Results 741 - 760 of 1275
|
||||||
Results from: Notes Author: srbaegon Ordered by Verse |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
741 | "Will be";Will God Bring" Future tense | John 3:13 | srbaegon | 138554 | ||
Hello He-man, You know someone called Steve now. Look up 'ilk' in a dictionary. And still you refused to answer EdB's question. Steve |
||||||
742 | "Will be";Will God Bring" Future tense | John 3:13 | srbaegon | 138591 | ||
Hello He-man, What is the point of this? I'm just asking that you answer EdB's question. Did you ask your intitial question for the purpose of expounding on soul sleep? A simple yes or no will suffice. Steve |
||||||
743 | explain Deut 6:4 | John 3:13 | srbaegon | 154254 | ||
Hello Bows44, The Athanasian Creed gives an excellent (and thoroughly Biblical) explanation of the triunity of God. You can find it at: http://www.ccel.org/creeds/athanasian.creed.html Steve |
||||||
744 | explain Deut 6:4 | John 3:13 | srbaegon | 154296 | ||
Hello Bows44, Which part do you find confusing and contradictory (aside from the objection that it must be believed for one to be saved)? Steve |
||||||
745 | Is the Formula for sin to hate anything? | John 3:14 | srbaegon | 46560 | ||
Hello Giam Yes, God loves us all the way! But the following logic in your posting doesn't make sense to me. God is love (1 John 4:8), so He freely loves us. Matt 22:36-40 commands us to love God and love people because these are not natural to us. God must place His love in us to accomplish this. And I agree with the correlation of love to Matt 7:12. You wrote: "So Steve, before we can love others, we have to lvoe ourselves." I disagree. We naturally love ourselves too much. The whole idea of following Christ is to deny ourselves and lose our lives so that He might have His perfect way in us (Matt 16:24-26). You go on to mention how we like or dislike our character traits and actions that we see in others. That's true. But I think you are making a simple thing very complicated. Steve |
||||||
746 | Can i hate chickens and love JC? mt23:37 | John 3:14 | srbaegon | 46563 | ||
Hello Mommapbs It seems reasonable to me that the serpent WAS one of the species that God created in Gen 1:24-25. And that Satan spoke through that creature to beguile Eve. :-) For "crawling on the belly", I see it as God changing snakes so that they no longer had legs. You might say they were collateral damage for the curse, much the same as the swine that were destroyed when Legion was allowed to inhabit them. Steve |
||||||
747 | Is the Formula for sin to hate anything? | John 3:14 | srbaegon | 46743 | ||
Hello Giam I'm sorry, but your logic is exceedingly difficult to follow. Much of my difficulty has to do with your use of the word "as". When you write: "So it is clear that when God continued to lvoe Himself as Man in order to lvoe Man as Himself,...", do you mean that God saw Himself to be a man and therefore loved Himself as a man? Or do you mean God loved man in the same way He loved Himself? Or is there another meaning? Also, you continually add words to Scripture. That is disrespectful. Please stop. Steve |
||||||
748 | Is the Formula for sin to hate anything? | John 3:14 | srbaegon | 46781 | ||
Hello Giam In the name of love you have intertwined God with creation to such an extent that I must conclude you are a heretic teaching pantheism. I have no time for such frivilous activity. Steve |
||||||
749 | Are we ever "worthy" of God's love? | John 3:16 | srbaegon | 52228 | ||
Hello Treadway I haven't kept up with your ponderings, but might I suggest Theology_List@YahooGroups.com as a place you might like to try your topic? They get deep. Steve |
||||||
750 | wjhat are the qualifications being | John 3:16 | srbaegon | 149724 | ||
Hello Janae, Be very careful here. If you say that the Holy Spirit currently teaches by revelation, then what someone receives must be added to Scripture and published for all to see. I don't think you want to say this. Perhaps there is a better way of explaining what you mean. Steve |
||||||
751 | What do you think the word "world" means | John 3:16 | srbaegon | 175265 | ||
Hello BigJohnUkraine, I doubt that you will get a response from that user since the post was 3 years old. However, you bring up some excellent questions concerning hermeneutics. Thanks. Steve |
||||||
752 | Allegorical interpretation | John 4:16 | srbaegon | 20206 | ||
Casiv, The problem with allegorical interpretation is that we can look at the same passage, come to opposite conclusions, and both say we are correct. And it's possible neither of us is correct. In a different thread you brought up the Samaritan women that Jesus met at the well near Sychar. I could say that this was prophecy and, Jesus was talking about a future football player who would hook up with several teams but never make it to the Super Bowl. Obviously, this is ridiculous, but since I am interpreting allegorically, I can say whatever I want. Now what if I state something that sounds more spiritual like: John 4:7 There *came a woman of Samaria to draw water. Jesus *said to her, "Give Me a drink." Gen 7:12 The rain fell upon the earth for forty days and forty nights. Matt 2:17-18 Then what had been spoken through Jeremiah the prophet was fulfilled: "A VOICE WAS HEARD IN RAMAH, WEEPING AND GREAT MOURNING, RACHEL WEEPING FOR HER CHILDREN; AND SHE REFUSED TO BE COMFORTED, BECAUSE THEY WERE NO MORE." What do these passages have to do with each other? I could say that Jesus was telling the woman about impending judegement which will cause wialing amongst the people. That is more spiritual sounding, but it's just as ridiculous as the idea of prophecy concerning football. There is no correlation between the woman of Sychar, Noah's flood, and Rachel weeping for her children. I made it up. I beg of you to stop searching for what is not there. There is more spiritual fruit in understanding the obvious than in trying to make obscure connections. You might ask, "Why then is it permissible to look at pictures and types of Christ in the Old Testament?" It's because the relationship can be easily identified by comparing the plain interpretation of the OT with the plain interpretation of the NT. If you are attempting to teach us, then give answers and explanations, not riddles. Steve |
||||||
753 | Why was the samarian woman right? | John 4:16 | srbaegon | 20313 | ||
Strong counter view............ Your attack on Tim is unfounded for at least two reasons. 1) Christou is the "transliteration" and Christ is the "translation." Check these definitions in a dictionary. 2) Greek word endings change depending on how it's used in a sentence. If you do a search, you will find Christou, Christo, and Christos all translated to Christ. To insist that Tim use Christou shows your ignorance in these matters. Steve |
||||||
754 | First Century Second Coming? | John 5:19 | srbaegon | 127713 | ||
Hello Fatherof4, Matt 16:28 was fulfilled in Matt 17:1-13. They saw His kingdom in its glory. In Luke 21:31-33 Jesus is speaking of the generation that will see these future signs would not pass away. He isn't speaking of those listening to Him. Steve |
||||||
755 | First Century Second Coming? | John 5:19 | srbaegon | 127738 | ||
Hello Fatherof4, Yes, it does make sense for the last verse of Matt 16 to be speaking of a different thing. The rest of Scripture upholds the separation. As for Luke 21:31-33 -- I would look for these things in order to see if this was the generation He was speaking of. Steve |
||||||
756 | First Century Second Coming? | John 5:19 | srbaegon | 128138 | ||
Hello Fatherof4, I've heard these things before. That doen't make it correct. Steve |
||||||
757 | First Century Second Coming? | John 5:19 | srbaegon | 128165 | ||
Hello Xerxes, If I might add just a bit to the conversation... Though I am still pre-mill, I have come to understand that the study of eschatology (end times) has more to do with how we are to live in light of Christ's return rather than getting the events in exact historical order. Steve |
||||||
758 | Is Hell fire literal that burns forever? | John 5:24 | srbaegon | 122079 | ||
Hello Rowdy, Do you realize how contradictory your post sounds? In one paragraph you say: "Now back to your question: 'Is Hell a literal place?' I don't really know for certain. I think we can be assured that they really do exist as God has already stated Hell has already been prepared, as stated in Matt 25:41. In other verses, God tells Heaven has been prepared for those of us who obey and are faithful to Him." If you don't know for certain hell is a literal place, how can you say for certain that you believe in it? The Lord Jesus believed in a literal hell enough to describe it. Steve |
||||||
759 | Is Hell fire literal that burns forever? | John 5:24 | srbaegon | 122140 | ||
Hello Rowdy, I asked a straightforward question and expected an answer in kind. Will you give one, or will you rather reply with nonsensical abstractions? Steve |
||||||
760 | God's fair standards to judge evildoers | John 5:28 | srbaegon | 232613 | ||
Hi EdB, I just caught this thread. Maybe this will help. Though Rom 1:18-32 does not speak explicitly of Jesus, he is spoken of since he is God: the same can be said of the Holy Spirit. God judges men according to their works. Those in Rom 1 demonstrate that they know enough truth about the God of scripture and have rejected him, as evidenced by their works. Men are lost because they are sinners and "children of wrath" (Eph 2:3). They refuse to believe the revelation they have been given. It is impossible to worship the God of Scripture without coming to him as he has revealed. Trying to come a different way only results in destruction. If Jesus is the way, truth, and life, any other attempt will fall short. Steve |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 ] Next > Last [64] >> |