||
I can't imagine though I try. I heard a message this morning on the way to work (Dr. David Jeremiah, Turning Point) "Where do people go when they die". It was part of a current series he is doing on Heaven. Just about the time he had my mind filled with all kinds of wonderful truths, he brought it all to a screaching halt to focus on the most important point. The Lord Jesus will be there. We talk the talk and we work so hard at walking the walk. In the process, He creates a change in us. He is making us new. We are coming to know Him better. But thinnk of it. One day, soon, we will actually see Him. Literally see Him. Talk to Him and hear His audible voice. Will I touch Him? Will He touch me? My best attempts at imagining fall far short I'm sure. God bless, Jeff |
||||||
865 | Must Christians follow OT Law? | James 2:10 | jlhetrick | 171351 | ||
Hi Doc, "Day by day". Isn't that the truth; and some days are better than others. As I grow in my understanding of this topic, I confess that I truly become smaller and smaller; while all the while, the grace of God and the true reality of the work of Christ moves more and more into the foreground. This may be off topic a bit; but I can't believe how many years I spent as a Christian before gaining a true understanding of God's sovereignty and God's grace. Not the lip service that is often applied, but the reality of it. The truth is, one can't truly revere God with due diligence before beginning to understand His sovereignty and His gracious way of dealing with men. Thanks for taking the time to contribute to this. Through the dialogue, it appears to me that my understanding and Hobb's understanding are both in agreement, just articulated differently. Fortunately, in the end, Scripture is able to make the point. Christ's Love, Jeff |
||||||
866 | Must Christians follow OT Law? | James 2:10 | jlhetrick | 171336 | ||
Hi John, Thanks for responding. Please refer to my post to Doc #171335 as it continues to elaborate on my understanding and position. Sometimes it is the failure to elaborate that brings doubt and question to our statements. Jeff |
||||||
867 | Must Christians follow OT Law? | James 2:10 | jlhetrick | 171335 | ||
Hi Doc, Thanks for responding and for presenting from the london Baptist Confession of Faith. You wrote: "but we are saved unto perfect compliance with the law (we are imputed with the righteousness of Christ)." I have no disagreement here and Scripture plainly teaches this. But to elaborate for others, "perfect" compliance with the Law is what we strive for, but nothing any of us have attained. I don't believe that your were saying we have attained it; as I go from memory; you are not one who agrees with the teaching or notion of "sinless perfection". Just as well, my understanding of having been imputed with the righteousness of Christ is an issue of my right standing with God; by being identified in Christ as one who has received through Grace the gift of salvation. I am justified in Jesus Christ. I relate this specifically to having been freed from the "penalty" of the Law. Phi 3:9 And be found in him, not having mine own righteousness, which is of the law, but that which is through the faith of Christ, the righteousness which is of God by faith: The issue of "perfect compliance" with the law, as I understand it, is an ongoing work of Grace. It is something God is working in us, and as we agree, something we can only understand in light of having kowledge of the Law. As Paul puts it: "Phi 3:10 that I may know him and the power of his resurrection, and may share his sufferings, becoming like him in his death, Phi 3:11 that by any means possible I may attain the resurrection from the dead. Phi 3:12 Not that I have already obtained this or am already perfect, but I press on to make it my own, because Christ Jesus has made me his own. So being freed from the penalty of the Law (Justified) the Law no longer has command over us, we are freed from it. As you say, there has not been a change in direction, but rather the law serves a new purpose. Not to condemn, but to guide. Having been justified, and having God's will revealed, we cooperate in the power of His grace to strive for perfection. Phi 3:13 Brothers, I do not consider that I have made it my own. But one thing I do: forgetting what lies behind and straining forward to what lies ahead, Phi 3:14 I press on toward the goal for the prize of the upward call of God in Christ Jesus. Christ's Love, Jeff |
||||||
868 | Must Christians follow OT Law? | James 2:10 | jlhetrick | 171295 | ||
Hi John, What part of Romans 7 do you base your satement: "What Christians are free from is not the Law itself, but free from the penalty of failing to keep the Law. Romans 7:6 (NASB95) 7:6 (NASB95) But now we have been released from the Law, having died to that by which we were bound, so that we serve in newness of the Spirit and not in oldness of the letter. The word "released" in verse 6 is translated "delivered" (KJV), "discharged" (Amplified). Would this not clearly teach that Christians have been "freed" from the "Law itself"? If we are, as you accurately put it, "free from the penalty" are we not then freed from the law? If I am free from the penalty of the law, then the law no longer has power over me. I believe this is the teaching here in Romans 7. This is the understanding I have always had regarding Paul's statement in 1 Corinthians 6:12 12 All things are lawful for me, but not all things are profitable. All things are lawful for me, but I will not be mastered by anything. (NASB) So, my understanding is that; Grace has freed us from the penalty of the law which has freed us from the law. What benefit is the Law to us now? It helps to demonstrate God's character. And the Law, being "holy" "righteous" and "good" (vs. 12) serves to guide us, but no longer to convict us. I invite other's to redirect my understanding in this area. I have struggled with understanding much of this chapter over the years and my above comments are where I am now in my understanding on the topic. Sincerely, Jeff |
||||||
869 | Destination of souls before Christ? | Luke 16:19 | jlhetrick | 171294 | ||
Tommy, The rich man was not a believer. Had he been, he would have been in Paradise with Lazarus and Abraham. This position is not stating something that is not written, it is consistent with the clear teachings of Scripture as a whole. However, within the passage alone we can still draw this conclusion. Notice that Abraham calls on the rich man's own memory vs. 25. Notice that Abraham understands that the rich man knows very well who Lazarus is. Of course works do not save, so, Abraham is not saying that you are there where you are because you did not feed this poor man. Rather, Abraham is calling into account the rich man's character. The account goes on to present an account of the man's brother's (all of them). He says as much, that they do not believe. They already had the knowledge spoken by Moses and the prophets. The rich man declares that having that knowledge was not enough for them to believe. Rather, they would require one who returns from the dead. How did he know this. We're not told, but a fair conclusion is that he also had the knowledge of Moses and the prophets and did not believe. keep in mind, Jesus had not yet been crucified and risen again. It is my belief, that Jesus is refering to Himself in verse 31. Jesus spoke the truth, that even if one returned from the dead, there would be those who will not believe. Of course, One did return from the dead, our Lord Himself. How many did not, do not, and will not believe? It would be a stretch to assume that the rich man was the only of six brother's who believed. Nothing in the story would indicate that he did. Hope this helps, Jeff |
||||||
870 | Destination of souls before Christ? | Luke 16:19 | jlhetrick | 171286 | ||
Hello Tommy, Welcome to the forum! Start with Luke 16:19-31. This is an interesting bible story (not a parable) just in the reading and the life lesson alone. But it also gives understanding regarding your question. Hope this helps, Jeff |
||||||
871 | God is faithful, He's an awsome God | Ephesians | jlhetrick | 171273 | ||
Hello Ghislaine, Welcome to the forum! If you will, take the time to "Update User Info." (under Resources; bottome left of page). Let us know a little about yourself. To view personal info. about other members, left click on their username. My following comments are meant as helpful feedback and not negative criticism. The forum is designed for bible study. As you will see as you go, it is typical to ask a question and wait for replies and then get involved in ongoing dialogue. We learn from, as well as teach, others through this process. If you "flood" the forum with multiple, back-to-back postings (as typical in "Chat Rooms") it will be very hard to be engaged in the discussions started from your own post. Perhaps more likely, people will not bother to respond at all. Again, welcome to the forum. Hope to see you contributing for a long time to come, Jeff |
||||||
872 | I need insight on proverbs chapter 31 | Prov 31:1 | jlhetrick | 171171 | ||
Hello Chosen, welcome to the forum. We have something in common. We are both chosen praise Jesus. I am no authority on Proberbs (or any section of the bible for that matter) but I wanted to give you something to consider while waiting on the member scholars that will likely respond soon. And there are some true scholars here on the forum so you have come to the right place. Here is a brief note from Adam Clark's Commentary on Proverbs 31. The commentary has much more to say about it and there are other commentaries as well. 'The words and prophecy of King Lemuel, and what his mother taught him, vv. 1, 2. Debauchery and much wine to be avoided, vv. 3-7. How kings should administer justice, vv. 8, 9. The praise of a virtuous woman and good housewife, in her economy, prudence, watchfulness, and assiduity in labor, vv. 10-29. Frailty of beauty, vv. 30, 31.' —Adam Clarke's Commentary Hope this helps, Jeff PS. A good commentary is great for helping understand scripture (but never the final authority or a replacement for Scripture) If you care for computer software there are many websites as well as free downloadable programs out there. Check out http://www.e-sword.net/ for an example of a really awesome, totally free complete bible software program and library. I use PC Study Bible 4 and Wordsearch7 as well, and the e-sword is just as functional as the high priced ones. |
||||||
873 | Divorce for no sexual life ever - OK? | Matt 19:9 | jlhetrick | 171108 | ||
Hello brother Justme, I will offer the following excerpt from the Holman Bible Dictionary as it articulates finer than I might. MARRIAGE The biblical standard for marriage is a monogamous relationship in which a man and a woman share a lifetime commitment to each other, second only to their commitment to God. It is an unconditional, lifetime commitment. Jesus emphasized God’s intention that marriage be a lifetime commitment (Mark 10:5-9; Matt. 19:4-9). He affirmed this as the principle of marriage inherent in divine creation (Gen. 2:24). Paul cited this key principle to show the sinfulness of sexual relations outside marriage (1 Cor. 6:12-20) and to emphasize the importance of self-giving love in marriage (Eph. 5:28). Genesis 2:24 emphasizes the oneness of the marriage relationship and the priority of the relationship over all others, including the relationship of the couple to their parents. Marriage is also for companionship (Gen. 2:18-23). Paul described the kind of mutual submission that should characterize the marriage relationship (Eph. 5:21-33). Although the husband is head of the home, his role is modeled after the role of Christ as Head of the church, who “loved the church and gave Himself for it” (Eph. 5:25).—Holman Bible Dictionary I would call attention to "It is an unconditional, lifetime commitment. Jesus emphasized God’s intention that marriage be a lifetime commitment (Mark 10:5-9; Matt. 19:4-9)." and "second only to their commitment to God" as well as "He affirmed this as the principle of marriage inherent in divine creation (Gen. 2:24) I don't read into this as being superceded by falsehoods on either party's part. In Christ's Love, Jeff |
||||||
874 | Divorce for no sexual life ever - OK? | Matt 19:9 | jlhetrick | 171106 | ||
Hello justme, Again I would encourage you to reread your first post in this thread. You might reread my response to you as well; as this response does not demonstrate an accurate reflection of my statements. Attempting to reverse the argument I made to you, and apply it back to me, serves no real purpose. Speaking of attitude, reconcilliation, mercy, grace, and Christian love carries little weight when you do not demonstrate those things. I was not (and do not make a habit) of addressing your teachings or attitude in the 1,699 posts you made before the one I responded to. I was responding only to the one in this thread. Again, read it. It was abusive and disrespectful to say the least. It was also very accusitory towards the brothers and sisters involved. I'm still not quite sure where your comments regarding the post having a focus on the issue of sex came from. You speak of attitude, mercy, grace, and those other things; your original post displayed none. To reemphasize my point in my original response to you. I was not asking you to "go home". I was trying to say: If you can not respond to a thread with the attitude of grace, mercy and Christian love, it is better not to respond at all. Therefore, "click" on the "HOME" button (top left) and choose another thread that doesn't offend you so. There was no statement, nor was there an insinuation that if you don't "agree" you should leave. If my statement was taken in that context, I appologize. It was not intended that way. You comment "I see no Scripture to back a single word you speak." Please re-read the thread. Much scritpture was offered throughout, by myself and others. Finally Justme, you write: "If I have got you or anyone else to look at the way questions are answered I gladly take the words that wound." Shouldn't this be my statement. It was me that was calling attention to your inappropriate response to the thread. You accurately comment that this is all a test of my Christian dignity as well. Have I failed as being as Christ-like as I can in my response to you. Yes I have, forgive me for that. Does my failing excuse or futher lagitimize your oringinal post in this thread? No it doesn't. Who is wrong? It would appear that we both are. Perhaps we should both take your advice to pray before putting a finger on the keyboard. I see that you have attached another post after this one. I have not read it yet but promise to. I may not respond to it though, as it appears to me that the continuation of this type of dialogue is neither productive (for the forum as a whole) nor the intended purpose of the forum. Feel free to email me if you would like, for this or any other discussion. My email address is included in my profile. If I have offended you I do appologize. You are my brother and I have confidence that this type of disagreement will not permanently divide us. Christ's Love, Jeff |
||||||
875 | Divorce for no sexual life ever - OK? | Matt 19:9 | jlhetrick | 171078 | ||
Justme, I am not here to argue with you like children on a playground. My response to you was with the level of respect that your post warrented. Please reread your first post in this thread and then consider the issue of respect. You might consider the word dignity as well. This is a biblestudy forum. If you are not interested in a thread other than to insult the members participating, a good strategy is to click the "HOME" button and choose another thread to follow and/or participate in. Thank you, Jeff |
||||||
876 | Divorce for no sexual life ever - OK? | Matt 19:9 | jlhetrick | 171072 | ||
Justme, You accuse others of being "unsensitive"; yet you insinuate that nana's very real situation and question is not a "real bible question". What is wrong with you? Furthermore, you offer not a bit of Scripture to support your "opinion". Again, what is wrong brother? Have we touched on a point of sensitivity for you? Where you do point to Scripture you offer no book, chapter, and verse for reference. I am not aware of a custom where marriage was "made official by the groom showing the blood on the sheets in the OT, when the marriage was consumated". Will you please point me to that custom in the bible? I am not an authority on the bible, it may in fact be there; but I do not find that custom anywhere including in the many dictionaries, encyclopedias, and commentaries I referred to. You wrote: "I think it is very unsensitive, and so legalistic to say this person should remain with a person who commited fraud in not telling their furture partner of his inability before taking any vows" sometimes the word of God seems that way to us. We easily forget that His holiness is not superseded by our sensitivities. When we do not fear God, then our feelings about what is right and wrong and what we want and don't want become our standard. We excuse our way out of obedience. You write that you are saddened. Well my brother, I am very saddened and disappointed at your post. Your profile indicates that you are of an age that should supersede such a childish response. With deepest sincerety, Jeff |
||||||
877 | Divorce for no sexual life ever - OK? | Matt 19:9 | jlhetrick | 171063 | ||
Hello Emmaus, I thought so but your profile didn't specify and I didn't want to make a mistake. Thanks for the dialogue brother, Jeff |
||||||
878 | Divorce for no sexual life ever - OK? | Matt 19:9 | jlhetrick | 171030 | ||
yes, thanks. I often find myself making adjustments. Never for the sake of agreement though (not that your meaning that). I want to be convinced that my beliefs need adjusting. Convinced by sound teaching from scripture. The forum is a great blessing. I visit it daily (often several times) and learn much even when I'm not participating. Jeff |
||||||
879 | Divorce for no sexual life ever - OK? | Matt 19:9 | jlhetrick | 171028 | ||
Brother (or sister) emmaus, By this reasoning, do you believe that a man or woman who (due to physical reasons) can never perform the act of sex can never marry. What I am asking is; since they are unable to "consumate" a marriage through the sexual act, they can never be given in marriage? Christ's Love, Jeff |
||||||
880 | Divorce for no sexual life ever - OK? | Matt 19:9 | jlhetrick | 171027 | ||
Hello searcher, I am not responding because we seem to be basically in agreement on this issue; but to show appreciation for your using the Scriptures to articulate your point. As one who frequently deals with the issue of marriage in my work, this thread has encouraged me to refresh my understanding of the bible regarding marriage. Your input is helpful. Christ's Love, Jeff |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 ] Next > Last [62] >> |