Results 3121 - 3140 of 3591
|
||||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Author: BradK Ordered by Verse |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
3121 | God the Son manifested by light | 2 Tim 2:15 | BradK | 235160 | ||
... | ||||||
3122 | scripture god is symbolized as fire | 2 Tim 2:15 | BradK | 235236 | ||
. | ||||||
3123 | God as fire | 2 Tim 2:15 | BradK | 235238 | ||
2 Tim. 2:15 | ||||||
3124 | how do i delete my profile | 2 Tim 2:15 | BradK | 235242 | ||
Hello Erica, You don't have any visible User Profile that can be viewed by anyoine. Beyond that, you'd want to contact Lockman with any further inquiries. BradK PS- If I may ask sincerely: What's up with the "God as fire" question? |
||||||
3125 | God symbolized by fire? | 2 Tim 2:15 | BradK | 235266 | ||
2 Tim.2:15 | ||||||
3126 | Scripture - God symbolized by fire | 2 Tim 2:15 | BradK | 235334 | ||
2 Tim. 2:15 | ||||||
3127 | God the Son as light | 2 Tim 2:15 | BradK | 235424 | ||
2 Tim. 2:15 | ||||||
3128 | God the Father as fire | 2 Tim 2:15 | BradK | 235426 | ||
2 Tim. 2:15 | ||||||
3129 | What duties did James have | 2 Tim 2:15 | BradK | 235489 | ||
Hello, This sounds like a test or homework question? If you haven't, read the Epistle of James. Additionally, a good bible dictionary may help you. There are numerous online resources available. Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
3130 | Genesis 20 | 2 Tim 2:15 | BradK | 235623 | ||
Have you read the passage? BradK |
||||||
3131 | Did Abraham suffer concerning sarah | 2 Tim 2:15 | BradK | 235700 | ||
This question has been asked and answered! Please use Search Box function. BradK |
||||||
3132 | Vain Babbling | 2 Tim 2:16 | BradK | 192022 | ||
Hello parable, I'd disagree with his statement. He's apparently a revisionist (though I'm not familiar with Pelikan), and he's way too broad. What of the OT? Certainly it had precedence over tradition and was before the NT! Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
3133 | SEARCHING FOR THE TRUTH | 2 Tim 2:25 | BradK | 155936 | ||
Hi Robert, I'm assuming your serious in your question? If you're referring to the nonsensical and unbiblical "slain-in-the-spirit" phenomenom, does it matter? Benny Hinn may have employment opportunities in his ministry for so-called "catchers". He may also have a training program and manual for such as well. May I inquire what the question has to do with bible study? Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
3134 | SEARCHING FOR THE TRUTH | 2 Tim 2:25 | BradK | 155945 | ||
Dear Bows, I did speak the truth in love! I will have to disagree on this matter as I have serious issue with your contention that it is a Biblical practice. It may be a matter of definition whereby I might need to better understand where you're coming from. However, there is simply no term used in the Bible called "slain in the spirit". I most certainly do not see the claim of the verses you provided as giving a foundation to support your contention. It is a mighty big stretch. These verses do not provide a foundation for any such doctrine either. In 2 of the verses significant visions are detailed by both Daniel and John. I trust you're not claiming the same for us as believers? If so, what is your basis? With all due respect, in following your posts and reading your profile, our major source of difference is this: Yours is an experienced-based belief, mine is that of sola scriptura! I don't mean this offensively either, I'm just pointing out wherein the basis for our differences lie:-) Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
3135 | SEARCHING FOR THE TRUTH | 2 Tim 2:25 | BradK | 155955 | ||
Dear Bows, Thank you for sharing and better explaining your view. I respectfully, still do not agree:-) Web surfing is not a Biblical topic to begin with, so it may not be the best example:-) My concerns are threefold: 1. The preaching about the Person and work of our Lord Jesus Christ is largely negated in the world of WOF teaching. Experience is king, anything goes, no matter how far-fetched, but Jesus Christ is minimized.( 2 Cor. 4:5) Bizarre practices don't need to be had to know the Lord or enter into a relationship with Him (Phil. 3:10); 2. It is a stretch to validate "being slain in the spirit" upon 4 verses of scripture! Particularly problematic is that 3 of these verses are OT and are not given for the purpose of proscribing this type of "phenomenom" for believers! They were to Israel first. Further, the NT Gospels are absent of this practice. I find it also noteworthy that Paul ,who wrote half the NT epistles is silent on this matter. 3. Experienced-based theology is dangerous because of it's highly subjective nature! Plaes don't hear what I'm not saying: I do not negate that God is sovereign or that He does not or cannot heal. He both can and does! (Ps. 115:30) What is most bothersome is when experience trumps scripture, or the experience is sought and then one attempts to find biblical support for it. Note in Rom. 4:3, in accord with Scripture that "Abraham believed God", not that he "experienced God",or "felt the presence of God". It's not that I think you'll accept what I'm saying, because I'm most certain you'll not. Experience is a very poor substitute for the authority of Gods' Word. Its' either true or its' not. It doesn't need my or your experience to validate it. That is the error of "proof-texting". Bows, in answer to you when you ask, "show me in scripture where God says he no longer allows us to experience his Glory or speak to us personally", He's not desiring us to seek some supernatural phenomena. God is glorified in and through me and He speaks to me through His Word ( Heb. 1:2) I still remain... Speaking the Truth In Love, BradK |
||||||
3136 | SEARCHING FOR THE TRUTH | 2 Tim 2:25 | BradK | 156018 | ||
Hi KSR, I'm not sure why you would completely disagree with kalos? Re-read what he said, because his implication was anything other than "I need some human to know and understand". I think you missed his point:-) In my experience, it is usually those who have no solid foundation, or claim "you're putting God in a box" that shun or ignore sound doctrine. Without attempting to answer for him, a sound doctrinal foundation would be what has been believed and taught in Orthodox Christianity. I hope this helps, BradK |
||||||
3137 | SEARCHING FOR THE TRUTH | 2 Tim 2:25 | BradK | 156076 | ||
Hi KSR, I'm assuming you're being sincere in your question? It's how you phrased your response that leads me to ask:-) But, to answer, yes! Start with the Nicene Creed. Also, Spurgeons' Catechism, a bit more lengthy but detailed, provides a very solid basis for what constitutes "Sound Doctrine". By way of clarification, Paul uses the phrase several times in both the Pastoral Epistles, 1 Timothy ( 1:3, 4:13), 2 Timothy (1:13,4:3) and Titus (1:9, 2:1). So, there is something that constitues "sound doctrine" in Pauls' mind. It could also be termed Essential Christianity. The late Dr. Walter Martin wrote a book so titled. Additionally, the late William Evans has a book entitled, "What Every Christian Should Believe" that may be helpful. He makes a couple of very key observations in his introduction. They are: "The Ignorance among Christians reagrding the fundamental doctrines of their faith is surprisingly great, widespread, and alarming." "Far too many Christians, while spiritually minded, are not scripturally instructed. This is why so many are led away from the truth into the false "isms", by every wind of strange doctrine that blows about them..." Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
3138 | SEARCHING FOR THE TRUTH | 2 Tim 2:25 | BradK | 156138 | ||
Hi KSR, Thank you for sharing and clarifying your views! I sincerely appreciate that. We are definitely on the 'same wavelength":-) I'm not sure if Orthodox Christianity would be "sufficient to override the blasphemy and heresy in today's churches?" It is most certainly what one should and needs to believe to be saved. It is the core of Christianity. You inquire, "Can a person remain in a church which condones some unsound doctrines as long as the conditions of "Orthodox Christianity" are there?" That too depends on what is meant by "unsound doctrines". Are we talking minor issues (Rom. 14:1) or serious deviations that would negate core beliefs? I don't know and can't say. For instance, our pastor and I disagree in many non-essential matters, yet have respect for and can fellowship with one another. Maybe you could provide a more clear definition on this point? I too take this matter seriously, which is probably why I've been a part of the SBF for over 3 years! There are many other good men on this Forum, who though we might and do disagree on non-essentials, I could safely say ,we're united in Orthodoxy! We have more on which to agree than we do to disagree! Spiritual maturity allows for that, as I couldn't have said that 10 to 15 years ago. Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
3139 | SEARCHING FOR THE TRUTH | 2 Tim 2:25 | BradK | 156173 | ||
Hi Victor, Thanks for the unsolicited advice- though the response was not directed to you:-) I'm not sure why you're confused? Did you read the entire thread? Who is the Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew that you refer to? Instead of just jumping in, would you be so kind as to give myself- and thereby the Forum- an idea of where you're coming from? Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
3140 | SEARCHING FOR THE TRUTH | 2 Tim 2:25 | BradK | 156176 | ||
Hi WOS, Thanks for the info! It just proves I certainly don't know everything:-) I've never heard of EPB if I can call "His All Holiness" that. That's a title I find difficult to grasp as it assumes something that ain't so. I appreciate your research and will check out the link you provided. Thanks too for your continued, solid contributions to this Forum. They are noted. Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 ] Next > Last [180] >> |