Results 21 - 31 of 31
|
||||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Author: gdh1127 Ordered by Verse |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
21 | Comparing Mark 2;26 with 1 Samuel 21:1 | Mark 2:26 | gdh1127 | 181413 | ||
In Mark 2:26, we read that it was Abiathar who was the high priest when David went into the house of God. But in 1 Samuel 21:1 we read that it was Ahimelech, the father of Abiathar who was the priest at Nob at that time. As he was the one to whom David spoke and the same one who gave David the bread, and the one who was called by Saul to question about this incident, I presume, although the bible only says "Ahimelech, THE priest, THAT AHIMELECH, NOT ABIATHAR WAS THE HIGH PRIEST AT THAT TIME. Is this an error on the part of Mark or is this a copiest error? | ||||||
22 | Comparing Mark 2;26 with 1 Samuel 21:1 | Mark 2:26 | gdh1127 | 181459 | ||
doc! so good to hear from you again *_*!!! ahimelech abiathar sr and ahiimelech abiathar jr! is this a common practice among israelites? i know they use names from their line of ancestry but jr *_*? again, i am amazed and just very pleased that you got on top of my question right away. bless ings to you. grace |
||||||
23 | Comparing Mark 2;26 with 1 Samuel 21:1 | Mark 2:26 | gdh1127 | 181467 | ||
i guess that will do for now, then. i have the urge of going to askmoses for the jewish explanation *_*. got this drive to make things air tight. so doc is for doctrine (just caught a glimpse of your user name *_*)? was just wondering about your background, how you could have such deep knowledge; plus how you can so quickly get a hold of(find/see)my questions (!!!). again, thank you so much. you are such a blessing. |
||||||
24 | 1 cor 15:53 immortality | 1 Cor 15:53 | gdh1127 | 179783 | ||
1 cor 15:53 does "perishable" here not refer to the physical body only or of the body, soul and spirit of man? | ||||||
25 | is the soul then immortal? | 1 Cor 15:53 | gdh1127 | 179793 | ||
hello doc! it seems very obvious to me as the eralier verses of the same chapter clearly refers just to the body. but the church i am assembling with teaches that this refers to the whole of man, that his soul is mortal and also needs to become immortal. but if it is so that paul ONLY refers to the physical body here, then the soul indeed is immortal because pual makes it clear that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of god. doc, do you have any other verses that clearly indicates that the soul ceases to exist beyond the life of the body? i have many verses that to me seems to indicate it continues to exist after the body dies. i would prefer to come to a firm conclusion on this matter *_*. take care, grace |
||||||
26 | rev 17 | Rev 17:5 | gdh1127 | 179766 | ||
does judaism not fit the great harlot of revelation, babylon, better than catholism? israel, from the beginning has been mired in idolatry; referred to as a harlot; gave rise to islam and the form of popular christianity that is unidentifiable with the christianity the nt portrays. | ||||||
27 | Judaism, Babylon the Great of Rev 17? | Rev 17:5 | gdh1127 | 179789 | ||
grace and peace to you too, john. i was expecting it was an answer i will get, not a question *_*. no, i have not come to any conclusion yet. it just occurred to me that judaism, a religion that is far removed when it comes to biblical commanded practices the ot reveals, more logically fits as babylon the great of rev 17 than the roman catholic church does. babylon the great, the book excerpt below also has points that adds to the validity to my above line of thinking *_*. do you have any other areas of consideration? take care, grace |
||||||
28 | resurrection of the dead rev 20 | Rev 20:12 | gdh1127 | 179768 | ||
where does the resurrection of ezekiel 37 fit in the resurrections mentioned in rev 20? | ||||||
29 | rev 20:11-15 | Rev 20:12 | gdh1127 | 179763 | ||
the church i assemble with teaches that at the resurrection foretold in rev 20:12-15, those who have not known christ will have their chance to know him, learn of his ways, and be accepted in his kingdom. i cannot for the life of me see this. what i see is that men (unlike those who remain faithful to christ tasked to be his kings and priests) will be judged according to his deeds. the ministers cannot show me anything beyond that god's will is that all be saved. i am saddened to note that having been given free will, many choose the broad gate (matthew 7:13,14) indeed. | ||||||
30 | where dpes ezekiel 37 fit? | Rev 20:12 | gdh1127 | 179792 | ||
hi rsinanan! In 2 Pe 3:10 we learn that this entire creation will be done away with and a new heavens and a new earth will replace it (Rev 21:1). I believe this is what Rev 20:11 is referring to. Ezekiel 37, however clearly talks of a resurrection to a very physical existence, and so can't be placed as being that of rev 20:12 unless i misunderstand rev 20:11 as the point when 2 peter 3:10 happens. this being the case, i then need to reconcile rev 20:5 that says "the rest of the dead did not come to life until the thousand years were over" with ezekiel 37!!! if my understanding of rev 20:11 is wrong, then what does "earth and heaven fled away , and no place was found for them."? i am of the firm conviction that the bible does not contradict itself and that there is a reasonable explanation reconciling these seemingly conflicting verses *_*. take care, grace |
||||||
31 | where dpes ezekiel 37 fit? | Rev 20:12 | gdh1127 | 179831 | ||
wow, thanks for the follow-up, rsinanan! ok, here are my thoughts on your response: john said ""...we know that, when he appears, we shall be like him, because we shall see him just as he is. (1 john 3:2)" this harmonizes with what paul said about putting on immortality. but note, that christ could be touched, could eat after he resurrected *_*. so there will be bodies, though of different nature. but christ also said in the resurrection,like with the angels, there will no longer be marriages *_* among the resurrected humans. so whatever increase g-d would make in this new environment (economy *_*)will have to be done some other way, i suppose. as to isaiah 65, v.20 talks of death. it is a possibility that before the creation of the new heavens and the new earth (v. 17), g-d's ot people will be resurrected to live again in jerusalem, most likely during the millennial reign of Christ. but then, it can also be supposed that this "no marriage among immortals" arrangement are just for those who belong to the first resurrection. and that the rest of the resurrected will die again as mentioned in Isaiah 65:20. then you can be right that this resurrection will indeed be in the new heavens and new earth and all of g-'ds increase in his kingdom will come from this group and the other gentiles who were judged according to their deeds fit to belong to the kingdom rather than in the lake of fire *_*. i did not see this possiblity before. thanks. i will keep this in mind as i continue to study this subject. |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 1 2 ] |