Results 41 - 60 of 90
|
||||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Author: SRN Ordered by Verse |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
41 | Is satan a spirit? | Ezek 28:14 | SRN | 26750 | ||
First, these Ezekiel verses, how is it translated as been Satan? I don't get. God says to him in verse 2, But you are a man and not a god, though you think you are as wise as a god. This I can't see how you read as being the Satan spoken about in the Gospels and that the same as the Dragon of Revalations. Ezekiel's 'devil' [so to speak] is a prince of tyre an assyrianstrong hold which we know tormented the israelites, but then just faded. [Guess they just built their own tower of babel] The gospel's devil is just an expression used for someone or something trying to get in the way of a greater purpose. Now the dragon in Revalations would be the Romans. You have heard of the pesher method of writing/reading the bible. That writing of a past historical figure represents Nebacabnezzar-Caezar, Babylon-Rome. Now what I find totally facinating is the closness of The prophecies of revalations and current afairs. Revelation 18:9-11 I do believe their are superpowers controlling all banking, industry and governments. They with their allies [dragon and it's heads]delibretly start wars, create famine, induce desease, promote addiction all for it's own end. But they too will build their own tower of babel. [My theory goes far deeper and dates back to ancient egypt and is based not on religeous grounds] |
||||||
42 | Is satan a spirit? | Ezek 28:14 | SRN | 33616 | ||
Wow back on to this. Was peter satan? The thought of temptation is our devil. willpower or lack there of. The bible tries and tells us that when we are at our lowest we'll be tempted to do things we usually think we won't. | ||||||
43 | eastern influence | Matt 2:2 | SRN | 26770 | ||
What was the Zorraist [magi] priests interest in the infant Jesus | ||||||
44 | eastern influence | Matt 2:2 | SRN | 26782 | ||
They were the priests of an acient Indian religion called Zoroastrianism. The significance here is to demonstrate that Jesus underwent education outside of judasim. |
||||||
45 | Can the church forgive sin? | Matt 6:12 | SRN | 33184 | ||
If you expecting the church to firgive you you're looking in the wrong place. Only God can forgive you once you've forgiven yourself | ||||||
46 | Caution: Hinn, Meyer, etc. | Matt 24:11 | SRN | 26574 | ||
I would take what they say with a pinch of salt untill they start with the devil this and the devil that andc start giving this devil all the credit for our misdeeds - i make an exit | ||||||
47 | Where was Jesus between 12yrs-30yrs. | Mark 1:9 | SRN | 26767 | ||
Where was Jesus between 12yrs-30yrs. | ||||||
48 | Where was Jesus between 12yrs-30yrs. | Mark 1:9 | SRN | 26781 | ||
Doing what? | ||||||
49 | Explaination of Mark 13:28-31 | Mark 13:28 | SRN | 32855 | ||
Yes, in a general sence. But why would Jesus have chosen to make a general statement when making a point refering to 'Fig Tree'? It's simple, if you just read and understand the history, politics and the why. At the time of Jesus there were plenty of different movements and organizations [as is during any uprising] Some were totaly renagade others were more subtle and supported by others even off-shoots of one another. 'Fig Tree' was one of the older bodies which was affiliated to Jesus. When Jesus saw [monitored] the fig tree, he went to enquire as to their recent activities and found they were just made up of members and 'producing no fruit' at this point he cuts them off and they 'withered and died as an organisation' In other words this particular 'generation' that had had been given the organisation to run weren't doing anything with it. Therefore it was of no use for Jesus to keep supporting them. What facinates me with [and i should let you be] literalists is the way you have all the answers but then delibaretly seem to ignore that politics was the biggest driving forces during that time and not religion. Notify me via email when someone replies to this submission? Yes No To adhere to StudyBibleForum's intended purpose, please read the following before submitting a post: 1. This post is biblically based and whenever possible, I have included Bible references to support it. 2. This post is not intended as a personal attack on the authority of the Bible or on other users of this forum. 3. This post is not submitted as an effort to foster divisiveness, ill-will, dissension or other disruptions to this forum. 4. I have carefully proofread my post and believe it represents my best efforts. To make changes, click the "Back" button on your browser Quick Search Get Bible Text New Bible Window Translation: NASB Amplified Search Range: Bible New Test. Old Test. Search word(s): Translation: NASB Amplified Book Chapter:verse More Online Resources |
||||||
50 | Explaination of Mark 13:28-31 | Mark 13:28 | SRN | 33185 | ||
Please don't answer a question with a question, because you don't have an answer. Of course do think I suck things out of my thumb? Judges 9;10-11 for starters. Trees talking to trees? I used to read the bible as it is but that did nothing for me and I asked God about this and almost instantly I began to see that to take everthing you're told literally is the cause of blindness, but once you realize that 'ask and you'll receive' is not a statement but a command from Jesus, you'll be freed from the hell of the five senses. Your Spirit in the Spirit |
||||||
51 | Politics source? | Mark 13:28 | SRN | 33191 | ||
So would say there was no politics? There wasn't any structured government? Of course there was. Through out the gospels we have political debates. The trial was in itself political. Pilot could care less if Jesus was God or some lunitic, but the very fact they didn't drag him to the out skirts and stone him to death but rather crucified him for treason, is an indication of political execution. your spirit in tbe spirit |
||||||
52 | Politics source? | Mark 13:28 | SRN | 33199 | ||
They did hesitate to stone mary magdalene untill jesus entervened. The law was she should die under jewish law. What authority power influence did Jesus have to stop them? To them he was not messiah and had no authority from God to change the law. He was Rabi was teacher was political spokesman. I was only going back to the actual parable and it's connection to the generation of Fig tree. | ||||||
53 | Explaination of Mark 13:28-31 | Mark 13:28 | SRN | 33609 | ||
No hostilities intendedn OK. I'm just learning too. I do often see things in the bible when I read them and they stand out. oh, fig tree is just one, perhaps we'll at some stage get to them I do have a whole 'theory' from gen - rev, but for now we'll focus on this. I do believe Jesus' parables and miricles had far deeper meanings than is written. There is no dounbt in my mind that he was of political persuasion. The whole period of rebellion against the romans started half century years before Jesus tells the eders and pharosees he'll break the temple down and build it up again in three days. Jesus just brought it to a head. He lead but had representitive for each province. Fig tree is so prominent that it's just makes sense that they were talking about an affiliated body. There were even those not affiliated but on the same mission. To destroy Rome. Jesus however sees that by going up against them violently will be the end of Israel and urges them rather to change their hearts if they wish to survive. I'm going of track here but my point of fig tree is still my belief that it represents the pointbthat there were bodies of rebel movements. |
||||||
54 | Politics source? | Mark 13:28 | SRN | 33614 | ||
I'm a theorist. I take ideas and run with them. Jesus told me to do so. Ask and?? | ||||||
55 | Politics source? | Mark 13:28 | SRN | 33618 | ||
How do you figure he wasn't? He was certainly in the public eye. He was crucified wasn't he? | ||||||
56 | Politics source? | Mark 13:28 | SRN | 33622 | ||
I take my sourses from many things. Human nature. History. The Bible. I've answered this so many times, if you can't get it then you should start looking. Just a thought. If you look at current affairs and this was Jesus' time now, [I'm not talking prophecy] which would you be Disiple or Foe?/ | ||||||
57 | Explaination of Mark 13:28-31 | Mark 13:28 | SRN | 33770 | ||
Thank you. You have actually confirmed my belief in Jesus being a leader of at least one rebellion body. Luke 22 he is clearly at a point where a battle seems the only way but Jesus makes a choice and asks and accepts weapons. Jesus then desides rather to ask God about this because it's the last thing Jesus wants."Father, if you are willing, take this cup from me; yet not my will, but yours be done." [this was discussed earlier] Jesus handed himself over as an attempt to show his followers that a violence will be the end of Israel. Which of course we know happened. Not to be offensive but our only sourse that Jesus existed is the bible. [I'll start a new line to discuss this]We going faith here aren't we. I enjoy your feed backs please don't get me wrong I. JESUS IS LORD OF MY LIFE. |
||||||
58 | Politics source? | Mark 13:28 | SRN | 33771 | ||
Politician [campaigner / public servant / civil servant - representative] Why don't you give me some real evidence Jesus was not political, or is your comment about a dictionary to do with spelling mistakes? Moses - spokesman-politician Joseph - 2 IC to the pharaoh David - King who is a politician The list goes on and on. The bible is full of politics. The notion that Jesus wasn't man like you and me is just undermine his real strength. He was changing peoples spiritual thinking and in that time [as it's pretty much now] religion was part of politics as a chicken is part of an egg. [Which came first I wonder?] |
||||||
59 | Explaination of Mark 13:28-31 | Mark 13:28 | SRN | 33785 | ||
I must admit I was a bit rash in my statement. Although it is true to a degree. We can't be sure it wasn't all in the enthusiasm of the times. Taken from the the original gospels and run with. I have documents of Jesus being in Tibet and India. I have gospels according to Mary, Thomas and Philip. With histories to claim as fact. Your second paragraph on sophists. I don't know how knowledgeable you're on Gnostic Christianity. I know you were pointing out historical Jesus but sophists don't believe in Jesus as an entity per se/ Have a good week-end | ||||||
60 | Historical Jesus questioned? | Mark 13:28 | SRN | 34154 | ||
I was expecting a response on the sophist theory/s. But I'm glad you didn't because I read again through it and am fasinated/confused. Your quote; Part1 2) Lucian: Referred to Christ as "...the mn wh was crucified in Palestie because he introduced this new cult into the world Is this your belief? Jesus was a 'cult' leader. part2 ....Furthermore, their first lawgve persuaded them that they were all brothers one of another after they have trasgressed once for all by denying the Greek gods. Why the referal to greek gods rarher than fullfillment of scripture?/ part 3 and by worshipping that crucified sophist himself and living under his laws." (p. 84). I just read a book on the subject of the myth goddess Sophia, and everything in there is so far from what we're actually discussing here, a new strain [no pun intended] would be needed. No a very convincing extract to prove the actual existence of Jesus. |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 1 2 3 4 5 ] Next > Last [5] >> |