Results 1 - 3 of 3
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Is this verse a parenthesis in the Mss | Rev 20:5 | Isabel | 7264 | ||
To your best knowledge, was the first part of this verse (the rest of the dead did not come to life until the 1000 years are finished) a parenthetical insertion, or is their proof it actually existed in the original Mss? | ||||||
2 | Is this verse a parenthesis in the Mss | Rev 20:5 | Makarios | 7282 | ||
Also, there is no dispute that this verse DOES actually exist in the original manuscripts, there is no dispute between the Critical, Received, or Majority text families of Greek manuscripts on this verse. Therefore, there is no question that it does indeed belong in this passage. If there was a such dispute, then there would be a caption or reference in your NKJV or it would be in brackets [] in the NASB or it would be taken out altogether from the text of the NIV and put underneath in the commentary below or somewhere else. Thanks for the good question! | ||||||
3 | Is this verse a parenthesis in the Mss | Rev 20:5 | Morant61 | 7287 | ||
Greetings Nolan! You are absolutely correct! I checked the Greek text. Not only does the verse exist in the Manuscript, there are absolutely no variant readings associated with the verse at all. Therefore, the parenthesis must be an interpretative tool added by the translators to help make the text more understandable. Your Brother in Christ, Tim Moran |
||||||