Results 701 - 720 of 1309
|
||||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Author: Radioman2 Ordered by Verse |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
701 | Did Jesus suffer in hell when he died? | Luke 23:46 | Radioman2 | 93942 | ||
Benny Hinn is controversial for his theology, his practices, and his claims. Christianity Today on Benny Hinn 'Benny Hinn is controversial for his theology, his practices, and his claims. While he at one point denounced the word-faith message, he later picked it up again. 'Representatives of CRI and other evangelical apologetics ministries say they have noticed a pattern of Hinn telling people behind the scenes that he has changed, but then going on as before. (...) 'Indeed, for those who have been keeping an eye on him, Hinn has proven to be difficult to pin down. Not long after telling Christianity Today that the ''faith message'' (as articulated by such teachers as Kenneth Copeland ) does not ''add up,'' Hinn said that speaking out against Copeland was tantamount to ''attacking the very presence of God.'' Also, though affirming the concept of a triune God , he continues to maintain that the Holy Spirit has a ''spirit-body.'' 'In last year's interview with CT, Hinn said he would no longer use the term revelation knowledge in reference to some of his teachings because of the implication that those teachings were directly from God and thus infallible. While he has shunned the term revelation knowledge, just a few months ago on TV Hinn said that the Holy Spirit was at that moment teaching him that God originally designed women to give birth out of their sides. (...) 'According to Hanegraaff , Hinn several times denied to him having made the statement about women and birth. Hanegraaff said he finally told Hinn where he could find the disputed remark on the videotaped sermon. Hinn later acknowledged making the statement, calling it ''dumb.'' Hanegraaff said that when he reminded Hinn that he had credited the Holy Spirit with the teaching, the evangelist chuckled and said he had actually picked up the teaching from the (1963) Dake's Annotated Reference Bible. (...) 'Critics have also questioned Hinn's account of his testimony. Hinn says he was miraculously cured of stuttering, but PFO claims it has talked to several people from Hinn's youth who do not recall him stuttering. And in an article in PFO's next newsletter, Fisher challenges Hinn's claim that his father was the mayor of Jaffa, Israel. Hinn acknowledges that his father did not have the title of mayor, but says he performed the functions of mayor. Fisher says Hinn's father, who is now deceased, was ''a clerk in an Arab labor office.''' Christianity Today, Oct. 5, 1992 (http://www.gospelcom.net/apologeticsindex/h01.html) 2908 |
||||||
702 | Can one accept Christ but not the Bible? | Luke 24:27 | Radioman2 | 86730 | ||
Can one be a skeptic and a believer at the same time? Can an individual accept the Son of God but reject the written Word of God? Edb, Emmaus, Hank, Justme, Mommapbs, Morant61, Reformer Joe and anyone else who wishes to reply: I have a question for you. I sincerely would like to know: Here on the forum we often read postings written by people who claim to be Christians, who profess faith in Christ for salvation. Then they go on to say they have many strong doubts about the Bible -- its inspiration, authority and reliability in the various English translations. Often they cite verses by Paul that they question -- ones they don't agree with or that anger them. Or they may cite passages in Genesis that they have a hard time accepting as inspired, accurate and literal. Some do not trust any English translation, as if all were perverted versions produced as a result of some conspiracy to deceive. You get the picture. My question is: Is it likely that the person who continues to reject part(s) of the Bible, to question the inspiration or authority of the Bible, to have no confidence in any English translation, etc. -- is it likely that such a person is really a Christian? Especially if this doubt and mistrust of the Bible continues for years and years with no change, no growth, and no resolution? (In my question I am not suggesting that we pick certain individuals by name and judge whether they are saved.) My question is a general one. In short, people who have a low view of the Bible and who question every other verse they read -- how likely is it that they have really come to know Christ, with the result that they are saved and indwelt by the Holy Spirit? If one's faith in the written Word is so uncertain, precarious and fragile and remains that way for years and years, is it likely that this person truly believes that Jesus is everything the Bible says he is? Is it likely that their salvation is real? Again, this is not to judge any given individual(s) as to their salvation. But, it just seems a contradiction to me that although what we know of God and Christ is contained in the Bible, there are people who have little or no trust in the written Word of God and still claim to be Christians. Is this possible, impossible, the normal Christian experience, abnormal or what? What do you all think? Why do you believe what you do regarding this question? Can you give scripture and sound reasoning to back up your view of this matter? Sincerely, Radioman2 |
||||||
703 | Can one accept Christ but not the Bible? | Luke 24:27 | Radioman2 | 86731 | ||
Can one accept Christ but not the Bible? Can one be a skeptic and a believer at the same time? Can an individual accept the Son of God but reject the written Word of God? Edb, Emmaus, Hank, Justme, Mommapbs, Morant61, Reformer Joe and anyone else who wishes to reply: I have a question for you. I sincerely would like to know: Here on the forum we often read postings written by people who claim to be Christians, who profess faith in Christ for salvation. Then they go on to say they have many strong doubts about the Bible -- its inspiration, authority and reliability in the various English translations. Often they cite verses by Paul that they question -- ones they don't agree with or that anger them. Or they may cite passages in Genesis that they have a hard time accepting as inspired, accurate and literal. Some do not trust any English translation, as if all were perverted versions produced as a result of some conspiracy to deceive. You get the picture. My question is: Is it likely that the person who continues to reject part(s) of the Bible, to question the inspiration or authority of the Bible, to have no confidence in any English translation, etc. -- is it likely that such a person is really a Christian? Especially if this doubt and mistrust of the Bible continues for years and years with no change, no growth, and no resolution? (In my question I am not suggesting that we pick certain individuals by name and judge whether they are saved.) My question is a general one. In short, people who have a low view of the Bible and who question every other verse they read -- how likely is it that they have really come to know Christ, with the result that they are saved and indwelt by the Holy Spirit? If one's faith in the written Word is so uncertain, precarious and fragile and remains that way for years and years, is it likely that this person truly believes that Jesus is everything the Bible says he is? Is it likely that their salvation is real? Again, this is not to judge any given individual(s) as to their salvation. But, it just seems a contradiction to me that although what we know of God and Christ is contained in the Bible, there are people who have little or no trust in the written Word of God and still claim to be Christians. Is this possible, impossible, the normal Christian experience, abnormal or what? What do you all think? Why do you believe what you do regarding this question? Can you give scripture and sound reasoning to back up your view of this matter? Sincerely, Radioman2 |
||||||
704 | Can one accept Christ but not the Bible? | Luke 24:27 | Radioman2 | 86732 | ||
. | ||||||
705 | Can one accept Christ but not the Bible? | Luke 24:27 | Radioman2 | 86754 | ||
Repost by mommapbs: In the beginning was the Word [Mommapbs: I have taken the liberty of reposting your note in order to keep all the replies to the question under one thread. Hope you don't mind. I made a mistake when I created two threads. Sorry. :-( --Radioman2] Note: John 1:1 - In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and the Word was God. It is MY opinion that one who rejects the Word rejects God. "but just as it is WRITTEN,(emphasis on "written" - mommpbs)"THINGS WHICH EYE HAS NOT SEEN AND EAR HAS NOT HEARD, AND which HAVE NOT ENTERED THE HEART OF MAN, ALL THAT GOD HAS PREPARED FOR THOSE WHO LOVE HIM." For to us God revealed them through the Spirit; for the Spirit searches all things, even the depths of God.For who among men knows the toughts of a man except the spirit of the man which is in him? Even so the thoughts of God no one knows except the Spirit of God. Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the Spirit who is from God, so that we may know the things freely given to us by God, which things we also speak, not in words taught by human wisdom, but in those taught by the Spirit, combining spiritual thoughts with spiritual words.But a natural man does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him; and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually appraised.But he who is spiritual appraises all things, yet he himself is appraised by no oneFor WHO HAS KNOWN THE MIND OF THE LORD, THAT HE WILL INSTRUCT HIM? But we have the mind of Christ." 1 Cor 2:9-16 Radioman, I don't know why this has been restricted because I believe that you have asked some important questions. This issue is heavy on my heart right now as I am concerned with a reply I recieved recently . . . it is MY opinion, that the Holy Spirit not only assures us of our salvation, but assures us of the TRUTH of God's Word. One who rejects God's Word as the absolute authority either does not have the Spirit or has quenched the Spirit by their rebellion. It is the Spirit who convicts and convinces! (John 16:8) I have replied to this in order to leave your question up for others! Comments? God Bless you - stand firm on the promises! (God's Word will not return to Him without accomplishing His purpose - Jesus did just that did He not?!!) mommapbs |
||||||
706 | Can one accept Christ but not the Bible? | Luke 24:27 | Radioman2 | 86782 | ||
Mommapbs: Q: 'Why was this "restricted?"' A: I don't know. Radioman2 |
||||||
707 | ever neccessary/permissable to deceit? | Luke 24:31 | Radioman2 | 79568 | ||
Has anyone here ever served in the Armed Forces? Has anyone here ever fought in an actual war (World War II, Korea, Vietnam, etc.)? If so, what do you veterans think? If a soldier lies to the enemy in the line of duty in order to protect the lives of himself or others, is he sinning? What do you all think is more urgent -- dying and taking pride in the fact that you didn't lie OR the survival of your fellow soldiers or civilians? Why would you feel obligated to tell the enemy everything you know? Also, the idea of sacrificing the lives of innocent women and children so you can boast of your sinlessnesss doesn't make a whole lot of sense. I'm not talking about situational ethics. I'm talking about what has more value -- your pride in your rigid obedience to the letter of the law or the lives of innocent people? Man was not made for the Law; but the Law was made for man. |
||||||
708 | ever neccessary/permissable to deceit? | Luke 24:31 | Radioman2 | 79675 | ||
You make a good point. Your post provides an excellent example of what I have written in an earlier post: If a soldier lies to the enemy in the line of duty in order to protect the lives of himself or others, is he sinning? What do you all think is more urgent -- dying and taking pride in the fact that you didn't lie OR the survival of your fellow soldiers, civilians, or believers? Why would you feel obligated to tell the enemy everything you know? Also, the idea of sacrificing the lives of innocent women and children so you can boast of your sinlessnesss doesn't make a whole lot of sense. What has more value -- your pride in your rigid obedience to the letter of the law or the lives of innocent people? But it may be that common sense is not all that common. |
||||||
709 | ever neccessary/permissable to deceit? | Luke 24:31 | Radioman2 | 79738 | ||
Tim: Thank you for doing a thorough job of providing us with verses that we need to consider if we are going to discuss this issue. It seems to me that in this thread there are at least three questions that are being addressed: 1) Is lying a sin?; 2) Define "lie" or "deceive"; 3) Are we obligated to tell the enemy all that we know? Before we can answer question #3, we must answer questions #1 and #2. You have answered question # 1 rather clearly. I will attempt here to define "lie" and "deceive". (From http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary) to lie is '1 : to make an untrue statement with intent to deceive 2 : to create a false or misleading impression' - - - - - - - - - - 'de·ceive 'Function: verb 'Date: 13th century (...) 'intransitive senses : to practice deceit; also : to give a false impression (appearances can deceive) '- de·ceiv·er noun '- de·ceiv·ing·ly /-'sE-vi[ng]-lE/ adverb 'synonyms DECEIVE, MISLEAD, DELUDE, BEGUILE mean to lead astray or frustrate usually by underhandedness. 'DECEIVE implies imposing a false idea or belief that causes ignorance, bewilderment, or helplessness (tried to deceive me about the cost). 'MISLEAD implies a leading astray that may or may not be intentional (I was misled by the confusing sign). 'DELUDE implies deceiving so thoroughly as to obscure the truth (we were deluded into thinking we were safe). 'BEGUILE stresses the use of charm and persuasion in deceiving (was beguiled by false promises). ' |
||||||
710 | ever neccessary/permissable to deceit? | Luke 24:31 | Radioman2 | 79748 | ||
Ed: You raise some good questions. However, I have never advocated tricking anyone into receiving the gospel or getting saved. Nor would I advocate misrepresenting the gospel in any way. Grace and peace, Radioman2 |
||||||
711 | ever neccessary/permissable to deceit? | Luke 24:31 | Radioman2 | 79752 | ||
Tim: Well said! Upon further consideration, I will amend my earlier question to read: Are we obligated to tell the enemy anything? Radioman2 |
||||||
712 | ever neccessary/permissable to deceit? | Luke 24:31 | Radioman2 | 79755 | ||
Ed: It is I who should apologize. In fact, I did not mean to imply that you suggested I advocated trickery or misrepresentation. I know that you never said or implied that in regard to myself. I should have clarified that in my earlier post. Radioman2 |
||||||
713 | ever neccessary/permissable to deceit? | Luke 24:31 | Radioman2 | 79853 | ||
Thank you for your kind words. Yes, I am a war veteran and was a radio operator. | ||||||
714 | how do I know if God is speaking to me | John | Radioman2 | 95126 | ||
kbus: The following is a quote from the website (www.str.org): 'Note that I have a very robust doctrine of the Holy Spirit. I'm charismatic in that I believe in the perpetuity of spiritual gifts and in energetic worship. The real question is-- and this is vital-- Are we justified in claiming that our personal, private, first-person, subjective experiences give us authoritative knowledge about God, or about what God wants us to do? 'If a woman said, "God told me to marry this man," that wouldn't be contrary to Scripture unless he was a non-Christian or already married. Even if he was a Christian, though, the statement begs a different question: Does Scripture give us the liberty to assign the authority of divine fiat to our subjective experiences? 'My answer is nowhere does the Bible give us that liberty. It does not enjoin us to assess our feelings and then judge whether they are a manifestation of the voice of God or not.' This is an excerpt from the article. To read more go to: ID# 85421 at this website (StudyBibleForum) and/or: (http://www.str.org/free/commentaries/life/aprivate.htm). ____________________ I agree with the above quote. (I do not post quotes that I do not believe or agree with and try to pass them off as the truth.) On the other hand, I also agree that God will lead, guide and direct us. Here's what the Bible says and what I believe: New Living Translation James 1:5 If you need wisdom – if you want to know what God wants you to do – ask him, and he will gladly tell you. He will not resent your asking. ____________________ Also, I strongly recommend the article, "How can I make decisions consistent with God's will for my life?" which you can read at (www.gty.org/IssuesandAnswers/archive/godswill2.htm) Grace and peace, Radioman2 |
||||||
715 | how do I know if God is speaking to me | John | Radioman2 | 95127 | ||
'How can I make decisions... consistent with God's will for my life?' 'Decision-making can be a daunting task for anyone, but Christians have the unique advantage of making decisions that are informed by God's Word. To do so, there are at least three factors to consider. 'First, you must obey the moral will of God as it is revealed in Scripture. If Scripture prohibits the action in question, your decision is easy: don't do it. ( . . . ) 'Second, good decision making requires that you exercise biblical wisdom. Such wisdom comes from a diligent study of God's Word, coupled with God's generous provision. James encourages those who lack wisdom to "ask of God, who gives to all men generously and without reproach, and it will be given to him" (James 1:5). ( . . . ) 'Finally, you need to consider your own desire. If the Bible is silent about your decision, and if one choice is not clearly wiser than the other, then do what you want. You have the freedom to do so, and God sovereignly works out His plan through your desires (Psalm 37:4; Philippians 2:13). 'The above process presupposes that you are submitted to Christ and filled with the Spirit. Otherwise you won't be able to make biblical decisions, as sin blinds your ability to understand and apply God's Word to your life. However, if you do have a vital relationship with the Lord Jesus Christ and are walking in the Spirit-as opposed to the flesh-you are free to make decisions so long as they don't violate God's revealed (moral) will. You shouldn't be concerned that your decisions will somehow derail God's sovereign will for you life, because He routinely works through your decisions to accomplish what He purposes.' ____________________ To read the entire article, go to: (www.gty.org/IssuesandAnswers/archive/godswill2.htm) --Radioman2 |
||||||
716 | Are you onced saved always saved? | John | Radioman2 | 102419 | ||
George: Exactly where in Scripture does it say that one "can remove his name from the Lambs Book of life"? Please give us the book, the chapter and the verse where it actually says this. I know you used the word "teaches," but since you put it in quotation marks, I'd like to know what verse of the Bible says that one "can remove his name from the Lambs Book of life." In this post, I'm not trying to argue or debate the Once Saved Always Saved question. I merely ask where in the Bible does it actually come right out and say that. Grace to you, Radioman2 |
||||||
717 | Are you onced saved always saved? | John | Radioman2 | 102420 | ||
George: You write: 'In the case of the "prodical son". Had that son died in the process of splurging his inheritance, would he have died within the will of his father? I think not. The father would have grieved because he loved the child, but he would have never condoned the childs action.' George, in the story of the prodigal son the adult child's action may have interrupted fellowship with his father, but at what point did he cease to be the son of his father? Grace to you, Radioman2 |
||||||
718 | Are you onced saved always saved? | John | Radioman2 | 102447 | ||
In other words, you cannot answer my question. You cannot tell us the book, chapter and verse where it SAYS what you say it does. Am I "with limited or no discernment and, or void of understanding"? |
||||||
719 | Are you onced saved always saved? | John | Radioman2 | 102449 | ||
Hank: Don't feel like the Lone Ranger. I, too, have been weighed in the balances and found wanting, in the opinion of George. Haven't you heard? I am "with limited or no discernment and, or void of understanding." Woe is us. I guess if anyone disagrees with him it is because that person is mentally deficient or an ignorant fool. --Radioman2 |
||||||
720 | Are you onced saved always saved? | John | Radioman2 | 102470 | ||
khuck: Yes, you were helpful. Thank you. Grace to you, Radioman2 |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 ] Next > Last [66] >> |